N6247018R4010_Amend_0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0004 is issued for the follow ing:

1. To extend the proposal submission deadline to 2:00 PM (EDT) September 27, 2018.

2. To answ er PPIs 1 – 37

3. To provide technical revisions

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Sep-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247018R4010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Apr-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Sep-2018

CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247018R4010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0004

Amendment 0004 is issued for the following:

1. To extend the proposal submission deadline to 2:00 PM (EDT) September 27, 2018.

2. To answer PPIs 1 – 37

3. To provide technical revisions and associated attachment

1. To revise Instructions to Proposers to extend the proposal submission date deadline:

FROM:

PHASE II PROPOSALS SHALL BE RECEIVED BY 2:00 PM EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, THURSDAY,

SEPTEMBER 20, 2018

PHASE II Proposals shall be delivered to:

Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Building A Mailroom ATTN: ACQ34 Phil Mathews 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23508-1278.

DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS SHOULD FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THE ORIGINAL

SOLICITATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT HAND DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE

ACCEPTED AT THE FACILITY GATE; ALL DELIVERIES MUST BE MADE TO THE MAIL ROOM.

ALL PROPOSAL INQUIRIES MUST BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL TO: philip.mathews@navy.mil NO LATER

THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO PROPOSAL DUE DATE.

Offerors shall follow all Phase II submission requirements as outlined in the solicitation and subsequent amendments.

TO:

PHASE II PROPOSALS SHALL BE RECEIVED BY 2:00 PM EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, THURSDAY,

SEPTEMBER 20, 2018 SEPTEMBER 27, 2018

PHASE II Proposals shall be delivered to:

Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Building A Mailroom ATTN: ACQ34 Phil Mathews 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23508-1278.

DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS SHOULD FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THE ORIGINAL

SOLICITATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT HAND DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE

ACCEPTED AT THE FACILITY GATE; ALL DELIVERIES MUST BE MADE TO THE MAIL ROOM.

ALL PROPOSAL INQUIRIES MUST BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL TO: philip.mathews@navy.mil NO LATER

THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO PROPOSAL DUE DATE.

Offerors shall follow all Phase II submission requirements as outlined in the solicitation and subsequent amendments.

2. Pre-proposal inquiries and responses:

Question 1: Can European equivalent materials be installed (e.g., European norms for Schedule 40 piping)?

Answer 1: Yes, European equivalent materials may be used except where modifying existing US piping where the new work should match existing work.

Question 2: What is the process for obtaining NATO security clearance?

Answer 2: It is a similar process to obtaining the Keflavik International Airport access. It is the same background check and same access card.

Question 3: Will non-US or non-Icelandic second tier subcontractors be allowed? Will non-US or non-Icelandic labor be allowed?

Answer 3: All subcontractors must be Icelandic or US. Non-Icelandic or Non-US labor is allowed if they have proper documentation. Refer to RFP for more information.

Question 4: Will NAVFAC be offering the CQM training in Europe prior to construction work on this contract?

Answer 4: Yes. The course can be taken from US Army Corps of Engineers Europe District. The training is typically in Weisbaden, Germany. The course schedules can be seen here: http://www.nau.usace.army.mil/Business- With-Us/CQM/

Question 5: Will continuous access be allowed in the hangar and rinse rack areas and on the airfield? Are there times when work will not be permitted?

Answer 5: Contractor will have full access to approximately one third of the hangar adjacent to the door that will be replaced. The remainder of the hangar will be accessible; however. access must be coordinated with the Icelandic Coast Guard. See RFP Part Two General Requirements, Section 01 14 00.05 20 Work Restrictions for Design Build, Para. 1.4.3 Working Hours and Section 00 73 05 Supplementary Conditions for Iceland Projects for further detail.

Question 6: Will a Contracting Officer's Technical Representative be onsite full time during the construction?

Answer 6: Yes, a Contracting Officer's Technical Representative will be onsite full time during the construction.

Question 7: Will there be other contractors or other work in the area? Will coordination with other contractors be required?

Answer 7: No other contractors will be working in the area.

Question 8: Will the contractor have full uninterrupted access of the area or work need to be phased?

Answer 8: Contractor will have full access to approximately one third of the hangar adjacent to the door that will be replaced. The remainder of the hangar will be accessible; however, access must be coordinated with the Icelandic Coast Guard.

Question 9: Can the Government please provide the Clark Nexsen concept drawings in native file format?

Answer 9: Yes, upon award of project.

Question 10: NICET personnel - This is a US based certification program. Is this a requirement for Icelandic design?

Answer 10: US FPE requirements apply as per RFP. NICET certification will not be required based on OCONUS location. Please review Item 3 below.

Question 11: To what extent is UFC 4-211-01 required to be used? Are surge tanks to be added to the project per paragraph 3-6.5?

Answer 11: UFC 4-211-01 is not applicable to this project.

Question 12: The scope requires providing drains at low points, should the design also include high-point vents?

Answer 12: Per NFPA 13-2016, provide high point vents for each system.

Question 13: Does the existing aircraft hangar meet UFC 4-211-01 (table 7-1) requirements for Type III Hangar with the exception of the existing hangar door? NFPA 409 lists Group I hangars with hangar door height greater than 8.5m, in referencing NFPA use Group I, in referencing UFC 4-211-01 use Type III?

Answer 13: UFC 4-211-01 is not applicable to this project.

Question 14: Do the new exterior steel personnel doors need to be fire rated (1-hour, 2-hour, etc.)?

Answer 14: Fire rated exterior doors are not required.

Question 15: Please explain purpose of exterior wall backup construction? Is this to function as a temporary wall during renovation of hangar door?

Answer 15: Exterior wall backup construction applies to the enclosure of the door truss and above the door pocket.

Question 16: Please confirm that modification of existing system to the 5-wire system applies only to new work and not to existing feeders, branch circuits, or equipment.

Answer 16: Confirmed.

Question 17: Please provide type and size of 400 Hz outlet and disconnect switches.

Answer 17: Each disconnect shall handle the full size of the 90kVA, 400Hz converter. Outlet shall conform to the requirements of the aircraft and cable connection.

Question 18: NEMA 5-20R is typically a US standard for 60 HZ (not 50 Hz). Please confirm Onboard Portable Water Cart Receptacle is NEMA 5-20R , 50Hz

Answer 18: Confirmed, equipment requires a NEMA 5-20R receptacle with 120V. It will operate at 50Hz.

Question 19: Can the existing hangar door be modified/reused in construction of the modified new hangar door? Or, is a new manufactured door required in compliance with UFC 4-211-01 guidelines and specs?

Answer 19: A new hangar door is required for this project in accordance with the RFP.

Question 20: What is the current estimated quality of AFFF to be disposed? What quantity should the contractor assume?

Answer 20: The existing foam tank is 1500 gallon. Contractor should assume that the tank is full.

Question 21: Is a US PE or Icelandic equivalent required to be onsite continuously during construction for inspection of excavations and soil/groundwater conditions or can it be a qualified person under the supervision of the PE?

Answer 21: As per the RFP, Section A10, the registered engineer does not need to be continuously on site, but is required to do periodic site visits.

Question 22: Spec states that UFC 4-010-01 (AT/FP) does not apply. Please confirm if mass notification system is or is not required.

Answer 22: A mass notification system is not required.

Question 23: Is a US PE or Icelandic equivalent required to be onsite continuously during construction for inspection of excavations and soil/groundwater conditions or can it be a qualified person under the supervision of the PE?

Answer 23: As per the RFP, the registered engineer does not need to be continuously on site, but is required to do periodic site visits.

Question 24: Note 4 indicated the telecom duct bank from Rinse Rack Remote Control to room C-20 location - C-20 is in existing Compressor room. Please provide demarcation point.

Answer 24: Remote control of the rinse rack is a stand-alone system, to be controlled in room C-20. A network connection is not required. Provide equipment as required by rinse rack manufacturer for remote control.

Question 25: Hard wire control to be provided to allow remote operation of the rinse rack from Hangar 831, room C-

20. Please provide termination type and approximate location of communication system.

Answer 25: Remote control of the rinse rack is a stand-alone system, to be controlled in room C-20. A network connection is not required. Provide equipment as required by rinse rack manufacturer for remote control.

Question 26: A complete grounding system is required. Can the Government please provide Soil Resistivity value for calculation purpose?

Answer 26: Soil Resistivity testing has not be performed. Contractor to meet the grounding requirements of the RFP.

Refer to Part 6, Attachment E for Geotechnical Investigation of soil conditions.

Question 27: Is sanitary sewer available to discharge water to that does not meet the rinse water quality standards?

If not please confirm where the water is to be sent, the flow diagram shows a waste tank, this would have to be a very large waste tank (size dependent on frequency of emptying, but will need to be well over 45,000 liters).

Answer 27: There is no sanitary sewer available at the site. The tank discharges to the storm system.

Question 28: Inlet water pre-treatment RO systems typically reject and discharge up to 50% of the water that they process, if no sanitary sewer is available should this discharge water be directed to the storm drain? If not where should it be sent? For every time the rinse tank is filled with clean water you could potentially generate up to 45,000L of discharge water.

Answer 28: There is no sanitary sewer available at the site. The tank discharges to the storm system.

Question 29: What unique aircraft will the automated rinse system be required to be programed for? How many different unique rinse recipe’s should the system be capable of being programed for?

Answer 29: The only requirement is for a P-8A aircraft.

Question 30: Please confirm that the articulating nozzles are to move automatically based on aircraft rinse pattern and that nozzles that need to be moved manually are not acceptable?

Answer 30: The articulating nozzles must move automatically.

Question 31: Typically automated rinse facilities have issues with normal wind conditions during rinsing operations, without an automated wind correction system you risk one side of the aircraft getting rinsed while the other stays dry. Is a rinse system with an automatic real time wind correction system required?

Answer 31: Yes, an automated real time wind correction system is required.

Question 32: The Southern edge of the wash rack must be a minimum of (51m) 168 ft. from centerline of existing taxiway. Is there a minimum for the Northern edge of the wash rack from the centerline?

Answer 32: Location and dimensions of rinse rack shall be as shown in the RFP.

Question 33: How many aircraft will be rinsed in one day? How long between each rinse?

Answer 33: It's estimated up to 4 aircraft in one day. Assume 4 hours between rinses.

Question 34: We would like to request a one-week extension for the subject proposal. The Phase II solicitation released a substantial amount of information that all had to be read through before initial estimating processes could begin, and has greatly increased the time required to put together a proposal.

Answer 34: Extension to 27 September 2018 granted as set forth above in Item 1.

Question 35: Hanger Door Roof Truss states that the existing truss is to be reused but the Contractor must perform their own structural analysis. A structural analysis must already have been undertaken to make this determination.

Can those calculations be made available?

Answer 35: A concept design was performed by the Government; however, a Final structural analysis must be performed by the successful bidder as per the RFP.

Question 36: RFP states that the box truss must be reused. Please confirm that the Government is mandating the reuse of the existing box truss, even if the bidder believes that it may not be the least expensive alternative?

Answer 36: The concept design prepared by the Government concluded that it was more economical to reuse the existing truss (with some local strengthening), however there is no objection to designing and installing a new truss.

Question 37: Are there any known discrepancies between the structural member sizes shown on original drawings for the box truss and field observations by Clark Nexsen? If so, can that information be provided?

Answer 37: During the site investigation no discrepancies were observed between the box truss member sizes shown on original drawings and those in the field.

3.To provide the following technical revisions

P307 RFP, PART 3, 6. ENGINEERING SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS

D40 FIRE PROTECTION

General System Requirements; Delete the third paragraph in its entirety.

END OF AMENDMENT

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 10-May-2018 02:00 PM to 27-Sep-2018 02:00 PM.

(End of Summary of Changes)