N6247018R4010_SF1442.pdf

P-307/P-308 MODIFY HANGAR REPAIR AND RINSE RACK, KEFLAVIK, ICELAND

TIME AND DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS IS LISTED IN BLOCK 13 BELOW & IN SECTION 00100 BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

SEE SECTION 00 21 13 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FOR BASE ACCESS PROCEDURES FOR DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS

SEE SECTION 00 21 13 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FOR SITE VISIT INFORMATION

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT FUNDING MAY NOT BECOME AVAILABLE, IF FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, NO AWARD WILL BE MADE AS

A RESULT OF THIS SOLICITATION.

OFFERORS WILL NOT BE REIMBURSED FOR ANY EFFORT OR PROPOSAL COSTS RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION.

PHILLIP MATTHEWS 001-757-322-8334

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

03-Apr-2018

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________767 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________03 May 2018 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

ATLANTIC DIVISION

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23511

N62470

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6247018R4010 44

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6247018R4010

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

DESCRIPTION OF WORK

This Request for Proposal (RFP) is to design and build MILCON Projects P-307 and P-308. These projects will provide modifications to existing Hangar 831 and installation of an outdoor automatic aircraft rinse facility at Keflavik, Iceland. The Government intends that this solicitation will be limited to U.S. and Icelandic firms only, which may only team with Icelandic and U.S. companies as subcontractors.

P-307 will modify existing aircraft maintenance Hangar 831 to accommodate and allow full enclosure of P-8A aircraft. The existing hangar doors will be replaced to accommodate the tail vertical stabilizer height of the P-8A and the hangar structural members modified to provide for an increased door height. The project will also reconnect the facility to a 400HZ power source and replace an existing segment of the floor that spans an existing utility tunnel with a thicker floor slab. The project also restripes the aircraft parking apron spaces to accommodate P-8A.

Project P-308 will construct a new, outdoor automatic aircraft rinse facility required for post-flight rinse of P-8A aircraft. The rinse facility will support current and future P-8A operations. A dedicated post-flight rinse facility will allow returning aircraft to easily and quickly taxi through the rinse facility and continue operations without having to be brought into the hangar to be hand washed.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Base Price

FFP

Price for the entire work for the P307 Hangar Upgrade, Keflavik, Iceland in accordance with the RFP, but excluding work described in CLIN 0002.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Base Price

FFP

Price for the entire work for the P308 Aircraft Rinse Rack, Keflavik,Iceland in accordance with the RFP, but excluding work described in CLIN 0001.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

Section 00 21 13 - Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

List of Attachments

(A) Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet

(B) Past Performance Questionnaire

(C) One Day Pass Request Form

(D) Pre Proposal Inquiry Form

1. OVERVIEW OF THIS SOURCE SELECTION

This solicitation is being conducted using two (2)-phase design/build procedures in accordance with FAR Part 36.

The best value continuum source selection process used in this acquisition is the tradeoff process. Award will be made to that responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to offer the best value to the Government considering the technical and price factors stated herein.

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration any or all offerors at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; to award the contract to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to be the best value.

This acquisition will result in a firm fixed price contract for design/build construction services. In accordance with FAR 36.205 statutory cost limitation for P307 Modify Hangar 831 is $12,800,000 USD and the statutory cost limitation for P308 Aircraft Rinse Facility is $4,330,000 USD .

The contract completion time for P-307 shall not exceed 767 days after notice to proceed. The contract completion time for P-308 shall not exceed 589 days after notice to proceed. It is expected that both projects would be performed concurrently.

The Government intends to award a contract to a single contractor for CLIN 0001 and CLIN 0002. Offerors must submit a price for each of CLIN 0001 and CLIN 0002. Offerors not submitting pricing for all CLINS will be considered nonresponsive to the solicitation and will not be evaluated.

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: Proposals must be set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this Request for Proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from a technical, cost and price standpoint.

2. SITE VISITS

A site visit to the Security Zone within Keflavik International Airport, Iceland is not mandatory for this procurement. Offerors will have the opportunity for a site visit during Phase II of the solicitation. Any requests for a site visit during Phase I will not be accommodated. The Phase II site visit information will be provided with the Phase II amendment.

3. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

To be eligible for award, your firm(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as required as required by FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Oct 2016).

****Entities registering from outside the United States MUST contact the Federal Service Desk as a part of the registration process. The contact information is available at https://www.fsd.gov/****

Note that the System for Award Management (SAM) is required for all offerors; including Joint Ventures (JV) (registration must state the NAME of the JV). Offerors not currently registered in SAM must obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

All offerors, including JV offerors, must submit with their proposal a DUNS number. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must submit with their proposal a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in SAM (see above.)

CAGE/NCAGE – A CAGE/NGAGE code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE/NCAGE Code registered in the JV name.

(a)U.S. Offerors, including Joint Venture offerors: U.S. offerors must obtain a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database, part of the SAM registration process (see paragraph above.)

(b) Non-U.S. (foreign) Offerors ONLY, including JV: Non-U.S. offerors must obtain a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) Code instead of a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database. NCAGE codes may be obtained at the NCAGE website https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/scage/CageList.aspx

IMPORTANT NOTICE: If the offeror is registering a new entity in SAM.gov, the offeror must follow new procedures, which include providing an original, signed notarized letter indicating authorized entity Administrator for the entity associated with the DUNS number before a new SAM.gov entity registration will be activated.

IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR THE NEW REGISTRANTS TO CHECK WITH SAM.GOV

HELPDESK DIRECTLY TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR TIMELY REGISTRATION ARE

MET.

4. ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by any employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities, and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

5. INQUIRIES, PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DUE DATE

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPI) regarding this RFP shall be submitted electronically to Philip Mathews (Phone

(757) 322-8334) by e-mail at philip.mathews@navy.mil. Offerors are requested to use the PPI’s submittal Form (Attachment D), Responses will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than ten (10) calendar days before the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiries. There is no guarantee that PPI’s submitted after cutoff date will be answered before the solicitation closes.

Amendments will be posted directly to NECO. Additionally, other postings will be made to NECO, such as the pre-proposal inquires (PPI) log, etc., under the Additional Documents section of the RFP. Postings to the Additional Documents section of NECO DO NOT generate an automated email to contractors. It is recommended contractors check the NECO Additional Documents section of the RFP periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check NECO for all postings.

The technical specifications and design drawings will be provided with the Phase II Amendment

PHASE I Proposals shall be delivered to:

Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic Building A Mailroom ATTN: ACQ34 Philip Mathews 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23508-1278

ALL PHASE I SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED AT THE LOCATION SPECIFIED ABOVE

PRIOR TO 2:00 PM NORFOLK, VA LOCAL TIME, THURSDAY, 3 MAY 2018. LATE SUBMITTALS

WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

ELECTRONIC/FACSIMILE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Only Phase I Proposals will be considered. The date and time for submission of Phase II proposals is to be determined at a later date. A MAXIMUM NUMBER OF FIVE (5) OFFERS WILL BE SELECTED TO

SUBMIT PHASE II PROPOSALS.

Price Proposal and Non-Price Factors Proposal - The Price Proposal is submitted in Phase II only. Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR NON-PRICE TECHNICALFACTORS PROPOSAL FOR RFP N62470-18-R- 4010, NAVFAC ATLANTIC P307/308, ICELAND, ATTN: Phil Mathews All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor. Price and Non-Price Factors proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non-Price Factors proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non-Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered.

PHASE I SUBMISSION:

Non-Price Factors: Offeror shall submit one (1), marked “Original”, and four (4) copies marked “copies”, each in a separate binder, and two (2) electronic copies on CD with the following characteristics:

-8 ½ x 11 format (A4 paper is also acceptable)

- 12 point font, Times New Roman -Two complete electronic copies of the technical proposal factors as a single .pdf searchable file on a CD (include with the “Original” technical submission). If there are any conflicts between hard copies and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.

-Amendments (SF30s), acknowledged _-Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

-The non-price proposal should only include information in response to Factors 1, 2, 3, and JV agreement (if applicable). Specific page limitations and Solicitation Submittal Requirements are specified in each factor.

PAGES THAT EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITATIONS SHALL NOT BE EVALUATED.

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Special Joint Venture (JV) Requirements: NOTE #1:

FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SOLICITATION A JOINT VENTURE (JV) REFERS TO A U.S.-STYLED

FORMAL LEGAL ENTITY IN THE NATURE OF A PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED OF TWO OR MORE

PERSONS OR COMPANIES. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST PROVIDE ONE (1) NCAGE CODE AND

ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR THE JOINT VENTURE AND ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR EACH

MEMBER COMPRISING THE JOINT VENTURE. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST BE REGISTERED

IN SAM USING THE NAME OF THE JOINT VENTURE.

JV offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement shall take effect upon the submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. Submission of the notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the price proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV. The Joint Venture must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

1. The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(a) Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

(b) Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each firm that forms the JV.

(c) Solicitation number.

(d) Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example: Firm A performing

100% of )

(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.”

(f) Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

(g) Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture (JV) is in compliance at the time of proposal submission with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture.

2. The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc) must be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

PHASE II SUBMISSION:

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO THOSE OFFERORS WHO ARE SELECTED TO PROCEED TO PHASE-II OF

THE SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS. DO NOT SUBMIT FACTORS 4, 5, 6 AND PRICE PROPOSAL

INFORMATION IN PHASE I PROPOSALS.)

Technical Non-price Factors: Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original”, four (4) copies, each in a separate three-ring binder, and two (2) electronic copies with the following characteristics for each project:

_ 8 ½ x 11 format (A4 paper is also acceptable.)

_ 12 point font, Times New Roman _Two complete electronic copies of the technical proposal factors as a single .pdf searchable file on a CD (include with the “Original” technical submission). If there are any conflicts between hard copies and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.

_ Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

_ This should only include information in response to Factors 4, 5 and Price. Specific page limitations and Solicitation Submittal Requirements are specified in each Factor. PAGES THAT EXCEED THE PAGE

LIMITATIONS SHALL NOT BE EVALUATED.

The evaluation of Phase I factors will be used for an overall evaluation of the offerors proposals and will be carried over into Phase II.

Price:

Offerors shall submit one (1) marked “original”, one (1) marked “copy”, each in separate three-ring binder, and one

(1) electronic copy (CD format) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

PROPOSALS MAY BE MAILED OR HAND DELIVERED.

HAND DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS:

All visitors to the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic) and be issued a temporary DBIDS (Defense Biometric Identification System) visitor pass.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or RAPIDGATE badge must complete the attached Visitor Access Pass Request form (Attachment C). Visitors must complete and forward the form directly to the following personnel in the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Department via email:

1. Iris Gholston (757) 322-8116 / Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil

2. Steven K. Anderson (757) 322-8115 / Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

3. Robert Hernandez, 757-322-8044, robert.hernandez3@navy.mil

Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Department at least five working days prior to their scheduled meeting date to allow ample time to process and complete the background check.

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA.

Offerors should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA.

DBIDS passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0700-1530 on Monday through Friday

6. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Phase I:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance

Phase II:

Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Technical Solution

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Factors 1-3 will be evaluated in Phase I. Factors 4-5 will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 (Technical Approach) will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase II. In Phase II, Factor 4 (Safety) will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 4, they will not be eligible for award, unless the deficiency(ies) is/are remedied through discussions. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the government will consider Factors 2, 3, 5 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that adjectivally-rated technical factors (Factors 2 and 5) are equal to each other and when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (Factor 3). The combined non-price factors are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offerors shall submit one (1) marked “original”, one (1) marked “copy”, each in separate three-ring binder, and one (1) electronic copy (CD format) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

-SF-1442, signed -Amendments (SF30s) Acknowledged -Completed Schedule B, Pricing Form -Bid Bond -Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

-Required Contractor Responsibility documentation

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate Tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Point of contact from a bank or any financial institution with which the offeror tranacts business.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price . Total price consists of the total for both CLINS. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Non-price Factors:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

- Submit information for Factors 1-3 under Phase I

- Submit information for Factors 4-5 under Phase II

(1) Factor 1, Technical Approach:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart. The narrative shall also include details on how Offerors will provide qualified labor. If importing labor, describe how you will gain the host nation approvals.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

(2) Factor 2, Experience:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

-a renovation of an aircraft hangar or construction of a new aircraft hangar with a minimum value of $4,000,000.00, or

-Construction of concrete airfield pavements (such as runways, taxiways and aprons).

Offerors must Submit a maximum of five (5) design projects for the design team that best demonstrate experience in

-Design of an aircraft hangar renovation or new construction of an aircraft hangar with a construction value of $4,000,000 or greater, and

-Design of concrete airfield pavements (such as runways, taxiways and aprons), Note that to be considered relevant, a project must demonstrate experience in one of the areas outlined above.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this

RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract.

More weight may be given to the Offeror’s projects than to those submitted for subcontractors.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

-Design of an aircraft hangar renovation or new construction of an aircraft hangar with a construction value of $4,000,000 or greater, or

-Design of concrete airfield pavements (such as runways, taxiways and aprons), Offerors must provide at least one project demonstrating relevant experience in each of the two areas outlined above.

Submit a maximum of five (5) design projects for the design team that best demonstrate experience in

-Design of an aircraft hangar renovation or new construction of an aircraft hangar with a construction value of $4,000,000 or greater, and

-Design of concrete airfield pavements (such as runways, taxiways and aprons), Note that to be considered relevant, a project must demonstrate experience in one of the areas outlined above.

Projects submitted shall be completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The design completion date and/or construction completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A). Projects in which work work is still ongoing will not be considered.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded;

however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction and five (5) for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience where the offeror performed on an active airfield/airport may be considered more favorable.

(3) Factor 3, Past Performance:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If a completed AE Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for design experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience for which a CPARS is not available AN OFFEROR SHALL

NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

When using PPQs, the Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal.

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Mr. Philip Mathews via email at philip.mathews@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

More emphasis will be placed on more relevant projects. Relevance as set out in Factor 2 is applicable here. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive an Unknown Confidence rating.

(4) Factor 4, Safety:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each Contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required).

(1) Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the Offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The Safety Narrative which shall include all information requested in this paragraph shall be limited to one (1) single-sided page.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors and will also evaluate the narrative to determine whether subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. . The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record and the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

This Safety Factor will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

(5) Factor 5, Technical Solution:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

-Hangar door and interior upgrades.

-Site layout including a description of the aircraft rinse facility, aircraft pavement striping. Also, include in the narrative a description of the design/construction phasing to accomplish both projects concurrently.

-Provide a contract duration that includes all aspects of the design and construction projects. The contract timeframe identified in the RFP defines the acceptable contract duration; a shorter contract duration is desirable. The Government will evaluate a comparison of the contractor’s proposed contract durations and the acceptable contract durations. The Government’s evaluation of the contractor’s proposed schedule is a means of determining whether the contractor understands the scope of work and approaches the tasks in a logical and effective manner. Provide a narrative that explains the proposed contract durations, scheduling innovations and methods to provide a shorter contract duration.

-Provide a design/construction schedule in the form of a Gantt chart that shows major features of work for each project.

Narrative shall not exceed five (5) double-sided pages (or 10 single-sided pages). Up to four (4) single sided conceptual drawings (11 x 17 or A3) may be provided to supplement the narrative and two (2) 11 x 17 or A3 schedule Gantt charts shall be provided to graphically present the contract durations.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative, Gantt charts and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

In addition, the contractor’s proposed contract durations shall become an enforceable part of the contract and will be reflected in the awarded Contract Completion Date (CCD) to the successful offeror.

Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters JUL 2013 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (NOV 2017)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 236210.

(2) The small business size standard is $36,500,000.

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b)(1) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (d) of this provision applies.

(2) If the provision at 52.204-7 is not included in this solicitation, and the offeror is currently registered in System for Award Management (SAM), and has completed the Representations and Certifications section of SAM electronically, the offeror may choose to use paragraph (d) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:

( ) Paragraph (d) applies.

( ) Paragraph (d) does not apply and the offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.

(c) (1) The following representations or certifications in SAM are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:

(i) 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination. This provision applies to solicitations when a firm-fixed-price contract or fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment is contemplated, unless—

(A) The acquisition is to be made under the simplified acquisition procedures in Part 13;

(B) The solicitation is a request for technical proposals under two-step sealed bidding procedures; or

(C) The solicitation is for utility services for which rates are set by law or regulation.

(ii) 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions. This provision applies to solicitations expected to exceed $150,000.

(iii) 52.203-18, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements--Representation. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(iv) 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification. This provision applies to solicitations that do not include the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management.

(v) 52.204-5, Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business). This provision applies to solicitations that—

(A) Are not set aside for small business concerns;

(B) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and

(C) Are for contracts that will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(vi) 52.209-2; Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation.

(vii) 52.209-5; Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. This provision applies to solicitations where the contract value is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(viii) 52.209-11, Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(ix) 52.214-14, Place of Performance--Sealed Bidding. This provision applies to invitations for bids except those in which the place of performance is specified by the…