N6247017R4014_Amendment_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0001

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MISSION ASSURANCE ASSESSMENTS OF INSTALLATION/FACILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE AND

FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS (FRCS) FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (DON)

This amendment is issued to provide revisions to Sections J, L, and M as w ell as provide revised Attachment J-4 Past Performance Questionnaire. This amendment also provides responses to pre-aw ard inquiries. (SEE CONTINUATION PAGE)

CS: Kathleen Delashmitt, kathleen.delashmitt@navy.mil, 757-322-4431

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 21

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 03-May-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247017R4014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-Apr-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

03-May-2018

CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247017R4014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0001

The purpose of this amendment is to disseminate the below information.

1.) Section J – The list of references has been revised to reflect the references publicly available to Offerors. A revised Attachment J-4 Past Performance Questionnaire is also provided.

2.) Section L – L.6 (b) (1) Factor 1 – Corporate Experience, Solicitation Submittal Requirements, has been revised.

3.) Section M – M.2 (b) (1) Factor 1 – Corporate Experience, Basis of Evaluation, has been revised.

4.) Section J – Amendment 0001 pre-award inquiry responses.

(Revisions are provided by the use of red font.)

Amendment 0001: Pre-award Inquiries

Question No.

REFERENCE

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

Page Section Para.

1 56 J Referenc es Section J includes a list of references that are not available from any source outside NAVFAC. This means only the incumbent has access. The list of references only available in FOUO or NIPRNET databases includes: USMC Assessment Team Guide, Version 5.0;

USMC ESA Program Guide, 24NOV14;

USMC OUTA Program Guide, 24NOV14; USMC/Navy AHTA Methodology; USMC MAA CY17 Benchmarks; Navy MA Team Guide, Version 2.0; Navy MAA FY18 Benchmarks; Facility-Related Control System (FRCS) Type List. Section M, Eval Critera, will grade offerors who demonstrate experience in these programs higher than those who do not have such knowledge or experience.

Since these references are only available to the incumbent, request the Government either: 1) Provide these references to ensure fair and open competition or; 2) Remove this requirement from Section M.

Please see revised Sections J, L, and M.

2 56 J All Section J identifies references incorporated by reference that provide guidance for the work to be performed under this contract including:

USMC Assessment Team Guide, Version 5.0 USMC ESA Program Guide, 24NOV14 USMC OUTA Program Guide, 24NOV14

USMC/Navy AHTA Methodology USMC MAA CY17 Benchmarks Navy MA Team Guide, Version 2.0 Navy MAA FY18 Benchmarks Facility-Related Control System (FRCS) Type List

Section M indicates that offerors that demonstrate experience with the above documents may be rated higher than those that do not. These references do not appear to be publicly available. In order to foster sufficient competition and to ensure all offerors have the opportunity to provide realistic, competitive technical proposals, request the government provide these references as soon as possible to industry for review and evaluation.

Request the government extend the proposal due date to 30 days from the date the government provides all relevant references to Industry.”

Please see revised Sections J, L, and M.

3 USMC has issued a Sources Sought for work that appears to closely mirror this solicitation (PP&O Mission Assurance Assessment Program Support, Solicitation Number MCICOM-18-014).

Is there any relationship between these two solicitations, and does the government expect there could be any Operational Conflict of Interest for an offeror winning both contracts.

No.

4 Will the government provide a two week extension given the complexity of the response required for this proposal?

Not at this time.

5 87 M.2.

(b)(1)

Basis of Evaluati on

Basis of Evaluation. “Offerors that demonstrate experience with the USMC MAA Team Guide (ver. 5.0), USMS ESA Program Guide (24NOV14), USMC OUTA Program Guide (24NOV14)m USMC/Navy AHTA Methodology, or Navy MA Team Guide (ver.2.0) may be viewed more favorably than Offerors without such experience.

How many contractors have experience with these Guides? Are these Guides available on the WBDG? Mission Assurance Assessment has been performed by many government contractors. You are limiting competition and providing an unfair advantage to only those who have experience with these guides. Is this your intent?

Please see revised Sections J, L, and M.

6 87 (b)(1) Corpor ate Experie nce

2nd full paragrap h

Please provide copies of USMC MAA Team Guide (ver. 5.0), USMC ESA Program Guide (24NOV14), USMC OUTA Program Guide (24NOV14), USMC/Navy AHTA Methodology, or Navy MA Team Guide (ver. 2.0)

Please see revised Sections J, L, and M.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

SECTION J

DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The individual files for Section J are attached separately. (Note: The documents are provided under “additional documents” on NECO under the solicitation number.)

This contract incorporates by reference the following attachments as if they were fully set forth herein. Please see the following attachments as part of this solicitation:

DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT

NUMBER

ATTACHMENT TITLE

J-1 One Day Access Pass Request

J-2 Pre-Award Inquiry Form

J-3 Schedule of Services

J-4 Past Performance Questionnaire, revised via Amendment 0001.

J-5 Corporate Experience Project Data Form

J-6 Small Business Participation Record

J-7 Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy

J-8 Small Business Subcontracting Plan

The following references are not provided as attachments, but are incorporated by reference as providing guidance for the work to be performed under this contract.

References

Reference

TITLE

DoDD 3020.40 Mission Assurance (MA)

Navy specific

USMC specific MCO 3058.1

N/A USMC Assessment Team Guide, Version 5.0

N/A USMC ESA Program Guide, 24NOV14

N/A USMC OUTA Program Guide, 24NOV14

N/A USMC/Navy AHTA Methodology

N/A USMC MAA CY17 Benchmarks

N/A Navy MA Team Guide, Version 2.0

N/A Navy MAA FY18 Benchmarks

N/A Whole Building Design Guide

Facility-Related Control System (FRCS) Type List

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

SECTION L

L.1 SUBMITTING YOUR PROPOSAL

Proposals must be submitted via express mail carriers or hand –carried the following address:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Attn: Kathleen Delashmitt and Erin Quimby Code ACQ22 Bldg A - Mail Room 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, Virginia 23508-1278

The signature of the Offeror provided in Box 17 of the SF33 agrees, if this offer is accepted within 180 calendar days from the date of receipt of offers specified as the due date in Box 9 of the SF33 or any extended due date, to furnish any or all items upon which the prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

Annotate solicitation number N62470-17-R-4014 on the bottom of the envelope or box. Proposals must be received and date stamped at the stated address above no later than the date and time identified in block 9 on the SF33.

Hand-carried Proposal Security Information:

All visitors to NAVFAC Atlantic who do not have a CAC badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic) and be issued a temporary DBIDS (Defense Biometric Identification System) visitor pass.

Visitors who do not have a CAC badge must complete the attached One Day Access Pass Request form (Excel spreadsheet) (Attachment J-1). Visitors must complete and forward the form directly to the following personnel in the security department via email:

1. Iris Gholston, 757-322-8116, iris.gholston@navy.mil

2. Robert Hernandez, 757-322-8044, robert.hernandez3@navy.mil

3. Steven K. Anderson, 757-322-8115, steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the security department NO LESS THAN 5 BUSINESS DAYS prior to either: 1) the proposal due date or; 2) the date on which the firm plans to hand-deliver their proposal, to allow ample time to process and complete the background check. Please also email a copy of the completed One Day Access Pass Request form (Attachment J-1) spreadsheet to the Contract Specialist, Mr.

Kathleen Delashmitt by email to kathleen.delashmitt@navy.mil.

Express mail carriers Security Information:

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected following LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA. The Commercial Vehicle Inspection location for vehicles coming to NAVFAC Atlantic on the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) is located at the Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads at the Meredith Street gate. The Meredith Street gate is located off of Terminal Boulevard.

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA.

DBIDS passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Building #CD9 Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0700 -1530 on Monday through Friday

All potential offerors must adhere to this notice in order to avoid delay in submitting your proposal. The level of security at Lafayette River Annex may change at any time. As the level of security heightens, the amount of time required to gain access to the Lafayette River Annex also increases.

L.2 PRE-AWARD INQUIRIES/REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) INFORMATION/

CLARIFICATIONS/QUESTIONS

Contractors are required to review the entire solicitation package before submitting questions. Submit all questions via one document using Attachment J-2 Pre-Award Inquiry Form, by E-mail to kathleen.delashmitt@navy.mil and erin.quimby@navy.mil no later than May 8, 2018 at 02:00PM EDT. This is the most efficient way to ensure all questions are addressed in a timely manner.

L.3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FILES

Solicitations are posted to the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website. By necessity, these files are protected to prevent unauthorized editing. The Contract Specialist will post the RFP files to a single website:

www.neco.navy.mil.

It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to obtain the RFP files, along with any amendments, from the NECO website.

L.4 GENERAL PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

a. General Information: The price proposal and non-price proposals shall be submitted in separate three- ring binders and tabbed appropriately. Binders must be marked as “Volume 1: Price Proposal” and “Volume 2: Non-price Proposal”. Should there be a discrepancy between paper and electronic information, the paper copies shall govern.

b. Elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal are not desired. Elaborate artwork and expensive visual or other presentation aids are not necessary. Organization, clarity, accuracy of information, relevance, and completeness are of prime importance.

c. The signature of the Offeror provided in Box 17 of the SF33 agrees, if this offer is accepted within 180 calendar days from the date of receipt of offers specified as the due date in Box 9 of the SF33 or any extended due date, to furnish any or all items upon which the prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

L.5 EVALUATION FACTORS

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1– Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Technical Approach/Management Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Small Business Utilization Factor 5 – Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors— Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4—are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor—Factor 5. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

L.6 PRICE AND NON-PRICE PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

(a) Volume 1: Price:

(1) Price Submittal Requirements: Submit one (1) “Original” and two (2) copies of the price proposal in three-ring binders clearly marked as the Price Proposal. In addition to providing hard copies of the price proposal offerors shall provide two (2) electronic copies of the price proposal on a non-rewritable CD. Offerors are advised that, in the event of a discrepancy between pricing information contained on the CD and the hard copy proposal, the original hard copy will govern. There is no page limit for Volume 1. Each copy of the price proposal shall include a separate tab for each item specified below:

Tab A. Identify the Company profile to include, the Offeror’s name, address, names of two (2) points of contact (including title, phone number and email address), the DUNS number and CAGE code;

Tab B. Completed and signed Standard Form 33 (SF-33)

Tab C. Acknowledgement of all solicitation amendment(s) (SF-30’s) related to this RFP.

Tab D. CONTRACTOR PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION:

____________________________________________ (Name of Offeror) warrants that its proposal _____________________________ (of date or other identifier) incorporated herein by reference, including, but not limited to, proposed approaches, staffing, methodology, or work plans, will meet the performance objectives set forth in this contract during the execution thereof. The Contractor is not excused from meeting such performance objectives in the event such proposal proves inadequate as conceived or executed to meet such performance objectives. The Contractor understands that it bears all of the cost and performance risk associated with adopting acceptable additional (and/or alternative) means or methods of meeting the performance objectives.

Tab E. Representations and Certifications (ref: https://www.sam.gov).

Tab F. Any offeror proposing as a partnership, joint venture, other teaming arrangement, or resource of a parent company/subsidiary/affiliate shall submit the following information:

i. Provide a listing of the team members’ corporate name (no abbreviations), address, point of contact, phone number, DUNS Number, and CAGE Code.

ii. Submit signed letters of commitment from the team members. The commitment letter shall clearly identify the expected relationship, role and responsibility of the team member.

iii. If proposing as a Joint Venture, submit a signed copy of the Joint Venture Agreement.

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF33 unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating that one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a signed copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirement may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. If the joint venture is subject to the

SBA Mentor-Protégé Program, a copy of the SBA approval of the joint venture arrangement shall be included. In addition, Joint Ventures shall specify if they are populated or unpopulated.

Tab G. Completed Attachment J-3 Schedule of Services for the base and all option years in U.S.

Dollars.

Note: Firm fixed-price task orders will be negotiated for the services required under this contract using the fully burdened labor rates and percent mark-ups for travel and other direct costs proposed under Attachment J-3 Schedule of Services, for the base year and each option year (if exercised).

However, the quantities listed in Attachment J-3 Schedule of Services are estimates only and will not be ordered with the award of the basic contract. Actual quantities ordered over the duration of the contract are expected to vary and are not limited to those estimated in Attachment J-3 Schedule of Services and shall not exceed the total contract not-to-exceed amount of $95,000,000.00 (base period and all option years).

Attachment J-3 Schedule of Services shall be completed as follows (items a-e):

a. Offerors shall enter unit prices, percent mark-ups, extended prices and total amounts as indicated on Attachment J-3 Schedule of Services, for the base period and all option years. All labor rates and extended prices shall be rounded to two (02) decimal places and the rounded prices will be used for evaluation purposes.

b. In the event there is a difference between a labor rate and the extended total amount (i.e. Hourly labor rate x estimated hours = extended total) the labor rate will be held to be the intended offer and the extended price and total price will be recomputed accordingly. If the offeror provides a total amount for a labor category(s) listed in Attachment J-3 Schedule of Services, but fails to enter the unit price, the extended price divided by the estimated labor hours will be held to the intended unit price or labor rate.

c. Proposed burdened labor rates shall reflect composite fully burdened hourly labor rates for prime/Joint Venture contractor, as applicable, performing work under the contract. Burdened hourly labor rates shall include the following costs: direct labor, fringe benefits, overhead, phone service (cellular and landline), all computer charges for computer workstations and laptops including standard software packages, general and administrative costs, and profit. Additionally, administrative costs for contract management, invoicing and other task order administrative tasks will not be separately negotiated, and shall be incorporated in the indirect costs included in the fully burdened hourly labor rates. Additional burdened labor classifications for the prime/JV will not be added to the contract or negotiated under individual task orders.

d. Applicable travel costs will be negotiated under individual task orders. Travel, subsistence and per diem costs negotiated under task orders shall be in compliance with current Joint Travel Regulation rates. The estimated travel costs listed in Attachment J-3 are for proposed costs to be directly incurred by the prime/JV under task orders issued under the contract. The prime/JV travel costs will be multiplied by the percentage shown on the schedule for direct costs and profit applied to travel. The multiplier percentage proposed shall include all handling fees, indirect costs, i.e., overhead and general and administrative costs, and profit applicable to travel. No additional indirect costs or profit will be applied to the prime contractor’s travel except as included in the multiplier percentage listed in the Attachment J-3 Schedule of Services.

e. Supplies/equipment/other direct costs will be negotiated under individual task orders. The estimated supplies/equipment/other direct costs listed in Attachment J-3- Schedule of Services are for proposed costs to be directly incurred by the prime/JV under task orders issued under the contract. These costs include, but are not limited, to equipment, supplies, material, reproduction, and shipping. The prime/JV/subcontractor “other direct costs” will be multiplied by the percentage shown on the schedule for indirect costs and profit applied to “other direct costs.” The multiplier percentage proposed shall include all handling fees, indirect costs, i.e., overhead and general and administrative costs, and profit applicable to “other direct costs.” No additional indirect costs or profit will be applied to the prime contractor’s “other direct costs” except as included in the multiplier percentage listed in the schedule.

f. Subcontractor costs will be negotiated under individual task orders. The estimated subcontractor costs listed in Attachment J-3 are for proposed costs to be directly incurred by the prime/JV under task orders issued under the contract. The prime/joint venture subcontractor costs will be multiplied by the percentage shown on the schedule for indirect costs and profit applied to subcontractor costs. The multiplier percentage includes all handling fees, indirect costs, i.e., overhead and general and administrative costs, and profit applicable to subcontractor costs. No additional indirect costs or profit will be applied to the prime contractor’s subcontractor costs, except as included in the multiplier percentage listed in the schedule.

Tab H. Compensation Plan for Professional Employees. Provide a total compensation plan in accordance with FAR 52.222-46, Evaluation of Compensation for Professional Employees (FEB 1993), setting forth salaries and fringe benefits proposed for the professional employees who will work under the contract. Advise if you have different compensation plans for various skill levels. Although this information is required to be submitted with your firm’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information will be utilized as additional basis of your responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award.

Tab I. If applicable and proposing as other than a small business, Offeror shall provide Attachment J-8 Small Business Subcontracting Plan. If you are other than a small business, submit a “Draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plan for this contract. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition, the extent of work you will perform as the prime contractor.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (Reference FAR 52.219-9 Alt II and DFARS 252.219-7003)

NAVFAC's command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition. Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall establish small business subcontracting plan goals that are consistent with their small business participation and commitment strategies submitted for evaluation under the small business utilization source selection factor in this solicitation and shall document in their subcontracting plans the basis for all proposed goals.

SB 65%

SDB 15%

HUBZone SB 6%

WOSB 15%

SDVOSB 5%

VOSB 5%

Small businesses identified by name in offerors’ proposals/participation and commitment strategies and considered in the evaluation shall be listed in small business subcontracting plans submitted pursuant to FAR 52.219-9 in order to facilitate compliance with DFARS 252.219-7003(e).

Tab J. Please submit the below items (a through c) with your price proposal in a SEALED envelope labeled “TAB J.” Although this information is required to be submitted with your firm’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. In order to be eligible for award, your firm must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards.

a. Provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or at least by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each Joint Venture company and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

b. One (1) signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If your firm has a line of credit, provide information on how many figures can your firm borrow against the line of credit (i.e.

“medium 6 figures”,-exact line of credit is not required).

c. Three (3) signed credit references. Credit references must verify that your firm pays its creditors timely and in accordance with the terms negotiated with the creditor.

d. The Government may request additional information if needed to determine responsibility.

Tab K. Please submit the below items (a through b) with your price proposal in a SEPARATE SEALED envelope, labeled “TAB K,” and packaged as FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY/PRIVACY ACT DATA. This data is NOT to be included on the electronic copies you will provide via a non-rewritable CD. Although this information is required to be submitted with your firm’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information allows the verification of your firm’s possession of the required security clearances. In order to be eligible for award, your firm must possess a TOP SECRET Facility Clearance.

a. CAGE Code information and Facility Address so that the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Office can confirm that the Offeror meets the required Facility Clearance and Safeguarding capability for this solicitation.

b. A list of the cleared personnel (Full Name and SSN) who are proposed to work on this effort so that the clearances of the Offeror personnel can be verified by the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Office.

(b) Volume 2: Non-price Factors:

Non-Price Submittal Requirements: Submit one (1) “Original” and three (3) copies of the non-price proposal in three-ring binders, clearly marked as the non-price proposal (Volume 2) and tabbed appropriately. Non-price proposals shall be submitted on 8 ½ x 11 paper with a font no smaller than 10 point. In addition to providing hard copies of the non-price proposal, offerors shall provide one (1) electronic copy of the non-price proposal on a non-rewriteable CD. Failure to provide an electronic copy may be cause to render the offeror non-responsive. The non-price proposal shall not exceed 50 single-sided or 25 double-sided pages. Pages exceeding the 50 single-sided / 25 double-sided page limitations shall not be evaluated. Note: The page limit count does not include the following:

Blank tab dividers and cover pages, commitment letters from team members or Joint Venture agreements, Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs), CPARS, Attachment J-6 – Small Business Participation Record, and Attachment J-7 – Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy. Offerors may submit the organizational chart using 11 x 17 size paper and it will count as one (1) page towards the overall page limit listed above. Only the organization chart may be presented on 11 x 17 size paper. Each copy of the non-price proposal shall include a separate tab for each item specified below:

Tab A-Offerors shall include a cover page that provides: name and address of the prime contractor, DUNS number, Cage Code and the name, title, email, phone and fax number of two (2) authorized representatives.

Tab B- Any offeror proposing as a partnership, joint venture, other teaming arrangement, or resource of a parent company/subsidiary/affiliate shall submit the following information:

a. Provide a listing of the team members’ corporate name (no abbreviations), address, point of contact, phone number, DUNS Number, and CAGE Code.

b. Submit a signed letter of commitment from the team members. The commitment letter shall clearly identify the expected relationship, role and responsibility of the team member.

c. If proposing as a Joint Venture, provide the DUNS Number; CAGE Code and a signed copy of the Joint Venture Agreement.

Tab C- Non-Price Factors:

(1) Factor 1 — Corporate Experience:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall provide a minimum of one (1) and a maximum of five (5) examples of recent and relevant contracts to be documented through use of Corporate Experience Project Data Form (Attachment J-5). The Offeror shall clearly demonstrate recent and relevant experience on contracts similar in size, scope, and complexity to the requirements described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant contract is defined as a contract that has been completed within the last five (5) years preceding the release date of the solicitation, having a value of $1,000,000 or more, and containing one or more of the following six (6) services:

1. Performance of All Hazard Threat Assessments

2. Performance of Utility Security Assessments

3. Performance of Facility-Related Control System assessments to include working knowledge of the DoN accreditation process

4. Performance of Mission Assurance Assessments

5. Performance of work to support Critical Infrastructure Protection

6. Providing assistance in incorporating data into Department of Defense official systems.

Offerors that demonstrate experience performing Utility Security Assessments on utility systems as defined by 10 U.S.C. §2688 to include: electric power, treatment or supply of water; collection or treatment of wastewater;

generation or supply of steam, hot water, and chilled water; supply of natural gas; and transmission of telecommunications, may be viewed more favorably than Offerors without such experience. This also includes equipment, fixtures, structures, and other improvements utilized in connection with a system and real property, easements, and rights of way associated with utility system.

Offerors that demonstrate experience with the performance of Mission Assurance Assessments for the Department of the Navy may be viewed more favorable than Offerors without such experience. the USMC MAA Team Guide (ver. 5.0), USMC ESA Program Guide (24NOV14), USMC OUTA Program Guide (24NOV14), USMC/Navy AHTA Methodology, or Navy MA Team Guide (ver. 2.0) may be viewed more favorably than Offerors without such experience.

Offerors that demonstrate experience working with the Critical Asset Management System (CAMS), the Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS), the Mission Assurance Standalone Tool (MAAST), or MDI application may be viewed more favorably than Offerors without such experience.

Relevant experience performed by the Offeror as a prime contractor may be considered more favorably than experience performed by the Offeror as a subcontractor, or by a proposed subcontractor.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), and the JV has shared relevant experience, at least one of the relevant projects should be submitted for the JV entity. If the JV does not have shared relevant experience, relevant experience shall be submitted for each JV partner. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) relevant experience examples.

If the Offeror uses a proposed subcontractor(s) to demonstrate corporate experience, the Offeror must provide a signed letter of commitment; the subcontractor’s DUNS number; submit at least one (1) contract for its proposed subcontractor(s); and, demonstrate that the proposed subcontractor will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

If the Offeror uses affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD ember companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF33) to demonstrate corporate experience, the Offeror shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will have meaningful involvement in the performance on this contract.

For each contract the offeror shall complete the Corporate Experience Project Data Form included as Attachment J-

5. All information shall be provided as requested on the form.

IMPORTANT: It is the Offeror’s responsibility to clearly explain and demonstrate to the Government how its work experience, and the experience of each teaming partner (if applicable) in each submitted contract is relevant to the contract requirements in this solicitation. If the Offeror does not clearly explain how its experience(s) are relevant to the contract requirements in this specification, the Government may determine that the submitted contract experience is not relevant.

(2) Factor 2—Technical Approach/ Management Approach

Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall clearly demonstrate its understanding of current Navy and Marine Corps Mission Assurance Program Requirements and the ability to utilize current standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The Offeror shall address each of the following components separately:

a. Technical Approach: PWS Solution:

1. The Offeror shall provide a concise narrative of how it will perform the following tasks outlined in the

Requirements Section of the PWS. This is to include the development of deliverables as well as the required site visits, data collection, and briefing of materials to high-level military and civilian members.

1. All Hazard Threat Analysis

2. Mission Analysis

3. Mission Assurance Assessments

4. Utility Security Assessments and supporting FRCS

5. Critical Asset Management (CAMS) Training

6. Critical Infrastructure Protection Review and Monthly Updates

2. The Offeror shall provide information on their ability to use Navy and Marine Corps information repositories including but not limited to: Navy Critical Asset Management (NAVCAMS), USMC Critical Asset Management (MCCAMS), Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS), and Mission Assurance Assessment Standalone Tool (MAAST).

b. Management Approach: Staffing and Resourcing: The Offeror shall provide a current organizational chart that demonstrates a discernable and logical flow of authority, responsibility, management, and communication between office headquarters staff, field office staff, subcontractors, and scientific or technical services. If applicable, address subcontractor interfaces and show how assigned responsibilities and experience of personnel will enhance project and contract execution. Describe the extent to which the proposed program management organization will interact with the home officer organization and other supporting offices under contract in order to meet the requirements detailed in this solicitation.

1. Management Capabilities and Plan: The Offeror shall provide a narrative that describes/demonstrates its Management Capabilities and Management Plan. The Offeror shall provide a Management Plan that describes the Offeror’s ability to provide personnel for on-site assessments and its ability to provide support at multiple sites simultaneously. The narrative shall address how the Offeror will provide the staffing and necessary materials need in geographical locations covered by this solicitations. Offerors shall address their ability to maintain program continuity and uninterrupted high-quality work as well as their ability to support the clearance requirements for the sensitive nature of this work.

2. Staffing Plan: The Offeror shall provide a narrative that describes/demonstrates its Staffing Plan, including availability of the required competent personnel identified in Section C, 2.5 Specific Personnel Requirements, and plan for retaining and replacing to assure continued availability of qualified personnel—including personnel having Top Secret Security Clearance. This narrative must also address the Offeror’s plan to maintain adequate staff with the appropriate security clearances.

3. Quality Control System (QC) Program - Provide a summary of the proposed QC program, including a quality management chart with lines of authority, inspection/surveillance methodology, corrective procedures and follow-up that will be used to ensure success of the contract. Describe the quality management processes (practices, resources, and activities), minimum controls and methodology and how quality management processes will address and ensure the following:

a. Accurate documentation of work processes, procedures, and output measures;

b. Accurate documentation of quality inspections and surveillance conducted throughout the execution of work;

c. Assessment-driven corrective actions and process adjustments as appropriate in a timely manner.

(3) Factor 3 — Safety:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one technical approach to safety narrative is required. EMR, DART, and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Submit your company’s EMR for the three previous complete calendar years [2015, 2016, and 2017]. This rate compares the company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If you have no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ [2015, 2016, and 2017] worth of data. If you cannot submit an OSHA DART Rate, for any year, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ [2015, 2016, and 2017] worth of data. If you cannot submit an OSHA TRC Rate, for any year, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC Rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(4) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee that safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work.

The Offeror will also describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the Offeror will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(4) Factor 4 – Small Business Utilization:

This factor assesses both historical achievements in utilizing small business concerns as subcontractors and proposed small business participation and commitment strategies (see Basis of Evaluation).

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

a. Achievements. All offerors shall provide a narrative (limited to two pages) to describe their achievements in supporting the Government’s policy to provide maximum practicable opportunities for small business (SB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), historically underutilized business zone (HUBZone) small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), and women-owned small business (WOSB) concerns to participate as subcontractors consistent with efficient contract performance. In support of narrative submissions:

(1) All offerors (SBs and other than SBs) shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under the Corporate Experience Factor whether performed as a prime or subcontractor. This information is required regardless of whether a subcontracting plan was incorporated into the contract award. This information shall be provided in the format provided in Attachment J-6, Small Business Participation Record. If projects submitted under Corporate Experience were task orders, the small business participation achievements should be specific to the task order, not the contract. If a project cited under the Corporate Experience Factor was not performed by the Offeror as a prime or subcontractor (i.e. the Offeror is utilizing experience of a subcontractor to fulfill Corporate Experience), Attachment J-6 is not required. The proposal shall include an explanation for any project that does not require Attachment J-6. Offerors shall provide explanations for contracts or task orders that were performed exclusively overseas or did not include opportunities for subcontracting (100% self-performed).

(2) Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall also provide copies of the most current individual subcontracting reports (ISRs) associated with each project cited under the Corporate Experience Factor if a small business subcontracting plan was required by the contract. If such projects were completed under specific task orders, provide ISRs for the overall contract. For cited projects with state and local government agencies, provide similar subcontracting performance reports if required by the contracts. When not specifically addressed in the ISR or similar report, offerors shall provide explanations for all instances of failures to meet dollar or percentage goals in individual subcontracting plans. Acknowledging a missed goal is not the same as providing an explanation for why a goal was missed.

The Government reserves the right to consider achievements information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources.

Offerors utilizing achievements information of key subcontractors shall clearly demonstrate how these companies will have meaningful involvement in the management of the subcontracting program for this acquisition. If not, such achievement information will not be considered under this factor. If the offeror is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one company, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities.

Failures to provide ISRs or any other requested information must be fully explained and may negatively impact your evaluation.

b. Small Business Participation and Commitment. All offerors shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy including all data elements shown in Attachment E, Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.

(1) Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the offeror will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

(2) Include supplemental narratives (limited to five pages) to address other elements of the offeror’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.

(3) The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition (i.e.

work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 20% of the contract value. Offerors are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment J-7 consistent with efficient contract performance. Offerors shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established. The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.

Note: The small business participation and commitment strategies evaluated under this factor do not replace small business subcontracting plans. Offerors representing as other than small businesses must submit acceptable small business subcontracting plans using Attachment J-8 as a template in order to be eligible for award (FAR 19.702(a)(1)). See the SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN section of INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS for subcontracting plan submission requirements.

Forms to be used for offeror submission of Small Business Utilization Factor information are:

Attachment J-6 – Small Business Participation Record Attachment J-7 – Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy

(5) Factor 5, Past Performance:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit a completed CPARS evaluation for each submittal under Factor 1, Corporate Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each contract the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR

SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment J-4), which will provide contract…