N3904026Q4819 Questions and Answers Final.pdf
PDF 406 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N3904026Q4819
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for federal solicitation N3904026Q4819, containing 30 clarifying questions and responses regarding barge maintenance and repair work.
The solicitation involves maintenance and repair services for multiple YC-class barges (YC-1679 and YC-1600 are currently included; YC-1684, YC-1685, YC-1619, and YC-1620 were removed as options). Work scope includes hatch replacement with test plugs, weld inspections and certifications via magnetic particle testing, void cleaning and preservation with specialized coating systems, non-skid deck replacement, fendering system repairs, handrail installation, hazardous waste abatement, and static load testing of structural fittings. Specific work items reference detailed Statements of Work (SOW) with numbered tasks covering hull inspections, coating specifications, welding procedures, and structural repairs. Key clarifications address exhibit availability (Exhibits C-F removed due to option CLIN elimination; Exhibits A-B provided separately), reference document restrictions (multiple technical references not permitted for release), coating system substitutions (guidance to follow SOW specifications), and inspection access limitations. The contracting agency clarified that cost adjustment clauses are not included due to contract length reduction from option year removals. Previously undetected hazardous materials discovered during execution will be addressed through contract modifications. The bid deadline was extended to July 7, 2026. The government provided limited photographic documentation and noted that site walkthroughs were conducted to address barge condition questions.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions Concerning N3904026Q4819 Solicitation
1) a. Section B; Item 0002 refers “with attachment 2 – SOW Barge Work items YC-1600 and Exhibit B -CDRLS”. There are Exhibits A through F mentioned throughout Section B. Please provide copies of all exhibits.
Answer: Due to the options CLINS being removed Exhibits C through F are also being removed. Exhibits A&B have similar data items and are provided on the document labeled “N3904026Q4819 Exhibit A-B CDRLS”.
b. Section B; Item A001, B001refer to “Diver Hull Inspection report” in accordance with SOW item 110-11-001, paragraph 3.1.1, which does not mention use of Divers in either amendment. Which is correct?
Answer: Follow SOW.
2) SOW #1; 123-21-001, 3.2.1, please confirm that these (12) hatches in entirety are being replaced with new. Will they need test plugs installed? Are there any photos of void condition available?
Answer: Yes replaced. Test plugs installed as needed. No pictures
3) SOW #1; 123-21-002, 1.3, please confirm that any of these items still have wiring connected that runs through transverse bulkheads? Are there photos available?
Answer: No photos. Items listed on SOW.
4) Sow #1; 582-11-002, 3.3, Please provide copies of references 2.6 – 2.8; These are also referenced in SOW #2; 582-11-002, 3.6
Answer: At this time these documents are not permitted for release.
5) Part 3.4, What size and thickness should placard be and confirm if material is 316 Stainless Steel.
Answer: In reference section.
6) SOW #1; 582-11-001, 3.1.1, Please confirm that 100% of welds securing listed Main Deck hardware is to be grit or hydro blasted before Magnetic Particle Testing, and that Individual or Company conducting NDT is to be certified.
Answer: In reference section. Means & Methods.
7) SOW #2; 582-11-002, 3.3 Please provide copies of reference 2.2
Answer: At this time these documents are not permitted for release.
8) SOW # 2; 998-41-001 Haz Waste refers to an “Attachment B” in section 3.5 and “Attachment A” in section 3.1.1, please provide copies of these references
Answer: At this time these documents are not permitted for release.
9) SOW # 1 and 2; 992-11-001 Towing, Section 3.9 refers to Item # 009-012, Table 3 which concerns welding procedures?
Answer: Disregard.
10) SOW # 2; 634-21-001 section 3.1.1, please provide copies of references 2.2 – 2.4, Are there any photographs of this area?
Answer: At this time these documents are not permitted for release. No photographs.
11) SOW # 2; Item 582-11-002, please provide copies of references 2.3,2.4,2.5
Answer: At this time these documents are not permitted for release.
12) SOW #2, 631-31-001, please provide copies of references 2.2 – 2.4
Answer: At this time these documents are not permitted for release.
13) SOW #1, 612-11-001, Please provide copies of references 2.2 – 2.5
Answer: At this time these documents are not permitted for release.
14) Due to length of contract, are there any costs adjusting provisions?
Answer: Due to the removal of all option year items, the length of the contract will not permit the use/inclusion of cost adjusting clauses per acquisition regulations.
15) Are there provisions if previously undetected hazardous materials are discovered for testing or removal (e.g. Red Lead paint)?
Answer: If anomalies are identified those will be addressed as applicable with the execution and issuing of modifications to the awarded contract.
16) Can Static Load Testing be conducted in House with a calibrated Load Cell?
Answer: Please give SOW section.
17) Only 2 of the 6 barges that are involved with bid were available for extensive viewing, Barges 1679 and 1600. Are there recent, reliable photos of the conditions of the 4 other Barges in areas of concern or specific to bidding?
Answer: N/A
18) Are there any photos available of the Fendering systems (top and bottom) on any, or all of the Barges?
Answer: No
19) Will the Bid Deadline be extended to facilitate the reception of requested drawings and information so that a more accurate contract can be proposed?
Answer: Yes, an extension has been issued to 7/7/2026.
20) Please provide pictures of full deck area on YC- 1679, YC-1620 & YC-1600.
Answer: No pictures.
21) Are all barges the same size and do all have same no. of voids. It seemed like there were (6) in YC-1679 and (5) in YC-1600 ?
Answer: Both are standard YC Class. Walkthrough should have covered that question.
22) Will we be able to inspect YC’s 1684, 1685, 1619 & 1620 ?
Answer: These barges were options and have since been removed from the solicitation.
23) We need to know size of upper fendering for pricing replacement of (4) corners. DWG. would be good.
Answer: In reference section.
24) Work Item 611-11-001
3.2 and 3.2.1
Can you specify the exact number of Coverleaf’s needed? 3.2 says 11 and 3.2.1 says 20. I’m assuming that whatever number is right, it is a replacement to a deteriorated one and new locations are not being added.
Answer: 11 known. 20 available after 3.1 inspection.
25) Work Item 123-21-001
I believe the description is wrong for the work item. Void; clean inspect and preserve when it is all about hatches? Also, If lead paint is discovered, is this on the contractor or is a change order given to abate?
Answer: SOW Void DFW is present.
26) On Work Item 634-21-001
Clarify that old non skid is to be removed, deck preserved and new nonskid applied?
Answer: SOW states replace.
27) It looks like the project specifications require the painting contractor to be QP1 certified. Is this accurate or will there be a possibility of a waiver for this requirement?
Answer: No, it is not required.
28) SOW # 2, Item 631-31-001, (3.3) - Please provide length of existing corner fenders as dwgs does not clearly show this measurement ?
Answer: In reference section.
29) SOW # 2, Item 612-11-001 - In the dwgs. provided, pg. (12), handrail arrangement & details, #18 (upper right, bill of materials). Can you explain what this is referring to, it requires (12) of them.
Answer: In reference section.
30) Doc 59AAO-AB-GOS-010 , Paragraph 582j , under the NOTE section states:
When test loads on chocks, bitts, cleats or towing pads exceed the capacity of available cranes or weight handling devices, static test is not required if:
a. Approved stress calculations are accomplished which indicate that the fitting and supporting structure are designed to adequate safety factor, and
b. All strength welds in the fitting and which attach the fitting to the ship's structure are tested by dye penetrant, magnetic particle, or radiograph method. Towing padeye (Repair) - Towing padeyes that are replaced per existing ships installation drawing or have been repair
Please clarify: If this is true in regard to test loads, then can either a or b listed above be used as a testing means.
SOW # 1, Item 612-11-001, 3.1.1 What length/ amount of wire and what length/ amount of chain should be used for quoting purposes. What about the number and/ or condition of the base hinges?
SOW # 1 and SOW #2, Item 123-21-001, Item 3.4 refers to a spec typically used for tanks or flooded spaces (as per Table 4). This spec requires a “plural feed” application process that is complicated and more costly than traditional, commercial applications previously done on similar contracts. Can products used in the past such as an Ameron 235 or International 264 be used instead? What is the existing color?
For previous barges we have drydocked for both Subase NLON and PNSY we have been allowed to use commercial coating system for both mechanically cleaned and near white blasted steel surfaces in lieu of the plural spray products. This system is typically (1) stripe coat following by (2) full coats of
(2) part epoxy primer (6-8 mils each coat) and commonly found in the YC series. Products generally used are International 264 or Ameron 235. System has proven robust and appropriate over decades of service.
Spec. also calls out for near white blast of all compartments. Inspection of barge voids during site visit revealed only (1) void in YC 1679 that could possibly need near white blasting. Coating failure there was due to improper surface preparation as paint was peeling off surface due to moisture or improper cleaning. The remaining (11) voids did not appear to have failure to the extent that would warrant near white blasting and it would be considered good marine practice to mechanically prep and pressure wash these areas.
We request permission to substitute and bid this project using the above coating system in lieu of plural spraying, bid near white blasting of (1) rake compartment in YC 1679, and (100 sq. ft.) of mechanical prep and pressure wash clean in the remaining (11) compartments.
Answer: In reference section. Follow SOW.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .