Amen04 220046.pdf
PDF 166 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Structure RTAFC MOUT Repairs
- Solicitation number
- N4008523R2751
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amen06 220046.pdf | ||
| Amen05 220046.pdf | ||
| Amen 04 Spec 01 35 26 modified.pdf | ||
| Amen03 220046.pdf | ||
| Amen02 220046.pdf | ||
| Amen01 220046.pdf | ||
| N4008522B0046 Specs.pdf | ||
| RFP 220046.pdf | ||
| N4008522B0046 Dwgs.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
NSN 7540-01-152-8070
Previous edition unusable
1 3
AMENDMENT NO. 0004 07/13/23
5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 22-0046
N40085
NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Resident Officer in Charge of Construction 1107A Birch Street Camp Lejeune, NC 28547-2521
See Item 6
✘ N40085-23-R-2751
6/12/23
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
22-0046, Structure RTAFC Repairs, Amendment 0004, Provide RFI response
The time and date for receipt of proposals remains unchanged.
This amendment should be acknowledged when your proposal is submitted. Failure to acknowledge the amendment may constitute grounds for rejection of a proposal.
See Continuation Page(s)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
N40085-23-R-2751 Amendment 0004
CONTINUATION SHEET
A. The following RFI responses have been provided:
1. QUESTION: Dwg. Pg G-002, Priority Work Order, Project Work Divisions, Note #1 states, in part, “project is divided by individual building and exterior site work for pricing and execution” Does this mean contractor is to price bid on each building individually? Is the contractor to completely finish a building or task before moving to the next building or task according to the “Priority Work Order” schedule?
ANSWER: This project is being advertised for a lump sum with no bid options. The government expects to award the contract in its entirety. Contractor does not need to fully complete a building before moving to the next building but work should be sequenced using the priority work order.
2. QUESTION: With the Priority Work Order, the buildings are not always grouped within close proximity. Can this order schedule be grouped closer together or into phased areas so contractor can work more efficiently?
ANSWER: Work should roughly follow priority work order. Civil and other site work can be done simultaneously with other building.
3. QUESTION: With project magnitude and scope, some contractors voiced concerns of contract duration. Can this duration be reviewed and possibly extended?
ANSWER: Per Amendment 02 Question 8, the Government agrees to an extension for project completion to 510 days.
4. QUESTION: Spec Sec 01 35 29.13, Para 1.5.1 indicates that the contractor is to employ a Certified Industrial Hygienist as their Safety and Health Manager (SHM) and that qualifications and responsibly required in the EM -385-1-1, Sec. 33.C.01. Is this correct?
N40085-23-R-2751 Amendment 0004 ANSWER: An IH is not required on the job site. Spec 01 35 26 Governmental Safety Requirements has been revised to reflect this.
5. QUESTION: Spec Sec. 03 30 00, “Concrete” Para 1.6.6 , indicates that the Contractor is to employ an individual to QC concrete operations and to submit ACI certifications for CQC, concrete placing/finishing & curing crews as well as the having the Quality Manager having to hold a current license as a P.E. in the U.S. It goes on to state that “Evidence of extraordinary proven experience may be considered by the Contracting Officer as sufficient to act as the Quality Manger” For Bidding proposes, what “extraordinary proven experience” is needed to fill this position and thus keep the contractor from employing the servicers of a licensed P.E.?
ANSWER: Spec 03 30 00, Paragraph 1.6.6 is deleted.
B. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
| Amend 0004 |
| Continuation sheet |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .