Amendment 09.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

N40085

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

LC-U33-RODRIGUEZ RANGE-DE-LEAD AND REPAIR BERMS ON OUTDOOR RANGES, JOINT EXPEDITIONARY BASE, LITTLE CREEK -

FORT STORY (LITTLE CREEK SITE), VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

Proposal due date has been extended to Thursday, 24 April 2025 @ 1400 EST.

The purpose of this amendment is as follows:

(1) Provide Attachment N- EPA_BMP

(2) Request contractors revise their proposals taking into consideration guidance in Attachment N

(3) Request contractors submit best and final offer, due date Thursday, 24 April 2025 @ 1400 EST

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

PWD LITTLE CREEK

FACILITIES ENGINEERING & ACQ DIV

1450 GATOR BLVD

VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23459-8616

SEE ITEM 6

ACQR 6021397

N4008525R2605

04/18/2025

02/13/2025

Chirine Johnson, Contract Specialist

04/18/2025

X

1 104

Best Management Practices for Lead at Outdoor Shooting Ranges

EPA-902-B-01-001

Revised June 2005 Region 2

United States Environmental Protection Agency

ATTACHMENT N- EPA_BMP

For additional copies of this manual, please contact:

United States Environmental Protection Agency Division of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance RCRA Compliance Branch 290 Broadway, 22nd Fl.

New York, New York 10007-1866

Tel: 212-637-4145 Fax: 212-637-4949

Copies of this manual along with any additions or updates can also be obtained on-line at:

http://www.epa.gov/region2/waste/leadshot

Copying and Reprinting

This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted.

Fourth Printing, June 2005

BMP for Lead at Outdoor Shooting Ranges

Best Management Practices for Lead at Outdoor Shooting Ranges

Notice

This manual is intended to provide useful general information to shooting range owners/operators.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not certify or approve ranges, range design or lead management practices. While every effort has been made to provide up-to-date technical information, this manual is not to be used as a substitute for consultation with scien-tists, engineers, attorneys, and other appropriate professionals who should be called upon to make specific recommendations for individual range design and lead management.

Any variation between applicable regulations and the summaries contained in this guidance docu-ment are unintentional, and, in the case of such variations, the requirements of the regulations govern.

This guidance was developed by EPA Region 2 in cooperation with a few states as well as many EPA offices. In addition, EPA, with the assistance of the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO) provided all 50 states with an opportunity to review the RCRA regulatory portion of the guidance. At the time of printing, about 40 states had contacted the EPA and given their support and concurrence. EPA is continuing to get the agreement of the re-maining states. Therefore, it appears that most, if not all, states will share the same view as to how lead shot is regulated.

Following the steps set forth in this guidance should result in compliance with applicable regulations.

EPA does not make any guarantee or assume any liability with respect to the use of any information or recommendations contained in this document.

This guidance does not constitute rulemaking by the EPA and may not be relied on to create a substantive or procedural right or benefit enforceable, at law or in equity, by any person.

Notice

Acknowledgements

The USEPA would like to acknowledge the support of:

• The National Rifle Association of America

• The National Shooting Sports Foundation

• The Wildlife Management Institute

• Mark Begley of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection

• Mr. Dick Peddicord of Dick Peddicord and Company, Inc.

These participants provided valuable information and assistance as peer reviewers in the develop-ment of the manual and their efforts are truly appreciated. EPA also wishes to give special thanks to Dr. Charles W. Sever of Okie Environmental Consulting, L.L.C., Inc., Mr. Mike Warminsky of Brice Environmental Services Corp., and Mr. Victor Ordija of Sporting Goods Properties.The EPA also wishes to acknowledge and thank the many others who provided important comments and insight, and especially those individuals who took the time to meet with us in person or on the phone.

Acknowledgements

Cover photo by: Mr. Jack Hoyt, EPA Region 2

Statement of Goals

The goals of this manual are:

� to inform shooting ranges :

� that the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) purpose in developing and distributing this manual is to assist range owners and operators to operate in an environmentally protective manner.

� to promote an understanding of:

� why lead is an environmental, public and regulatory concern, � what laws and regulations apply, � the benefits of applying good management practices, � what can be done to successfully manage lead, � why implementing lead best management practices is an integral part of environmental stewardship, � how to minimize litigation risk.

� to promote action by ranges to:

� adopt and implement best management practices for managing lead, � recycle a finite natural resource, � become a model for other ranges through proper lead management, � advocate environmental stewardship.

Statement of Goals

This page intentionally left blank

EPA Statement on National Guidance

Table of Contents - i

Best Management Practices for Lead at Outdoor Shooting Ranges

Table of Contents

Page

List of Figures ...................................................................................................................ii List of Tables .....................................................................................................................ii Introduction .......................................................................................................................iii

Chapter I - Environmental and Regulatory Concerns at the Shooting Range ................ I-1

1.0 Background ............................................................................................... I-1

1.1 Lead Contamination’s Impact on Human Health and the Environment ...... I-2

1.2 Legal Requirements & Court Rulings ........................................................ I-6

1.3 Benefits of Minimizing Lead’s Environmental Impact ............................... I-12

Chapter II - Range Characteristics & Activities to Consider When Implementing BMPs ................................................................................. II-1

2.0 Background ............................................................................................. II-1

2.1 Physical Characteristics ........................................................................... II-1

2.2 Operational Aspects ................................................................................. II-4

2.3 Planning a New Range ............................................................................. II-4

Chapter III - BMPs for Outdoor Ranges ....................................................................... III-1

3.0 Background ............................................................................................. III-1

3.1 Bullet and Shot Containment Techniques (Step 1) ................................... III-1

3.2 BMPs to Prevent Lead Migration (Step 2)................................................ III-5

3.3 Lead Removal and Recycling (Step 3) .................................................. III-11

3.4 Documenting Activities and Record Keeping (Step 4) ........................... III-17

3.5 Additional Economic Considerations ..................................................... III-18

3.6 Summary of Key BMPs for Shooting Ranges ........................................ III-18

3.7 Certificate of Recognition ....................................................................... III-18

References

Appendix A - Resources

Appendix B - Lead Shot Alternatives

Appendix C - Sample Bullet Containment Devices

Appendix D - RCRA Regulatory Requirements and Interpretations

Appendix E - Template for an Environmental Stewardship Plan for Management of Lead Shot/Bullets

Lists of Figures and Tables - ii

Figure Number

1-1 Effects on the Human Body from Excessive Exposure to Lead

2-1 pH Scale

3-1 Four Steps to Build a Successful Lead Management Program Utilizing a Variety of BMPs

3-2 Sample Filter Bed System

3-3 Examples of Common Lead Reclamation Equipment

Table Number

1-1 Application of Key Terms to Outdoor Ranges

2-1 Common Physical Characteristics at Ranges - Potential Risks and Benefits Associated with Range Operations

3-1 Summary of Key BMPs

3-2 Calculating Weight of Lime to Increase Soil pH Values

Page

I-5

II-1

III-1

III-10

III-11

Page

I-10

II-3

III-19

III-6

List of Figures

List of Tables

Introduction

This manual provides owners and operators of outdoor rifle, pistol, trap, skeet and sporting clay ranges with information on lead management at their ranges. This manual serves as a reference guide and presents best management practices (BMPs) available to the shooting range community. The practices have been proven to effectively reduce or eliminate lead contamination and may also be economically beneficial to the range owner/operator. Since each range is unique in both the type of shooting activity and its environmental setting, specific solutions are not provided in this manual.

Rather, a range owner or operator may use this manual to identify and select the most appropriate BMP(s) for their facility. Other information on environmental aspects of management at outdoor shooting ranges can be found in the National Shooting Sports Foundation’s Environmental Aspects of Construction and Management of Outdoor Shooting Ranges.

The manual does not address range layout or design to meet range safety or competition requirements. For information on range safety and competition requirements, range owners/ operators are directed to other comprehensive reference materials available on that subject, such as the National Rifle Association’s Range Source Book, and the National Association of Shooting Range’s website (www.rangeinfo.org).

Owners/operators of ranges may want to assign the use of this BMP Manual to a specific team or committee. Delegating this responsibility to a specific team or group helps to assure that the BMP’s are identified and implemented.

The manual is organized as follows:

• Chapter I provides the background on why lead is of concern to human health and the environment. It includes a discussion of how environmental laws impact shooting ranges and the importance of an integrated BMP program to manage lead.

• Chapter II discusses physical and operational characteristics to be considered when selecting a successful BMP program.

• Chapter III addresses best management techniques for rifle/pistol ranges, skeet and trap ranges, and sporting clay ranges. In this chapter, the manual explores possible solutions to prevent, reduce and/or remove lead contamination for each type of range.

• The Appendices provide current (as of June 2005) contacts for lead reclamation and recycling companies, vendors that provide prevention and/or remediation techniques and shooting organizations that have additional information on the lead issue. Additionally, the Appendices provide information on alternatives to lead, diagrams of bullet trap designs, summaries of regulatory requirements and interpretations, and a sample Environmental Stewardship Plan.

EPA is very interested in any suggestions you have about practices included in this manual which have proven effective in controlling lead contamination or recycling lead bullets/shot.

Please send such information to the address below. Also, for additional information, or to be added to the list of lead reclaimers or remediation contractors, contact the National Rifle Association (NRA), the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) or:

Lead Shot Coordinator RCRA Compliance Branch

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2

290 Broadway New York, New York 10007-1866

Telephone: (212)637-4145 E-Mail: Leadshot.Region2@epa.gov

Introduction - iii

Chapter I - Page I-1

Chapter I:

Environmental and Regulatory

Concerns at the Shooting Range

(CDCP), and a large number of states have identified human exposure to all forms of lead as a major health concern in the United States.

Lead management practices at ranges across the United States remain inconsistent. Some range owners/operators have examined the impact of range operations on human health and the environment and have implemented procedures to manage and/or remove accumulated lead from ranges. Other range owners/operators are just beginning to characterize and investigate their ranges in order to design an environmental risk prevention and/or remediation program(s) specific to their sites. A third group of ranges has adopted a “wait and see” policy – taking no action until specifically required to do so by law or clear guidance is in place. Finally, a fourth, small, but important group of range owners/operators remain unaware of lead’s potential to harm human health and the environment, and of existing federal and state laws.

To manage lead, many owners and operators have successfully implemented Best Management Practices (BMPs) at their ranges.

These range owners and operators have realized many benefits from sound lead management including:

- stewardship of the environment, natural resources and wildlife,

- improved community relations,

- improved aesthetics of the range/good business practices,

- increased profitability through recovery/ recycling lead, a valuable and finite resource, and

- reduced public scrutiny.

Shooting sports organizations [e.g., National Rifle Association (NRA) and the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF)] promote lead management throughout the United States.

These organizations have researched different methods to effectively address potential and actual lead mobility and exposure without detracting from the enjoyment of the sport. The NRA, NSSF, and a number of other shooting sports organizations strongly encourage range

1.0 Background

Outdoor shooting ranges provide recreational facilities for millions of shooting sports enthusiasts in the United States. Recently, there has been a growing public concern about the potential negative environmental and health effects of range operations. In particular, the public is concerned about potential risks associated with the historical and continued use of lead shot and bullets at outdoor ranges.

This concern is not unfounded. An estimated 9,000 non-military outdoor ranges exist in the United States, collectively shooting millions of pounds of lead annually. Some ranges have operated for as long as several generations.

Historical operations at ranges involved leaving expended lead bullets and shot uncollected on ranges. Many of these ranges continue to operate in the same manner as in the past.

It is estimated that approximately four percent (4%) (80,000 tons/year) of all the lead produced in the United States in the late 1990’s (about 2 million tons/year), is made into bullets and shot.

Taking into account rounds used off-range, and rounds used at indoor ranges, it is clear that much of this 160,000,000 pounds of lead shot/ bullets finds its way into the environment at ranges.

Since the mid-1980’s, citizen groups have brought several lawsuits against range owners and have urged federal and state agencies to take action against owners and operators of outdoor shooting ranges. The citizen groups argued that range owners improperly managed discharged lead bullets and shot. Federal courts have supported parts of these suits, requiring range owners/operators to clean up lead-contaminated areas. Concurrent with the increased citizen suit activity, the federal EPA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Chapter I - Page I-2 owners/operators to develop a BMP program that contains elements discussed later in this manual. Contact the NRA and NSSF for additional guidance materials available on lead management practices.

By implementing appropriate lead management at outdoor shooting ranges, range owners and operators can reduce the environmental and health risks associated with lead deposition, meet legal requirements and realize quantifiable benefits.

1.1 Lead Contamination’s Impact

on Human Health and the Environment

Exposure Routes

Historically, the three major sources for human exposure to lead are lead-based paint, lead in dust and soil and lead in drinking water.

Typically, human exposure occurs through ingestion, which is the consumption of lead or lead-contaminated materials, or by inhalation.

The main human exposure to lead associated with shooting ranges is through lead-contaminated soil. However, other pathways are discussed below, along with lead’s detrimental effects on humans and animals.

Lead can be introduced into the environment at shooting ranges in one or more of the following ways. Each of these pathways is site-specific and may or may not occur at each individual range:

• Lead oxidizes when exposed to air and dissolves when exposed to acidic water or soil.

• Lead bullets, bullet particles, or dissolved lead can be moved by storm water runoff.

• Dissolved lead can migrate through soils to groundwater.

Lead oxidizes when exposed to air and dissolves when exposed to acidic water or soil

When lead is exposed to acidic water and/or soil, it breaks down by weathering into lead oxides, carbonates, and other soluble compounds. With each rainfall, these compounds may be dissolved, and the lead may move in solution in the storm runoff waters.

Decreases in water acidity (i.e., increases in its pH) will cause dissolved lead to precipitate out of solution. Lead concentrations in solution are reduced by this precipitation. At pHs above 7.5, very little lead remains in solution. Increased time of contact between lead and acidic water generally results in an increase in the amount of dissolved lead in the storm runoff water. The five factors which most influence the dissolving of lead in water are summarized below:

Annual Precipitation Rate - The higher the annual precipitation rate, the faster the lead weathers. Also, during prolonged rains, the contact time between water and lead is increased. In general, the higher the precipitation rate, the higher the potential risk of lead migration off-site in solution.

pH of Rain and Surface Water - The acidity of the rainwater decreases as basic (alkaline) minerals in the soil are dissolved. If sufficient minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and iron are present in local soils, then the lead may quickly precipitate out of solution entirely as these other minerals are dissolved. The pH of shallow surface water is an indicator of the presence or absence of basic minerals in the local soil and in gravel within the stream beds through which the water has moved. The water in deeper streams and lakes is more likely to be composed of acidic rainwater that is not neutralized.

Contact Time - The contact time between acidic surface water and lead is a factor in the amount of lead that is dissolved. For example, lead shot deposited directly into a lake has a longer contact time then lead shot deposited in upland areas.

Soil Cover - Organic material will absorb lead and remove it from a water solution. The thicker the organic leaf and peat cover on the soil, the lower the lead content in solution in water leaving the shot area. Organic material has a strong

Chapter I - Page I-3 ability to extract lead out of solution in water.

pH of Groundwater - During periods of no rainfall, the water flowing within most streams comes from groundwater discharging into the stream channel. Therefore, the acidity of the groundwater affects the acidity of the surface water, and hence, affects the solubility of any lead particles carried into the stream during storm runoff.

Lead bullets, bullet particles or dissolved lead can be moved by storm water runoff

The ability of water to transport lead is influenced by two factors: velocity of the water and weight or size of the lead fragment. Water’s capacity to carry small particles is proportional to the square of the water’s velocity. Clear water moving at a velocity of 100 feet per minute can carry a lead particle 10,000 times heavier than water moving at a velocity of 10 feet per minute. Muddy water can carry even larger particles. The five factors that most influence velocity of runoff are described below:

Rainfall Intensity - The greater the volume of rainfall during a short period of time, the faster the velocity created to carry the rainfall off-site.

The higher the annual rainfall, the greater the number of periods of heavy rainfall.

Topographic Slope - Generally, the steeper the topographic slope, the faster the velocity of stormwater runoff.

Soil Type - More rainfall will soak into sandy soils then into clay soils. Hence, for a given rainfall intensity, the volume of runoff will be greater from areas underlain by clays or other low permeable soils than from permeable sandy soil.

Velocity - Velocity tends to decrease as stream width increases. Merging streams, eddy currents, and curves in streams are other factors that may reduce the velocity. Generally, the shorter the distance from the lead deposit to the property line, the more likely it is that the lead fragments in suspension will be transported off-site.

Vegetative Cover and Man-made Structures - Structures such as dams and dikes reduce the water’s velocity and greatly reduce the size and weight of the lead particles the water can carry.

Since lead particles are heavy compared to the other suspended particles of similar size, they are more likely to be deposited under the influence of anything that reduces velocity of the storm runoff. Grass and other vegetation reduce runoff velocity and act as a filter to remove suspended solids from the water.

Dissolved lead can migrate through soils to groundwater

Acidic rainwater may dissolve weathered lead compounds. A portion of the lead may be transported in solution in groundwater beneath land surfaces. Groundwater may transport lead in solution from the higher topographic areas to the lower areas such as valleys, where it is discharged and becomes part of the surface water flow. If the water flowing underground passes through rocks containing calcium, magnesium, iron, or other minerals more soluble then lead, or through minerals that raise the pH of the water, then the lead in solution may be replaced (removed) from the solution by these other metals. However, if the soil is a clean silica sand and gravel, fractured granite, or similar type material, then the lead may move long distances in solution. The factors most likely to affect the amount of lead carried by the groundwater in solution are discussed below:

Annual Precipitation - Generally, high precipitation rates result in heavy dew, more frequent rainfall, numerous streams, shallow depth to groundwater, shorter distance of travel, and more rapid rates of groundwater flow. Also, the greater volumes of rainfall over geologic time probably have reduced the amount of calcium and other soluble basic minerals that could raise the water pH and cause lead to precipitate (settle) out of solution from the groundwater.

Soil Types - Clays have a high ionic lead bonding capacity and more surface area to which the lead can bond. Also, groundwater movement in clay is very slow, which increases the contact time for lead to bond to the clay.

Chapter I - Page I-4

Low permeability reduces the amount of historical leaching and increases the probability of the presence of basic (pH-increasing) minerals that can precipitate out of solution in groundwater or cause the lead to bond to the clay. All of the basic calcium and related minerals generally will have been removed from the clean silica sand and gravel soils, so the lead in solution in groundwater in these type soils can move long distances (miles) through the ground relatively unchanged.

Soil Chemistry - The more basic minerals like calcium and magnesium that are present in soils along the pathways through which the groundwater moves, the greater the lead precipitation (removal) rate. Lead should move in solution only a short distance (a few feet) through a sand composed of calcium shell fragments, but could move in solution long distances (miles) through clean quartz sand.

Depth to Groundwater - In areas of groundwater discharge such as river flood plains and most flat areas, the groundwater surface is often a few feet below the surface. Remember, the shorter the distance traveled, the greater the risk that the lead will migrate into the environment. Shallow depth to groundwater is indicative of higher risk for lead to reach the water.

pH of Groundwater - Although other factors influence solubility of lead in water, a good rule of thumb is that lead will precipitate out of solution when the pH or alkalinity of water is greater then about 7.5. But, lead dissolved in acid groundwater may travel many miles without change.

Health Effects of Lead Exposure on Ranges

Lead poisoning is a serious health risk. At higher concentrations, it is dangerous to people of all ages, leading to convulsions, coma and even death. At even very low concentrations, it is dangerous to infants and young children, damaging the developing brain and resulting in both learning and behavioral problems. Figure 1- 1 describes the effects of exposure to lead on children and adults.

Federal, state and local actions, including bans on lead in gasoline, paint, solder and many other lead-containing products, have resulted in significant reductions in average blood-lead levels. Despite these advances, the number of lead-poisoned children remains alarmingly high.

Children living in older homes may be exposed to lead in peeling paint or paint dust. Children can also come in contact with lead in soil and with lead dust carried home on the clothing of parents.

On ranges, inhalation is one pathway for lead exposure since shooters are exposed to lead dust during the firing of their guns. Because wind is unlikely to move heavy lead particles very far, airborne dust is generally considered a potential threat only when there are significant structures that block air flow on the firing line.

Under such conditions, the hygiene and other practices proposed by the NRA for indoor shooting ranges in their “Source Book” are applicable to outdoor ranges.

Range workers may also be exposed to lead dust while performing routine maintenance operations, such as raking or cleaning out bullet traps. Owners/operators may want to protect these workers by requiring them to wear the proper protective equipment or dampening the soil prior to work.

Another exposure route for lead at outdoor ranges is ingestion by direct contact with lead or lead particles. For example, lead particles generated by the discharge of a firearm can collect on the hands of a shooter. These particles can be ingested if a shooter eats or smokes prior to washing his/her hands after shooting. The relative risk of lead exposure to people in a well managed facility is low.

Detrimental effects due to elevated lead levels can also be found in animals. Excessive exposure to lead, primarily from ingestion, can cause increased mortality rates in cattle, sheep and waterfowl. For example, waterfowl and other birds can ingest the shot, mistaking it for food or grit. Waterfowl, in particular, are highly susceptible to lead ingestion. This is a concern at ranges where shooting occurs into or over

Chapter I - Page I-5

Effects on the Human Body from Excessive Exposure to Lead

If not detected early, children with relatively low levels of lead (as low as 10 microgram/deciliter for children) in their bodies can suffer from:

- damage to the brain and nervous system,

- behavior and learning problems (such as hyperactivity and aggressiveness),

- slowed growth,

- hearing problems,

- headaches, and

- impairment of vision and motor skills.

Adults can suffer from:

- difficulties during pregnancy,

- reproductive problems in both men and women (such as low birth weight, birth defects and decreased fertility),

- high blood pressure,

- digestive problems,

- neurological disorders,

- memory and concentration problems,

- muscle and joint pain, and

- kidney dysfunction.

Brain or Nerve Damage

Slowed Growth

Hearing Problems

Digestive Problems

Reproductive Problems (Adults)

Lead affects the body in many ways

Figure 1-1: Effects on the Human Body from Excessive Exposure to Lead

Chapter I - Page I-6 understand the legal issues and requirements.

1.2.1 Resource Conservation and

Recovery Act (RCRA)

RCRA provides the framework for the nation’s solid and hazardous waste management program. Under RCRA, EPA developed a “cradle-to-grave” system to ensure the protection of human health and the environment when generating, transporting, storing, treating and disposing of hazardous waste. RCRA potentially applies to many phases of range operation because lead bullets/shot, if abandoned, may be a solid and/or a hazardous waste and may present an actual or potential imminent and substantial endangerment.

Connecticut Coastal Fishermen’s Association v. Remington Arms Company, et al.

In the late 1980s, the Connecticut Coastal Fishermen’s Association filed a lawsuit against Remington Arms Company as the owner of the Lordship Gun Club. The Lordship Gun Club (a.k.a. Remington Gun Club) is a 30-acre site in Stratford, Connecticut, located on the Long Island Sound at the mouth of the Housatonic River. In the mid-1960s, the Lordship Gun Club was reconstructed to its final configuration of 12 combined trap and skeet fields and one additional trap field. Over the years, the Lordship Gun Club became known as one of the premier shooting facilities on the East Coast.

The Connecticut Coastal Fishermen’s Association filed a lawsuit, alleging that lead shot and clay targets are hazardous waste under RCRA. The Complaint alleged that because the lead shot and clay targets were hazardous wastes, the gun club was a hazardous waste storage and disposal facility subject to RCRA requirements. The plaintiff also sought civil penalties and attorney’s fees.

Remington moved for a summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the Connecticut Coastal Fisherman’s Association cross-moved for a partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. On September 11, 1991, the United water. Many of the legal and government actions that have been brought against ranges are based on elevated levels of lead and increased mortality in waterfowl. For example, in one case, an upland area of a range became a temporary pond after a thunderstorm. Waterfowl used the pond to feed and shortly thereafter, there was a waterfowl die-off (increase in bird mortality), apparently from lead ingestion.

1.2 Legal Requirements & Court

Rulings

To date, most litigation concerns have been at shotgun ranges where the shotfall zone impacts water or wetland areas. The potential environmental and human health risks are greater at these ranges. However, all ranges, including those not located near water bodies, may be subject to legal and government action if proper range management programs are not implemented. Range owners/operators should expect greater scrutiny as ranges become more visible to regulators, environmental groups and the general public.

Citizen groups have been the driving force behind most legal actions taken against outdoor ranges. These groups have sued range owners/ operators under federal environmental laws. Two of EPA’s most comprehensive environmental laws, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), specifically provide citizens with the right to sue in cases in which the environment and human health are threatened. These citizen suits have been highly effective in changing the way ranges operate, even when out-of-court settlements have been reached. The decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Remington Arms and New York Athletic Club set a legal precedent in the application of RCRA and/or the CWA to outdoor ranges. Lead management programs at outdoor ranges must comply with both laws. Actions have also been taken under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) commonly know as Superfund.

State and local statutes and regulations may also apply. To ensure environmental laws are being followed, range owners/operators must

Chapter I - Page I-7

States District Court for the District of Connecticut ruled on the case.

Regarding the plaintiff’s claims under RCRA, the District Court ruled in favor of the Connecticut Coastal Fishermen’s Association, holding that the lead shot and clay targets were “discarded materials” and were “solid waste;” therefore, the materials were subject to regulation under RCRA. The court further stated that the discharged lead shot was a “hazardous waste,” but declined to rule on whether the clay target fragments were also hazardous waste.

Remington petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Court to review the lower court’s ruling.

On June 11, 1992, both parties presented oral arguments before the court. Subsequent to oral arguments, the appellate court requested that EPA file an amicus brief “addressing whether lead shot and clay target debris deposited on land and in the water in the normal course of trap and skeet shooting is ‘discarded material’...

so as to constitute ‘solid waste’ under RCRA.”

On March 29, 1993, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reached its decision. With respect to RCRA, the court both reversed and affirmed the lower court’s opinion in part.

Briefly, the decision affects currently operating and future gun clubs, and the following key points are of primary concern:

1. With respect to RCRA, the court agreed with EPA’s amicus brief, which had argued that shooting at gun clubs is not subject to regulatory (as opposed to statutory) requirements. In other words, during routine operations, gun clubs are not viewed as facilities that manage hazardous wastes subject to RCRA regulations and, as such, do not require RCRA permits.

2. Another argument in the EPA’s amicus brief with which the court agreed was the view that the RCRA statute allows citizen suits to be brought if a gun club’s shooting activities pose an “imminent and substantial endangerment to health or the environment.” Although gun clubs are not subject to RCRA regulations, EPA or any state, municipality, or citizen group can take legal action under the statutory provisions of RCRA against gun clubs for actual or potential environmental damage occurring during, or even after, the operation of the club. Under RCRA, the plaintiff would be eligible to recover its legal fees as well.

3. The court concluded that lead shot and clay targets meet the statutory definition of solid waste because these materials were “discarded (i.e. abandoned)” and “left to accumulate long after they have served their intended purpose.”

Further, the court concluded that based upon toxicity testing and evidence of lead contamination, the lead shot was a hazardous waste subject to RCRA.

The important point to consider here is that if lead shot and clay target debris are discarded (i.e. abandoned), these materials are considered a solid waste as defined in the statute and the facility may be subject to governmental or citizen suits.

If, on the other hand, the discharged lead shot is recovered or reclaimed on a regular basis, no statutory solid waste (or hazardous waste) would be present and imminent hazard suits would be avoided.

Thus, the Remington Arms case is an important legal precedent. Even though regulations have not been issued regarding gun club operations and environmental protection, gun clubs are still at risk of legal action under RCRA if they fail to routinely recover and reclaim lead, do not take steps to minimize lead release or migration, or if they abandon lead in berms.

Gun clubs where there is shooting into water, wetlands, rivers, creeks, and other sensitive environments have the highest degree of litigation risk. Conversely, gun clubs that have the lowest risk of environmental litigation or government action are those clubs that do not shoot into water or wetlands and which have an active program to recover lead.

The following describes how RCRA may apply to outdoor shooting ranges.

Chapter I - Page I-8

How is Lead Shot Regulated Under

RCRA?

Lead shot is not considered a hazardous waste subject to RCRA at the time it is discharged from a firearm because it is used for its intended purpose. As such, shooting lead shot (or bullets) is not regulated nor is a RCRA permit required to operate a shooting range. However, spent lead shot (or bullets), left in the environment, is subject to the broader definition of solid waste written by Congress and used in sections 7002 and 7003 of the RCRA statute.

With reference to reclaiming and recycling lead shot, the following points should serve as guidance in understanding RCRA and how it applies to your range. (A more detailed discussion of the underlying RCRA rules applicable to lead shot removal at ranges is included in Appendix D)

• Removal contractors or reclaimers should apply standard best management practices, mentioned in this manual, to separate the lead from soil. The soil, if then placed back on the range, is exempt from RCRA. However, if the soil is to be removed off-site, then it would require testing to determine if it is a RCRA hazardous waste.

• Lead, if recycled or reused, is considered a scrap metal and is, therefore, excluded from RCRA.

• Collected lead shot and bullets are excluded from RCRA regulation, and need not have a manifest, nor does a range need to obtain a RCRA generator number (i.e., the range is not a hazardous waste “generator”), provided that the lead is recycled or re-used. The reclaimer does not need to be a RCRA transporter. However, it is recommended that ranges retain records of shipments of lead to the receiving facilities in order to demonstrate that the lead was recycled.

Records should also be kept whenever the lead is reused (as in reloading.) The range should be aware that it ultimately may be responsible for the lead sent for reclamation. Therefore, only reputable reclaimers should be utilized.

• Lead from ranges destined for recycling may be temporarily stored on range property after separation from soil if the lead is stored in closed, sealed containers, the containers are stored in a secure location and routinely inspected by range staff, and records of inspections are maintained.

• Sections 7002 and 7003 of the RCRA statute allow EPA, states or citizens to use civil lawsuits, to compel cleanup of or other action for “solid waste” (e.g., spent lead shot) posing actual or potential imminent and substantial endangerment. Such actions can be sought whether the range is in operation or closed, and is based solely on a determination that harm is being posed or may be posed by the range to public health and/or the environment.

Since the risk of lead migrating increases with time, making ranges that have not removed lead more likely candidates for government action or citizen lawsuits under RCRA Section 7002 and 7003, ranges are advised to maintain a schedule of regular lead removal.

• With time, lead in soil can become less desirable to reclaimers and smelters, thereby potentially reducing or eliminating financial returns from lead removal. Moreover, such soil may be subject to more expensive treatment to separate the lead for recycling.

• Lead removal will allow the range to: avoid contamination of the site and potential impacts to human health and the environment; reduce liability with regard to potential government agency or citizen suit action; and, possibly, benefit economically from the recycling of lead. Additional guidance on reclaiming lead is provided in other parts of this manual.

• Soil from berms and shotfall zones may be moved to another area of the range for such reasons as addressing potential environmental impacts (e.g., runoff), altering the layout to address safety concerns or allowing different types of shooting activities, or adding or removing shooting positions.

However, removal of lead prior to such

Chapter I - Page I-9 movement of soil is normal practice and highly advised because it extends the usable life of the materials and reduces the possibility of release of lead into the environment. If lead is not first removed, it will be further dispersed and will be more difficult to remove in future reclamation.

Written records of all such activity should be maintained indefinitely, as they will be necessary in subsequent construction or range closure.

• This RCRA summary applies to operating and non-operating ranges, and the use of BMPs at operating ranges is highly recommended. However, because of increased risk if lead is not actively managed, such application may not preclude the need for remediation, as appropriate and/or as required by states’ regulations, when a range is permanently closed, on-site lead is abandoned, or the land use changes.

Introductory guidance for remediation can be found at www.epa.gov/epaoswer/osw or www.epa.gov/superfund. Look under the sections “Cleanup” or “Resources,” or use the Search function.

1.2.2 - Clean Water Act

The goal of the Clean Water Act (CWA) is to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.”

The most common allegation against ranges by the EPA and citizen groups, is that they violate the CWA if they do not have permits that allow spent ammunition to be discharged into water.

The CWA prohibits “the discharge of any pollutant by any person” into the waters of the United States without a National Pollution Discharge and Elimination System (NPDES) permit. There have been two court cases that have applied the provisions of the CWA to civilian shooting ranges. To understand how the CWA can apply to shooting ranges, a summary of the cases follows. Also see Table 1-1.

To understand the application of the CWA to outdoor ranges, one must know the definitions of key terms and how they have been applied to shooting activities. See Table 1-1.

In the Remington Arms and the New York Athletic Club lawsuits, citizen groups argued that the defendants violated the CWA by discharging pollutants from point sources into the Long Island Sound without a NPDES permit.

Application of the CWA requires the violations to be ongoing. Consequently, the court in Remington Arms dismissed the CWA charge against the range because it had ceased operating before the lawsuit was filed.

However, in the New York Athletic Club case, the club was still in operation during the time of litigation, but had switched to steel shot. EPA’s opinion on this case also addressed the CWA violation. EPA argued that certain trap/skeet ranges can convey pollutants, via point sources, to water in violation of the CWA if a NPDES permit is not obtained. Although some shooting organizations have disagreed with the EPA position, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York specifically found that:

• The mechanized target throwers, the concrete shooting platforms, and the shooting range itself are considered point sources as defined by the CWA;

• Expended shot and target debris, including non-toxic shot, such as steel shot, left in water, are pollutants as defined by the CWA.

Although the New York district court’s decision in the New York Athletic Club case is not controlling in any other district, range owners and operators of outdoor ranges that shoot over or into wetlands or other navigable waters of the United States should be aware of it.

Based on the court’s decision in the New York Athletic Club case, any range whose shot, bullets or target debris enter the “waters of the United States” could be subject to permitting requirements as well as governmental or citizen suits. “Waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States” are waters of the United States, including territorial seas that include any body of water that has any connection to, or impact on, interstate waters or commerce. The waters may include lakes, Chapter I - Page I-10

Table 1-1: Application of Key Terms to Outdoor Ranges mreTyeK noitinifeDyrotutatS otnoitacilppA bulCcitelhtAkroYweN afoegrahcsiD tnatulloP yna" noitidda ottnatullopynafo tniopynamorfsretawelbagivan

)deddasisahpme("ecruos

)21(2631§.C.S.U33

)sdnaltewgnidulcni(retawotnignitoohS ehtnI.egrahcsidasetutitsnoc kroYweN bulCcitelhtA tahtetupsidtondidegnareht, ehtnidetlusersnoitarepognitoohssti sirbedrehtodnatohstnepsfonoitisoped .setatSdetinUehtfosretawehtotni ecruoStnioP dna,denifnoc,elbinrecsidyna" hcihwmorf...ecnayevnocetercsid ebyamroerastnatullop s'noitaNehtotni"degrahcsid

.sretaw

)41(2631§.C.S.U33 nI bulCcitelhtAkroYweN dnuoftruoceht, yllacitametsysottcasegnargnitoohstaht sretawdetalugerotnistnatulloplennahc sreworhttegratdezinahcemtahtdna .retawotniyltceridstnatullopyevnoc gnitoohspartA",detatsti,yllacificepS hcihwmorfecruoselbaifitnedinasi...egnar erastnemgarftegratdnatohstneps ehtfosretawelbagivanotnideyevnoc denimretedoslatruocehT".setatSdetinU ebnacsmroftalpgnitoohsetercnocehttaht ehtrednu"secruostniop"etarapessanees egnargnitoohsehtfotecafenosaroAWC .g.e(stnatullopsreviledyllacitametsystaht

.retawehtotni)gniddawdnatohs tnatulloP ...,etsawdilos,liopsdegderd" otnidegrahcsid...snoitinum

"retaw

)6(2631§.C.S.U33 nI bulCcitelhtAkroYweN tegratdnatohs, "etsawdilos"fomrofaetutitsnoceudiser asaAWCehtrednunoitalugerottcejbus esehtnodesaB".tnatullop" s'APEdetroppustruoceht,snoitanimreted erewsegnarehttahtnoitnetnoc ecruostniopamorfstnatullopgnigrahcsid .AWCehtfonoitaloivni,timrepatuohtiw

Chapter I - Page I-11

1 The term “land” in this instance refers specifically to terrain recognized as “non-wetland” areas.

ponds, rivers, streams, wetlands, or even guts that are frequently dry, which may not be obvious to range owners/operators. These ranges may be required to remediate contaminated sediments and soils, which could be both difficult and expensive, and to cease operations over waters and wetlands. It is essential that these ranges change the direction of shooting, to avoid shooting over or into wetlands or other navigable waters of the United States, and initiate lead removal and recycling activities, where feasible.

In addition, these ranges can cause a substantial impact on wildlife and wetlands, which range owners/operators may be required to restore under other federal laws (e.g., CERCLA, discussed below). Lead shot entering a water body substantially increases the potential risk of contaminating surface and groundwater which, in turn, threatens human health and the environment. Finally, as New York Athletic Club, Remington Arms and similar cases show, neighbors have the most leverage when range activity affects wetlands and waterways.

For ranges located away from coastal areas or whose operating areas are situated wholly over land, compliance with the CWA can be…