Enclosure 3_Amendment_23R0008_U0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of Amendment 0003 is to accomplish the list of changes outlined in Section A of this amended solicitation. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 24

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Apr-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N3904023R0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05-Jul-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Apr-2024

CODE

PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD

CONTRACTING DIVISION, CODE 410

BLDG 156, PNS

KITTERY ME 03904

N39040 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

Touch Labor Recompete Sections L and M

N3904023R0008

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The following have been added by full text:

PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT 0003

The purpose of this Amendment (N3904023R0008-0003) is to accomplish the following changes to the Solicitation:

1. Replace FAR 52.212-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (OCT 2022), with 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (FEB 2023) (DEVIATION 2021-O0008).

2. Insert FAR 52.215-20, Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data (NOV 2021), Alternate III (OCT 1997) and Alternate IV (OCT 2010).

3. Insert Clause G-216-H003 Ordering Process for Multiple Award Contracts (MACS) (NAVSEA) (FEB 2024).

4. Amend Factor 1, Technical Approach, by deleting the first element from Sections L and M. The Government has determined that the content of that element will be adequately evaluated under Element 1, General Management Approach, of Factor 2, Management Approach.

5. Amend Factor 4, Small Business Participation Plan, by (i) deleting “Past performance of the offerors in complying with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan” from Sections L and M and (ii) evaluating that information under Factor 3, Past Performance.

6. Delete Factor 5, Total Evaluated Cost (TEC) and Price as an evaluation factor at the contract level as authorized under FAR 15.304(c)(1)(ii) and amend Sections L and M to revise the evaluation factors and basis for award.

7. Update Delivery Information in Section F, CLIN 0001 and CLIN 0002, Ordering Period(s) of Performance (POP) from “30-SER-2023 TO 29-SEP-2028 “ to “01-JUN-2024 TO 31-MAY-2029”

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME.

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 30-SEP-2023 TO

29-SEP-2028

N/A PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD

RECEIVING OFFICER

CODE 501.2 RECEIVING OFFICER

BUILDING 170

KITTERY ME 03904

207-438-5206 FOB: Destination

N39040

To:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2024 TO

31-MAY-2029

N/A PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD

RECEIVING OFFICER

CODE 501.2 RECEIVING OFFICER

BUILDING 170

KITTERY ME 03904

207-438-5206

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0002 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 30-SEP-2023 TO

29-SEP-2028

N/A PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD

RECEIVING OFFICER

CODE 501.2 RECEIVING OFFICER

BUILDING 170

KITTERY ME 03904

207-438-5206

To:

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2024 TO

31-MAY-2029

N/A PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD

RECEIVING OFFICER

CODE 501.2 RECEIVING OFFICER

BUILDING 170

KITTERY ME 03904

207-438-5206

SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

The following have been added by full text:

G-216-H003 Ordering Process for Multiple Award Contracts (MACS) (NAVSEA) (FEB 2024)

(a) General. One or more orders may be issued during the performance period of this contract. The Contractor agrees to accept and perform orders issued by the Contracting Officer within the scope and within the maximum value of this contract. It is understood and agreed that the Government has no obligation to issue any orders under this contract, except the minimum order. In the event of any inconsistency between any order and this contract, this contract shall take precedence.

(b) Fair Opportunity for Orders.

(1) All orders in excess of the micro-purchase threshold to be issued under this indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) MAC will be competed per FAR 16.505(b)(1), unless one of the exceptions to fair opportunity at FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i) applies. Orders will be tailored to specific project requirements and issued per the evaluation criteria established in the order solicitation.

(2) During the Fair Opportunity Process, the Government may elect to restrict competition for orders, either totally or in part, to Small Businesses or other available Small Business Administration (SBA) small business designations (i.e., 8(a), HubZone, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business (EDWOSB)). The order solicitation will notify Offerors if the order will be solicited on a restricted or an unrestricted basis.

(c) Competitive Ordering Process.

(1) Pre solicitation and solicitation. All eligible IDIQ MAC holders will receive notification of the solicitation for each order via Government Point of Entry (SAM.gov)or by email. All proposed orders will incorporate all terms of the IDIQ MAC unless otherwise specified in the proposed order. IDIQ MAC holders will be provided a reasonable response period to prepare and submit proposals based on the estimated dollar value and complexity of the proposed order.

(a) The due date for the order proposals will be set forth in each solicitation.

(b) Proposals received from IDIQ MAC holders not eligible to participate in the competition for the specific order will not be considered.

(2) Evaluation. The Government will evaluate proposals against the selection criteria contained in the order solicitation. At a minimum, evaluation criteria will include:

(i) Price/Cost

(ii) Evaluate Past Performance on all orders when appropriate

(3) Order Execution. Upon completion of evaluations of proposals for an order, the Contracting Officer will issue an order to the IDIQ MAC holder whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in the order solicitation. The Government reserves the right to issue one, more than one, or no orders following completion of evaluations. The Contracting Officer will notify the IDIQ MAC holders of the selection decision.

(d) Unauthorized Work. The Contractor is not authorized to commence performance prior to issuance of a signed order. Orders shall either be funded at time of issuance, or under the authority of FAR 52.232-18, Availability of Funds (if included in the order).

(e) Ordering Authority and Tracking. Contracting Officers from the below listed activities are authorized to issue orders under this contract for services or supplies listed in Section B from contract award through the end of the ordering periods specified in Section F.

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) (List activities)

(End of Text)

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by reference:

52.215-20 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data

Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data

NOV 2021

52.215-20 Alt III Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data (NOV 2021) - Alternate III

OCT 1997

52.215-20 Alt IV Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data (NOV 2021) - Alternate IV

OCT 2010

52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting OCT 2022

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES

TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

I. GENERAL

In addition to instructions to offerors contained elsewhere in this solicitation, the following instructions are provided.

Initial proposals and any modifications thereto are to be submitted to the Contracting Officer on or before the closing date and time cited elsewhere in this solicitation. Offerors are required to submit their proposals, hardcopy submission, in three separate volumes as follows:

Volume I Non-Price Proposal:

Factor I - Technical Approach Factor II - Management Approach Factor III - Past Performance

Volume II Price Proposal:

Factor IV- Small Business Participation Plan and Small Business Subcontracting Plan

General Volume:

Tab A. Exceptions/Assumptions Tab B. Standard Form (SF33) and Amendments Tab C. Section K (Representations, Certifications, and other Statements of Offerors) Tab D. Organizational and Consultant Conflict Tab E. Offeror Points of Contact and Other Information Tab F. Accounting System Information Tab G. Small Business Subcontracting Plan

NOTE:

In addition, offers consist of and shall include the following items as part of Volume II:

A complete and signed Standard Form 33, “Solicitation/Offer/Award” and executed copy of

Amendments, if applicable, completed by the offeror;

Executed “Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors” completed by the offeror in accordance with FAR 52.204-8 and DFARS 252.204-7007 Alt. A.

Each page of each copy should include the following legend: Source Selection Information - See FAR

2.101 and 3.104

The completion and submission of the above items will constitute an offer (proposal) and will indicate the offeror’s unconditional assent to the terms and conditions of this RFP and any attachments and/or exhibits hereto. Alternate proposals are not authorized..

IMPORTANT NOTES:

(1) Offerors shall respond to all requirements of the solicitation document. Offerors are cautioned not to alter the solicitation.

(2) In the event any person who is not a bona fide employee of the offeror participated in the creation, formulation, or writing of any portion of the proposal, a certificate to this effect shall be included in the proposal which shall be signed by an officer of the offeror. Such certificates shall identify the name of the person who is not a bona fide employee, that person’s employment capacity, the name of the person’s firm, the relationship of that firm to the offeror, and the portion of the proposal in which the person participated.

(3) In order to ensure that all questions submitted by potential offerors are answered prior to the solicitation closing date, one consolidated list of questions concerning the solicitation should be submitted via e-mail to the contracting point of contact, Victoria MacLellan at victoria.b.maclellan.civ@us.navy.mil no later than 4:00 pm, local time, on April 26, 2024. The Government reserves the right not to respond to any questions received concerning this solicitation after the questions receipt date above. Accordingly, offerors are encouraged to carefully review all solicitation requirements and submit questions to the Government early in the proposal timeframe.

Proposals are to be submitted via hardcopy in the volumes, format and quantities as identified below. All electronic files via CD ROM and versions of offerors proposals shall be compatible with the current release of Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office Suite version 2010. The offeror shall be responsible for ensuring that their electronic proposals via CD ROM are virus free. If the Government finds a discrepancy between the original paper copy of the proposal and the electronic copy provided on the CD ROM, the paper copy will take precedence. Offerors shall submit their hardcopy proposals to the address specified below.

Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Code 410 Contracting Department Attention: Victoria MacLellan Building 156 Kittery, ME 03904

(4) Hand-carried proposals are permitted. Coordinate delivery of hand carried proposals with Steven Carlberg, 603- 581-9341,victoria.b.maclellan.civ@us.navy.mil. Offerors must provide personnel in all labor trades identified within the Statement of Work. Offerors who fail to meet this requirement will be considered ineligible for award.

FILE NAMING CONVENTION via CD ROM

All electronic files must be submitted in the following formats:

Cost_Company Name_Document Name_ Vol# (or Attachment Number) Example: Cost_PNS_CostNarrative_Vol II Example: Cost_PNS_Cost Summary Attachment 1 Technical_CompanyName_DocumentName_Vol# Example:

Technical_PNS_Technical Capability_Vol I Past Performance_CompanyName_DocumentName_Attachment#_Vol# Example: PastPerformance_PNS_Previous Contracting Efforts_Volume II

II. REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSAL CONTENT

(1) Introduction and Purpose: This section specifies the format that offerors shall use in this Request for Proposal (RFP). The intent is not to restrict the offerors in the manner in which they will perform their work but rather to ensure a certain degree of uniformity in the format of the responses for evaluation purposes.

(2) Each volume should contain the following items in addition to the other information required by this solicitation:

Cover: The cover should indicate the following:

Title of the proposal Volume Number Request for Proposal (RFP) Number Name and address of offeror, Cage Code, DUNS and applicable Tax I.D.

Number (TIN) Identification if original or a copy of the proposal Proposal shall be valid for 180 days.

Cover Letter: In accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), the same cover letter for each volume of the proposal must show the following:

The solicitation number;

The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the

Offeror;

A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

Names, titles and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation;

DCAA office point of contact including branch location, contact name, telephone number and e-mail address;

Name, title and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office;

Table of Contents: The table of contents should provide sufficient detail as to allow the important elements to be easily located. The use of tabs and dividers is encouraged.

(1) Requirements for Style: Each offeror shall submit a proposal that clearly and concisely describes and defines the contractor’s response to the requirements contained in the RFP. Unnecessary elaboration or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal are not desired and may be construed as an indication of the offeror’s lack of understanding of cost consciousness. Elaborate art work, expensive paper or bindings, and expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. The proposal shall contain all the pertinent information in sufficient detail in the one area of the proposal where it contributes most critically to the discussion of the same information. When necessary, the offeror shall refer to the initial discussion and identify its location within the submitted proposal.

(2) Proposal Page Limitations:

Volume I, Non-Price Proposal - The following page limitations are established:

Title Hardcopy Proposal Quantities Page Limit* Non-Price Proposal – (Technical Approach, Management Approach, and Past Performance)

1 Original, 1 Copy, 1 Electronic on

CD ROM**

25 Pages each for Factors 1 and 2 and 20 pages for Past Performance.

The Non-Price Proposal factors are limited to the maximum number of pages as defined in the table above. These page limitations are inclusive of the executive summary and any charts, diagrams, and/or other graphics. Graphics (including tables) included in the proposal may use an alternative font with 8 point size type or larger. Each “page” is defined as one sheet, 8 ½ “ x 11”, with at least one inch margins on all sides, using a font with a point size of 12 or greater (e.g., "Times New Roman" style with 12 point font). Lines shall, at a minimum, be single-spaced. Pages shall be consecutively numbered. Multiple pages, double pages, two-sided pages, or foldouts will count as an equivalent number of 8 ½" x 11" pages. Page Limit does not include covers for volumes, tables of contents, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, and section dividers/tables if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. Pages will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted. Pages submitted in excess of the page limitations described above will not be evaluated. The Offeror shall use a standard page numbering system to facilitate proposal references.

***NOTE: The 25 page limit excludes the following: -Resumes; -Letters of Commitment; -Training Plans for the confined/enclosed space entry, personal fall arrest system, and respirator programs; -Trade Training Plans for each Trade - Training Records for one (1) in each Trade.

Volume II, Price Proposal is not page limited.

Title Hardcopy Proposal Quantities

Limit* Software

Participation Plan (Factor 4);

1 Original, 1 Copy, 1 Electronic on CD ROM**

No limit Microsoft Excel

The Small Business Participation Plan is not page limited.

* Page limits represent the maximum pages the Government will evaluate and are not construed as de facto standards for the amount of material expected in the proposal.

** Offerors are to submit one master CD ROM with all files.

Organizational Conflict of Interest Mitigation Plan (if applicable)

Due to the nature and scope of the work encompassed by this solicitation, the Government requires that there be no conflict which would preclude the prime contractor from performing any portion of the Performance Work Statement, regardless of whether it intends to subcontract that portion. Due to the nature of the work outlined in Section C, the Government anticipates that organizational conflicts of interest (OCIs), including impaired objectivity OCIs, will arise for Offerors that perform under other contracts within the cognizance of PNS as prime contractor or subcontractor for touch labor that will be covered by this solicitation.

If any Offeror may have an OCI the Offeror must notify the Government and must submit an OCI mitigation plan with its proposal. Failure by an Offeror that has identified a potential OCI or an eliminated OCI to submit an OCI mitigation plan with its proposal shall be considered grounds for disqualification from award. The Government will not accept mitigation measures for impaired objectivity OCIs. For any OCI, the Government will not accept mitigation or elimination measures:

(1) That creates an additional burden on the Government to implement;

(2) That involve directed subcontractors or creating separate lines of reporting or any modification to the

Government/prime contractor relationship; or

(3) That is deemed in the sole discretion of the contracting officer to provide insufficient organizational independence between the prime contractor or a subcontractor under this contract and a prime contractor or subcontractor for touch labor that will be covered by this solicitation.

This is not an exhaustive list of measures that will be considered inadequate to protect the Government. It is an illustrative list provided in an effort to ensure that all Offerors understand the Government’s expectations and intent to avoid OCIs. The Government reserves the right to determine whether or not any mitigation plan provided by an Offeror is sufficient to protect the Government. The Government also does not intend to accept any mitigation measures that involve additional oversight or commitment of resources by the Government, such as agency review of contractor deliverables, internal review of task assignments for OCI before issuance, or formalized monthly reviews of work performed and projected. All Offerors are directed to review and comply fully with the OCI clauses included in Section L of this solicitation.

**NOTE: If an OCI is applicable, include it in Volume I, Non-Price Proposal with Factor II, Management Approach under a separate tab.

OFFER

The completion and submission to the Government of an offer shall indicate the Offeror’s unconditional agreement to the terms and conditions in this solicitation, concurrence with the Performance Work Statement, and the proposed contract type. In evaluating an Offeror’s capability, the Government shall consider how well the Offeror complied with the instructions in the solicitation.

III. PROPOSAL CONTENT

1. Volume I Non-Price Proposal

The Non-price Proposal evaluation factors are listed below:

Factor I: Technical Approach. Offerors shall provide a detailed Technical Approach in their proposal. The Technical Approach shall demonstrate the Offerors’ ability to provide an adequate number of personnel with the qualifications and experience necessary to perform and manage all tasks described in the Statement of Work (SOW) throughout contract performance. The Offerors’ approach shall include the following information:

Demonstrate a sound process to hire, train, and retain an adequate number of personnel (Tradesman, Key Personnel, Others) with the applicable qualifications and experience required for their designated positions.

Demonstrate the methods that will be used to reduce personnel turn-over and the timeline for hiring, training, and replacing personnel during contract performance. Identify the proposed staffing levels for each Trade the Offeror intends to perform by FTE and employer (offeror, subcontractor).

Provide the names and resumes of all Key Personnel who will perform under this contract. Letters of Commitment are required if an Offeror proposes an individual for a key position who is not a current employee of the Offeror or its subcontractors. Resumes shall clearly demonstrate that the Key Personnel possess all applicable qualifications and experience required for their designated positions and shall present dates using both Months and Years. Letters of Commitment shall be signed no earlier than 60 days before the due date for proposal submission and shall state that the individual intends to accept a reasonable offer of employment if the Offeror is awarded a contract. Offerors’ proposals shall clearly identify the specific Trades that each Supervisor will be assigned to supervise; and

Demonstrate the Offerors’ plan to provide a Formal Training Program that satisfies all requirements within the SOW, including Trade Training Plans, a Training Management System, Training Records and Continuing Training Plans. Discuss the degree to which the training program encompasses the competencies for each Trade (i.e., typical trade tasks; trade skill requirements) and ensures employees are capable of performing in their selected trades. Submit copies of the following: (i) Training Plans for the confined/enclosed space entry, personal fall arrest system, and respirator programs; (ii) Trade Training Plans for each Trade the Offeror intends to perform during contract performance; and (iii) Training Records for one (1) employee in each Trade.

Factor II: Management Approach. Offerors shall provide a detailed Management Approach in their proposal. The Management Approach shall demonstrate the Offerors’ ability to monitor and manage its workforce and the contract’s requirements and to ensure timely, quality performance in a cost effective manner. The Offerors’ approach shall include the following information:

General Management Approach. Describe the Offerors’ approach with respect to the following requirements:

-Procedures to monitor and adhere to performance requirements, including the quality control measures that will be used to identify and resolve problems early;

-Procedures used to plan, track and control multiple taskings;

-Factors considered in assigning individuals to tasks, methods for handling changing priorities and schedules and for transitioning employees from tasks during performance; and

-Procedures to track, control and adhere to manpower, schedule and cost limitations.

SOW Requirements. Describe the Offerors’ approach with respect to the following SOW requirements:

-Workforce Management Program (SOW 2.3);

-Emergency Reporting Protocol (SOW 2.8);

-Personnel Management Program (SOW 2.9);

-Equal Employment Opportunity Policy;

-Alcohol and Drug Prevention Policy;

-Contractor Furnished Material (SOW 2.10.1);

-On-Site Supervision (SOW 3.5);

-On Boarding (SOW 3.6);

-Security Clearances / Shipyard Access (SOW C-4.0);

-Technical Conferences / Review Meetings (SOW C-5.0) -Deliverables (CDRLs A001 - A0011)

Organizational Structure. Provide an organizational chart of the Offeror’s proposed management structure. Identify positions, titles, number of personnel by FTE, and their employers (prime or subcontractor, if applicable). Describe individuals’ responsibilities and authorities within the Offerors’ organization and when interacting/communicating with Government personnel (e.g., project and contracting personnel). Identify who bears ultimate responsibility for contract performance and authority to bind the Offeror. Explain relationships between the Offerors’ corporate entities and on-site organizational elements in performing the contract.

Subcontractors: Offerors that intend to use subcontractors, teaming partners or affiliates (hereafter subcontractors) shall identify those entities in their proposal (by name, size and socio-economic status), their roles under the contract (by SOW section where possible), their authorities within the Offerors’ organization and when interacting/communicating with Government personnel, and their relevant capabilities and experience. Describe how subcontractors will be integrated into the Offeror’s organization and managed.

Factor III- Past Performance. The offeror shall demonstrate relevant past performance or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance. Relevant past performance is performance under contracts or efforts within the past five (5) years that is the same as, or similar to, the scope, magnitude, and complexity of the work described by this solicitation.

To demonstrate its past performance, the offeror shall provide up to three (3) of its most relevant contracts or efforts within the past five (5) years, and provide any other information the offeror considers relevant to the requirements of the solicitation using the format as provided within Attachment 6 (Past Performance Information Form). Offerors should provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the relevance of the contracts or efforts to the requirements of the solicitation.

Prior Performance Information. Provide information substantiating the Offeror’s track record of utilizing small business on past contracts. For Large Businesses, include SF 294 and SF 295 (or Individual Subcontracting and Summary Subcontracting Reports in eSRS) information for government contracts with these reporting requirements for the last three years. If Offeror has had no contract in the last three years with these reporting requirements, a statement to that effect must be included. For Large and Small Businesses, provide descriptive information for all small business categories. Any information concerning long-term relationships with Small Business subcontractors, such as mentor-protégé relationships should also be provided.

Offerors may provide contracts describing their own experience as a subcontractor. Offerors shall describe the major or critical aspects of the work performed, as well as the dollar value of work performed, under the submitted contract. The offeror must also submit at least one (1) recent and relevant contract effort for each proposed subcontractor that performs more than 10% of the total contract effort in total man hours. The contracts identified should demonstrate in-depth knowledge and successful performance of contracts, or similar size, scope and technical complexity to this solicitation and the dollar value of work performed, under the contract.

Subcontractor performance (either the offeror's own subcontractor experience or proposed subcontractors experience) of major or critical aspects of this requirement will be considered as highly as prime contractor past performance information for the offeror. Failure of offerors to describe the required information will result in the contract reference not being evaluated.

The references will be evaluated in the aggregate in order to allow offerors who may not have the entire scope, magnitude, and complexity of the requirement under one individual contract to still be considered acceptable if past performance with the full scope, magnitude, and complexity of the requirement can be demonstrated within the allotted number of references as described above.

*NOTE: Offerors are advised that the Government may consider past performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the Offeror, including Federal, State and local Government agencies, better business bureaus, published media and electronic databases including, but not limited to, Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). The Government may research Offeror performance on any Federal, State, local and non-commercial procurement that is known to the Government, but not included on a submitted reference.

Customer Assessments

Offerors shall submit the Past Performance Report Form provided as Attachment 7 with this solicitation to each of their customer POCs identified in Attachment 6 (Past Performance Information Form). In order to expedite the assessment process, the Offeror may complete the “Contract Information” portion of the Past Performance Questionnaire for the convenience of the customer POC. The Offeror shall not, however, complete any other section of the Customer Assessments. The questionnaire shall be provided to the customer POC with instruction to complete and submit it directly to the Contracting Officer on or before the proposal due date. Electronic submission by the customer is required and should be sent to victoria.b.maclellan.civ@us.navy.mil.

The Government reserves the right to limit or expand the number of references it decides to contact and to contact other references than those provided by the Offeror.

Note: The Government reserves the right to use contract performance data provided in the Offeror’s proposal and contract performance data obtained from other sources, such as the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) database and from the point of contact identified by the Offeror in its proposal.

Volume II Price Proposal.

Factor IV-Small Business Participation Plan.

All offerors are required to provide a Small Business Participation Plan that identifies the level of participation of small businesses (as primes or subcontractors) in the performance of this acquisition. The proposal shall addresses the individual areas below.

The extent to which small business concerns are specifically identified;

The extent of commitment to use small business concerns (for example, enforceable commitments will be weighted more heavily than non-enforceable ones);

The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform;

The extent of participation of small business concerns in terms of the percentage of the value of the total acquisition.

(1) Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME offeror only. Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime -or- { } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a { } Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) { } Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) { } Historically Underutilized Zone (HUB Zone) Small Business { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

(2) Identify the total combined percentage of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (as primes and subcontractors) based on the total value of the acquisition:

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) % = $ _____ Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) % = $ ______ 100%

(3) Identify the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of small business subcategory. The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

Small Business (SB) % Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) % Woman Owned Small Business (WOSB) % Historically Underutilized Zone (HUB Zone) Small Business % Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) %

(4) List principle supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Name of Company Identify Type of Service/Supply

Small Business (SB)

Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB):

Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB):

Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUB Zone):

Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business

(SDVOSB):

(5) Extent of Commitment. Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (e.g., what types of commitments, if any, are in place for this specific acquisition either – small business prime, written contract, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.) Provide documentation regarding commitments to small businesses for this effort including teaming agreements. Copies of signed agreements shall be provided as part of your Small Business Participation Plan and will not count against the page limitations for this volume.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION M – Evaluation Factors for Award

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

BASIS FOR AWARD AND EVALUATION CRITERIA.

a. Basis for Contract Award. The Government intends to solicit, evaluate and award multiple Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Contracts resulting from this solicitation using the policies and procedures in FAR Part 15.3. The Government will not include price or cost as an evaluation factor as the contract level, but will instead award contracts to all qualifying offerors in accordance with FAR 15.304(c)(1)(ii) and as defined below. The Government will consider cost and price as one of the factors in the selection decision for each order placed under the contract.

b. Evaluation Criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the factors described below.

Factor I: Technical Approach Factor II: Management Approach Factor III: Past Performance Factor IV: Small Business Participation Plan

c. Award for All of the Work. Offerors must provide personnel in all labor trades identified within the Statement of Work. Offerors who fail to meet this requirement are not eligible for contract award.

The Government will award contracts to all qualifying offerors. To be considered a Qualifying Offeror, an Offeror must receive an Acceptable rating in Factors I, II and IV, must receive a Satisfactory Confidence Rating in Factor III, must be a responsible source and must satisfy other conditions in FAR 15.304(c)(1)(ii) and FAR 2.101. Offerors who fail to meet these criteria are not eligible for contract award.

*NOTE: Awards will only be made to an Offeror that has no Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) as defined in FAR 9.5 or that the Government determines has provided a satisfactory mitigation plan. Offerors are advised that technical proposals may be evaluated without consideration of any proposed subcontractor which is deemed to have an OCI and for which an unsatisfactory mitigation plan has been proposed

Please note, acceptance of the offeror’s small business participation proposal does not satisfy the requirement in FAR Part 19.702 for submittal and approval of a Subcontracting Plan.

Volume I-Non-Price Factors

Factor I: Technical Approach. The Government will evaluate Offerors Technical Approach for clarity, reasonableness and the degree to which it demonstrates an understanding of and the capability to perform the Government’s requirements as noted below.

The Government will evaluate Offerors’ ability to recruit, train and retain an adequate number of properly qualified personnel (Tradesman, Key Personnel, Other) in the appropriate labor categories to accomplish individual work requirements of the SOW and successfully perform this effort. The Government will evaluate whether the offeror has identified sound methods to reduce personnel turnover and responsive timelines for hiring, training and replacing personnel during contract performance.

The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror has proposed Key Personnel for all required positions who are properly qualified, as reflected in their resumes and any required letters of commitment, to perform and manage the contracted effort successfully; and

The Government will evaluate Offerors’ Formal Training Program, including its subordinate elements (Trade Training Plans, Training Management System, Training Records, Continuing Training Plans), for compliance with the Government’s requirements and the degree to which the training program ensures employees are capable of performing in their selected trades.

Factor II: Management Approach. The Government will evaluate Offerors Management Approach for clarity, reasonableness and the degree to which it demonstrates Offerors’ ability to monitor and manage its workforce and the contract’s requirements and to ensure timely, quality performance in a cost effective manner as noted below.

General Management Approach. Offerors’ General Management Approach will be evaluated as noted above.

-Procedures to monitor and adhere to performance requirements, including the quality control measures that will be used to identify and resolve problems early;

-Procedures used to plan, track and control multiple taskings;

-Factors considered in assigning individuals to tasks, methods for handling changing priorities and schedules and for transitioning employees from tasks during performance; and -Procedures to track, control and adhere to manpower, schedule and cost limitations.

SOW Requirements. Offerors’ approach to these SOW Requirements will be evaluated as noted above.

Workforce Management Program (SOW 2.3);

Emergency Reporting Protocol (SOW 2.8); Personnel Management Program (SOW 2.9);

Equal Employment Opportunity Policy;

Alcohol and Drug Prevention Policy Contractor Furnished Material (SOW 2.10.1);

On-Site Supervision (SOW 3.5);

On Boarding (SOW 3.6);

Security Clearances / Shipyard Access (SOW C-4.0); Technical Conferences / Review Meetings (SOW C-5.0) Deliverables (CDRLs A001 - A0011)

Organizational Chart. The Government will evaluate whether Offerors’ have proposed a sound management structure that clearly identifies: individuals (by positions, titles, numbers, and employers), their responsibilities and authorities within the Offerors’ organization and when interacting/communicating with Government personnel; individuals who are ultimately responsible for contract performance and have authority to bind the Offeror; and the relationships between the Offerors’ corporate entities and on-site organizational elements in performing the contract.

Subcontractors: The Government will evaluate whether Offerors have clearly identified any proposed subcontractors, their roles under the contract, their authorities within the Offerors’ organization and when interacting/communicating with Government personnel; their relevant capabilities and experience and how they will be integrated into and managed in the Offeror’s organization. The Government will assess the degree to which any proposed subcontractors can be expected to yield timely, quality performance.

Factor III – Past Performance

The Government will evaluate Offeror’s past performance over the past five years for relevance, which is considered to be whether the experience cited is similar to the size, scope and technical complexity of this effort. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to relate past performance to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will consider the relevance of past performance information obtained in relation to the scope of this procurement. Past performance, either positive or negative, which is considered by the Government to be more closely related to the scope of this effort, will be given additional weight in the evaluation process.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings – Regarding relevancy, each past performance reference under each offeror’s Past Performance submission will be evaluated to determine its scope, complexity and magnitude relative to the instant requirement. In assessing Relevancy, the Government will compare the Offeror's past performance to the scope, value and magnitude of a common task order that the Government expects to issue under the contract The following definitions will apply to this evaluation:

-Scope: Assesses the number of FTEs used in the Trades defined in the SOW.

-Complexity: Assesses the length of the performance period in which Trades in the SOW were used;

-Magnitude: Assesses the value of the work performed using Relevant Trades.

*NOTE: Offerors are advised that the Government may consider past performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the Offeror, including Federal, State and local Government agencies, better business bureaus, published media and electronic databases including, but not limited to, Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). The Government may research Offeror performance on any Federal, State, local and non-commercial procurement that is known to the Government, but not included on a submitted reference.

In evaluating the Past Performance, the Government will consider:

-Quality of Product or Service. The degree to which the products or services provided meet the requirements of the contract and the degree to which they were similar to this solicitation.

-Delivery/Completion Schedule. The extent to which the Offeror satisfied customer requirements for contract completion in accordance with agreed upon schedule.

-Cost Control. The extent to which the Offeror provided contract services at or below their initially proposed costs while maintaining customer desired level of quality and delivery, and limit direct and indirect cost growth.

-Small Business Subcontracting. The extent to which the Offeror complied with any applicable Small Business Subcontracting goals.

Factor IV: Small Business Participation Plan.

All offerors are required to provide a Small Business Participation Plan that identifies the level of participation of small businesses (as primes or subcontractors) in the performance of this acquisition. The proposal shall addresses the individual areas below.

The extent to which small business concerns are specifically identified;

The extent of commitment to use small business concerns (for example, enforceable commitments will be weighted more heavily than non-enforceable ones);

The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform;

The extent of participation of small business concerns in terms of the percentage of the value of the total acquisition.

Past Performance.

The following adjectival ratings/definitions shall be used for the Past Performance evaluation factor: There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation.

1) Relevancy of Past Performance.

The first aspect is to evaluate the Offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the Offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection.

More relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance. Sources of past performance information may include information provided by the Offeror, information obtained from questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition, or any other sources available to the Government. Other sources include, but are not limited to: PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting officers and Fee Determining Officials; and DCMA.

Rating Description Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

2) Performance Confidence Assessment.

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contacts. In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each Offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings below:

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Performance Confidence Assessment is an evaluation of the likelihood (or Government’s confidence) that the offeror will successfully perform the solicitation’s requirements; the evaluation is based upon past performance information.

Volume II Price Factors.

Factor IV – Small Business Participation Plan.

All offerors (both large and small) will be evaluated on the level of proposed participation of small business concerns (as primes or subcontractors) in the performance of this acquisition. The Government will evaluate the following areas:

The extent to which small business concerns are specifically identified;

The extent of commitment to use small business concerns (for example, enforceable commitments will be weighted more heavily than non-enforceable ones) The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform;

Small Business Participation Plan Rating Definitions. Each area listed above will be evaluated using the adjectival rating chart below:

Adjectival Rating

Extent to Which SB Firms are Specifically Identified

Extent of Commitment to Identified Firms

Complexity & Variety of Work SB Firms will Perform

Extent of Participation of SB Firms in Terms of the Value of the Total Acquisition

Outstanding SB Firms are identified by name in each category proposed.

W…