Amendment_0001_Changes_N4008518R1613.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SOLICITATION N4008518R1613, NSWC BUILDING 3330S HVAC RENOVATION AT NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY, CRANE, INDIANA

See follow ing pages for details

PROPOSAL DUE DATE IS EXTENDED TO 2:00 P.M. (EDT) ON 17 MAY 2018. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS AMENDMENT WITH YOUR

PROPOSAL.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 19

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Apr-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008518R1613

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-Apr-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Apr-2018

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

PWD CRANE FEAD

300 HIGHWAY 361

NSA BLDG 2516

CRANE IN 47522

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

carrie.grimard Typewritten Text carrie.grimard Typewritten Text xx carrie.grimard Typewritten Text Carrie L. Grimard, Contracting Officer 812-854-6641 carrie.grimard Typewritten Text carrie.grimard@navy.mil

N4008518R1613

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 02-May-2018 02:00 PM to 17-May-2018 02:00 PM.

The contractor period of performance end date has increased by 50 days from 365 days to 415 days.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMAITON

NAICS Code: 238220 – Plumbing, Heating, and Air Conditioning Systems (Size Standard: $15.0 million) FSC Code: Z2HB

This procurement is a competitive small business set-aside.

Proposals are due no later than 2:00 p.m. (EDT) on Thursday, 17 May 2018.

Proposals shall be submitted to the following address:

NAVFAC MIDLANT PWD CRANE – ACQUISITION DEPT

ATTN: MARISSA WAGLER (CODE PRX22)

300 HIGHWAY 361 B-2516

CRANE IN 47522-5082

Proposals submitted via e-mail or fax will not be accepted.

2.0. REQUIRED DATA SUBMISSIONS – RESPONSIBILTY DETERMINATON ITEMS

In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. All offerors are required to register in the System for Award Management (SAM) database in accordance with FAR 52.204-7. LACK OF REGISTRATION IN THE SAM DATABASE WILL MAKE THE OFFEROR INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD. The website address for the SAM database is: https://www.sam.gov. Note: Registration in SAM is Free.

In addition, all offerors are required to complete and submit Annual Representations and Certification via the Online Representations and Certification Applications (ORCA) in accordance with FAR 52.204-8.

THE FOLLOWING RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH

THE PRICE PROPOSAL ON A SEPARATE TAB:

• The offeror shall provide a Bid Guarantee, as required by FAR 52.228-1. (The bid bond shall be 20% of the total price.

http://www.sam.gov/

• One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required), as well as the available balance on the line of credit.

• Indicate that the representations and certifications have been completed on-line via SAM in accordance with FAR 52.204-8.

• Provide proof that the required VETS-4212 Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report has been submitted for the preceding fiscal year in accordance with FAR 52.222-37 or provide an explanation of why this requirement does not apply to your firm.

• Description of the offeror’s facilities and equipment.

• Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

• The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contract certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award.

3.0 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT

A pre-proposal conference/site visit will be held at 10:00 a.m. (EDT) on Wednesday, 18 April 2018.

Attendance is not mandatory but is strongly encouraged. Offerors planning to attend the site visit shall submit names of participants to Marissa Wagler at marissa.wagler@navy.mil no later than Thursday, 12 April 2018.

Participants will be required to provide information and undergo a background check prior to attending the site visit.

Participants will meet at NSA Crane, Building 56, Training Room.

4.0 NOTIFICATION AND DEBRIEFINGS

Notification of unsuccessful offerors shall be accomplished after award and in accordance with FAR

15.503. Debriefing of unsuccessful offerors shall be in accordance with FAR 15.505 and 15.506.

5.0 DISPOSITION OF PROPOSALS

After award, any excess copies of the successful proposal will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. .No certificate of destruction will be issued.

6.0 COMPLETION TIME

All work will be completed 430 calendar days after award for contract completion. Beneficial Occupancy Date (BOD) shall be within 400 calendar days after award. Contract Completion Date (CCD) shall be within 30 calendar days after the BOD.

7.0 QUESTIONS

ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING. The offeror may submit written questions via mailto:carrie.grimard@navy.mil e-mail or fax to the address below specifying the section and paragraph of the RFP for which clarification is desired.

Inquiries must be submitted in writing via email to: E-Mail to carrie.grimard@navy.mil. All questions shall be submitted before the close of business on 25 April 2018. The Government does not guarantee a response to questions submitted after that date.

8.0 PROPOSALS

Offerors are required to submit both technical and price proposals, and must be submitted in separate volumes. Proposals consist of price and technical information. Contractors shall submit an original and one (1) copy of the technical proposal and an original price proposal. No additional copies of the price proposal are required. The technical proposal shall not contain any cost/pricing information.

PRICE PROPOSAL:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall submit an original only of the price proposal. The basis of price proposal shall be CLIN 0001.

• Offerors shall complete and submit the SF1442 and SFl442 Continuation Page (Section 00010) as well as the Contractor’s Pricing Schedule.

•Offerors shall indicate on the proposal that prices are valid for not less than ninety (90) days

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Proposals will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness as follows:

Completeness. All pricing information required by the solicitation has been provided, all mathematic computations are correct and the pricing application understood, prices are on an “all or none” basis, and failure to submit a price on an item or a number of items may cause this factor and the entire offer to be determined unacceptable.

Reasonableness. Price analysis comparisons indicate the offered price to be fair and reasonable.

Unreasonable or incomplete pricing may cause a proposal to be determined unacceptable.

NOTE: The responsibility determination items described in paragraph 2.0 above shall be submitted with the price proposal.

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL:

Technical Proposals Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall submit an original and one (1) copy of the technical proposal, in separate three-ring binders, that shall include the following:

• 8 ½ x 11 format

• 12 point Arial or Times New Roman font mailto:carrie.grimard@navy.mil

• 75 page limit (inclusive of all charts, resumes, forms and other documentation responsive to the solicitation requirements), pages sequentially numbered

• Include a cover page with Contract Number, Contract Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address

• Include only information in response to Factors 1, 2, 3 and 4, separated by tabs, as applicable

• A complete electronic copy of the technical proposal as a .pdf file on a CD-ROM (include with the “original” technical submission)

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THIS SOLICITATION ARE

IDENTIFIED BELOW:

Factor 1– Experience Factor 2 – Project Specific Requirements Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4– Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND BASIS OF EVLUATION FOR EACH FACTOR:

(1) FACTOR 1 - EXPERIENCE:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit a minimum of four (4) and a maximum of five (5) construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as a renovation of a non-residential space greater than >5,000 Square Feet (SF) that includes a complete replacement of the HVAC system.

Two projects must include installation of a new Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) type HVAC system.

At least one project must include the renovation of a testing or lab type space.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of the Request for Proposal.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods).

The offeror shall be the prime contractor on at least one (1) relevant contract of similar size, scope, and complexity as the current requirement. The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factors.

The Offeror must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. If no shared project experience is demonstrated, proposals that fail to submit projects for each partner may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC /LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the past performance information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered.

The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror's experience or Offeror's team experience, where allowed, in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror's relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The prime contractor will not be found acceptable on the basis of the subcontractor’s experience only. As noted above, the offeror shall be the prime contractor on at least one

(1) relevant contract of similar size, scope, and complexity as the current requirement.

The Offeror must have at least four (4) projects that are relevant as defined in subsection (a) of this factor. The Government will only review five (5) projects. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will be not be considered.

(2) FACTOR 2 - PROJECT SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:

Provide a narrative describing the technical approach to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP.

Include the following:

A. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES – Include a narrative detailing all pre-construction activities including submittal procedures, material delivery and staging and other items.

B. CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE - The Contractor shall provide an overall narrative describing the major construction activities, applicable interdependences and sequencing.

Narrative to include utility cutovers, and downtimes. Include areas to be unoccupied and a dust control plan. This shall include: Construction phasing to minimize anechoic chamber downtime including field controls. The narrative shall include major milestones and all applicable NAVFAC redzone activities as defined in the checklist, included in the RFP. On-time completion and turn-over of the project is imperative. The narrative shall include HVAC, testing, adjusting, and balancing, commissioning, and closeout documentation.

C. SCHEDULE: Include a schedule in a Gantt chart form showing all major construction activities and the relationships between those activities. This schedule shall be incorporated into the contract. The schedule shall clearly indicate, but not be limited to, the following:

OVERALL PROJECT:

1. Anticipated award (set at 15 calendar days after bid due date)

2. Material submittal processing

3. Material procurement

4. Field installation

5. Testing adjusting, balancing, commissioning

6. Punchlist completion

7. Beneficial Occupancy Date (BOD)

8. Contract Completion Date (CCD).

ANECHOIC CHAMBER

1. Take Chamber Offline / Chamber Renovation Work Start Date

2. Chamber Renovation Complete Date

3. Chamber Recertification and Ready for Use Date

Narrative shall not exceed six (6) double-sided pages (or 12 single-sided pages); the Gantt chart schedule is not included in the overall page count.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the design-bid-build team's technical solution to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the technical requirements of the RFP. The anechoic chamber in building 3330 South is currently used to test various Electronic Warfare systems and components. Therefore, it is critical that the time this chamber is down is minimized. The government will evaluate the amount of down time proposed for the chamber work and offerors who propose shorter down times will be rated more favorably.

(3) FACTOR 3 – SAFETY

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

Include three previous complete calendar years’ ( 2015, 2016, 2017) worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. EMR shall be submitted on insurance company letterhead. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable

Case (TRC) Rate:

Submit three previous complete calendar years’ (2015, 2016, 2017) worth of data. If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided.

Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA, DART, and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels.

Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case

(TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

For the three previous complete calendar years the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates:

For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety:

The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(4) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government:

Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

(4) FACTOR 4 - PAST PERFORMANCE:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT

SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS

EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Experience.

AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment B), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Marissa Wagler, via email at marissa.wagler@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last seven years, such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand

9.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

All technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined is approximately equal to price.

Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

SECTION 00 70 00 - CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

The following have been modified:

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 15 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than 415 days. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

(End of clause)

Section 01 14 00, paragraph 1.2(a): Change to read as follows:

“Work shall be performed within 430 calendar days after award.”

Section 01 45 00.00 20, paragraph 1.5.1.1: Delete the following sentence:

“In addition to implementing and managing the QC program, the QC manager may perform the duties of the Project Superintendent.”

Remove Wage Determination IN180008 Revision 0, dated 05 Jan 2018 and replace with the attached, updated Wage Determination IN180008, Revision 1, dated 06 Apr 2018.

(End of Summary of Changes)

Questions and Answers received to date are provided.

Site Visit Attendee Sheet is provided.

Pre-Proposal Conference/Site Visit Presentation is provided.

General Decision Number: IN180008 04/06/2018 IN8

Superseded General Decision Number: IN20170008

State: Indiana

Construction Type: Building

Counties: Daviess and Martin Counties in Indiana.

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include residential construction consisting of single family homes and apartments up to and including 4 stories).

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.35 for calendar year 2018 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.35 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2018. The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually.

Please note that this EO applies to the above-mentioned types of contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but it does not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/05/2018 1 04/06/2018

BRIN0005-002 06/01/2016

Rates Fringes

BRICKLAYER

BRICKLAYER; STONE MASON &

POINTER, CAULKER, CLEANER...$ 30.35 12.56

MARBLE and TILE SETTER......$ 27.57 7.32

TERRAZZO FINISHER..........$ 19.07 7.05

TILE and MARBLE FINISHER....$ 19.03 4.35

CARP0224-008 04/01/2017

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER (Including Drywall)....$ 25.58 20.58

ELEC0016-001 04/01/2017

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN (Including Alarm Installation and HVAC Control Wiring)..........................$ 36.25 15.83

ENGI0181-025 04/01/2015

MARTIN COUNTY

Rates Fringes

Power equipment operators:

Backhoe.....................$ 31.88 14.40

LABO0561-004 04/01/2016

DAVIESS COUNTY

Rates Fringes

LABORER (Unskilled)..............$ 24.12 13.55

LABO0741-005 06/01/2016

MARTIN COUNTY

Rates Fringes

LABORER (Unskilled)..............$ 21.58 13.80

PAIN0156-005 04/01/2017

DAVIESS COUNTY

Rates Fringes

PAINTER..........................$ 26.45 $14.05+A

FOOTNOTE A:

All Structures over 40Â’ S0.75/ hour above base wage All Structures over 75Â’ 51.501 hour above base wage All Structures over 100Â’ 52.50/ hour above base wage

PLAS0692-026 04/01/2017

DAVIESS & MARTIN COUNTIES

Rates Fringes

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 25.60 16.66

* PLUM0136-005 04/01/2018

Rates Fringes

PLUMBER (Including HVAC Work)....$ 36.22 18.71

PIPEFITTERS.................$ 36.22 18.71

ROOF0106-003 04/01/2017

Rates Fringes

ROOFER...........................$ 29.50 15.52

SHEE0020-021 07/01/2017

Rates Fringes

Sheet metal worker (Including HVAC Duct Work)..................$ 29.14 23.65

SUIN1996-003 04/22/1996

Rates Fringes

Elevator Constructor.............$ 19.90 5.57

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of "identifiers" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than "SU" or "UAVG" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the "SU" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Union Average Rate Identifiers

Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010 08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION