Page 26 and 27 of Revised SF1449.pdf

N4008420R7001

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Technical Factors:

Offerors shall submit 1 original and 3 copies of their non-price proposal in three-ring binders clearly marked as the non-price proposal. The non-price proposal shall use A4 sized paper and 10 point Arial or Times New Roman font.

Each copy of the non-price proposal shall include a separate tab for each factor specified below.

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 3 projects performed by the company that are relevant to work requirements specified in the solicitation.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as follows:

(i) A single project or multiple projects that collectively demonstrate experience with the following type of services: Custodial (Annex 1503010), Ground Maintenance and Landscaping (Annex 1503050), and Pavement Clearance (Annex 1503060);

(ii) A project performed in Japan;

(iii) A project with a contract completion date within the past 10 years of the issuance of this solicitation or an ongoing project with at least one year of completion;

Any projects submitted in excess of 3 will not be considered. If more than 3 projects are submitted, only the first 3 shall be considered.

The attached Experience Form, Attachment (5) Experience Project Data Sheet, is mandatory and shall be used to submit project information. The failure to utilize the attached Experience Form, Attachment (5) Experience Project Data Sheet, shall be cause for rejection of the proposal. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed 1 double-sided or 2 single-sided pages. Any data submitted in excess of the 1 double-sided page 2 single-sided pages will not be considered/evaluated.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements as described above.

Joint Ventures If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, at least 1 project shall be submitted for each respective Joint Venture partner. Offerors are still limited to a total of 3 projects combined.

Where an Offeror is/was a JV and would like to submit a project completed by the JV as a single entity to show the single entity's experience/capability, said JV project must clearly demonstrate the percentage of work performed by each firm in the JV and the single entity Offeror must provide a detailed description of the work the single entity self-performed

Affiliates and Subsidiaries

N4008420R7001

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF33), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s demonstrated experience in performing recent and relevant projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements.

An Offeror will be rated “Acceptable” if collectively its submittals for “Corporate Experience” demonstrate experience involving the following: 1) Custodial (Annex 1503010), 2) Ground Maintenance and Landscaping (Annex 1503050), and 3) Pavement Clearance (Annex 1503060);

An Offeror will be rated “Unacceptable” if it fails to meet the requirements to be rated acceptable described above.

Any projects submitted which are outside the period specified or above the maximum number allowed, will be removed and will not be considered.

(2) Factor 2, Safety:

The Offeror shall submit a narrative no more than 2 single-sided (1 double-sided) pages that demonstrates its commitment to safely accomplishing the requirements identified in the solicitation and will properly manage and implement safety procedures and accident prevention methods. The narrative should address each of the following topics:

(a) the offeror’s method for selecting a subcontractor with a safe performance record;

(b) the offeror’s safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work;

(c) the offeror’s methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates accident prevention techniques and processes, and employee reporting of unsafe conditions and unsafe activities.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine whether the information contained in the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures and accident prevention methods for itself and its subcontractors.

An Offeror will be rated “Acceptable” if it demonstrates a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures and accident prevention methods for itself and its subcontractors.

An Offeror will be rated “Unacceptable” if it fails to meet the requirements to be rated acceptable described above.

(3) Factor 3, Past Performance:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE

PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire