N40085-19-R-9047_-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

CUSTODIAL SERVICES AT PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD, KITTERY, MAINE AND OTHER AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR)

This Amendment is issued to incorporate revision to Section L (inclusive of a scheduled site visit) and M. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-Mar-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008519R9047

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11-Mar-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Mar-2019

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008519R9047

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been added by full text:

SITE VISIT

This site will be available for visitation on:

Wednesday, 10 April 2019 at 10:00 A.M. Building 59 in the parking lot.

Directions to Building 59 from Gate 1 and the Pass & ID Office:

Go straight across the bridge for Gate 1. Building 59 is the first building on the left immediately after the bridge. There is a small parking lot in the front.

Site Visit Registration Requirements:

The Government Sponsor for the site visit will be:

Brady Hammond Contract Specialist NAVFAC PWD‐Maine Acquisition.

(207) 438‐4612 brady.c.hammond@navy.mil

You must send your completed site visit package by email to Mr. Hammond by Wednesday, 27 March 2019 at 5:00 PM. All required documents are enclosed.

Please refer to the attached documents and next steps below for access to Portsmouth Naval Shipyard.

Attachments:

1. DBIDS Access Request Form (5500): Company Registration

a. Please fill out the attached DBIDS Access Request Form (5500) and send back to me with a list of all employees requiring access by [INSERT DATE]. I will send that along to the pass office so that your company information can be entered into the DBIDS system here at the Shipyard.

2. Base Access Pass Registration (5512): Individual Registration

a. Each employee will also need to fill out the attached Base Access Pass Registration (5512) document and bring that in person to the Pass & ID Office, along with two forms of ID. An initial background screening will be conducted based upon a review of these documents.

3. List of Identity Proofing Documents:

a. Please see the attached List of Identity Proofing Documents for acceptable forms of ID. A valid passport and driver's license will work best. Please also note that a Social Security Card will not be accepted as a valid form of ID if access to the CIA (Controlled Industrial Area) is required.

It is recommended to come to the Pass and ID Office two business days ahead of time to complete initial background screenings. This will help ensure access is granted in time for the site walk. We cannot predict how busy the Pass Office will be, and the wait is sometimes long. Waiting until the day of the site visit to register may result in access not being granted in time to attend the site walk.

You will be asked for sponsor information as part of this process. Your sponsor for this visit is:

Brady Hammond Contract Specialist NAVFAC PWD‐Maine Acquisition.

(207) 438‐4612 brady.c.hammond@navy.mil

CIA Access:

This visit will require access to the CIA (Controlled Industrial Area). The following additional information is required for each individual requesting access:

1. Full name: Last, First, Middle Initial

2. U.S. Citizen: Yes or No

3. State of residence

Pass & ID Office Location and Instructions:

The Pass & ID Office is located in Building 384. It opens at 6 AM and is located just inside Gate 1 on the right.

Please be aware that there is a very limited amount of parking by this office; you may find it necessary to park off the Shipyard and walk in. To enter the Pass & ID Office, please use the walkway on the right hand side of Gate 1.

After entering the office, follow the line around the corner to the left. Let the greeter at that desk know why you are there and they will issue a ticket for you. Your ticket number will be called to a window for service.

Please feel free to follow up with me if you have any questions.

DBIDS ACCESS REQUEST FORM (NAVSHIPYD PTSMH 5500)

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

1. Requester full name:

2. Title:

3. Phone Number :

4. COMPANY NAME :

DBIDS INFORMATION

Is the company requesting access to the installation the primary Contractor Yes☐ No☐ If no, who do they subcontract for:

COMPANY REQUESTING ACCESS INFORMATION

Company Name (Corporate Legal name):

Company Address :

Company Phone Number(Corporate Office):

Company Local POC:

Email and Phone:

For access to: PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD Timeframe of Access Required: ☒ 0600-1800 ☐ 1400-2300 ☐ 24 Hours

☐ All Week ☒ M-F only ☐ Weekends Only

SPONSOR INFORMATION (MUST BE SHIPYARD PERSONNEL)

Sponsor Name: Brady Hammond Sponsor Organization: NAVFAC PWD-Maine Acquisition

Sponsor Title: Contract Specialist Sponsor Phone Number: 207-438-4612 Sponsor Email Address: brady.c.hammond@navy.mil

Contract or project number:

Contract or Project ACCESS EXPIRATION Date:

Only ONE request for Company access should be submitted to;

PNSDBIDS@navy.mil (all requests for employees are on the 5512 and are carried by the employee to pass and ID once the company is approved)

LOCAL VISIT REQUEST ‐ Site Visit for DLA Renovation

Company/Organization Name: Last, First , M I

US

Citizen

Yes/No

State Of

Residence

LOCAL VISIT REQUEST ‐ SITE VISIT

Company/Organization Name: Last, First, MI

7. State-issued Enhanced Driver’s licenses

8. Driver’s license issued by the U.S. Department of State

9. Border Crossing Card (From DSP-150)

10. Identification card issued by Federal, State, or local government agencies, provided it contains a photograph and biographic information such as name, date of birth, gender, height, eye color, and address.

11. Veteran Health Identification Card (VHIC) issued by the Department of

Veterans Affairs

12. Department of Homeland Security “Trusted Traveler” Cards (Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST)

13. U.S. Certificate of Naturalization or Certificate of Citizenship (Form

N-550)

14. School identification card with a photograph

15. Persons under the age of 18 who are unable to present a document listed above may present one of the below documents.

(a) School record or report card

(b) Day care or nursery school record

(c) Birth certificate (original or certified copy)

16. Native American Tribal Photo ID cards

17. U.S. Coast Guard Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) or Merchant Mariner’s

Documents (MMD)

18. Other documents that may be provide for identity proofing purposes, but must be accompanied by a second form of ID with photograph and biographical information.

a. Social Security Number card

b. Original or certified copy of a birth certificate issued by a state, county, municipal authority, or outlying possession of the U.S. bearing an official seal.

c. Certification of birth Abroad issued by the U.S. Department of State

(Form FS-545)

d. Certification of Report of Birth issued by the U.S. Department of

State (Form DS-1350)

e. Voter’s Registration Card

Documents that Establish Identity

1. U.S. Passport or Passport Card

2. Permanent Resident Card or Alien Registration Receipt Card (Form I-551)

3. Foreign passport that contains a temporary I-551 stamp or temporary I-551 printed notation on a machine-readable immigrant visa (MRIV)

4. Employment Authorization Document (Card) that contains a photograph (Form

I-766)

5. In the case of a nonimmigrant alien authorized to work for a specific employer incident to status:

(a) Foreign passport; and

(b) Form I-94 or Form I-94A has the following:

(1) Bearing the same name as the passport; and

(2) An endorsement of the alien’s nonimmigrant status, as long as the period of endorsement has not yet expired and the proposed employment is not in conflict with any restrictions or limitations identified on the form.

6. Driver’s license or ID card issued by a RealID Act compliant state or outlaying possession of the U.S., provided it contains a photograph and biographic information such as name, date of birth, gender, height, eye color, and address. Licenses or IDs possessing “NOT APPLICABLE FOR FEDERAL

PURPOSES” will not be accepted.

The following have been modified:

CONTENT OF PROPOSALS

a. The Non-Cost proposal and the price proposal shall be submitted in separate columns. The non-cost proposal shall not contain any cost/pricing information. The non-cost proposal presented by the offeror to whom the awards is made will be incorporated into the contract at time of award.

b. Offerors will complete and submit the following:

(1) Non-cost/price Factors Submission Requirements:

Technical Factors Binder: Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original” and two (2) copies, each in a separate three-ring binder with following characteristics:

• 8 ½ x 11 format

• 12-point Arial or Times New Roman font

• 100-page limit (inclusive of all charts, forms and other documentation responsive to the solicitation requirements), pages sequentially numbered.

• Include a cover page with Contract Number, Contract Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

• Include only information in response to Factors 1, 2, 3 and 4 separated by tabs, as applicable.

• Provide approved SBA JV Agreement or SBA approved Mentor-Protégé Agreement (if applicable).

• A complete electronic copy of the technical proposal as a single .pdf file on a CD- ROM (include with the “Original” technical submission).

• The technical proposal shall include responses to each non-price factor as specified in Section M.

c. Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall submit one (1) original and one (1) copy of the price proposal, in a separate three ring binder, that shall include the following:

• Signed Solicitation, Offer and Award Forms (SF 33), including Section B (CLINs 0001 through 0010), with all amendments acknowledged.

• Exhibits A through E (Attachment J-0200000-11)

• Submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan for this project in the format provided in Attachment E.

• Copy of Representations and Certifications and proof of registration in System of

Award Management (SAM).

• Confirm submission of the most recent Vets 4212 Report.

• Provide name of financial institution, point of contract, telephone number and email address. Provide a signed statement of release giving the reference permission to release the information to the Navy.

• The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. If the offeror is a ne joint venture or partnership, include the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each firm, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an autahorized officer of the organization.

• In addition to providing hard copies of the price proposal (original and copy), offerors shall also provide one (1) non-rewritable CD with pricing information.

Offerors are advised that in the event of a discrepancy between the original, copy, and CD, the original hard copy will govern.

The price proposal shall be submitted separately but at the same time as the technical proposal. Any non-price information in the price proposal will not be considered.

Likewise, any price information in the non-price proposal will not be considered.

Offers are solicited on an “all or none” basis and FAR 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORSCOMPETITIVE ACQUISITION (MAY 2001)” in Section L, is hereby modified. Failure to submit offers for all line items listed shall be cause for rejection of the offer.

NOTE: Offerors are cautioned that “parroting: of the Performance Work Statement Performance Objectives with a statement of intenet to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

BASIS OF AWARD

M.1 Basis for Award

a. The Government will select the lowest-price technically acceptable offer at a reasonable cost to the Government.

M.2 Evaluation Factors

a. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1– Technical Approach/Management Factor 2 – Corporate Experience Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

In order to permit efficient competition, the Navy will utilize the following methodology: Proposals will initially be screened for price and placed in order of price (lowest priced to highest price). The Navy will then evaluate the technical factors of the lowest priced proposal. The Navy will make award to the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal. However, if the lowest priced proposal is not found to be technically acceptable, the Navy, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase the number of proposals it will review, until the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal. Accordingly, under this methodology, the technical factors of some proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated (both technical and price) for the purpose of establishing a competitive range.

NOTE: An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

b. Technical proposals will be evaluated to ensure the offeror understands the requirements of the solicitation in accordance with the following descriptions of each evaluation factor.

(1) Factor 1 - Technical Approach/Management:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit a narrative response that clearly demonstrates its understanding of and approach to accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work

Statement. Each of the topics below must be included in the narrative, tabbed in the technical proposal, and discussed separately.

a. Phase-In Transition Plan. Describe what you will do to "start-up'' for performance of this contract. The phase-in transition period is 30 days as per F.2 of the RFP. Include a schedule of key events, personnel actions, identification of key personnel and their responsibilities.

b. Workforce Management.

(1) Describe the lines of management authority, supervision, span of control and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, and subcontractors.

(2) Provide an Organizational chart of your proposed organization and a workforce project management plan.

(3) Quality Management. Provide a two page summary of your “Quality

Management System” i.e. the Quality Processes (Practices, Resources and Activities) and minimum controls that will be used to ensure full compliance with all performance objectives and standards as described in Section 0200000 – Management and Administration. Include the methodology to be implemented to accomplish the performance requirements and detail how the proposed approach will effectively achieve each performance objective and standard.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: This factor shall be evaluated considering some or all of the following criteria:

a. The proposal demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the performance objectives and standards.

b. The proposal provides a feasible technical approach with the capability to, at least, meet solicitation performance objectives and standards.

c. The proposal offers a low to moderate performance risk to the Government.

(2) Factor 2- Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of one (1) and a maximum of five (5) relevant projects (as the prime contractor) that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the work requirements specified in the solicitation. Size, scope, and complexity are further defined as follows:

Size: A custodial service contract with a yearly value of at least $2.5M and/or 900,000 SF or greater per year for recurring services. Individual Indefinite Quantity / Indefinite Delivery task orders for infrequent work will not be considered similar in size.

Scope: Demonstrate the ability to provide all labor, management, supervision, tools, materials, equipment to provide custodial services and other items necessary as defined by the RFP. Demonstrate the ability to perform various miscellaneous services including, but not limited to high and low area cleaning, exterior and interior window cleaning services, and other services that may be typical of a custodial services contract.

Complexity: Demonstrate the ability to respond simultaneously to service call and maintenance requirements for various locations and buildings throughout the installation and supporting annexes. Demonstrate the ability to manage competing priorities in order to support customer demands.

The attached Corporate Experience Form (Attachment J-0200000-09) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded;

however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

Projects submitted for the offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of the solicitation.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP as it relates to size, scope, and complexity.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience shall be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. For a JV, the offeror shall provide the signed U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA)-approved Joint Venture Agreement or an SBA-approved Mentor-Protégé Agreement as part of this Factor. Failure to submit an SBA-approved Agreement will result in the relationship being considered as Prime/Subcontractor, and the prime contractor will not be found acceptable on the basis of the subcontractor’s experience only. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF33), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. As noted above, to be deemed acceptable under this factor, the offeror must be the prime contractor on at least one (1) relevant project (similar size, scope and complexity as the current requirement). The prime contractor will not be found acceptable on the basis of its subcontractor’s experience. Additionally, the prime contractor’s experience as a subcontractor will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements above. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review the first five projects submitted. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for this factor will not be considered.

(3) Factor 3- Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists.

If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, the offeror shall affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends m be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART)

Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data. If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, the offeror shall affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA, DART, and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety:

• Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors.

• The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work.

• The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels.

• Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer

(DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror must submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, the offeror shall affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate the safety performance of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(4) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

(4) Factor 4- Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall clearly demonstrate a history of successful performance within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of the contract. The offeror shall be the prime contractor on a minimum of one (1) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant contracts of similar size, scope and complexity to the RFP as defined in Factor 2, Corporate Experience. The prime contractor will not be found acceptable on the basis of a subcontractor’s past performance. Additionally, the prime contractor’s experience as a subcontractor will not be considered.

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE

SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED

CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2, Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A

COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror must complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment C), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, LeeArjetta W. Hamilton, via email at leearjetta.hamilton@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last (5) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation, such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Attachment J-0200000-10.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering some or all of the following:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand

Price

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall submit one (1) original and one (1) copy of the price proposal, in a separate three ring binder, that shall include the following:

• Signed Solicitation, Offer and Award Forms (SF 33), including Section B

(CLINs 0001 through 0010), with all amendments acknowledged.

• Exhibits A through E (Attachment J-0200000-08)

• Submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan for this project in the format provided in Attachment J-0200000-11.

• Copy of Representations and Certifications and proof of registration in

System of Award Management (SAM).

• Confirm submission of the most recent Vets 4212 Report.

• Provide name of financial institution, point of contract, telephone number and email address. Provide a signed statement of release giving the reference permission to release the information to the Navy.

• The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. If the offeror is a ne joint venture or partnership, include the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each firm, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an autahorized officer of the organization.

• In addition to providing hard copies of the price proposal (original and copy), offerors shall also provide one (1) non-rewritable CD with pricing information. Offerors are advised that in the event of a discrepancy between the original, copy, and CD, the original hard copy will govern.

The price proposal shall be submitted separately but at the same time as the technical proposal. Any non-price information in the price proposal will not be considered. Likewise, any price information in the non-price proposal will not be considered.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the aggregate total price submitted for FFP COLs 2, COLs 3, COLs 4 and speciality areas inclucive of ELINs A001 though A0006 and corresponding ELINs in Exhibits and the total IDIQ prices for the Base and the Option Year (See Section B of the solicitation). Although evaluation for award will be based upon the aggregate totals for COLs2, Cols3, COLs4, the speciality areas and the total IDIQ prices for the Base and the Option Years, the Government shall make an award at COLs 2, COLs 3 and the speciality areas (including IDIQ prices). Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the options. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Proposals will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness as follows:

(1) Completeness. All pricing information required by the solicitation has been provided, all mathematic computations are correct and the pricing application understood, prices are on an “all or none” basis, and failure to submit a price on an item or a number of items may cause this factor and the entire offer to be determined Unacceptable.

(2) Reasonableness. Price analysis comparisons indicate the offered price to be fair and reasonable, balanced across option years, and balanced between fixed-price and IDIQ items.

Unreasonable, unbalanced, or incomplete pricing may cause a proposal to be determined unacceptable.

(End of Summary of Changes)