Amend 0001_Encl 1 - Pre-Proposal Conference Slides_N4019222R9100.pdf

Pre-Proposal Conference

DEMOLITION SERVICES

AT VARIOUS MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, GUAM.

N40192-22-R-9100

12 September 2022

UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO

2 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

AGENDA

• Points of Contact

• Administrative Remarks

• Solicitation Overview

• Submittal Requirements

• Evaluation

• Current Project Timeline

• Closing Statement

22 May 2020

3 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

POINTS OF CONTACT

Janalyn T. Rosario Contracting Officer

(671) 333-2272 Janalyn.Rosario@fe.navy.mil

22 May 2020

Felix A. Benavente Contracting Officer

(671) 339-6750 Felix.Benavente@fe.navy.mil

Donovan Merfalen Contract Specialist

(671) 339-1143 Donovan.Merfalen@fe.navy.mil

4 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

ADMINISTRATIVE REMARKS

• Attendance Roster

• No minutes of this meeting will be published. The attendance sheet and Pre- Proposal Conference presentation slides will be posted on the SAM.gov website at https://www.SAM.gov

• Recording devices are not allowed during the Pre-Proposal Conference.

• No questions will be taken at this Pre-Proposal Conference. All questions must be submitted in writing using Attachment JL-1 Questions/ Request for Information (RFI) Form and submitted via email to Felix Benavente (felix.benavente@fe.navy.mil) and Donovan Merfalen (donovan.merfalen@fe.navy.mil). Please clearly reference the section and paragraph number of the RFP or specification, as applicable. Deadline for submission of questions is at 1400 hours, Chamorro Standard Time (ChST), Friday, 16 September 2022.

5 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

ADMINISTRATIVE REMARKS (cont.)

• Remarks and explanations addressed during the Conference shall not qualify or alter the terms and conditions of the solicitation.

• The terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is amended in writing.

• Any changes to the solicitation will be made in writing, with an amendment posted to the SAM.gov website.

• To date, no amendments have been posted.

• It is the offerors’ responsibility to check the SAM.gov website for any amendments.

6 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas 22 May 2020

SOLICITATION OVERVIEW

7 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

RFP HIGHLIGHTS

This procurement is solicited as a competitive 8(a) Set-Aside procurement.

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS):

238910 – Site Preparation Contractors

Size Standard: $16.5 million

8 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

RFP HIGHLIGHTS (cont.)

SCOPE:

The Contractor, unless otherwise noted, shall furnish all labor, safety controls, transportation, materials, equipment and supervision necessary to perform demolition services to housing, facilities and miscellaneous structures at various military installations, Guam.

9 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

CONTRACT TYPE AND TERM:

• Indefinite Delivery (ID)-Requirements contract

• Contract begins on 07 November 2022 (Planned). There will be a 12 (twelve) month base period and four (4) 12 (twelve) month option periods.

There will also be a 6-month optional contract extension. The contract period of performance will be a maximum of 66 months.

• The Government has the unilateral option to extend the term of the contract in accordance with FAR 52.217-8, “OPTION TO EXTEND SERVICES (NOV 1999)” and FAR 52.217-9, “OPTION TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE

CONTRACT (MAR 2000)”

10 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

UNIFORM CONTRACT FORMAT

Part I – The Schedule

A – Solicitation/contract form

B – Supplies or services and prices

C – Description/specifications

D – Packaging and marking (None)

E – Inspection and acceptance

F – Deliveries or performance

G – Contract administration data

H – Special contract requirements

11 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

Part II – Contract Clauses

I – Contract clauses

Part III – List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments

J – List of documents, exhibits, and other attachments

Part IV – Representations and Instructions

K – Representations, certifications, and other statements of bidders

L – Instructions, conditions, and notices to bidders

M – Evaluation factors for award

12 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

• Annex 0100000 (General Information)

• Annex 0200000 (Management and Administration)

• Annex 1502000 (Demolition)

13 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas 22 May 2020

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

14 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

INTRODUCTION – GENERAL SCOPE REQUIREMENT

• Discuss the general nature of your business and how you intend to fulfill the requirements in the current RFP;

• In broad terms discuss your business principles and ethics;

• Identify the principal owners/managers (who they are and in what capacity they will partake); and

• Discuss the resources you intend to employ (affiliates that will participate in meaningful contract performance), your capabilities and your general strengths and weaknesses.

• Limit your introduction to no more than 3 pages.

• Refer to Section L.6 of the solicitation for a sample format

15 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas 22 May 2020

VOLUME I

PRICE PROPOSAL

16 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME I - PRICE

Refer to Section L.6 Proposal Requirements of the RFP.

• Paper Copies:

– Original and four (4) copies of signed price proposal and Section B.

• Electronic Copy:

– One (1) Compact Disc (CD)

– Editable documents (i.e. Microsoft Word and/or Excel 2010 files)

• Printed Format:

– Paper shall be white, 8 ½” x 11” paper.

– Print on one side only.

– Submit in three (3) D-ring binders.

– Use Arial or Times New Roman font with type size equivalent to 11 point or larger.

– Original and copies should be marked accordingly.

– For charts, graphs, and spreadsheets, paper shall be 11”x17”.

17 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

COMPONENTS OF VOLUME I – PRICE PROPOSAL

1. Standard Form 33, with blocks 12 through 18 completed;

2. Section B and accompanying Exhibits from Section J of the RFP with all CLIN and ELIN unit pricing completed. All unit prices shall be rounded to the nearest dollar;

3. Authorized Personnel, (name, title, and contact information of person(s) authorized to negotiate and bind on behalf of the Offeror & points of contact should proposal clarifications be required;

4. Executed Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors (Section K of the RFP);

5. Evidence of Financial Capability for the previous three (3) fiscal years, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or at least by an authorized officer of the organization;

6. Teaming/Joint-Venture/Mentor-Protégé Agreement, if applicable, shall submit a copy of the teaming, JV, LLC, or MP agreement and

7. Price Information Rating Criteria (Detailed Supporting Cost Data) is required.

18 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

FINANCIAL CAPABILITY

For Prime Contractor and all Joint Venture Partners, provide:

• Previous three (3) fiscal years complete Financial Statements, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or at least by an authorized officer of the organization;

• Evidence of availability of Working/Operating Capital for contract performance; and

• For Joint Venture arrangements, discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies and if the Joint Venture has been in existence for less than 3 years, also provide the latest 3 years’ complete fiscal year financial statements for each member of the Joint Venture.

19 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

SUPPORTING COST DATA

• As part of their pricing proposal, offerors shall provide a complete detailed cost breakdown for each contract period by cost element, by Annex, by ELIN, and by Sub-ELIN to support the amounts specified for each CLIN on Section B.

•Offerors will need to provide supporting worksheets and narrative explanations to fully explain the basis and rationale for the proposed amounts, including back up details that can be related to various segments of an offeror’s technical proposal.

•Offerors shall submit the supporting cost data in the same format for, the base period, and all option periods. Cost summary worksheets are required. Any offeror that does not provide summary cost worksheets may be ineligible for award.

20 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas 22 May 2020

VOLUME II

NON-PRICE/TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

21 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME II – NON-PRICE/TECHNICAL

•Refer to Section L.6 Proposal Requirements of the RFP

•Paper:

– Original and four (4) paper copies

•Electronic:

– One (1) Compact Disc (CD) compatible with IBM-type CPU

•Bookmark all sections the same for paper and electronic copies.

22 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME II – NON-PRICE/TECHNICAL (cont.)

Address the following Non-Cost/Price Factors:

• Factor 1 – Technical Approach

• Factor 2 – Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm

• Factor 3 – Safety

• Factor 4 – Management Approach

• Factor 5 – Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects

23 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME II – FACTOR 1:

TECHNICAL APPROACH

SOLICITATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:

• The offeror shall clearly demonstrate its understanding of and approach to accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement. The narrative shall not exceed five (5) pages. Pages that exceed the maximum number allowed will be removed and discarded prior to evaluation. Offerors shall describe the staff, skills, techniques, equipment, supplies and other resources proposed to accomplish the objectives and standards detailed in the Performance Work Statement, particularly the requirements set forth under Annex 1502000 - Facility Investment (Demolition).

• Offerors shall describe the staff, skills, techniques, equipment, supplies and other resources proposed to accomplish the objectives and standards detailed in the Performance Work Statement, particularly the requirements set forth under Annex 1502000 - Facility Investment (Demolition). Though technical approach will be evaluated with emphasis on Annex 1502000, this does not preclude the offeror from addressing other areas of the PWS which may contribute to and supplement the offerors’ overall technical approach.

• Offerors shall identify the risks they expect to encounter under the performance objectives and standards of this solicitation and how their technical approach and contingency plans will mitigate those risks. Failure by the offeror to identify any risks, (e.g. mobilization, equipment, personnel, supplies, changing requirements etc.) that are readily apparent to the Government evaluators and mitigation to such risks, may result in a lower rating for this factor.

• Narrative shall not exceed five (5) pages.

• REFER TO SECTION L, FACTOR 1, FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.

24 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME II – FACTOR 2:

RECENT, RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRM

SOLICITATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:

•Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) service projects/work performed of the Offeror that best demonstrates offeror experience on recent, relevant projects that are similar in size, scope and complexity to the request for proposal (RFP). For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as SIMILAR DEMOLITION SERVICES. Service projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered.

• REFER TO SECTION L, FACTOR 2, FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.

25 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME II – FACTOR 3:

SAFETY

SOLICITATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The Offeror shall submit:

•The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY) (2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below.

•For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

• REFER TO SECTION L, FACTOR 3, FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.

26 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME II – FACTOR 3:

SAFETY, CONT.

SOLICITATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The Offeror shall submit:

• Technical Approach for Safety. Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

–Describe the Offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

–Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

–Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

–The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

• REFER TO SECTION L, FACTOR 3, FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.

27 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME II – FACTOR 4:

MANAGEMENT APPROACH

SOLICITATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:

•The offeror’s proposal must include a detailed management plan with emphasis on an effective organizational structure for performance of the work required and quality control procedures to adequately monitor and measure contract performance. The plan shall not exceed five (5) pages.

Pages that exceed the maximum number allowed will be removed and will not be considered.

•A description of the Management Plan shall include a list of Key Personnel for the following positions: Project Manager, Quality Control Manager and Site & Safety Health Officer. Key Personnel should also be identified by name, educational level, qualifications; years of service with the company, years of experience and the skills offered. The Management Plan shall also address your quality control process and any measure you would use that ensures success. The Plan shall be in sufficient detail that clearly supports the requirements as stated in the solicitation.

• REFER TO SECTION L, FACTOR 4, FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.

28 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME II – FACTOR 4:

MANAGEMENT APPROACH, CONT.

SOLICITATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:

•The management plan shall also include: a description of the Offeror’s overall concept of operations, an explanation of any resource management strategies (i.e. material stock outs/substitute supplies/supply chain management/alternate equipment measures/replacements, etc), and any quality control procedures to adequately monitor and measure contract performance.

•The Offeror shall affirmatively state in the Management Plan that they intend to staff the requirement with experienced, qualified and capable personnel. If applicable, a description of the Offeror’s plan to monitor subcontracted efforts should also be provided.

• REFER TO SECTION L, FACTOR 4, FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.

29 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

VOLUME II – FACTOR 5:

PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT RELEVANT PROJECTS

SOLICITATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:

• IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2 (Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm). AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED

CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

• Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

• In addition to the above, the Government may review other sources of information for evaluating past performance.

• A copy of the blank NAVFAC Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) to be used for requesting client references is included as Attachment JL-3. Past Performance questionnaires must be submitted not later than the date and time provided in Block 9 of the Standard Form 33, “Solicitation, Offer and Award,” in sealed envelopes/boxes marked in the bottom right corner “RFP No. N40192-22-R-9100.”

• REFER TO SECTION L, FACTOR 5, FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.

30 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas 22 May 2020

EVALUATION

31 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

BASIS FOR AWARD

•The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

• As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)).

•The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

•As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

•REFER TO SECTION M.1 FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

32 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

BASIS FOR AWARD (cont.)

• The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

• If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

•Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. If discussions are held, they will be for proposals containing one weakness or worse.

33 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The solicitation requires the evaluation of PRICE and the following NON-PRICE factors:

FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL APPROACH

FACTOR 2 – RECENT, RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRM

FACTOR 3 – SAFETY

FACTOR 4 – MANAGEMENT APPROACH

FACTOR 5 – PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT, RELEVANT PROJECTS

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

34 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

BASIS OF EVALUATION - PRICE

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options; however, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

• Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

• Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

• Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

• Comparison of market survey results.

35 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

BASIS OF EVALUATION - FACTOR 1:

TECHNICAL APPROACH

The Government will focus on whether the Offeror has proposed an adequate and workable plan, methods, procedures and resources to accomplish the requirements of the overall project. The government preference is for a proposal that demonstrates a high probability of accomplishing solicitation performance requirements.

36 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

BASIS OF EVALUATION - FACTOR 2:

RECENT, RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRM

•The Government will focus on whether the offer demonstrates extensive experience in recent, relevant demolition services projects. The offeror's experience demonstrates a strong ability to manage demolition projects being executed at the same time, with little to no risk of achieving solicitation requirements. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as referred to in Annex 1502000 under PWS Spec Item 4 and incidental related work. Offerors must also demonstrate the ability to perform multiple projects in different locations simultaneously. As previously stated, recency of the evaluated project will also be considered.

•As previously stated, recency of the evaluated project will also be considered. For purpose of evaluation, recent is considered to be a project within the past five (5) years from the date of the Request for Proposal and relevancy is based on similarity of service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and degree of subcontract/teaming effort required, if any.

37 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

BASIS OF EVALUATION - FACTOR 3:

SAFETY

•The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

•The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

•REFER TO SECTION M.1 FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

38 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

BASIS OF EVALUATION - FACTOR 3:

SAFETY, CONT.

• The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative:

• To determine the degree to which the Offeror:

–Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

–Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

–Describes a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

–The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

• REFER TO SECTION M.1 FOR MORE DETAILED SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

39 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

BASIS OF EVALUATION - FACTOR 4:

MANAGEMENT APPROACH

•The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the offeror’s project management plan and structure for performance, and the ability to utilize such objectives to successfully meet the demolition services requirements of this contract. The Government will evaluate whether key personnel proposed meet or exceeds the stated minimum requirements in terms of experience, education and training as provided in the PWS 0200000 Section C, Spec Item 2.7. Additionally, the Government will evaluate the quality control measures presented in the proposal for achieving both quality and timeliness, as well as the effectiveness of the offeror’s plan for management of subcontracted efforts. Failure to provide any of these requirements (e.g. objectives, organizational structure and quality control procedures may result in a lower rating for this factor.

40 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

BASIS OF EVALUATION - FACTOR 5:

PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT RELEVANT PROJECTS

The evaluation will consider:

•The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

–A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

–A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

–A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

–Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand

•For the purpose of evaluation, recent is considered to be a project within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP and relevancy is based on similarity of demolition services, complexity, dollar value and contract type.

41 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

A combined technical/risk evaluation considering risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings shall be used. The technical risk evaluation shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings listed in the following table. Adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign an overall rating to each technical proposal and to assign a rating for each technical factor. Use upper case letter ratings for major technical factors as well as the overall rating. The addition of plus (+) or minus (-) to an adjective rating is not allowed.

22 May 2020

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding (O) Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good (G) Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable (A) Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal (M) Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable (U) Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

42 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS (cont.)

•Past Performance Evaluation: This source selection requires a greater level of discrimination within the past performance evaluation, therefore, the relevancy ratings in the following table shall be used:

22 May 2020

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method Adjectival Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

43 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS (cont.)

• Performance Confidence Assessment: This source selection requires a greater level of discrimination within the past performance evaluation, therefore, Government shall use the confidence ratings identified in Table below:

22 May 2020

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

Table 3. Performance Confidence Assessments Adjectival Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

44 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

CURRENT PROJECT TIMELINE

• Pre-solicitation Issued – 01 August 2022

• Solicitation Issued – 01 September 2022

• Pre-Proposal Conference – 2:00 PM, Local Time/ChST, 12 September 2022

• Proposals Due – 2:00 PM, Local Time/ChST, 30 September 2022

If hand carrying or express mailing proposals, Offeror is advised that the address is on a secured base and passes are required to gain access.

• Contract Award (Planned) – 07 November 2022

• Full Performance – 07 November 2022

22 May 2020

If sent by regular mail: If hand carried/private courier:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas Facilities Support Acquisition Division Attn: FELIX A. BENAVENTE PSC 455 Box 195

FPO AP 96950-2937

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas Facilities Support Acquisition Division Attn: FELIX A. BENAVENTE Building 103 (2nd Floor), Naval Base Guam Santa Rita, GU 96915

45 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas

CLOSING STATEMENT

• No minutes of this meeting will be published.

• The attendance sheet and Pre-Proposal presentation slides will be posted on the SAM.gov website at https://www.SAM.gov.

• If any of the information presented at the Pre-Proposal conflicts with the RFP, the information in the RFP will govern.

• Any changes to the RFP will be made in writing, with an amendment posted to the SAM.gov website.

• It is the offerors’ responsibility to check the SAM.gov website for any amendments.

46 Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas 22 May 2020

THANK YOU

FOR YOUR TIME AND ATTENTION