A.04.01_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Architect and Engineering Services for

Marine Design and Engineering Services Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility

N4523A18R1351 23 July 2018

1. GENERAL: This is a multiple award indefinite delivery indefinite quantity, firm-fixed-price contract for Marine Design and Engineering Services. The contract has an expected start date in December 2018 (DATE OF AWARD) with a period of performance for five years with a total contract capacity value of $40,000,000.00.

2. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform Marine Design and Engineering Services as defined in this Performance Work Statement except for those items specified as government furnished property and services. The contractor shall perform to and be held accountable to the standards in this contract along with traditional industrial and professional standards of the engineering discipline.

3. BACKGROUND: Originally established in 1891 as a Naval Station, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard has proudly built and serviced our nation’s vital naval assets through two world wars and several conflicts, many technological changes, as well as fluctuations in our nation’s economy. On May 15, 2003, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and the Naval Intermediate Maintenance Facility, Pacific Northwest (located at Bangor, Bremerton and Everett, WA) consolidated into one maintenance activity, creating “Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility” (PSNS and IMF). PSNS and IMF is the Pacific Northwest's largest Naval shore facility and one of Washington State's largest industrial installations. PSNS and IMF has work in Bremerton, WA (Naval Base Kitsap – Bremerton); Silverdale, WA (Naval Base Kitsap – Bangor); Everett, WA (Naval Station Everett); San Diego, CA (Naval Air Station North Island); Yokosuka, Japan and Guam. As the largest shore facility with work assignments throughout the world, PSNS and IMF has a reoccurring need for marine design and engineering services throughout the various codes and facilities of the organization. The current requirement as identified within this document and is primarily focused on marine design and engineering services in order to support the engineering assessment, design and modeling, and engineering support services of the repair of US Navy Vessels.

4. OBJECTIVE: The Objective of this contract is to provide PSNS and IMF a non-organic resource to provide supplemental (Expected to be 20% of total work) marine design and engineering contracted resources to support the mission of the maintenance, modernization, and retirement of the US Navy fleet. PSNS and IMF vision is to deliver our services on time, every time to support the US Navy mission to preserve national security and protect the lifeblood of the world economy in which shipping carries 90% of international trade. The Engineering firms that will work on this contract will directly support the PSNS and IMF mission and vision by providing the most highly qualified personnel necessary to support short to long term taskings. The Engineering firms will be expected to be subject matter experts on marine design and engineering services and be capable of growing internal support capabilities and leveraging subcontract relationships with other highly qualified engineering firms to meet the short notice problems that are inherent to the dynamic nature of ship repair. This contract is part of a multi-contract, multi-project effort of PSNS and IMF to innovate and increase the professional standards and expectations of the people, practices, and procedures within PSNS and IMF in both the Government but also the supporting Contracted workforce.

5. SCOPE: Marine design and engineering services. The Contractor shall provide comprehensive services for all current and former U.S. Naval vessels, ships, craft and boats in the areas of naval architecture, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, electronics, industrial, and environmental engineering. The work will include planning and estimating, engineering designs and calculations, technical research, troubleshooting and failure mode analysis, assessments and inspections, oversight and technical support of industrial work, training, and detailed reports based on engineering studies and analysis relating to marine vessels and equipment (including but not limited to cranes, caissons and similar equipment used to support ship repairs, overhaul and dismantling). The requirements also include Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) drafting and modeling, and technical document preparation, publication and reproduction.

5.1 ENGINEERING ASSESSMENTS AND INSPECTIONS

The Contractor will be tasked to perform assessments and inspections to verify accurate representation of existing conditions.

5.1.1 On-Site Surveys

The Contractor will be required to perform on-site surveys (i.e., ship checks and inspections) as necessary, including outside the United States. These surveys may involve a wide variety of ship types such as, but not limited to:

aircraft carrier, cruisers, amphibians, auxiliaries, and submarines.

The number of persons performing an on-site survey will be negotiated for each task order based on the scope of work and the spread of engineering disciplines involved. The Contractor will assign one on-site lead surveyor to act as a point of contact.

In order to accomplish the survey requirements of a task order, the Contractor may be required to do the following:

make on-site independent engineering decisions, coordinate interference control, photograph areas of concern (in accordance with security requirements), perform tests, take measurements and perform calculations, make arrangements for proper access to secured or locked spaces, provide licensed and certified gas free engineering services for Contractor personnel prior to entry into voids, tanks or other oxygen-depleted spaces, make provisions to transmit specialized expertise and information to military and civilian personnel, and conduct or attend meetings with on-site military and civilian personnel. In addition, the contractor may also be required to produce electronic sketches during the survey, using contractor provided and Government approved software (such as AutoCAD) and laptop computers. Laptop computers may also be required during surveys to perform calculations using either contractor or Government provided software. When marking up hard-copy drawings, such as to verify installations, the contractor will use the government-approved color-coding system to annotate the drawing, e.g., red (remove), green or blue (add), and yellow (acceptable as is) unless otherwise directed in the task order.

5.1.2 Engineering Assessments

The Contractor may perform engineering studies, engineering analysis, developing work processes and flows, determining equipment or system requirements, providing engineering support for the administrative elements of marine environmental programs, and the taking of samples or other data collection efforts to support laboratory or other analysis. The Contractor may be tasked with the testing, assessment, and maintenance of shipboard systems or equipment. Provide engineering, technical and program support services to perform troubleshooting and failure mode analysis, logistics support, fleet support, and industrial support. Current, up-to-date knowledge of the profession and the ability to conduct technical research will be expected of the contractor in the performance of their duties. Troubleshooting and failure mode analysis are expected to be performed by the contractor.

5.2 ENGINEERING DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS

5.2.1 Design

The Contractor shall be required to perform marine design. Design will include informed judgments in recommending alternative design or materials and in planning or conceiving engineering systems, structures, machinery, electrical or electronic installations in order to satisfy performance, economy, safety, size, strength, durability, and maintainability factors.

5.2.1 Design Calculations

Calculations may be required to support engineering designs. These may include Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) calculations, pipe stress analysis, piping pressure and flow loss calculations, complex structural finite element analysis for anisotropic and isotropic materials, vibration and shock analysis, system load analysis and fault current/protective device coordination analysis. Data collection may be needed for calculations, including development of mock-ups for system prototypes or models. Design may include cost estimation requests.

5.3 TECHNICAL DOCUMENT PREPERATION, PUBLICATION, AND REPRODUCTION

5.3.1 Drawings

The Contractor shall be required to create, edit, or review engineering drawings and manuals to include;

Ship Installation Drawings (SIDs) Selected Record Drawings (SRDs) Ship’s Information Book (SIB) Propulsion Operating Guide (POG) Installation Control Drawings (ICDs) Drawings for equipment used to support the overhaul, repair and dismantling of ships.

Drawings for engineering designs and issues relating to shipboard systems and equipment.

All drawings developed shall include pertinent notes and references, applicable weight control data and a structural penetration list, a complete list of material or equipment (depending on the type of drawing), and all other drawing elements as required the technical criteria and standards of this contract and any additional requirements specific to the task order. Some portions of drawings will require on site use of PSNS programs or assets. This requirement will be included in the task order when required. Training on the use of PSNS assets and programs will be provided.

5.3.2 Documents

Engineering documents shall be accomplished as specified in the task order. The content of engineering documents shall be intelligible, concise, all-inclusive, and presented in a logical format.

The Contractor shall be required to create, edit, or review engineering documents to include;

Ship Change Documents (SCDs) Documents to support Ship’s Installation Drawings (SIDs) Documents to support Installation Control Drawings (ICDs) Engineering Calculation Documents Cost Estimation Documents Technical Analysis Documents Advanced Industrial Management (AIM) Documents Material Requirement System (MRQT) Documents Technical Work Documents (TWD) Task Group Instruction (TGI) Documents Test Procedure Documents Work Authorization Forms Quality Assurance Forms Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Documents Configuration Overhaul Planning (COP) Documents Configuration Data Managers Database-Open Architecture (CDMD-OA) Documents Ship System Status Report (SSSP) Documents

Some documents will require on site use of PSNS programs or assets. This requirement will be included in the task order when required. Training on the use of PSNS assets and programs will be provided.

5.3.3 Reports

Engineering reports shall be accomplished as specified in the task order. The content of engineering reports shall be intelligible, concise, all-inclusive, and presented in a logical format. All research and analysis performed to develop reports shall be submitted with the final product. Conclusions shall be as objective as possible and include all supporting data.

The comprehensiveness of engineering reports shall be clearly communicated in the task order. The basis for the comprehensiveness of the report will be predicated on potential needs for the development of additional and follow-on documents, such as installation drawings, which may be based solely on the information provided by the report.

Technical research reports. (Supporting reports for the development of SCDs, ICDs, SIDs, and Engineering Calculations) Reports on shipboard designs on new technology and concepts.

Reports for equipment used to support the overhaul, repair and dismantling of ships.

Reports for to support engineering designs and issues relating to shipboard systems and equipment.

Environmental engineering reports.

Assessment reports for needed maintenance of shipboard systems and equipment.

Reports documenting data analysis and reliability analysis.

Engineering reports.

Reverse engineering reports.

Reports detailing necessary maintenance, troubleshooting, and repair of shipboard Hull, Mechanical, & Electrical equipment.

Reports on the estimated cost of production.

5.3.4 Training

Training may be contracted through task orders if the Contractor has methods, procedures, or specialized experience needed to improve the performance and capabilities of PSNS and IMF staff. Training may include maintenance/overhaul processes as well as the identification, compilation and production of measures of effectiveness. Training may take the form of on the job training, formal classroom training, on board maintenance training, feedback for training modules or curricula, and assist in functional system or equipment modifications, alterations and overhauls.

5.4 COMPUTER AIDED DRAFTING AND DESIGN (CADD) AND MODELING FOR US NAVY

SHIPS

The Contractor shall develop detailed design drawings on a CADD system. The CADD system shall be capable of producing 2D and 3D design drawings. Computer assisted Modeling will also be required.

Drawings shall conform to the requirements of the individual task order.

5.4.1 Drawing File Format. All drawings shall be submitted in AutoCAD format. Drawings shall be .DWG files. The 2010 version or later shall be used.

5.4.2 Border File. The Government will provide the Contractor with the border.

5.4.3 Interdisciplinary Coordination Review. The Contractor shall perform an interdisciplinary coordination review of all tasked drawings prior to submission.

5.4.4 Informational Drawings. The Government shall provide informational drawings. The Government is responsible for providing any readily available drawings to be used by the Contractor at the task level. The Government shall be responsible for ensuring that the informational drawings being provided are of the most current revision. The Contractor shall be responsible for identifying and requesting the need for any additional drawings needed to complete the task.

5.4.5 Autodesk Inventor 3d Model. Contractor is responsible for creating 3D drawings and models.

Contractor will likely be expected to create these drawing types in a very limited manner throughout performance of the contract but shall have the capability to do so at each task order. 3D drawings, existing condition models, preferred alternatives 3D models are expected to be requested.

5.5 COST ESTIMATION & TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Contractor shall be required to provide Cost Estimation and Technical Analysis of Price/Cost Proposals against Government requirements.

5.5.1 Cost Estimator with experience in Marine Design and Engineering will be extensively used to generate cost estimates for each task deliverable. Contractor is expected to design within funding limitations which are communicated by the Government at the task order level. Failure to design within funding limitations shall result in immediate re-performance and any costs associated and in accordance with the contractual clauses.

5.5.2 Technical Analysis shall be performed to assist the Government with detailed technical reviews of price/cost proposals submitted in response to Government solicitations for work. Technical Analysis will look to historical, parametric estimation, market research against publically and Government held available price lists as well, as other methods of price/cost analysis. Technical Analysis shall be performed as technical assistance within the task for the initial work or as a separate defined task.

6. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: The contract has an expected start date in January 2018 (DATE OF AWARD) with a period of performance for five years.

7. GENERAL INFORMATION:

7.1 QUALITY CONTROL

All deliverable items shall be thoroughly checked and reviewed by the Contractor for technical accuracy and compliance with the provisions of the applicable task order and this contract.

7.1.1 Quality Program Requirements

The Contractor is responsible for the conformance of all work performed under this contract to all applicable specifications, standards, and requirements invoked. To assure conformance, the Contractor shall provide and maintain a Quality Program that parallels the applicable portions of the International Standards Organization (ISO) 9001:2015 Standard. Note that ISO certification is not required. The Contractor’s Quality Program shall be documented and include policies and procedures specifically tailored to the work required by this contract.

The Government reserves the right to perform any audits or examinations deemed necessary to assure the adequacy of the Contractor’s Quality Program and to reject any or all submittals, including engineering drawings, related data, and other documents, that do not conform to the requirements of this contract or to any invoked specification, standard, or instruction.

A checklist shall be used by the Contractor to document examinations and inspections of deliverable items prior to submittal. Checklists shall indicate that the submittal conforms to the requirements of the contract, task order and Contractor’s Quality Program. Each checklist shall be signed by the Contractor’s representative having final approval authority for deliverable item submittals. The signature of the Contractor’s representative shall constitute a certification of compliance. Certified checklists shall be forwarded with each submittal.

The use of Government checklists may be required by a task order. These additional checklists shall not replace the Contractor’s checklist unless otherwise specified in the task order.

In the absence of direct guidance, the Contractor shall make every effort to conduct all research and analysis independent of cognizant Government technical leads. This includes obtaining and reviewing relevant reference documents, such as drawings and technical manuals, utilizing the Shipyard’s Plan Files or other sources responsible for retention and distribution of original documentation. Further, the Contractor shall make all inquiries and provide any notice needed to coordinate system interfaces and to avoid interferences related to task order work requirements, by contacting the cognizant PSNS&IMF Engineering & Planning Branch. These inquiries and notices shall be documented by the Contractor and copies shall be provided with submittals.

7.1.2 Quality Control Plan

The Contractor shall maintain and conduct a formal documented Quality Control program addressing cost, schedule, and risk as contractually applicable. All deliverables will be routed internally within the Contractor to all for a documented quality control check by a senior design professional. Contractor shall produce a Quality Control Plan at the task order level. The Quality Control Plan (QCP) is a management plan for producing a quality product or service, on schedule and within budget. The Contractor shall submit QCP(s) addressing each task being contracted for approval prior to award of the task beginning any work. QCP(s) shall outline quality control and desired Government quality assurance procedures that shall ensure the stated accuracy specifications are met. The Contractor shall prepare and submit a QCP with their task proposal.

7.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE

The Government shall provide a detailed submittal and Government review schedule for the performance of Quality Assurance at the task order level. At a minimum the Government shall provide a review of all documentation at delivery but the larger, more complicated, or higher risk work items shall have more extensive review calendars to include a 30%, 60%, 90% review schedule.

7.2.1 Government Technical Review

Contractor will be expected to respond and re-perform as necessary based upon Government comments received after a technical review of the submitted deliverable or interim work product. The technical review performed by the Government will be communicated at the task level along with Government expectations about the schedule for re-performance and acknowledgement or explanation against the comments received.

7.2.2 Quality Monitoring and Measurement

The Government will perform quality monitoring and measurement of the services performed at the task order level.

Please reference Appendix A, Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for the expected QASP standards to be applied at the task order level.

7.2.3 Performance Schedule

Interim milestones will be provided at the task order level. Interim milestones are expected target dates and changes to these dates will be required to change through a bi-lateral modification at the task order level. The schedule deliverables are firm performance targets, also requiring a bi-lateral modification at the task order level if an adjustment to the date is required. Failure to perform work under the quality conditions required may lead to extensive work re-work and re-performance within the same schedule.

7.3 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE

Performance is primarily expected to be in Kitsap County, WA (90%). Other areas of performance may be expected of the contractor based upon the needs of PSNS and IMF.

7.4 TYPE OF CONTRACT

The Contract that is the subject of this performance work statement is a Firm Fixed Price Commercial Engineering Service Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Multiple Award Contract to be awarded at both the base and task level using The Selection of Architect and Engineering (AE) Procedures.

7.4.1 Task Order Selection Process

Orders under this contract shall be made using AE Procedures. Selection of the firm will be made by the engineering and technical staff at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard through a review of the SF330 submitted in response to the base IDIQ synopsis, information submitted in discussions/interviews, information received in direct response to questions asked by the Government throughout the life of the IDIQ, or any other method the Government chooses to use to determine selection at the task order level in accordance with AE procedures. The Government may be required to submit questions to the IDIQ holders throughout the life of the contract in order to assist with the determination of the most highly qualified firm to receive tasks throughout the life of the contract. The Government may elect to reserve 20% or more of the entire contract value for the small business IDIQ holder.

7.4.2 Task Order Proposal Process

After selection of the firm the Government will provide the Contractor a task order performance work statement in order to allow for questions and scoping in advance of a proposal. Proposal shall address all disciplines and level of effort required of the contractor to perform the work under the task order.

The technical content of all deliverables (reports, drawings, etc.) shall be based on specific guidance provided by the performance work statement within the task order. A task order being provided to the Contractor may include Job Information Sheets (JISs), informal memorandums, Ship Change Documents (SCDs), on-site survey notes, Installation Control Drawings (ICDs), Liaison Action Requests (LARs), Preliminary Configuration Data (PCD) and any other document deemed necessary to support the development of the end deliverable. Guidance used to develop drawings shall be submitted with the final product.

7.4.3 Task Order Scoping Meetings

Contractor may request a scoping meeting immediately upon receipt of the Government proposal to allow for a meeting of minds as to what the Government requirement and expectations are for performance and deliverables under the contract action.

7.4.4 Task Order Post Proposal Conference

Contractor may request a post-proposal conference to verify Government understanding of the proposal and allow for a meeting of minds between the Government and Contractor regarding the work under the task order.

7.4.5 Task Order Discussions

Government and Contractor shall enter into discussion and negotiations to resolve any differences that exist between the Government Estimate and the Contractors proposed approach.

7.5 STAFFING QUALIFICATIONS

7.5.1 Engineering Disciplines

Successful completion of a professional curriculum in, civil, mechanical, electrical, electronics, chemical, or environmental engineering, naval architecture or computer science at an accredited college, signified by an appropriate Bachelor of Science degree.

Staffing Classifications & Qualifications. The staffing classifications contained in this Contract are based upon the following:

Level Min. Education Preferred Education Min. Yrs. Experience Junior BA/BS 3 Staff/Senior BA/BS 5/8 Principal BA/BS MA/MS 10

7.5.2 Engineering Discipline Levels

Principal Project Manager Mechanical Engineer Structural Engineer Electrical Engineer Electronic Engineer

Principal of the firm: Registered professional engineer of the firm. The principal will sign and stamp the cover sheet for all drawings and design documents. Principal shall insure that the Independent Technical Review is being performed by the firm. Principal is an authorized agent of the firm whose signature and stamp represents the firm.

Project Manager: Academic qualifications of an engineering discipline and 10 years of experience. Mid-level management needs to be fluent in most of the technical aspects or requirements, and capable of playing a leadership role, overseeing QC/QA, overseeing task order progress, personnel, serving as team lead, task order spokesperson, engaged in conflict resolution, money and time manager, product scheduling and completion.

Staff/Senior: Experienced employee capable of working fairly independently in architect & engineering fields (Knowledgeable and reliable worker). Employee has received sufficient training and is able to apply technical skills in numerous areas of architect & engineering. Employee is able to serve as a team member on more complex assignments and is capable of working on moderate to complex assignments. The Employee requires little or no mentoring and guidance.

Junior: Several years’ experience in architect & engineering fields. Skill sets enable production or development of engineering related products to a fair degree in certain technical areas. Jr. Level engineer requires journeyman or senior level mentoring, guidance and oversight to accomplish tasks.

7.5.3 Non-Engineering Personnel

Engineering Technician Senior Engineering Technician Cost Estimator Logistician Senior Logistician CAD Operator

Engineering Technician: Engineering technicians generally apply conventional well-established engineering practice to tasks involving a lesser degree of complexity, unique design problems, or responsibility than those typically assigned to their professional engineering counterparts.

Senior Engineering Technician: Fifteen years’ experience in a technical discipline.

Cost Estimator: Cost Estimator shall have a minimum of five years of cost estimating experience. Cost Estimates shall be approved and signed by a certified cost estimator. To support a Government developed estimate, the Contractor shall provide quantity computations that reflect the design level scope of work. Quantities and calculations shall show dimensions such as length, width, thickness, diameter, volume, weight, etc. Use or application of lump sum and/or allowances shall be kept to a minimum. The Contractor shall prepare narratives for each work item which explain how the estimator envisions the work to be accomplished. The narrative shall describe the project requirements that must be performed in sufficient detail to give a clear understanding of the scope of work including special problems that will be encountered, site conditions affecting the work, reasons for selection of the major plant and equipment, assumptions made for mobilization and demobilization of all equipment, and the reasons for unusually high or low contingencies. All major cost elements and assumptions made in the estimate shall be noted at the general level, major folder levels, and cost levels. The estimator shall discuss the anticipated plan, addressing the time frame likely to be required to complete the proposed work. The estimator shall present rationale for crew composition and production rates for major cost items.

Logistician: Logisticians generally read and interpret Ship Installation Drawings (SIDs), prepare and revise Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) documents, and conduct inventories and identify discrepancies in the following areas: Special Tools, Software Products, Tech Manuals and Maintenance Assistance Modules (MAMs).

Senior Logistician: Six years’ experience as a logistician.

CAD Operator: CAD Operator generally perform drafting involving judgments in recommending alternative design or materials and in planning or conceiving engineering systems, structures, machinery, electrical or electronic installations in order to satisfy performance, economy, safety, size, strength, durability, and maintainability factors.

8. ENGINEERING SERVICES:

8.1 DELIVERABLES

8.1.1 All deliverables prepared pursuant to this contract shall be subject to review and approval by the Commander, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF), or a duly authorized Shipyard representative. Performance of the work shall be under the cognizance of the Chief Engineer, PSNS & IMF, or a duly authorized shipyard representative. The standard for the deliverable will be communicated within the task order but the general standard is in alignment with the general industrial standards for that or similar work items.

8.1.2 All work and data associated with this effort will be the property of PSNS and IMF.

8.1.3 All deliverables developed by the Contractor shall represent a practical engineering solution based on the best trade-off between total cost, reliability, maintainability, availability of material, labor skill, industrial capability, state of the art, and timely accomplishment of the task as it relates to task requirements and Government-provided task guidance.

8.1.4 The task order will specify the documents required as deliverables under the task order. Examples of potential documents to accompany the final deliverable are review copy, on-site survey data, supporting calculations, guidance materials, source documentation, copy of the completed checklist used to ensure the quality of the deliverable item, design notebooks, and all electronic media reflecting the deliverable item. Where drawing checkprints are appropriate, the drawing checker shall sign and date the checkprint and submit with deliverable item.

8.2 TECHNICAL CRITERIA AND STANDARDS

8.2.1 Professional Standards

The Contractor shall be bound by the technical and professional standards of the profession they hold.

8.2.2 References

The Contractor shall be governed by and implement the policies and procedures set forth in the following references unless the task order specifically identifies a deviation from these standards.

The following documents and referenced sub-tier specifications and standards, as well as all current instructions and directives from the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), shall form a part of the technical requirements of work under the contract. The most current revision shall be used unless otherwise specified in the task orders.

COMMERCIAL SPECIFICATIONS

ABS Rules American Bureau of Shipping & Affiliated Companies (Parts 1 through 5) (www.eagle.org)

ISO 9001:2015 Standard International Standards Organization (ISO), Quality Management System Requirements Standards (http://www.iso.org)

Commercial Drawings ASME Y14.100, Engineering Drawing Practices (www.asme.org)

DoD Basic Practices ASME Y 14.100 and the following Appendices, as applicable o Appendix B, Non-Commercial Drawing Practices o Appendix C, Drawing Titles o Appendix D, Numbering, Coding and Identification o Appendix E, Markings on Engineering Drawings (www.asme.org)

Types of Engineering Drawings ASME Y14.24, Types and Application of Engineering Drawings

(www.asme.org)

Revision of Engineering Drawings ASME Y14.35M, Revision of Engineering Drawings and Associated

Lists (www.asme.org)

Associated Lists ASME Y14.34M, Associated Lists (www.asme.org)

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARDS (https://assist.daps.dla.mil/online/start/)

DOD-STD-2003 Electric Plant Installation Standard Methods for Surface Ships and Submarines (Sections 1 through 5)

MILITARY STANDARDS (https://assist.daps.dla.mil/online/start/)

MIL-STD-25 Structural Symbols for use on Ship Drawings

MIL-STD-438 Schedule of Piping, Valves, Fittings and Associated Components for Submarines

MIL-STD-777 Schedule of Piping, Valves, Fittings and Associated Piping Components for Surface Ships

MIL-STD-1310 Shipboard Bonding, Grounding, and other techniques for Electromagnetic compatibility and safety

IA Pub. 5239-22 Information Assurance Protected Distribution System (PDS)

Publication

IA Pub. 5239-31 Information Assurance Shipboard Red/Black Installation Publication

NSTISSAM TEMPEST/2-95 12/12/95 Red/Black Installation Guidance

MIL-STD-1628 Fillet Weld Size, Strength and Efficiency Determination

MIL-STD-1689 Ship Hull Fabrication Welding Inspection

NAVAL PUBLICATIONS (Available upon request)

NAVSEA-0900-LP-001-7000 Fabrication and Inspection of Brazed Piping Systems

NAVSEA S9AA0-AB-GOS-010 General Specifications for Overhaul of Surface Ships.

NAVSEA S9AA0-AB-GOS-020 General Specifications for Overhaul of Surface Ships.

NAVSEA-0902-018-2010 General Overhaul Specifications for Deep Diving SSN/SSBN Submarines (DDGOS)

NAVSEA-0908-LP-000-3010 Shock Design Criteria

NAVSEA-SE000-00-EIM-100 Navy Installation and Maintenance Book (NIMB), General

NAVSEA-SE000-00-EIM-110 Navy Installation and Maintenance Book (NIMB), Installation

Standards

NAVSEA-0938-LP-018-0010 Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning (HVAC) Design Criteria Manual for Surface Ships of the U.S. Navy

NAVSEA T9500-AA-PRO-130 HVAC Design Practices Manual

NAVSEA-S9086-C6-STM-000 Weight and Stability (Chapter 096)

NAVSEA-S9086-CH-STM-000 Welding and Allied Processes (Chapter 074, Vol. I)

NAVSEA-S9086-CN-STM-020 NAVSEA Technical Manual, Practical Damage Control

NAVSEA S9086-KC-STM-010 Electric Plant General (chapter 300)

NAVSEA- Fabrication Welding Inspection of HY80/100 Submarine T9074-AD-GIB-010-1688 Applications

9090 series tech specs (below) available at: http://www.fmp.navy.mil/

NAVSEA TECHNICAL Ship Alteration Drawing Preparation

SPECIFICATION 9090-600

NAVSEA TECHNICAL Ships Configuration & Logistics Support Information SPECIFICATION 9090-700 System (SCLSIS)

NAVSEA TECHNICAL Selected Record Drawings

SPECIFICATION 9090-800

NAVSEA DDS552-21 Magazine Sprinkling Handbook

NAVSEA T9500-AA-PRO-030 Design Criteria for Firemain on Surface Ships

COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3 Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual (JFMM)

NAVSEA 0924-062-0010 Submarine Safety (SUBSAFE) Requirements Manual

NAVSEA S9002-AK-CCM-010/6010 Industrial Ship Safety Manual for Submarines

NAVSEA S0570-AC-CCM-010/8010 Industrial Ship Safety Manual for Fire Prevention and Response

NAVSEA S0400-AD-URM-010/TUM Tag-Out User's Manual

Design Data Sheets (various)

INSTRUCTIONS (Available upon request)

DOD 5220.22 Industrial Security Regulation and Industrial Security

Manual for Safeguarding Classified Information (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/ins1.html)

OPNAVINST 5510.1 Department of the Navy Information and Personnel Security Program

Regulations (http://neds.nebt.daps.mil/)

NAVSEA INSTRUCTION 5511.32C SAFEGUARDING OF NAVAL NUCLEAR PROPULSION

INFORMATION (NNPI) (a NOFORN document)

PLANDEPTPUGET P5200(2) Engineering Planning Procedures Manual (EPPM)

PSNS&IMF P5100(14) Visitor and Contractor Handbook

ESH Requirements at Bremerton Naval Complex

NAVSHIPYDPUGET P5090(4) Contractor’s Guide to Environmental Compliance

NAVSHIPYDPUGET P5090(5) Contractor’s Guide to Hazardous Waste Compliance

PHNS&IMF SOP JPL003 Non-nuclear Technical Work Document Preparation

PSNS&IMFINST P9210.6 Nuclear/Nonnuclear Interface

PSNS&IMFINST P4730.8 Test and Work Control Program Manual

8.3 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS

The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with all applicable current Federal and State laws and regulations.

Occupational Safety and Health standards which include Maritime Standards (29 CFR 1915), General Industry Standards (29 CFR 1910), and other applicable federal, state and local environmental protection

9. CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS/WORK SPECIFICATIONS

9.1 SOFTWARE

9.2 SPECIFICATIONS FORMATING

9.3 DESIGN CLACULATIONS

9.4 COST ESTIMATION

9.5 EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES

9.6 SUBMITAL SCHEDULE AND REQUIREMENTS

All these features of work will be communicated at the individual task order level.

9.7 TRAVEL

The Government will reimburse the Contractor for allowable travel costs incurred by the Contractor in performance of the contract, per Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), Volume II. Costs for travel to perform work at PSNS&IMF may result in a failure of negotiations as the Government expectation is for IDIQ holders to maintain a local presence to reduce overall costs.

9.8 TECHNICAL REVIEW

9.8.1 POST AWARD CONFERENCE/PERIODIC PROGRESS MEETINGS

9.8.2 CONTRACTING OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE

These features of work will be determined at the individual task order level.

9.8.3 TECHNICAL REVIEW PROCESS

Each submittal required by a task order, and any submittal required as a result of Government mark-up of a prior submittal, shall be delivered to the Government according to the process outlined in the task order.

If the Government finds errors, discrepancies, omissions or deficiencies during review of a deliverable item, the Contractor shall promptly make the corrections as indicated by the Government’s mark-up of the item. Subsequent deliverable item re-submittals shall include the Government’s mark-up of the item and all documentation required for the original submittal.

Deliverable items that are submitted later than the due date indicated on the task order will result in an immediate corrective action process by the government. The late delivery of items without a bi-laterally signed modification to the task order to allow for such a late deliverable is unacceptable and will be considered to be grounds for termination of the task order and recoupment of costs associated with the effort.

Deliverable items returned to the contractor for rework shall be tracked and will result in an immediate corrective action process by the government. The unsatisfactory deliverable will be noted in the monthly assessment of performance. Contractor schedule for rework must still fall in the period of performance within the task order, if the contractor requires more time to perform it will have to take the form of a bi-lateral modification to the contract.

9.9 QUALITY MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT

9.9.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

9.9.2 PERFORMANCE METRICS

9.9.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

These features of work will be determined at the individual task order level.

Examples of the Government expectations are listed below.

The main outcomes anticipated for this contract as a whole will be based on task specific Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) charts included in each task order. Two examples of these PRS charts are shown below, one for Planning Yard type completion tasks and the other for Waterfront type term tasks. Each PRS chart is divided into four of the basic categories found in Contract Performance and Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) with specific performance objectives that will be tailored to each task.

97-100% - Exceptional 92-96% - Very Good 86-91% - Satisfactory 70-85% - Marginal 0-69% - Unsatisfactory

EXAMPLE TASK ORDER CONTRACT PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT SUMMARY (PRS)

Example Task Order Performance Requirement Summary.

Phase 1 Shipcheck Performance Objectives Performance Standard/AQL

Performance Assessment Method

Quality:

1. Provide assessment of the accuracy of reports/data required.

86%-100% CPARS Scale

Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

2. Shipcheck notes easily interpretable by third party drafter/technician.

86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will review mark-ups and sketches.

3. Shipchecker uses PSNS & IMF mark-up standards. 86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will review mark-ups and sketches

4. Shipchecker completes package checklist, validating work completion.

86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will review check-list and sketches.

5. Contractor was able to perform with minimal Government technical direction/guidance.

86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will review and evaluate.

Schedule:

6. Contractor able to meet internal task deadlines (delivery on-board of shipcheck packages/reports).

86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will review and evaluate.

Business Relations:

7. Contractor maintained close liaison and good communications with the Government. Project issues/discrepancies reported to TL within 24 hours of discovery. Solutions implemented same day provided.

86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will review and evaluate.

8. Shipchecker reports aboard on time and puts in full day in tandem with TL.

86%-100% CPARS Scale

Daily muster checks by TL.

9. Shipchecker reports aboard with all required PPE. 86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will confirm as needed.

Technical:

10. Shipchecker submits pertinent service requests. 86%-100%

CPARS Scale TL will verify with follow codes.

11. All dimensioning for correct removal, temporary access and installation included.

86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will review mark-ups and sketches

12. All interferences were identified and sized/located w/dimensions, including but not limited to potential interferences to foundation backup stiffening on the far side of deck or bulkhead.

86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will review mark-ups and sketches

13. Compartment outline and structure shown with correct frame numbers and dimensions.

86%-100% CPARS Scale

TL will review mark-ups and sketches

Phase 2 Drawing Development Performance Objectives Performance

Performance Assessment

Method Quality:

1. Evaluation of quality shall be based on deliverable item receipt (DIR) record for rework required on submittals.

86%-100% CPARS

Scale

DIR info fed into CMS database for evaluation.

Schedule:

2. Evaluation of schedule performance shall be based on DIR record for on-time delivery of submittals.

86%-100% CPARS

Scale

DIR info fed into CMS database for evaluation.

Business Relations:

3. Contractor maintained close liaison and good communications with the Government.

86%-100% CPARS

Scale

Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

4. Contractor provided adequate notice when guidance or technical problems/conflicts arose.

86%-100% CPARS

Scale

Gov't TL will evaluate overall at end of task.

Phase 2 Drawing Development Performance Objectives Performance

Performance Assessment Method

5. Contractor was able to perform with minimal Government technical direction/guidance.

86%-100% CPARS

Scale

Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

6. Contractor submittals met task and contract requirements and could be judged completed actions.

86%-100% CPARS

Scale

Gov't TL will check for conformity.

Technical:

7. Drawings conform to Weight and Moment requirements. 86%-100% CPARS

Scale Gov't TL will check for conformity.

8. Drawings conform to Front Sheet requirements. 86%-100% CPARS Scale

Gov't TL will check for conformity.

9. Drawings conform to I.D.E.A. CAD Standards. 86%-100% CPARS Scale

Gov't (Technical Lead) TL will check for conformity.

10. Contractor adequately incorporated design requirements that are not addressed by Shipcheck package.

86%-100% CPARS

Scale

Gov't TL will verify with follow codes.

11. The Contractor provided a technically knowledgeable point of contact.

86%-100% CPARS

Scale

Gov't TL will evaluate.

Technical Assistance

Performance Objectives Performance

Standard/AQL Performance Assessment Method

Quality:

1. Technical Work Documents (TWD) are of sufficient detail and clarity to provide shop with clear guidance.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

2. Overall percentage of rework required.

(Rework is defined as work turned in by contractor which, when checked by Gov’t, had to be sent back to contractor or worked on by another person in order to make it useable.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

3. Contractor was able to perform with minimal Government technical direction/guidance.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

Schedule:

4. Overall performance regarding delivering required documents “on time” to meet internal deadlines.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

Business Relations:

5. Contractor maintained close liaison and good communications with the Government.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

6. Contractor followed the guidelines specified in PSNS&IMF P5100(14).

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

Technical:

7. Quality Assurance (QA) documents for functions including, but not limited to, joint makeup, welding and epoxy are correctly done and incorporated into DM2.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

8. PC bolt torque calculations (using PSNS program) are accurate and complete.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

9. ATIS, CITIS, & SDI drawing research are relevant and complete.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

Technical Assistance Performance Objectives

Performance Standard/AQL

Performance Assessment Method

10. For already completed AIM document review, the Contractor was successful at resolving technical problems and deficiencies.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

11. Internet - Historical Information Tool Kit (Hit Kit) / Technical Information Management (TIMS) - Database support programs for historical documents & Lessons learned

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

12. Project Trouble Desk support - responding to DF/DL/DRs to evaluate deficiencies

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

13. Shipchecks systems and components to evaluate the need for repairs or removal as interference.

86%-100% CPARS Scale Technical Lead (TL) will review and evaluate.

10. SUBCONTRACTORS-CONTRACTORS

All work provided under this contract is considered the responsibility and being the work product of the Contractor that has been awarded the task order. Contractor is inherently required to perform internal quality control process to verify that subcontractors work product meets their quality standards.

11. SPECIAL CONDITIONS

11.1 NUCLEAR POWERED SHIPS AND FACILITIES

Contractor personnel are not permitted to enter posted radiation areas, to handle radioactive materials, or to wear radiation-measuring dosimetry without prior written permission from NAVSEA. Contractor personnel are required to inform the Government whenever it is determined that work cannot be completed without entering a radiation area. DO NOT ENTER POSTED RADIATION AREAS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY TASKED IN WRITING

TO DO SO.

11.2 SECURITY CLEARANCES

Security Requirement needs will be communicated at the task order level.

Facility and personnel security clearances shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Industrial Security Manual for Safeguarding Classified Information, DOD 5220.22, and the Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254 for this contract. Personnel directly involved in task orders issued hereunder shall be U.S. citizens and have a proper security clearance for the work assigned to them. Some task orders may require access to classified technical documents, secured areas of the Shipyard facilities, or shipboard spaces requiring a clearance of CONFIDENTIAL or SECRET. Resumes required by this contract must include the current level of security clearance held by the individual (if none, show “Pending” status). This indicates that the individual is capable of obtaining the required security clearance.

Upon award of the contract, the Contractor shall submit visit clearance requests for employees who are working under this contract, who will be visiting Government Installations. These requests shall be prepared in accordance with DOD 5220.22. The Contractor shall revise visit clearance requests as often as necessary to reflect current status. All Contractor personnel visiting Puget Sound Naval Shipyard or traveling for performance of work under this contract shall read and adhere to PSNS&IMF P5100(14), Visitor and Contractor Handbook.

The Contractor shall submit visit clearance requests in time to support task order requirements, including Government-issue of a visit clearance message if needed. The Contractor shall prepare and submit visit clearance messages only if specifically required by a task order. The Contractor shall provide a copy of all Contractor prepared visit clearance messages. Otherwise, when traveling for performance of work under this contract, the Contractor shall submit information required for Government preparation of visit clearance messages.

Contractor personnel requiring continual access to Shipyard facilities shall be identified by a separate visit clearance request for Shipyard badges. Badge requests shall be granted, at the discretion of the Shipyard Security Officer, for the duration of the current contract lot year, after which the Contractor shall request renewal. Examples of this type of access would be as follows: key personnel assigned to work on task orders that will require periodic interface with Government technical personnel, couriers who will be assigned to pick up reference documents from the Shipyard’s Plan Files, senior managers who will visit often to discuss contract performance and related issues, and personnel who are working on-site as a requirement of a task order. The Contractor shall be responsible for retaining Shipyard badges of employees whose badges have not expired and are not actively working on Shipyard business or tasking (as described in “examples” above).