Amendment 0002 to Synopsis_24R2508_IDIQ_AE_North-AOR.pdf
PDF 115 KB Posted
- Attached to
- IDIQ Contract for Navy Marine Corps Planning Multi-Discipline Architect Engineer Services MIDLANT AOR
- Solicitation number
- N4008524R2508
About this file
This document is an amendment to a Synopsis for a planned Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract solicitation by the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) for planning and multi-discipline architect-engineer (A-E) services primarily in the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Area of Responsibility (AOR).
The amendment provides responses to 10 Requests for Information (RFIs) submitted by interested parties. Key details include: Activity Overview Plans and Activity Planning and Management Models are not required, an economics degree is acceptable in lieu of certification, subcontractor experience can be used as example projects, a joint venture between a small and large business is acceptable, and personnel can serve in multiple key personnel roles. The solicitation due date is April 15, 2024. The contract will be for planning and multi-discipline A-E services, which may be required throughout the NAVFAC CONUS AOR, but are predominantly expected in the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic region.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
A-E Synopsis WON 1789564 Solicitation N40085-24-R-2508
IDIQ A&E Contract Planning & Multi-Discipline Architect & Engineer (A&E) Services – NAVFAC NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic AOR
N40085-24-R-2508 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT
FOR NAVY & MARINE CORPS PLANNING & MULTI-DISCIPLINE ARCHITECT &
ENGINEER (A&E) SERVICES FOR WORK PREDOMINANTLY LOCATED IN NAVFAC MID-
ATLANTIC AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY. HOWEVER, TASKS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS
CONTRACT MAY BE ASSIGNED ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.
ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD
FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN.
THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD.
THE NOTICES DOES NOT RESTRICT THE GOVERNMENT FROM A PARTICULAR
ACQUISITION APPROACH. THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT OBLIGATED TO, AND WILL NOT
PAY FOR ANY INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM POTENTIAL SOURCES AS A RESULT
OF THIS NOTICE.
Amendment 0002 – 02 April 2024
PROPOSAL DUE DATE APRIL 15, 2024 AT 2:00 P.M.
All changes made to this Synopsis are included as red text in the body of this document.
Summary of the changes:
- Provide RFI responses #10-19.
RFI Responses
10. We developed a number of Activity Overview Plans decades ago. WE were not aware they are still be used and developed. Can you confirm this is still a requirement?
Response: AOPs are not required for this IDIQ
11. We were the developer of the Activity Planning and Management Models (APMM) decades ago, we were not aware they were still be used and developed,. Can you confirm this is still a requirement?
Response: APMMs are not require for this IDIQ
12. You indicate requirement for, "and/or certification of staff in appropriate supporting disciplines such as, but not limited to, cost estimating, economics and GIS,". What certifications are you referring to for Economics? Will degree in Economics suffice?
Response: Economics degree is acceptable
IDIQ A&E Contract Planning & Multi-Discipline Architect & Engineer (A&E) Services – NAVFAC NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic AOR
13. You do not list Economics and GIS as key personnel but allude to it. Can we confirm that Economics/economist and GIS/GIS Specialist are not being considered Key personnel that we must include in Section E?
Response: Economics/economist and GIS/GIS Specialist are not considered Key personnel
14. You state: "A FIRM SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE." We have a project completed in 2017 in which the POP was over 2 years long, received 2 Interim CPARS but no final. The NAVFAC PM is no longer in that position but before he left he did not complete a final CPARS but did fill out a final PPQ. We understand there is no one left that has the knowledge to complete a final CPARS. In this instance will the Final PPQ that was completed be permitted to be used in lieu of a final CPARS which was not generated?
Response: Final PPQ is acceptable
15. You indicate placing DUNS number in Part I, Section F, block 25 for verification. We were under the impression DUNS has been replaced by UEI number. Please confirm which number to use?
Response: DUNS Number replaced by UEI
16. The solicitation states that "Project performed by proposed subcontractors and submitted under this criterion as experience will NOT be considered". Would NAVFAC reconsider the requirement of Subcontractors experience to be considered as experience criteria?
Response: We will accept project experience if the contractor acted as a subcontractor on an example project. We will not accept proposed subcontractor experience on example projects.
17. Would it be acceptable to have a JV with a small and large business if we as the small business hold 51% and the large business holds 49%?
Response: Yes
18. Can personnel have multiple key personnel roles. Can Key personnel have multiple roles on org chart?
Response: Yes
19. What is our recourse if we have a sample project/section F in which we are not sure if we received a CPARS and no NAVFAC personnel are present that were involved in project to write PPQ? WE have inquired with new COR and he is checking for CPARS in system but is promising nothing. Again, what is our recourse if he finds none in system? We feel it was a well
IDIQ A&E Contract Planning & Multi-Discipline Architect & Engineer (A&E) Services – NAVFAC NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic AOR received project and product based on our feedback at the time. We find it has been challenging to stay on top of CPARS evaluations on govt side.
Response: Submit first page of PPQ (Attachment A)
END OF DOCUMENT
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .