Solicitation_for_TAP_to_Post.pdf

Revised JUL 2017

N62470-18-R-7008 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER (A-E) SERVICES FOR RANGE SUSTAINABILITY SERVICES

FOR MILITARY TRAINING RANGE COMPLEXES AND ASSETS FOR VARIOUS

LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMANDS

ATLANTIC AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, WORLDWIDE

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD

FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN.

THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Architect-Engineer (AE) and environmental services of an interdisciplinary nature required for preparation of warfighter readiness documentation including environmental and military range planning documents for the Atlantic Ocean and eastern United States (U.S.). The preponderance of work will involve assessment of Navy training and testing activities within the Commander, Task Force 80 (CTF-80) Area of Operations (AO); however, this contract may also include work on ranges and installations around the world. Potential work in the CTF-80 AO may include, but is not limited to, preparation of environmental planning documentation for Navy and Marine Corps at-sea training and testing activities, including those in the Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea, the Caribbean Sea, the Arctic Ocean, and the Gulf of Mexico. This work commonly is associated with activities on at-sea training and testing ranges conducted by U.S.

Fleet Forces Command, Naval Air Systems Command, Naval Sea Systems Command, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, Office of Naval Research, and other Navy and Marine Corps components. A minimal amount of work is expected to involve assessments of activities on Navy and Marine Corps land-based installations throughout the U.S. and abroad. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $50,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000.00. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is March 2019.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code NAICS code of 541330 for Engineering Services. The size standard for this code is $15.0 million. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The market research study Sources Sought Number: N62470-18-R-7008 conducted by Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Atlantic included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to solicit this procurement on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition. The NAVFAC Atlantic small business office concurs with this decision.

The general scope of this contract requires the services of environmental engineering, biological science, physical science, cultural resource, community planning, and military operations specialists. The engineers and community planners providing services under this contract must have competence attested by licensure as a professional engineer or certified planner. The services required from the A/E firm include the following: preparation of environmental planning documents in compliance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Executive Order (EO) 12114; preparation of Range Complex Management Plans (RCMPs), Range Condition Assessments, and/or Water Range Condition Assessments in accordance with applicable Navy and Marine Corps policies, including the most current version of OPNAV 5090.1, MCO P5090.2, and DoD instruction 4715.11/12; preparation of biological and ecological studies in support of environmental documentation, including the preparation of Endangered Species Act (ESA) Biological Assessments, preparation of Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) permit applications, preparation of Sanctuary Resource Statements in accordance with the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA), and preparation of Essential Fish Habitat Assessments in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act; preparation of Coastal Consistency Determinations (CCDs) in accordance with the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA); preparation of Section 106 and 110 assessment as required to support consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA); preparation of Range Air Installation Compatibility Use Zone (RAICUZ) studies; preparation of reports and documentation related to Operational Range Clearance (ORC) in accordance with OPNAVINST 3571.4; preparation of water, soil, and sediment testing studies to support range sustainment initiatives; preparation of other range-related reports, documentation, or analyses such as the Sustainable Ranges Report (SRR) per section 366 of the FY03 National Defense Authorization Act (10 U.S.C. §113) of 02 Dec 02; preparation of Encroachment Action Plans (EAPs) in accordance with OPNAVINST 11010.40 and CNICINST 11010.1; and other documentation requirements needed to support general environmental compliance or range management actions including, but not limited to, documentation required to comply with Clean Water Act (CWA), Clean air Act (CAA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

Additional requirements under this contract may include, but are not limited to, studies, sketches, preliminary plans, cost estimates and descriptive text for future planning and work plans and special planning and engineering services, such as, but not limited to, environmental analyses;

acoustical analyses associated with at-sea testing and training; density modeling; geospatial analyses; information technology applications; traffic; air quality, noise, encroachment, and socio-economic studies; and development and reproduction of a variety of public outreach materials of different media to relay this scientific information to public audiences. The selected firm or teams shall have online access to e-mail via the Internet for routine exchange of correspondence and shall at a minimum, conduct project collaboration, compile documents, populate databases, conduct geospatial analyses, generate maps, and integrate final deliverables into the Navy enterprise information management systems as specified in the individual task orders.

All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Web site: https://www.sam.gov.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest, including NFAS 5252.209-9300, Organizational Conflicts of Interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or provide complete information may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. Evaluation Criteria (1) through (5) are considered most important and equal among themselves; Criteria (6) and (7) are slightly less important and equal among themselves; Criteria (8) is of least importance and will be used as a tie-breaker among technically equal firms.

Specific selection criteria include:

1. Specialized Experience

2. Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence

3. Past Performance

4. Program Management and Capacity

5. Quality Control Program

6. Firm Location

7. Commitment to Small Business

8. Volume of Work

Criterion 1- Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

The Government will evaluate firms/teams on specialized experience and technical competence with regard to preparation of the following: DoD planning documents; RCMPs Range Condition Assessments, and/or Water Range Condition Assessments in accordance with applicable Navy and Marine Corps policies, including the most current version of OPNAV 5090.1, MCO P5090.2, and DoD instruction 4715.11/12 biological and ecological studies in support of environmental documentation, including the preparation of ESA Biological Assessments, preparation of MMPA permit applications, preparation of Sanctuary Resource Statements in accordance with the NMSA, and preparation of Essential Fish Habitat Assessments in accordance with the Magnuson-Steven Fishery Conservation and Management Act; preparation of CCDs in accordance with the CZMA;

preparation of Section 106 and 110 assessments as required to support consultation under the NHPA; preparation of RAICUZ studies; preparation of reports and documents related to ORC in accordance with OPNAVINST 3571.4; preparation of other range-related reports, documents, or analyses such as SRR; preparation of EAPs in accordance with OPNAVINST 11010.40 and CNICINST 11010.1; preparation of a variety of public outreach materials of different media to relay this scientific information and other Navy wide environmental and operational energy stewardship initiatives to public audiences; and other documentation requirements needed to support general environmental compliance or range management actions including, but not limited to, documents required to comply with CWA, CAA, RCRA, and CERCLA.

Submission requirements: Provide a maximum of five projects completed or substantially completed within the past five years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above.

Sufficient information to determine the date of completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. A project will be considered substantially complete if it has reached 80% completion based on amount invoiced as compared to maximum value, before the date of issuance of this notice. At least three of the five projects submitted must demonstrate experience in providing services covering the principal geographic area of this contract. If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.

All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work under this contract.

Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name” Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture involving different partners, specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted;

however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, projects must be submitted for each joint venture partner, not to exceed a total of five projects. At least one project shall be submitted from each JV partner. The combined experience must still meet the requirement that at least three projects demonstrate experience in providing services covering the principal geographic area of this contract.

Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed or substantially completed as defined above. Projects not completed or substantially completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Criterion 1.

Criterion 2- Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms/teams will be evaluated in terms of the staff’s active professional registration, competence and related experience of the key personnel, and the technical team proposed to accomplish this work. Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Failure to provide a balanced workforce in the disciplines required to satisfy the requirements of the scope listed above will result in the firm being considered not qualified. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are quality control/quality assurance; task order or project managers; environmental planners; professional engineers; natural resource specialists; marine biologists; archaeologists;

architectural historians; subject matter experts in the fields of military operations, wetlands, physical impacts to aquatic substrates, noise, and air quality; and technical writer/editor.

Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to one page and should indicate: professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite recent (within the past ten years) project-specific experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract; and indicate proposed role in this contract. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Criterion 3: Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Criterion 1 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria.

NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 may be given greater weight.

Submission Requirements:

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER

CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, Code ACQ21, Attn: Kimberly Pryor via email at Kimberly.pryor@navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Criterion 4: Program Management and Capacity (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract and the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. A-E firms must demonstrate capability to handle and store classified information within a secured environment in accordance with SECNAV M-5510.36, Department of the Navy Information Security Program (June 2006);

OPNAVINST 5513.1F, Department of the Navy Security Classification Guides (December 2005); and DOD 5220.22-M, Change 1, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (March 2013).

Submission Requirements:

1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

Criterion 5: Quality Control Program (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control plan proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors.

Submission Requirements:

Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract.

4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

Criterion 6: – Firm Location (SF 330, Part 1, Section H):

Provided that the application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract, firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Due to the worldwide coverage of this contract, offices in multiple locations may be considered an advantage. Furthermore, having offices located in Fleet concentration areas such as, but not limited to, Norfolk, VA and San Diego, CA may be considered an advantage.

Submission Requirements:

1. Indicate location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members.

2. Provide a narrative describing the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract.

3. Provide a narrative explaining how the location of the office(s) will be advantageous to the government.

Criterion 7: Commitment to Small Business (SF 330, Part 1, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated in terms of the extent to which they have identified and committed to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZoneSB), Veteran- Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement.

Submission Requirements:

In support of (A), all firms, Large Business (LB) and Small Business (SB), shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/M. Large Businesses shall submit three “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts relative size which show compliance with utilizing the various types of small business firms noted above. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT they will not be considered. The MOST RECENT reporting period is 30 March 2018.

If subcontracting goals are not met, provide an explanation. If LBs have no ISRs to document performance in utilizing small business for similar contracts of relative size, then large business shall submit other documentation which shows their utilization of various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size. Small Businesses shall also submit documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size.

In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Command goals for FY2019 in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses. Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals:

FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023

SB 65.00% 65.00% 65.00% 65.00% 65.00%

HUBZone 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00%

SDB 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00%

WOSB 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00%

SDVOSB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

VOSB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFAR 219.7, will be required and incorporated into the contract award. A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small businesses;

however, small businesses shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract.

The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541330, Engineering Services, size standard $15,000,000.00.

The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment (B)) shall be used by large businesses to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

Criterion 8: Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H)

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A&E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD A&E contracts.

Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this factor.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF-330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11 point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed 75 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11 point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). The Government will allow two 11×17 foldout pages to be substituted for two of the 8.5×11 sheets in the total of the 75 pages. Please include your DUNS and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330.

**In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering.

Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

Architect-engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit 10 hard copies of the SF-330 and 10 CDs to Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, Code ACQ21, Attn: Kimberly Pryor, Contract Specialist, 6506 Hampton Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23508-1278. Responses received by the Government by 2:00PM EST on 07 June 2018 will be considered. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The points of contact are either Kimberly Pryor, Contract Specialist, at 757-322-4594 or Jennifer McDonald, Contracting Officer, at 757-322-8154.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

If hand-carrying or express mailing proposal, the firm is advised that the Contracting Officer is on a secured base and passes are required to enter the base. Anticipate delays in base access and plan accordingly. Hand-carried proposals must be delivered to the mailroom located in the basement of Building A, Room 0006. Proposals shall be delivered to the mailroom between 1:00 and 2:00 EDT. For your convenience, a phone is available outside the mail room door, if delivering proposals outside the specified timeframe. If required, contact Joe Goncalves at 757- 322-8125. Government personnel will not pick up proposals at the gate. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure delivery to the location specified.

All visitors to NAVFAC Atlantic at Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have a CAC badge or DBIDS badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic). Special Note: DBIDS badges must be programmed for access to the Naval Support Activity, Hampton Roads in order to gain access to the LRA.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or DBIDS badge must complete the attached Visitor Access Pass Request form (Excel spreadsheet). Visitors must complete and forward the form directly to the following personnel in the security department via email:

1. Iris Gholston, 757-322-8116, iris.gholston@navy.mil

Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the security department at least (insert number) working days prior to their scheduled meeting date to allow ample time to process and complete the background check.

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge or DBIDS badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA.

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA.

Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on

LRA:

Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 on Monday through Friday]

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to Kimberly Pryor at kimberly.pryor@navy.mil. Questions will be accepted until Noon eastern standard time 22 May 2018.