SF30.14T8701.Amd0002.pdf

ACQR3354706

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Solicitaion N40084-14-T-8701 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FOR VARIOUS SUBSTATION, 60 HZ POWER PLANT, AND HIGH VOLTAGE SYSTEMS FOR THE U.S.NAF ATSUGI AND U.S. FORCES CONTROLLED AREAS IN KANTO PLAIN, JAPAN.

Description of this amendment begins on page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Nov-2013

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N40084-14-T-8701

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Oct-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Nov-2013

CODE

NAVFAC FAR EAST

FEAD ATSUGI

PSC 477 BOX 15

FPO AP 96306-0001

N40084 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N40084-14-T-8701

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMD 0002

The purpose of this modification is as follows:

1. Provide detail information in blue font below for Solicitation Submittal Requirements for Price Factor

2. The closing date for this solicitation remains unchanged at 12 November 2013 at 10:30AM (JST).

3. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

ADDENDA TO FAR 52.212-1

EVALAUTATION FOR AWARD:

1. Award will be made on a lowest price technically acceptable basis considering the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Technical Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

- Standard Form 1449, Solicitation Offer and Award

- All pages of Part B (Part B refers to page 3 through 7 of SF1449)

- Attachment J-200000-10

- Representations/Certifications – Part F of RFQ

- Latest Financial Statement

- Joint Venture Agreement (If applicable)

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Part E of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFQ.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.”

(b) Technical Factors:

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall complete Exhibit “A” OFFEROR EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET, for a maximum of five (5) project completed including all options within the past five (5) years before the date of issuance of this RFQ, or ongoing projects more than 80% complete including all options.

Acceptable corporate experience is a submittal of at least one (1) of each type of relevant project or at least one (1) combination of both types of relevant projects by the offeror.

Type 1: Relevant projects are projects that involve periodic maintenance on distribution facilities with over 50 kilo volts.

Type 2: Relevant projects are projects that involve periodic maintenance on cubicle type secondary unit substations for 6.6 kilo volts or more

Relevant projects have a yen value of ¥5,000,000 or more per year, completed within the five (5) years prior to issuance of this RFQ, or if ongoing, are at least 80% complete at the time of issuance of this RFQ.

Except as provided below, experience narratives shall be for the offeror, and shall reflect the legal name of the offeror. Joint Ventures may submit experience narratives from any contractor who is part of the joint venture and the experience will be treated as experience of the offeror if adequate evidence of the legal documentation that describes the joint venture is submitted for review with the proposal.

Experience Narratives from any contractor who is part of the joint venture will be considered as the offeror.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the experience of the proposed offeror. The assessment of the offeror’s experience will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFQ. This factor considers the extent of the offeror’s experience with contracts within the last five (5) years, in performing substation maintenance with project cost of more than ¥5,000,000 per year as described above. At least one (1) of each type or a combination project must be relevant in order to be considered acceptable.

(2) Factor 2, Technical Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

1. The offeror shall submit an Organizational Chart showing key personnel that meets the requirements of Section C, Sub Annex 0200000, Spec Item 2.7.1.

An acceptable organizational chart will include the following key personnel: Project Manager (PM), Quality Manager, SSHO, and on-site supervisor(s). The organization chart shall include names of personnel, their position title for this contract, and company name.

2. The offeror shall submit resumes for the SSHO and on-site supervisor, Exhibit (B).

An acceptable SSHO resume will comply with the requirements specified in Section C, Sub Annex 0200000, Spec Item 2.7.1.3.

An acceptable on-site supervisor resume will comply with requirements specified in Section C, Sub Annex 0200000, Spec Item 2.7.1.4 and will include a copy of “Denki Syunin Giyutsusya (Chief Electrical Engineer)” certificate

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the technical approach of the offeror.

The government will evaluate the organization chart showing lines of authority for key personnel on this contract, and a copy of “Denki Syunin Giyutsusya (Chief Electrical Engineer)” certificate for the on-site supervisor.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

(i) Submittal Requirements: Offeror shall provide the following information in accordance with the notes at the bottom of this subsection:

(1) Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses

Offeror (or each member of a Joint Venture (JV) or partnership) shall provide a Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses for each of the past three full calendar years (Jan – Dec, 2010 - 2012) including explanation of any extenuating circumstances or trends. The summary, including explanations, shall not exceed 2 single sided pages per year.

The summary shall include the following data for each calendar year:

- Total number of fatalities.

- Total number of cases with days away from work.

- Total number of cases with job transfer or restriction.

- Total number of days away from work.

- Total number of days of job transfer or restriction.

- Total number of other recordable cases.

(2) Total Case Incident Rate (TCIR)

Offeror (or each member of a JV or partnership) shall provide the Total Case Incident Rate (TCIR) for each of the past three full calendar years (Jan – Dec, 2010 - 2012) including an explanation of extenuating circumstances or trends covering all three years, not to exceed two single sided pages per year.

The Total Case Incident Rate (TCIR) is calculated by multiplying the number of recordable cases by 200,000, and then dividing that number by the number of labor hours.

Total Number of Recordable Cases x 200,000 TCIR = Number of employee labor hours worked

(3) Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) rate

Offeror (or each member of a JV or partnership) shall provide the Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) rate for each of the past three full calendar years (Jan – Dec, 2010 - 2012) including explanation of any extenuating circumstances or trends. The summary, including explanations, shall not exceed 2 single sided pages per year.

The DART rate is calculated by adding up the number of incidents involving work related deaths, one or more Lost Days, one or more Restricted Days, or the transfer of an employee to a different job within the same company, multiplying that number by 200,000, and then dividing that number by the number of employee labor hours worked.

Total Number of DART incidents x 200,000 DART Rate = Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

(4) Citations

Offeror (or each member of a JV or partnership) shall provide a listing of any citations, fines, notices or findings of violations, or equivalent warnings or sanctions received from the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Japan Labor Standards Inspection Office, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Singapore Occupational Safety and Health Division, or other government agency responsible for enforcing occupational health or safety standards for each of the past three full calendar years (Jan – Dec, 2010 - 2012).

(5) Safety Recognition Awards/Certificates and Accreditations

Where applicable, Offeror (or each member of a JV or partnership) may provide safety recognition awards/certificates, accreditations, and/or letters of commendation specific to safety received within the past five years. Accreditations include participation in the OSHA Voluntary Protection Program, Construction Occupational Health and Safety Management System, Occupational Safety and Health Management System, or other equivalent accreditations endorsed by a government agency.

(6) Safety Narrative

Offeror shall provide a safety narrative, not to exceed six single sided pages discussing the following information:

- Description of plan to monitor safety performance and ensure a safe worksite. At a minimum, such plan shall include employee involvement and orientations, training, worksite analysis and mishap investigation.

- Description of what Offeror has done to address/correct safety problems in the past.

- Description of Offeror’s plan to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the subcontractor selection process.

- Description of Offeror’s methods to ensure and monitor safe work practices.

Notes:

(1) For enterprises which have separate divisions, if segregated information applicable only to the division or divisions that may be involved in the performance of the contract is available, information shall be provided at that level; otherwise information shall be provided at the next level that includes information for all divisions that may be involved in performance of the contract.

(2) “Recordable cases” include each work related death and each work related injury or occupational illness involving days away from work, restricted work, transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

(3) Required summaries and rates shall be based on all projects, regardless of whether projects were military or commercial.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will subjectively evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to maintain a safe worksite, the Offeror’s ability to correct safety problems, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, and any safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to Enterprise Safety Application Management System (ESAMS) Contractor Incident Report System (CIRS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. Proposals subjectively determined to present moderate or higher risk, based on consideration of all elements of safety will be rated unacceptable. Proposals subjectively determined to present low or very low risk will be rated acceptable.

(1) Safety Records:

The Government will evaluate the Safety Records (including Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, TCIR, DART and Citations) for the past three full calendar years to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the ratings. Lower incident rates and lack of citations may contribute to lower risk ratings while higher incident rates and presence of citations may contribute to higher risk ratings.

(2) Safety Recognition Awards/Certificates and Accreditations:

The Government will evaluate Safety Recognition Awards/Certificates, accreditations, and/or letters of commendation specific to safety, such awards, certificates, accreditations, or letters of commendation may contribute to a lower risk determination.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety:

The Government will evaluate the safety narrative to determine the degree to which the Offeror will ensure, manage and maintain the safety of personnel during the performance of work; the Offeror’s procedures to address/correct safety problems; and the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors.

Plans that demonstrate better safety practices, ability to comply with the safety requirements, commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety, and methods to enhance a safe working environment may contribute to a lower risk determination in the evaluation.

(c) Past Performance

(1) Factor 4, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Government will evaluate past performance based upon sources available to the contracting officer that may include Past Performance Information Retrieval System, FAPISS, ESRS, inquiries to and responses from customers, and any relevant information submitted by the offeror. Offerors may also submit past performance information not to exceed 10 pages regarding provision of items similar in scope to what is required under this contract. Such information should clearly provide a point of contact for any customer references.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The offeror’s past performance will be evaluated with regard to recentness and relevancy of the past performance, general trends and quality of performance, timely completion of work and adherence to schedules, quality of deliverables, commitment to customer satisfaction, and business integrity, cooperation, and responsiveness.

CONTRACT AWARD:

The Government intends to enter into a bilateral contract resulting from this request for proposals and will require the successful quoter to execute complete contract documents prior to beginning performance.

PERIOD FOR ACCEPTANCE:

Because this is a Request for Quotations, subparagraph (c) of 52.212-1 does not apply.

LATE QUOTATIONS:

Notwithstanding subparagraph (f) of FAR 52.212-1, late quotations, modifications and revisions may be considered if the contracting officer determines such consideration is in the best interest of the Government.

LOCAL SOURCES RESTRICTIONS:

This solicitation is intended for local source in accordance with FAR 5.202(a)(12). Local sources are those persons or entities normally resident and licensed to conduct business in Japan. Quoters from non-local sources will not be considered under this solicitation.

CURRENCY OF QUOTES:

Quotations shall be priced only in Japanese Yen.

SAM REGISTRATION:

Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database to be eligible for award. For more information please go to https://www.sam.gov/sam/

All questions concerning this solicitation shall be addressed to PWD Atsugi FEAD, Erin Hoe, e-mail:erin.hoe@fe.navy.mil, telephone: 0467-63-2520.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

Department of the Navy PWD Atsugi Facilities Engineering and Acquisition Division Organization PSC 477 Box 15, FPO AP 96306-0001 Bldg 89,

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)