Atch_(1)_S2025_RRL_FY20CC_SOW.docx
DOCX document 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- FY20 RRL CC Final RFP Posting
- Solicitation number
- N6134019R0022
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOW 190004
March 2019
29 March 2019
STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)
FOR
SAILOR 2025 (S2025) FY20 READY RELEVANT LEARNING (RRL)
CONTENT CONVERSION (CC)
Prepared For:
Commander, United States Fleet Forces Command (CFFC) Norfolk, VA 23551-2487
Prepared By:
Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) 12211 Science Drive Orlando, FL 32826
DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.
Change Log
| Date |
| Section Number |
| Section Title |
| Change |
Table of Contents
| 1. | SCOPE | 1 |
| 1.1 | Background | 4 |
| 1.2 | Government Furnished Information (GFI) | 4 |
| 1.3 | Government Furnished Software, Tools, Equipment | 5 |
| 1.4 | Government Furnished Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) | 5 |
| 2. | APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS | 5 |
| 2.1 | Government Documents | 5 |
| 2.2 | Department of Defense (DOD) Documents | 7 |
| 2.3 | Department of Navy (DON) Documents | 8 |
| 2.4 | S2025 Documents | 8 |
| 2.5 | Authoring Instruction Materials (AIM) Documents | 9 |
| 2.6 | Industry Standards | 9 |
| 2.7 | Other Documents | 10 |
| 3. | REQUIREMENTS | 11 |
| 3.1 | General Requirements | 11 |
| 3.1.1 | Program Planning | 11 |
| 3.1.1.1 | Life Cycle Model Management | 11 |
| 3.1.1.2 | Infrastructure Management | 11 |
| 3.1.1.3 | Program Assessment and Control | 12 |
| 3.1.1.4 | Program Decision Management | 12 |
| 3.1.2 | Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) | 12 |
| 3.1.3 | Online Management System (OMS) | 12 |
| 3.1.4 | Data Library | 12 |
| 3.1.5 | Configuration Management (CM) | 13 |
| 3.1.6 | File Sharing | 13 |
| 3.1.7 | Integrated Product Team (IPT) | 13 |
| 3.1.8 | Contractor SMEs | 13 |
| 3.1.9 | Data and Software Rights | 14 |
| 3.1.10 | Contractor Acquired Property | 14 |
| 3.1.11 | Copyrights | 15 |
| 3.1.12 | Risk Management | 15 |
| 3.1.13 | Quality Assurance and Management Plan (QAMP) | 15 |
| 3.1.14 | Communications Plan | 15 |
| 3.2 | Management Requirements | 15 |
| 3.2.1 | Lead Integrator | 15 |
| 3.2.2 | Integrated Management Plan (IMP) | 16 |
| 3.2.2.1 | Work Planning and Scheduling | 16 |
| 3.2.2.2 | Development of the Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) | 16 |
| 3.2.2.3 | Subcontractor Management and Reporting | 17 |
| 3.2.2.4 | Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) | 17 |
| 3.2.3 | Program Progress, Tracking, and Reporting | 17 |
| 3.2.4 | Conferences, Meetings, and Reviews | 18 |
| 3.2.4.1 | Post Award Conference (PAC) | 18 |
| 3.2.4.1.1 | PAC Entry Criteria | 19 |
| 3.2.4.1.2 | PAC Exit Criteria | 19 |
| 3.2.4.2 | Design Engineering Technical Interchange Meeting (ETIM) | 20 |
| 3.2.4.2.1 | Design ETIM Entry Criteria | 20 |
| 3.2.4.2.2 | Design ETIM Exit Criteria | 20 |
| 3.2.4.3 | Development ETIM | 20 |
| 3.2.4.3.1 | Development ETIM Entry Criteria | 21 |
| 3.2.4.3.2 | Development ETIM Exit Criteria | 21 |
| 3.2.4.4 | Test ETIMs | 21 |
| 3.2.4.5 | In-Process Review (IPR) | 21 |
| IPR Entry Criteria | 22 | |
| IPR Exit Criteria | 22 | |
| 3.2.4.6 | Data-Gathering Trips | 22 |
| 3.2.4.7 | Working Group (WG) or Content Design Meetings (CDMs) | 22 |
| 3.2.4.8 | Additional Meetings | 23 |
| 3.2.5 | Security | 23 |
| 3.2.5.1 | Classified Processing and Access to Classified Systems | 23 |
| 3.2.5.2 | Operations Security (OPSEC) | 23 |
| 3.2.5.3 | Unclassified Contractor-Owned Network Security - Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information | 24 |
| 3.2.5.4 | Cyber Incident and Compromise Reporting | 25 |
| 3.2.5.5 | Access to DOD Installations, Government Information, and Information Technology (IT) Systems - Personnel Security Background Checks | 25 |
| 3.2.5.6 | Personnel Security – Background Checks | 26 |
| 3.2.5.7 | International Traffic and Arms Regulation | 26 |
| 3.2.5.8 | Personnel Security – Reporting of Adverse or Derogatory Information related to Contractors | 26 |
| 3.2.5.9 | Government-Issued Personal Identification Credentials | 26 |
| 3.2.5.10 | Contractor “Out-processing” Policy | 27 |
| 3.2.5.11 | Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) For National Security Systems | 27 |
| 3.2.5.12 | Protection of Critical Program Information (CPI) | 27 |
| 3.2.5.13 | Transmission of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) via e-mail | 27 |
| 3.2.5.14 | Transmission of CUI via Army Research Laboratory Safe Access File Exchange (ARL SAFE) | 27 |
| 3.2.6 | Cybersecurity | 28 |
| 3.2.6.1 | Cybersecurity for training content products | 28 |
| 3.2.6.2 | Cybersecurity for other products | 28 |
| 3.2.6.3 | Cybersecurity Compliance | 28 |
| 3.2.6.3.1 | Cybersecurity Control Considerations | 28 |
| 3.2.6.3.2 | Cybersecurity Certification and Accreditation Support | 28 |
| 3.2.6.3.3 | Cybersecurity and Personnel Security Requirements for Accessing Government IT Systems - Credentialing Standards | 29 |
| 3.2.6.4 | Software Integrity Testing and Certification | 29 |
| 3.2.6.5 | Information Assurance Vulnerability Management Program (IAVMP) | 29 |
| 3.2.6.6 | Critical Program Information (CPI) | 29 |
| 3.2.6.7 | Cybersecurity Training & Certification | 29 |
| 3.3 | Instructional Design Requirements | 30 |
| 3.3.1 | Design Phase | 30 |
| 3.3.1.1 | Instructional Media Design Package (IMDP) Development (Style Guide) | 30 |
| 3.3.1.1.1 | Conventions | 31 |
| 3.3.1.1.2 | Interface and Design Controls | 31 |
| 3.3.1.2 | Model Product Creation | 31 |
| 3.3.1.2.1 | Performance Support (PS) Model Product Creation | 32 |
| 3.3.1.2.2 | Structured On the Job Training (SOJT) Model Product Creation | 32 |
| 3.3.1.2.3 | Interactive Courseware (ICW) Model Product Creation | 32 |
| 3.3.1.2.4 | Instructor Facilitated Interactive Training (IFIT) Model Product Creation | 33 |
| 3.3.1.3 | Lesson Design Strategy (LDS) Development for Self-Directed Interactive Training (SDIT) and IFIT Courses | 33 |
| 3.3.1.3.1 | Flow Diagrams Development | 34 |
| 3.3.1.3.2 | Courseware Overview | 34 |
| 3.3.1.3.3 | Integrated Course Schedule | 35 |
| 3.3.1.3.4 | Course Structure Format | 35 |
| 3.3.1.3.5 | Assessments (Test) Design Strategy | 35 |
| 3.3.1.3.6 | Performance Tracking Control Features | 35 |
| 3.3.2 | Development Phase | 35 |
| 3.3.2.1 | Instructional Media Usage | 36 |
| 3.3.2.2 | Photos and Graphics | 36 |
| 3.3.2.2.1 | Photo / Graphic Traceability Cross Reference Matrix | 36 |
| 3.3.2.2.2 | Photo and Graphic Capture | 38 |
| 3.3.2.3 | Development Phase: SDIT and IFIT | 38 |
| 3.3.2.3.1 | Script Storyboards (SSBs) Development | 38 |
| 3.3.2.3.2 | On-Screen Lessons (OSLs) Development | 39 |
| 3.3.2.3.3 | Tests and Assessments Creation | 39 |
| 3.3.2.3.3.1 | Test Banks | 39 |
| 3.3.2.3.3.2 | Test Administration Materials | 39 |
| 3.3.2.3.3.3 | Assessment Items | 39 |
| 3.3.2.3.3.4 | Checks on Learning (COL) | 40 |
| 3.3.2.3.3.5 | Posttests | 40 |
| 3.3.2.3.3.6 | Assessment Item Cross-Reference Chart | 40 |
| 3.3.2.3.3.7 | Answer Keys | 40 |
| 3.3.2.3.4 | Instructor Facilitated Interactive Training Curriculum Package Creation | 40 |
| 3.3.2.3.4.1 | Instructor Guides (IGs) and Lesson Plans (LPs) Creation | 40 |
| 3.3.2.3.4.2 | Instructor Guidance | 41 |
| 3.3.2.3.4.3 | Instructor Training Handouts and Presentation Materials Creation | 41 |
| 3.3.2.3.4.4 | Instructional Visual Aids | 41 |
| 3.3.2.3.4.5 | Trainee Guides (TGs) or Student Guides (SGs) Creation | 41 |
| 3.3.2.3.4.6 | Student Guidance | 41 |
| 3.3.2.4 | Development Phase: PS and SOJT | 42 |
| 3.3.2.4.1 | Performance Support (PS) Development | 42 |
| 3.3.2.4.2 | SOJT Development | 42 |
| 3.3.3 | Implementation Phase | 43 |
| 3.3.3.1 | Training Course Control Data (TCCD) | 43 |
| 3.3.3.1.1 | Training Planning Data | 43 |
| 3.3.3.1.2 | Training Project Plan (TPP) | 43 |
| 3.3.3.1.3 | Training Course Data | 43 |
| 3.3.3.2 | Training Systems Support Procedures | 44 |
| 3.3.3.2.1 | Training Syllabus | 44 |
| 3.3.3.2.2 | Skill Progression | 44 |
| 3.3.3.2.3 | Training Resource Requirements | 44 |
| 3.3.3.2.4 | Training Exercises | 44 |
| 3.3.3.2.5 | Training Exercise Formulation | 44 |
| 3.3.3.3 | Train the Trainer (T3) | 45 |
| 3.3.3.3.1 | T3 Entry Criteria | 45 |
| 3.3.3.3.2 | T3 Exit Criteria | 45 |
| 3.3.3.4 | Pilot | 45 |
| 3.3.3.4.1 | Pilot Entry Criteria | 46 |
| 3.3.3.4.2 | Pilot Exit Criteria | 46 |
| 3.3.4 | Evaluation Requirements Phase | 46 |
| 3.3.5 | Delivery Requirements Phase | 46 |
| 3.3.5.1 | Delivery of Training Solution Products | 46 |
| 3.3.5.2 | Developmental Source Material | 46 |
| 3.3.5.3 | Instructional Media Source (Data) Files | 47 |
| 3.3.5.4 | Transportability and Maintainability of Data | 47 |
| 3.3.5.4.1 | Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) Data Requirements | 47 |
| 3.3.6 | CD-ROM or DVD Inspection or Acceptance | 47 |
| 3.3.6.1 | Learning Management System (LMS) Integration | 47 |
| 3.3.6.2 | Content and Functional Integrity | 47 |
| 3.4 | Systems Engineering Requirements | 48 |
| 3.4.1 | Risk Management | 48 |
| 3.4.2 | Media Requirements Development & Definition | 48 |
| 3.4.2.1 | Requirements Development and Management | 48 |
| 3.4.2.2 | Media Trade Studies | 48 |
| 3.4.2.3 | Media Design and Development | 48 |
| 3.4.3 | Media Requirements Verification & Validation | 49 |
| 3.4.4 | Technical Reviews and Meetings | 49 |
| 3.4.4.1 | Working Group Meetings | 49 |
| The Contractor shall participate as an active member in the following identified working groups and conduct formal meetings per the requirements of their working group charters: | 49 | |
| 3.4.4.1.1 | Technical Interchange Meetings (TIM) | 49 |
| 3.4.4.2 | Government Facilities Access | 50 |
| 3.4.5 | Content Conversion (CC) Requirements | 50 |
| 3.4.5.1 | Requirements Analysis Phase | 50 |
| 3.4.5.2 | Design Phase | 50 |
| 3.4.5.2.1 | Training Environments | 51 |
| 3.4.5.2.1.1 | Display Resolutions and Aspect Ratios | 51 |
| 3.4.5.2.2 | Design Implementations to Reduce TRANET VDI Bandwidth Usage | 51 |
| 3.4.5.2.3 | Experience Application Program Interface (xAPI) Requirements | 52 |
| 3.4.5.3 | Mobile Requirements | 53 |
| 3.4.5.4 | Development Phase | 53 |
| 3.5 | Test and Evaluation (T&E) | 53 |
| 3.5.1 | Testing Requirements | 53 |
| 3.5.2 | Responsibility for Tests | 54 |
| 3.5.3 | Test Authority | 54 |
| 3.5.4 | Test Resources and Facilities | 54 |
| 3.5.5 | Test Methods | 54 |
| 3.5.6 | Verification Criteria | 55 |
| 3.5.7 | Configuration | 55 |
| 3.5.8 | Verification Log | 55 |
| 3.5.9 | Changes During Testing | 55 |
| 3.5.9.1 | Software Changes During Government Testing | 55 |
| 3.5.10 | Changes After Testing | 55 |
| 3.5.11 | T&E Non-Conformance Reporting System | 56 |
| 3.5.11.1 | Deficiency Review Board (DRB) | 56 |
| 3.5.11.2 | Deficiency and Discrepancy Adjudication | 56 |
| 3.5.12 | T&E Program Components for NeL Training Environment | 57 |
| 3.5.12.1 | NeL Test Track Contractor Testing (DT-D1) | 57 |
| 3.5.12.1.1 | NeL Content Announcement Form Completion | 57 |
| 3.5.12.1.2 | NeL Content Acknowledgement Form Completion | 57 |
| 3.5.12.2 | Test ETIM #1 | 57 |
| 3.5.12.3 | NeL Test Track Government Testing (DT-D2) | 58 |
| 3.5.12.3.1 | DT-D2 Changes | 58 |
| 3.5.12.4 | Test ETIM #2 | 58 |
| 3.5.12.5 | Government Content Acceptance Testing (GCAT) | 58 |
| 3.5.12.5.1 | GCAT NeL Review Changes | 59 |
| 3.5.12.5.2 | ATLAS GCAT Changes | 59 |
| 3.5.12.6 | Content Installation & Validation | 59 |
| 3.5.12.7 | Regression Testing | 59 |
| 3.5.13 | T&E Program Components for Non-NeL Environments | 59 |
| 3.5.13.1 | Non-NeL Environments Contractor Internal Testing (DT-D1) | 60 |
| 3.5.13.2 | Test ETIM | 60 |
| 3.5.13.3 | Non-NeL Environments Integrated Testing (IT-D1) | 61 |
| 3.5.13.3.1 | IT-D1 Entry Criteria | 61 |
| 3.5.13.4 | Content Installation & Validation | 62 |
| 3.5.13.5 | Regression Testing | 62 |
| 3.6 | Delivery Requirements | 63 |
| 3.6.1 | Software Product | 63 |
| 3.6.1.1 | Installation and Configuration Procedures | 63 |
| 3.6.1.2 | Media and Storage Devices | 64 |
| 3.6.1.3 | Cold Start and Installation Procedure Media | 64 |
| 3.6.1.4 | Automated Processes | 64 |
List of Tables
| Table 1: Government Documents | 6 |
| Table 2: Department of Defense (DOD) Documents | 7 |
| Table 3: Department of Navy (DON) Documents | 8 |
| Table 4: S2025 Documents | 8 |
| Table 5: Authoring Instruction Materials (AIM) Documents | 9 |
| Table 6: Industry Standards | 10 |
| Table 7: Other Documents | 11 |
| Table 8. Rating and Classification Requirements | 14 |
| Table 9: Photo/Graphic Traceability Cross Reference Matrix | 38 |
List of Figures
| Figure 1: Content Conversion Process | 1 |
| Figure 2: RRL Training Strategies and Training Support Products | 2 |
| Figure 3: Training Environment and Devices | 3 |
MARCH 2019
March 2019
STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)
FOR
SAILOR 2025 (S2025) FY20 READY RELEVANT LEARNING (RRL)
CONTENT CONVERSION (CC)
SCOPE
This Statement of Work (SOW) documents the Contractor tasks for the design, development, testing, and delivery of products in support of the Sailor 2025 (S2025) Fiscal Year 2020 (FY20) Ready Relevant Learning (RRL) Content Conversion (CC) effort. Figure 1 identifies the process for converting content into various product types outlined within the SOW.
Figure 1: Content Conversion Process
The project is to employ innovative instructional design and assessment strategies in conjunction with new and modernized technology to support the ratings accession training while simultaneously supporting the broader S2025 overarching goal of improving Sailors’ transfer of training to the operational work environment. Figure 2 identifies training strategies and training and performance support products that will be used to support the RRL effort.
Figure 2: RRL Training Strategies and Training Support Products
The effort will facilitate the creation and conversion of training products to be hosted within specific training environments. Figure 3 identifies the training environments and devices capable of presenting training content within the current Naval training enterprise.
Figure 3: Training Environment and Devices For this effort, the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD), as the RRL Training Systems Program Manager, is responsible for A School and accession C School CC, in support of RRL, for the following ratings (Highest classification is Unclassified FOUO unless otherwise noted):
· Aviation Electrician’s Mate (AE)
· Basic Engineering Common Core (BECC)
· Boatswain’s Mate (BM)
· Damage Controlman (DC)
· Engineman (EN)
· Engineering Professional Apprenticeship Career Track (EPACT)
· Electrician’s Mate (EM)
· Gas Turbine System Technician (Electrical); (GSE)
· Gas Turbine System Technician (Mechanical); (GSM)
· Hull Maintenance Technician (HT)
· Quartermaster (QM)
· Machinist’s Mate (MM(SUR))
· Machinery Repairmen (MR)
· Aviation Structural Mechanic-Safety Equipment (AME)
· Master at Arms (MA)
· Mineman (MN)
· Religious Program Specialist (RP)
· Seaman Professional Apprenticeship Career Track (SPACT)
This DO also includes:
· Train-the-Trainer (T3)
· Pilot
The appendices are as follows:
· Appendix A provides a list of rating requirements.
· Appendix B provides a list of acronyms and definitions used within this SOW.
· Appendix C provides a list of terms and definitions used within this SOW.
· Appendix D provides a list of the Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) linked with the Instructional Design Requirements identified within this SOW.
· Appendix E provides a Risk Assessment Example Format.
· Appendix F provides a list of conference meetings duration and locations.
· Appendix G provides the definitions of the performance and training strategies.
· Appendix H provides explanations for operationally engaging instructional strategies to be used in development.
· Appendix I provides a list of Bloom’s taxonomy action verbs.
· Appendix J provides a list of media capabilities and training delivery environments for media solutions at different levels of interactivity.
· Appendix K provides a list of media definitions.
· Appendix L provides a mobile learning roadmap.
· Appendix M lists the Experience Application Program Interface (xAPI) requirements.
· Appendix N provides guidance on Naval Educational Training Center (NETC) RRL Single User Gaming and Simulation.
· Appendix O provides guidance on NETC RRL Video Streaming.
· Appendix P provides the S2025 RRL Media Map.
Background The work outlined in this SOW contributes to the broader S2025 effort that has the overarching goal of improving Sailors’ transfer of training to the operational work environment. The following represents examples of the broader S2025 goals:
· Converting and/or improving designated courses so they are compatible with the waterfront or shipboard environment and contribute to the acquisition of actionable knowledge (i.e., practical knowledge that will be activated by and recognized as relevant to operational work contexts and events).
· Modernizing media that is engaging.
· Scheduling the converted and/or improved content closer in time to when the training will be put into practice in the work environment.
Government Furnished Information (GFI) The Government will provide the following references:
a. Functional Requirements Document (FRD) Appendix C data for AE, QM, DC, EM, EN, GSE, GSM, HT, MM, MR, BECC, EPACT, BM
b. Preliminary Analysis Results Data for ratings AME, MA, RP, SPACT, MN
c. FRD Reports (one document for each rating, etc.)
d. Knowledge Capture (KC) photos for each rating
e. KC data for each rating
f. Training Guides, Lesson Plans, TCCD, COI for each rating
g. Existing courseware (ICW, IMI, etc.) examples for ratings
h. NETC Style Guide
Government Furnished Software, Tools, Equipment The Government will not furnish software (MS Office, Adobe Acrobat, etc.) or tools. The Government will not furnish equipment, hardware, software personnel, personnel, or materials for the Contractor’s use during this effort. The Government will provide a developer’s seat, within the test bed, for the Contractor to debug training materials tested. The Contractor shall provide the necessary hardware, software, tools, personnel, materials, and facilities, not otherwise furnished by the Government, to perform the tasks specified by this SOW.
Government Furnished Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) Government SME access will be provided on a not-to-interfere basis. The Government is sensitive to overburdening SMEs. NAWCTSD will serve as the liaison between the fleet, Type Commander (TYCOM), Learning Centers (LCs) and/or Schoolhouses and the Contractor to coordinate access to SMEs in support of SOW activities and requirements. Location for SME support will be provided by the Government. The Government’s SMEs will be available face-to-face for key data collection activities (interviews, workshops, and reviews) and will be available for providing follow up information via phone, video-teleconference (VTC), or by Defense Collaboration Services (DCS), whenever practical.
APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
The following represent a list of applicable guidance documents for this effort. In the event of a conflict between the SOW and the references cited herein, the contents of this SOW take first precedence. Nothing in this SOW, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations, unless a specific exemption has been obtained. These documents will be provided to the Contractor as GFI, if they are not readily available to the Contractor via the Internet. For all documents listed below, the latest versions apply.
Government Documents
| Document Number |
| Document Title and/or Description |
| 22 CFR, Parts 120-130 |
| Foreign Relations, Chapter 1 Department of State, Subchapter M, International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) |
National Security Agency (NSA) Configuration Guide
| NAVAIRINST 4355.19E |
| System Engineering Technical Review Process |
| NIST SP 800-44 |
| Guidelines on Securing Public Web Servers |
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Final Credentialing Standards for Issuing Personal Identity Verification
| 21 CFR 1040 |
| Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 21, Part 1040, Performance Standards for Light-Emitting Products |
| 29 CFR 1910 |
| Occupational Safety and Health Standards (OSHS) |
· Copies of the CFR sections can be obtained from http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/regulations_laws/itar_offical.html.
· Copies of U.S. Code can be obtained from https://ile-help.nko.navy.mil/ile/content/policy/section508.aspx.
· Copies of DISA Configuration Guide can be obtained from http://disa.mil/.
· Copies of CFR documents can be obtained from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR
· Copies of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses can be obtained from http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm.
· Copies of NSA Configuration Guides can be obtained from http://www.nsa.gov/ia/mitigation_guidance/security_configuration_guides/index.shtml.
· Copies of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) documents can be obtained from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsSPs.html.Copies of OSHA standards can be obtained from http://www.osha.gov.
· Copies of OPM document can be obtained from http://www.opm.gov/investigate/resources/index.aspx.
Table 1: Government Documents
Department of Defense (DOD) Documents
| Document Number |
| Document Title and/or Description |
| DODI 1322.26 |
| Development, Management, and Delivery of Distributed Learning dated 16 Jun 2006 |
| DODI 5000.02 |
| Operation of the Defense Acquisition System |
| DODI 8500.01 |
| Department of Defense Instruction 8500.01 Cyber Security dated 14 Mar 2014 |
| DODI 8510.01 |
| Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT), Change 1, dated 24 May 2016 |
| DODI 5220.22-M |
| National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, dated 28 Feb 2006 |
| DOD 8570.01-M |
| Information Assurance (IA) Workforce Improvement Program, dated 19 Dec 2005 w/Change 4, 11/10/2015 |
DOD Implementation Plan for Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) dated 19 May 2000
| MIL-HDBK-881D |
| Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items |
| MIL-HDBK-29612-1A |
| Department of Defense Handbook for Guidance for Acquisition of Training Data Products and Services (Part 1 of 5) |
| MIL-HDBK-29612-2A |
| Department of Defense Handbook for Instructional Systems Development/Systems Approach to Training and Education (Part 2 of 5) |
| MIL-HDBK-29612-3A |
| Development of Interactive Multimedia Instruction (Part 3 of 5) |
| MIL-HDBK-29612-4A |
| Department of Defense Handbook Glossary for Training (Part 4 of 5) |
| MIL-HDBK-29612-5A |
| Department of Defense Handbook for ADL Products and Systems (Part 5 of 5) |
| MIL-PRF-29612B |
| Performance Specification Training Data Products |
· Copies of DOD Directives and Instructions can be obtained from the DOD Issuances Website (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/).
· DOD Implementation Plan for ADL can be obtained from http://prhome.defense.gov/Portals/52/Documents/RFM/Readiness/docs/adl_implementplan.pdf.
· Copies of the DOD Specifications and Handbooks can be obtained online from the DOD Single Stock Point or from the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST) website (http://everyspec.com/DoD/DoD-HDBK/)
Table 2: Department of Defense (DOD) Documents
Department of Navy (DON) Documents
| Document Number |
| Document Title and/or Description |
DON Department of Defense Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP) Handbook Version 1, dated 15 July 2008
| NETCINST 5510.1 |
| Content Segmentation and Classification Guide |
| NETCNOTE 1500.6 |
| Metadata Instruction |
| NMCI.10011.01.UA3.E |
| Core Build Contents Version 2.3, 02 Aug 07 |
Copies of the Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) Core Build Standard can be obtained from http://www.nmci-eds.com/downloads/core-build
| OPNAVINST 1500.76C |
| Naval Training System Requirements, Acquisition, and Management |
| SECNAVINST 5000.36A |
| Department of the Navy Information Technology Application and Data Management |
| SECNAVINST 5870.4A |
| Copyright, dated 16 Aug 2005 |
| SECNAV M-5239.1 |
| Department of the Navy Information Assurance Program, Information Assurance Manual, dated Nov 2005 |
| SECNAV M-5510.36 |
| Department of the Navy, Information Security Program, dated Jun 2006 |
· Copies of the CON DIACAP Handbook can be obtained from http://www.doncio.navy.mil/PolicyView.aspx?ID=73
· Copies of the DON documents can be obtained online from the Navy’s Integrate Learning Environment website (http://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/Policy/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2frda%2fPolicy%2fSECNAVINST%205000&FolderCTID=0x012000C996D88A9F817948AB69758011503AE2).
· Copies of the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) documents can be obtained from http://doni.daps.dla.mil/allinstructions.aspx.
Table 3: Department of Navy (DON) Documents S2025 Documents
| Document Number |
| Document Title and/or Description |
Ready Relevant Learning (RRL) Analysis Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Sailor 2025 (includes process flows)
| Appendix G |
| Sailor 2025 RRL Performance and Training Strategies |
| Appendix J |
| Sailor 2025 RRL Content Conversion Media Type Characteristics |
| Appendix K |
| Sailor 2025 RRL Content Conversion Media Definitions |
| Appendix I |
| Sailor 2025 RRL Content Conversion Use of Bloom’s Taxonomy Action Verbs |
| Appendix H |
| Sailor 2025 RRL Content Conversion Operational Engaging Instructional Strategies |
| Appendix P |
| Sailor 2025 RRL Media Map |
Table 4: S2025 Documents
Authoring Instruction Materials (AIM) Documents
| Document Number |
| Document Title and/or Description |
AIM Content Planning Module (CPM) User’s Manual
AIM Learning Object Module (LOM) User’s Manual
AIM 2 User’s Manual
Copies of the AIM documentation can be obtained from (https://studylib.net/doc/18638038/netc-e2e-sop---authoring-instructional-materials--aim/)
Table 5: Authoring Instruction Materials (AIM) Documents Industry Standards
| Document Owner |
| Document Title and/or Description |
| ADL Co-Laboratories |
| Shareable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) 2004—SCORM is a collection of standards and specifications adapted from multiple sources to provide a comprehensive suite of e-learning capabilities that enable interoperability, accessibility and reusability of Web-based learning content. SCORM documents and important information about SCORM can be obtained from: http://www.adlnet.gov/policy. |
| ADL Co-Laboratories |
| SCORM 2004 Conformance Testing Tool—This is a self-testing tool downloaded from http://www.adlnet.org to verify SCORM compliant courseware. |
| ADL Co-Laboratories |
| The Advanced Distributed Learning Registry (ADL-R): Best Practices for Updating Registered Content https://www.atsc.army.mil/tadlp/implementation/scorm/conformance/tools_scorm.asp |
| AICC |
| Aviation Industry CBT Committee (AICC) Guidelines and Recommendations (AGRs) can be obtained from http://www.aicc.org. Recommended documents to download include: |
· AGR 007—Courseware Interchange
· AGR 008—Digital Video
· AGR 009—Icon Standards: User Interface
· AGR 010—Web-based Computer Managed Instruction (CMI)
| ANSI/ASQ Q9000-2000 |
| Quality Management Systems - Fundamentals and Vocabulary |
| ANSI/ASQ Q9001-2000 |
| Quality Management Systems - Requirements |
| ANSI/ASQ Q9004-2000 |
| Quality Management Systems - Guidelines for Performance Improvements |
| ANSI Z535.1-2006 (R 2011) |
| Safety Colors |
| ANSI Z535.2-2011 |
| Environmental and Facility Safety Signs |
| ANSI Z535.3-2011 |
| Criteria for Safety Symbols |
| ANSI Z535.4-2011 |
| Product Safety Signs and Labels |
| ANSI Z535.5-2011 |
| Safety Tags and Barricade Tapes (for Temporary Hazards) |
| IEEE Std 12207-2008, 2nd Edition |
| Systems and Software Engineering – Software Life Cycle Processes |
| IMS Global Learning Consortium |
| Question & Test Interoperability (QTI) Specification |
| Joint ADL Co-Lab |
| Best Practices Guide for Design and Development of SCORM Assessments (https://adlnet.gov/research/scorm/scorm-2004-3rd-edition/scorm-2004-3rd-edition-conformance-test-suite/) |
· Copies of the industry standard documents can be found by visiting the web addresses indicated.
· Copies of the following Industry Standards can be obtained from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) (http://www.ansi.org).
· (Copies of the ANSI/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) documents are available from http://standards.ieee.org/ or IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854-1331.)
Table 6: Industry Standards Other Documents
| Document Number |
| Document Title and/or Description |
| CJCSI 6510.01F |
| IA and Computer Network Defense (CND) |
| Executive Order 13465 |
| Economy and Efficiency in Government Procurement Through Compliance with Certain Immigration and Nationality Act Provisions and Use of an Electronic Employment Eligibility Verification System, dated 6 June 2008 (Amendment to Executive Order 12989 of 13 February 1996) |
| NMCI.10011.01.UF0.E |
| Core Build Contents Version 7, 22 May 2012 |
| Unnumbered Document |
| Joint ADL Co-Lab, ADL Acquisition Guidance, dated 9 Aug 2006 |
| NAVPERS 18068F |
| Volume I Navy Enlisted Occupational Standards |
| Unnumbered Document |
| NeL Content Hosting Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) |
| Unnumbered Document |
| Navy Education and Training Center (NETC) Course Hosting Process |
| Unnumbered Document |
| Content Hosting and Report Management Service (CHaRMS) Developer User Guide V2 |
| Unnumbered Document |
| Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Specifications Brief |
| Unnumbered Document |
| VDI Risk Management Framework package |
| Unnumbered Document |
| NETC RRL IT Roadmap |
| Unnumbered Document |
| Mobile Learning & Technology Roadmap |
| Unnumbered Document |
| NETC RRL Video Streaming Guidance |
| Appendix N |
| NETC RRL Single User Gaming and Simulation Guidance |
· Copies of the CJCSI document can be obtained from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/
· Copies of the Presidential document can be obtained from the Federal Register at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/08-1348.pdf
· Copies of the NMCI document can be obtained from the Navy’s Integrate Learning Environment website (https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ile/Default.aspx).
· Copies of the SCORM documents can be obtained from http://www.adlnet.gov/capabilities/scorm/scorm-2004-4th#tab-resources.
· Copies of the Joint ADL Co-Lab document can be obtained from https://adlnet.gov/collaboration/dadlac.
Table 7: Other Documents
REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall organize, coordinate, and control program activities to ensure compliance with contract requirements and timely delivery of products specified herein.
General Requirements The Contractor shall provide the necessary hardware, software, personnel, supervision, management, materials, services, equipment, facilities, technical, logistics, and clerical support to perform the tasks specified in this SOW. The requirements defined herein form the basis for work performed for the Government during the entire DO. The Contractor shall meet the requirements of the SOW IAW the guidance documents provided and the contents of this document.
Program Planning The purpose of the program planning process is to produce and communicate effective and workable program plans. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply program planning processes IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, sections 6.1.2.3.4.5, 6.3.1, and 7.1.1.3.1.
Life Cycle Model Management The purpose of the life cycle model management process is to define, maintain, and assure availability of policies, life cycle processes, life cycle models, and procedures for use by the program. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply life cycle model management, at the program level, IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.1. References to the organizational implementation of life cycle model management within IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.1 shall only apply to the program.
Infrastructure Management The purpose of the infrastructure management process is to provide the enabling infrastructure and services to the program and program objectives throughout the life cycle. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply infrastructure management, at the program level, IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.2. References to the organizational implementation of infrastructure management within IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.2 shall apply only to the program.
Program Assessment and Control The purpose of the program assessment and control process is to determine the status of the program and direct program plan execution. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply program assessment and control IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.3.2.
Program Decision Management The purpose of the decision management process is to select the most beneficial course of program action where alternatives exist. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a program decision management process IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.3.3.
Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) The Contractor shall update, improve, manage, and deliver acceptable contractually required data. The Contractor shall implement data management procedures and policies to provide control and configuration management (CM) of contractually required data. CDRL items shall be submitted via NAWCTSD form 4330/60 (Data Item Transmittal or Acceptance or Rejection Sheet [DITS]). The Contractor shall:
a. Ensure data items to be delivered to the Government meet the quantity and quality requirements of the CDRL.
b. Establish data management procedures and policies to provide control and CM of contractually required data. To ensure sub-Contractors meet the contract data requirements set forth in the CDRL, the prime Contractor shall maintain control of work completed by sub-Contractors.
c. Establish and maintain data libraries consisting of technical manuals, parent system technical description, and software documentation for the work completed for academic training systems and other data pertaining to training systems.
Online Management System (OMS) The Contractor shall establish, implement, and make available an OMS throughout the entire DO completion date. The Contractor shall use the OMS as a tool for communication between the Contractor and the Government. The Contractor shall maintain deliverables (all versions) and corresponding Government comments on the OMS. The Contractor shall include on the OMS supporting materials, agendas, and minutes for conferences (e.g., Post Award Conference [PAC]), meetings (e.g., Integrated Product Team [IPT]), reviews (e.g., In-Progress Report [IPR]) and materials (presentations, agendas, etc.). The Contractor shall make available the OMS to be used at the PAC.
Data Library The Contractor shall establish and maintain a data library consisting of non-proprietary documentation, data, and information. The Contractor shall record and maintain a master listing of non-proprietary contract related documentation, data, and information used, maintained, updated, and improved for use in this effort. File sharing (Section 3.1.6) between the Contractor and the Government reviewers shall be provided. An intuitive file structure and naming convention, file directories, and final deliverables shall be provided on the file sharing website (i.e., OMS Section 3.1.3). The latest version of files (text, graphics, animations, videos, etc.) shall be made available by close of business on Fridays for download by the Government.
Configuration Management (CM) The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a CM process. CM shall be controlled by the Contractor to ensure only files associated with a specific date, location, and rating are in the directory for those files. The Contractor shall notify the Government, via e-mail, what directories on the OMS have new or revised files by close of business each Friday.
File Sharing The Contractor shall allow for file sharing between the Contractor and the Government reviewers. An intuitive file structure and naming convention, file directories, and final deliverables shall be provided on the OMS (see Section 3.1.3). The Contractor shall provide the Government notification, via e-mail, of the latest version of files (text, graphics, animations, videos, etc.) by close of business on Fridays for download by the Government.
Integrated Product Team (IPT) The Contractor shall define, document, implement, and maintain an IPT structure for the entire DO duration. The IPT provides a forum for discussion and resolution of concerns voiced by either Government or Contractor personnel. IPT membership may consist of multi-functional stakeholders working together with a product-oriented focus. The IPT will consist of Government and Contractor personnel and have a Government chair. The IPT establishes a Government and Contractor IPT partnership beneficial to achieving program goals and allows for participation and feedback among IPT members. Specific IPT or Working IPT (WIPT) at a minimum shall include weekly IPT or WIPT meetings (frequency of recurrence may be changed to a mutually agreed upon frequency); date and time shall be determined at the PAC and be mutually agreed upon. The Contractor shall provide a recap email to the IPT or WIPT members of each IPT or WIPT meeting. The Contractor shall include in the IPT or WIPT recap email, date of meeting, attendees, discussion topics, action items, and date of next IPT or WIPT meeting. VTC or Webinar shall be used where suitable for time efficiency and for cost saving measures. At no time shall the Contractor accept guidance from the IPTs that shall have a cost, schedule, or performance impact upon the effort. In the event an IPT identifies an out-of-scope requirement, this requirement shall be passed to the NAWCTSD PCO.
Contractor SMEs The Government strongly encourages the Contractor to employ personnel who are recent SMEs in the domain areas specific to the applicable ratings with experience in operations and/or maintenance as required by rating. The Government strongly encourages the Contractor to utilize SMEs (i.e., domain, Engineer and Instructional Design) to ensure technical accuracy, data, information, and reports developed by the Contractor meet Government specification and requirements. The Contractor shall ensure personnel assigned to the contract have the appropriate security clearance necessary to access information and facilities required. Table 8 identifies the rating, information classification, facilities access classification and when Contractor personnel would need to have the classification in order to meet content conversion courseware.
Table 8. Rating and Classification Requirements
| Rating |
| Information Classification |
| Facilities Access Classification |
| When Classification Required |
| AE |
| Unclassified FOUO |
| Unclassified |
| At Contract Award |
| BECC |
| TBD |
| TBD |
| TBD |
| QM |
| Unclassified NOFORN |
| Unclassified |
| At Contract Award |
| DC |
| Secret NOFORN |
| Unclassified |
| At Contract Award |
| EM |
| Unclassified FOUO |
| Unclassified |
| At Option Execution |
| EN |
| Unclassified FOUO |
| Unclassified |
| At Option Execution |
| GSE |
| Unclassified FOUO |
| Unclassified |
| At Option Execution |
| GSM |
| Unclassified FOUO |
| Unclassified |
| At Option Execution |
| HT |
| Unclassified FOUO |
| Unclassified |
| At Option Execution |
| MM(SUR) |
| Secret NOFORN |
| Unclassified |
| At Contract Award |
| MR |
| TBD |
| Unclassified |
| TBD |
| EPACT |
| TBD |
| Unclassified |
| TBD |
| BM |
| TBD |
| Unclassified |
| TBD |
| AME |
| TBD |
| Unclassified |
| TBD |
| MA |
| TBD |
| Unclassified |
| TBD |
| RP |
| TBD |
| Unclassified |
| TBD |
| MN |
| TBD |
| TBD |
| TBD |
| SPACT |
| TBD |
| Unclassified |
| TBD |
Data and Software Rights The Contractor shall provide the Government with Licensing/Ownership Rights. All technical data and computer software, including, but not limited to source files, two- and three-dimensional imagery, three-dimensional models and wire-frames, video, audio, animations, design documentation, other supporting documentation, and courseware developed by the Contractor with Government funding, not private funding, are property of the Government and are not to be used for resale to any Government agency, organization, or command. If the Contractor is involved in any future efforts with the Government, pursuant to the Government’s Unlimited Rights as provided for under the contract, the Government will not be charged again for the technical data and computer software developed under this contract when provided to, or expected to be used by, or for the use by any Government agency, organization or Command including, any modifications, derivative, works, and any integrated products created through a non-segregable interface to the technical data or computer software.
Contractor Acquired Property During the performance of this DO, the contractor shall transfer title of contractor acquired property procured for the performance of the efforts in this SOW in accordance with the Government Furnished Property (GFP) clauses of the delivery order.
Copyrights The Contractor shall follow Federal copyright laws and DON Instructions (Secretary of the Navy Instruction [SECNAVINST] 5870.4A, Copyright) during the effort. Media assets, content, and files that are not expressly created or written by the Contractor shall be accompanied with copyright permission requests and copyright granted documentation. The Contractor shall cultivate and maintain a copyright database (to be included in the Software Product CDRL A005) to record and track information and documentation pertaining to copyright content. Delivery shall be in accordance with CDRL A005.
Risk Management The Contractor shall implement and execute risk management processes that meet the requirements of the RRL TSPM Risk Management Plan (RMP). The Contractor shall coordinate and perform assessments of risks and formulate plans to mitigate risks. The Contractor shall participate in the FY20CC Joint Government and Contractor Risk Management Boards (RMBs). The Contractor’s responsibilities shall include identifying and assessing risks, formulating risk mitigation plans, and completing risk mitigation steps. The Contractor shall make available risk assessments and mitigation status utilizing TBD to support effective and timely mitigation of risks. The Contractor shall provide status of risks at reviews and meetings. The Contractor shall define, document, and deliver the FY20CC Risk Management Plan IAW CDRL A001. The Contractor shall manage risk using the FY20CC Risk Management Plan and Appendix E Risk Assessment Example Format.
Quality Assurance and Management Plan (QAMP) The Government shall not serve as the Contractor’s quality assurance team. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a QAMP, including flowcharts, documenting multiple reviews at the program and corporate level. The Contractor shall document processes (e.g., inter-rater agreements for data categorization) and management controls employed to ensure requirements are met. The QAMP shall, at a minimum, include specific work required and methods used to determine product quality and technical adequacy and include methods for conducting intermittent and ongoing reviews of deliverables.
Communications Plan The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a Communications Plan including internal and external communications. The Contractor shall document the Communications Plan methods relative to planning, developing, accomplishing, and reporting management, technical, and administrative tasks relevant to requirements.
Management Requirements The Contractor shall organize, coordinate, and control the project activities to ensure compliance with requirements and the timely delivery of the product and services required. The Contractor shall provide the necessary management functions to support the effort.
Lead Integrator The Contractor shall function as a Lead Integrator. A Lead Integrator is a Contractor who provides management oversight of subcontractor(s), ensuring integration, standardization, and uniformity of Government requirements within a large scale contract, focusing primarily on instructional systems design and systems engineering products providing training support products and courseware delivered via traditional methods and using software-based delivered methods. The Contractor, as a Lead Integrator, shall manage all aspects of the contract including ensuring the timely award of all subcontracts, integration of their subcontractors’ plans and status into appropriate schedules with sufficient detail, monitoring the subcontractors’ staffing plans, and execution of those staffing plans to the required levels with the necessary skills. The Contractor shall reserve the right for themselves, and for the Government accompanied by a representative of the prime contractor, to send personnel into the subcontractor’s facilities to monitor and evaluate subcontracted activities. The Contractor shall ensure that the subcontractors’ technical efforts are accomplished per contract requirements. The Contractor shall monitor subcontractor quality, configuration management, risk processes, and ensure that subcontractors use objective criteria to measure performance.
Integrated Management Plan (IMP) The Contractor shall develop a detailed IMP describing the Contractor’s organization, assignment of functions, duties, responsibilities, management procedures and policies, plans for deliverable intermittent and ongoing reviews, and reporting requirements for the effort. The Contractor shall detail management and control processes to integrate activities within SOW requirements, schedule requirements, and quality assurance activities. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver the IMP IAW CDRL B001.
Work Planning and Scheduling The Contractor shall document the work planning and scheduling of content conversion requirement processes including Government responsibilities (i.e., review of deliverables) and the interaction between Government and Contractor for the content conversion requirements for the design, development, and delivery of the training products. The Contractor shall develop, implement, control, and maintain an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) that presents the Contractor’s plans and schedules to meet the requirements of the contract. The Contractor shall develop and document a tiered scheduling system based on the Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) elements showing program milestones and prerequisite events, conferences, reviews, data submittals, deliveries, materials, travel, and other direct costs. The Contractor shall integrate contract deliverables and subcontractor schedules into the IMS. The Contractor shall construct the IMS to ensure that the program milestones are met and to ensure that deliveries meet the requirements of the contract. Contractor schedule information delivered to the Government or presented at program reviews shall originate from the IMS. The Contractor shall perform analyses of the IMS tasks, compare the IMS tasks to the schedule baseline, report potential or existing problem areas, and recommend corrective actions to eliminate or reduce schedule impact. The Contractor shall use the IMS as a day-to-day execution tool and to periodically assess progress in meeting program requirements. For any Agile methodologies utilized during the development phase, the Contractor shall detail release planning including Epics/Capabilities and Features, at a minimum, within their period of detail planning for those products. The Contractor shall prepare the IMS IAW the Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR), CDRL B002.
Development of the Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) The Contractor shall develop, document, maintain and apply a CWBS and CWBS dictionary that define the work structures required to perform the work required by the contract IAW Military Standard-881D (MIL-STD-881D). The Contractor shall use the CWBS as the framework for contract planning, budgeting, and reporting of cost, schedule, and performance. The Contractor shall extend this CWBS to control accounts, work packages, and lower levels that represent the plan to accomplish the entire contract work scope consistent with internal organizations and processes. The Contractor shall define and describe each element of the CWBS in the CWBS dictionary. During the performance of the contract, the Contractor shall not change the approved CWBS or associated definition, or the reporting elements, without written approval from the Government. The Contractor shall prepare the CWBS and Dictionary IAW CDRL B003.
Subcontractor Management and Reporting The Contractor shall ensure the timely award of all subcontracts, integration of their subcontractors’ plans and status into appropriate schedules with sufficient detail, monitoring the subcontractors’ staffing plans, and execution of those staffing plans to the required levels with the required skills. The contractor shall reserve the right for themselves, and for the Government accompanied by a representative of the prime contractor, to send personnel into the subcontractor’s facilities to monitor and evaluate subcontracted activities. The Contractor shall ensure that the subcontractors’ technical efforts are accomplished per contract requirements. The Contractor shall monitor subcontractor quality, CM, risk processes, and ensure that subcontractors use objective criteria to measure performance. The Contractor shall flow down separate IPMR reporting requirements to subcontractors IAW the IPMR CDRL B002 for subcontracts exceeding $20M.
Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) The Contractor shall participate in Government conducted Probabilistic SRA as per the SRA frequency and direction delineated in the CWBS and Dictionary IAW CDRL B003. SRAs are conducted to determine how major areas of uncertainty in the schedule could impact contractual milestones, including assumptions and potential effects of the identified schedule risks. In addition to the paths identified in the IPMR CDRL B002, the Contractor shall also report optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely remaining durations and rationale for the values for each task and activity on the following paths: driving path to the next Major Milestone, the next three near-driving paths to the next Major Milestone. A complete SRA shall be performed outside of routine scheduled occurrences, at the request of the Government, when the schedule is a significant issue due to operational requirements, funding limitations, and when scheduling is considered a major risk element to the acquisition effort. If the Contractor conducts internal SRAs as part of their standard business practices (i.e., independent of those executed with the Government), the Contractor shall provide the result of those assessments to the Government. The Contractor shall document and report the results of the SRAs in the Contractor’s Progress, Status, and Management Report CDRL B004.
Program Progress, Tracking, and Reporting The Contractor shall track, measure, monitor, assess, summarize, and report the work progress, and schedule performance information under the contract to the Government. The Contractor shall identify program risks, perform risk analysis, risk handling, risk monitoring, and create a risk reporting matrix using Naval Systems Commands (SYSCOM) Risk Instruction, signed 21 July 2008, as guidance. The Contractor shall use Appendix E – Risk Assessment Example Format for an example of a risk reporting matrix, supporting identified risks, and the risk analysis format. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver the Contractor’s Progress, Status, and Management Report IAW CDRL B004.
Conferences, Meetings, and Reviews The Contractor shall conduct, attend, and participate in conferences (e.g., PACs), meetings (e.g., Content Design Meetings [CDMs]), reviews (e.g., IPRs, Engineering Technical Interchange Meetings [ETIMs]), and scheduled trips (e.g., for data gathering, reviews, photo capture) at either Government or Contractor facilities. Duration, location, and frequency are outlined in Appendix F. Conferences, meetings, and reviews shall be co-chaired by a Government and a Contractor representative. The Contractor shall have key personnel and support available to carry out the meetings. Subcontractors shall be required to attend conferences, meetings, and reviews when required to address key elements of the program. The Contractor shall make available facilities for Government only meetings during conferences, meetings, and reviews. The Contractor shall prepare presentation and other materials, as required, to aid in the conduct of the conferences, meetings, and reviews (i.e., intermittent and ongoing reviews of deliverables). The Contractor shall prepare the Conference Agenda and Conference Minutes for each conference, meeting, review, and scheduled trip IAW CDRLs B005 and B006, respectively. Once set, changes to the scheduled meeting shall be submitted via e-mail to and approved by the Government PM.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.