N3319121R4005.pdf

Firm Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Job Order Contract (JOC) for Maintenance, Repair and Minor Construction Services, Naval Air Station Sigonella (NASSIG), Sicily, Italy.

NAICS: 2368990 Contract Ceiling: $30M Period of Performance: One (1) 12-month base period and four (4) 12-month option periods for a total of 60 months.

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

23-Feb-2021

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______30 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________365 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________ copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time 25 March 2021(date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC EURAFCENT FEAD NAPLES

AEROPORTO DI CAPODICHINO

BASE AMERICANA (ROICC)

80144

NAPOLI 81044

N33191

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE N33191

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

NAVFAC EUROPE AFRICA SOUTHWEST ASIA

VIALE PORTO CAPODICHINO

NAPOLI 80144

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

39-081-568-5260FAX:TEL: TEL: 39 081 568 7750 FAX: 39 081 568 7750

N3319121R4005 112

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 30,000,000 Each Base Period

FFP

This is an indefinite delivery quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer, who will issue Task Orders. Award of Task Orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The aggregate value of all delivery orders awarded under this contract is not to exceed $30,000,000.00 (Base and four option periods) for a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: Z2AA

MAX

NET AMT

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0002 30,000,000 Each OPTION Option 1 Period

FFP

This is an indefinite delivery quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer, who will issue Task Orders. Award of Task Orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The aggregate value of all delivery orders awarded under this contract is not to exceed $30,000,000.00 (Base and four option periods) for a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: Z2AA

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0003 30,000,000 Each OPTION Option 2 Period

FFP

This is an indefinite delivery quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer, who will issue Task Orders. Award of Task Orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The aggregate value of all delivery orders awarded under this contract is not to exceed $30,000,000.00 (Base and four option periods) for a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: Z2AA

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0004 30,000,000 Each OPTION Option 3 Period

FFP

This is an indefinite delivery quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer, who will issue Task Orders. Award of Task Orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The aggregate value of all delivery orders awarded under this contract is not to exceed $30,000,000.00 (Base and four option periods) for a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: Z2AA

MAX

NET AMT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0005 30,000,000 Each OPTION Option 4 Period

FFP

This is an indefinite delivery quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer, who will issue Task Orders. Award of Task Orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The aggregate value of all delivery orders awarded under this contract is not to exceed $30,000,000.00 (Base and four option periods) for a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: Z2AA

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A Government N/A Government 0002 N/A Government N/A Government 0003 N/A Government N/A Government 0004 N/A Government N/A Government 0005 N/A Government N/A Government

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.1 ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

1.2 SOCIETA’ ORGANISMI D’ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION

1.3 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED

PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.

1.4 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

1.5 CAGE/NCAGE CODE

1.6 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

1.7 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES(PPI)

1.8 AMENDMENTS

1.9 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

1.10 PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE

1.11 ANTI-MAFIA LAW

1.12 PROVISIONS

1.1 ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by an employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities, and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

1.2 SOCIETA’ ORGANISMI D’ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION

a. Societa’ Organismi d’ Attestazione (SOA) certification requirement. The following qualification standards shall be met by the offerors:

Category Classification

OG1 III

OG3 III

OG11 II

b. Submission of SOA Certification and Article 38 of the DL 163/06 (DeLise Code). Offerors shall demonstrate that they meet the SOA certification requirements and demonstrate compliance with Article 38 of DL 163/06. An offeror shall submit the following as part of its proposal:

(1) An unexpired SOA Certificate (including joint venture partner, consortium partners or subcontractors that will be utilized to meet the qualification standard).

(2) Current self-certification documentation required by Article 38 of DL 163/06.

(3) If the potential offeror is a joint venture or a consortium, the offeror shall demonstrate how each member or partner meets the SOA certification requirements stated in paragraph (a) above. Include a description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member or partner (for example – Firm A performing 70% of OG-1 and Firm B performing 30% of OG-1)

(4) An offeror’s proposal will be rejected for failure to provide the current SOA certificates required under this solicitation.

In the case of a Joint Venture (JV), each member of the JV must have at least one of the required SOA Certifications. The JV member who has the SOA Certification must perform the majority of the work pertinent to the certification. In the case of a JV, certification submitted by a subcontractor will not be accepted.

1.3 JOINT VENTURES (JV) AGREEMENTS

FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SOLICITATION, A JOINT VENTURE (JV) REFERS TO A U.S.-STYLED

FORMAL LEGAL ENTITY IN THE NATURE OF A PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED OF TWO OR MORE

PERSONS OR COMPANIES. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST PROVIDE ONE (1) CAGE/NCAGE CODE,

ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR THE JOINT VENTURE AND ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR EACH

MEMBER COMPRISING THE JOINT VENTURE. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST BE REGISTERED IN

THE CCR USING THE NAME OF THE JOINT VENTURE.

Joint Venture Offerors (JV) offerors, shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement shall take effect upon the submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable until one

(1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. Submission of the notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV document. The Joint Venture must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severably liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

**Only offers from Prime Contractors and Joint Ventures (JV) will be accepted. Offers from Associazione Temporanea d’Imprese (ATI) or Offers using a contract of availment (contratto de avvalimento) will not be accepted for this procurement and will be considered non-responsive to the solicitation.**

1. The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(a) Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

(b) Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

(c) Solicitation number.

(d) Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example: Firm A performing 100% of C-2-d.)

(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after contract completion.”

(f) Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing in behalf of each party.

(g) Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture(JV) is in compliance at the time of proposal submission with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture.

The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc) will be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

1.4 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

1. System for Award Management (SAM) registration is required for all offerors, including Joint Venture (JV) offerors (registration must state the NAME of the JV). SAM registration can be accomplished at https://www.sam.gov. Offerors not registered in SAM shall obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

2. A DUNS number is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must provide a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in

SAM.

1.5 CAGE/NCAGE CODE

1. A CAGE/NGAGE Code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE/NCAGE Code registered in the JV name.

2. U.S. Offerors, including Joint Venture offerors: U.S. offerors must obtain a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database, which is part of the SAM registration process.

3. Non-U.S. (foreign, including Italian) Offerors ONLY: Non-U.S. offerors must obtain a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) Code instead of a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database. NCAGE codes may be obtained at the NCAGE website http://www.dlis.dla.mil/Forms/Form_AC135.asp.

1.6 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

a. PRICE PROPOSAL: The Price Proposal shall be submitted via email to Magdalena Guerra at magdalena.guerra@eu.navy.mil and Alex Wingert at Alex.wingert@eu.navy.mil no later than 25 March 2021 at 14:00 Central European Time (CET). Hand carried proposals will be NOT be accepted.

Submit the Price Proposal with the following subject line:

“SOLICITATION N33191-20-R-4002 SIGONELLA JOC PRICE PROPOSAL”

Multiple e-mails may need to be sent for any of the submissions, if your e-mail exceeds 5MB. The U.S. Navy computer server will only accept e-mails with attachments up to 5MB. If you need to submit more than one e-mail for the above submission, number them at the end of the e-mail subject title as “1 of ?”, “2 of ?”, etc.

Proposals not received at the above address on or before the hour and date set for the receipt of proposals shall be considered late, subject to the provisions of FAR Clause 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors -- Competitive Acquisition (JAN 2004).

The PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) First page of the proposal shall be in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)

(2) All information required by the Price Proposal submission

b. NON-PRICE PROPOSAL (FACTORS 1, 2, 3 and 4): The Non-Price Proposal shall be submitted via email to Magdalena Guerra at magdalena.guerra@eu.navy.mil and Alex Wingert at Alex.wingert@eu.navy.mil no later than 25 March 2021 at 14:00 Central European Time (CET). Submit the Non-Price Proposal with the following subject line:

“SOLICITATION N33191-20-R-4002 SIGONELLA JOC NON-PRICE PROPOSAL”

Multiple e-mails may need to be sent for any of the submissions, if your e-mail exceeds 5MB. The U.S. Navy computer server will only accept e-mails with attachments up to 5MB. If you need to submit more than one e-mail for the above submission, number them at the end of the e-mail subject title as “1 of ?”, “2 of ?”, etc.

Proposals not received at the above address on or before the hour and date set for the receipt of proposals shall be considered late, subject to the provisions of FAR Clause 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors -- Competitive Acquisition (JAN 2004).

It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure the government received the proposal and all enclosures by the proposal due date and time as set forth above.

The NON-PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) First page of the proposal shall be in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)

(2) All information required by Factor 1, Corporate Experience

(3) All information required by Factor 2, Management Approach

(4) All information required by Factor 3, Safety

(5) All information required by Factor 4, Past Performance

1.7 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPI)

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI) regarding the solicitation shall be submitted in writing via electronic mail to Magdalena Guerra, Contract Specialist, at magdalena.guerra@eu.navy.mil . Pre-Proposal Inquiries shall reference the drawing/detail and/or the specification section, including paragraph number. Verbal queries will not be accepted. Responses to the Pre-Proposal Inquiries will be provided as an attachment to an amendment and will be posted to the Contract Opportunities (FBO) website www.beta.sam.gov . The Government may not respond to Pre- Proposal Inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt due date. The Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) Template is provided as Attachment A.

1.8 AMENDMENTS

Amendments will be posted to the Contract Opportunities (FBO) website www.beta.sam.gov . It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the www.beta.sam.gov website periodically for any amendments to the solicitation.

1.9 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

FAR §9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical evaluation. The following information shall be submitted:

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for the past three years.

b. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts.

The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort.

For joint ventures, discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide the same information for each partner.

1.10 PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE

The Contractor shall provide a notarized Performance Guarantee letter within ten (10) days after issuance of each task order greater than $150,000 or as required by the Contracting Officer. In lieu of the 10% Performance Guarantee requirement, the Offeror may provide Performance and Payment Bonds, pursuant to FAR Clause 52.228- 15, through an approved surety under the United States Treasury Department Circular 570. If the Offeror fails to provide a Performance Guarantee letter or Performance and Payment Bonds within ten (10) days, the task order may be terminated for default. In such event, Offeror shall be liable for any cost of re-procuring the work which exceeds the amount of his offer.

The Performance Guarantee letter shall be accompanied by a notarized document authenticating the financial institution's authority to sign the letter. An English translation of the Performance Guarantee letter shall be submitted at the same time.

Performance Guarantee: An amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the contract shall be deposited into a properly certified banking institution, which will then issue an irrevocable letter guaranteeing the payment of the amount deposited plus any applicable interest, to the United States Government, upon demand by the Contracting Officer. Demand will be made if the Contractor fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract, or does not fulfill its undertaking in whole or in part. Payment to the Contracting Officer will be by check made payable to the "United States of America by the U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Europe, Africa, Southwest Asia."

The Performance Guarantee shall take effect upon the date of signature of the Performance Guarantee letter and shall remain valid and irrevocable until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government."

SAMPLE OF PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE ISSUED BY A BANK

This sample meets the material requirements of the “Performance Guarantee.” The Government will accept a Performance Guarantee conforming to these requirements.

BANK LETTERHEAD

To: United States of America U.S. Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Europe Africa Southwest Asia Viale Porto, Box 51 Aeroporto Capodichino 80144, Napoli, Italia Attention: Contracting Officer Date Bank Letter of Performance Guarantee No.

I/We, the undersigned, acting as the duly authorized representative(s) of the Bank, declare that the Bank hereby guarantees and is jointly and severally liable as guarantor with the Contractor named below to effect payment to the Contracting Office that issued the contract stated below, by check made payable to the “United States of America by the U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Europe Africa and Southwest Asia,” within five (5) calendar days after receipt of a simple written request by registered mail in amount up to sum of (Amount equal to ten (10%) percent of the contract amount in the currency stated in the contract), which represents the deposit required of the Contractor to guarantee fulfillment of his obligations for the satisfactory completion and timely performance of the work under Contract No. (insert contract number) for the construction of (insert name of construction contract Services) at (insert location of construction), in strict compliance with the terms, conditions and specifications of said contract entered into between the United States of America by the U.S. Department of Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Europe Africa and Southwest Asia and the Contractor (insert name of Contractor) on (insert contract date), plus legal interest to be calculated from the date of receipt of the registered letter of request by the Contracting Officer to the date of actual payment, without any need for the Contracting Officer to take any legal action or obtain the prior consent of the Contractor, or for any other proof, action or decision by any other authority. The request by the Contracting Officer shall simply inform the Bank that the Contractor failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract, or did not fulfill his undertaking in whole or in part.

I/We agree and consent that said contract may be modified by change order or supplemental agreement affecting the amount or the period of performance of the contract without prior consent of the Bank and without affecting the validity of this guarantee; provided, however, that the amount of this guarantee shall remain unchanged.

This letter of performance guarantee will continue in effect without change in amount or terms until one year after final acceptance of the work by the Government by the Contracting Officer’s legal representative.

(BANK NAME & ADDRESS) (CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS)

Signed by: Signed by:

(Typed name) (Typed name)

(Title) (Title)

(This Performance Guarantee shall be accompanied by a notarized document authenticating the bank agent’s authority to sign the letter of performance guarantee for the bank company.)

1.11 ANTI-MAFIA LAW

a. Pre-Award Effect of Anti-Mafia Procedures

In as much as the work of this solicitation is to be performed on land owned by the Italian State, the prospective contractor will be subject to Italian Law No. 646, of 13 September 1982, and subsequent integrations and amendments. The solicitation data will be made available only to firms that meet the related submittal requirements below in paragraph "Submittals". As such, in the event that prior to award any disciplinary actions or proceedings for Mafia related matters exist against the apparent successful offeror, no award will be made to said successful offeror.

b. Termination Under Italian Law No. 646 (Anti-Mafia). If during the life of this contract, any proceeding or disciplinary actions contemplated by Italian Law No. 646 of 13 September 1982 (and subsequent amendments and integrations) is undertaken against any component of the Contractor or any Subcontractor, the Government can consider this a failure to execute the work and terminate the contractor's right to proceed with the work under the "Default" clause of this contract.

c. Contractor shall submit the following:

1. If available, the offeror’s Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio (applicable to Italian offerors)

– Original, unexpired and not older than SIX (6) months at the date of proposal submission of the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio) inclusive of the anti mafia nulla osta statement reading: "Nulla osta ai fini dell'articolo 67 del Decreto Legislativo n. 159 del 6 settembre 2011 (gia Art 10 della legge 31 maggio 1965, n. 575) e successive modificazioni. La presente certificazione è emessa dalla C.C.I.A.A. utilizzando il collegamento telematico con il sistema informativo utilizzato dalla prefettura di Roma" or any similar statement having the same scope as provided for by applicable Laws.

If the offeror has attempted and is unable to obtain the certificate from the Chamber of Commerce that includes the Anti-Mafia Nulla Osta statement, include an explanation why not along with official correspondence from the Chamber of Commerce, if available. This documentation is to be included in your Price Proposal.

2. If available, the Chamber of Commerce Certificate mentioned in Paragraph 1 above for each of its subcontractors.

If the offeror has attempted and is unable to obtain the certificate from the Chamber of Commerce that includes the Anti-Mafia Nulla Osta statement for its subcontractors, include an explanation why not along with official correspondence from the Chamber of Commerce, if available. This documentation is to be included in your Price Proposal.

1.12 PROVISIONS

Contractor shall submit all completed provisions noted on this solicitation, such as:

52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO

SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT

52.209-11 REPRESENTATION BY CORPORATIONS REGARDING DELINQUENT TAX LIABILITY OR A

FELONY CONVICTION UNDER ANY FEDERAL LAW

252.204-7016 COVERED DEFENSE TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES --

REPRESENTATION

252.204-7017 PROHIBITION ON THE ACQUISITON OF COVERED DEFENSE TELECOMMUNICATIONS

EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES--REPRESENTATION

52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS

52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS

252.229-7001 TAX RELIEF

252.247-7022 REPRESENTATION OF EXTENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY SEA

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. GENERAL

2.1 ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL

2.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

2.3 ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

PART II. EVALUATION FACTORS / RATING SCHEME

2.4 PRICE EVALUATION

2.5 NON-PRICE EVALUATION

2.6 ATTACHMENTS

PART I. GENERAL

2.1 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL

The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of a contract. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions will be equal or better than as proposed and accepted for contract award and shall require prior Contracting Officer’s approval.

2.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

In accordance with FAR 52.215-1, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

The contract resulting from this solicitation will be awarded to the responsible offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the most advantageous to the Government considering “Price” and “Non- Price/Technical” evaluation factors. Award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors – Factor 1 Experience, Factor 2 Management Approach, and Factor 3 Safety – are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation factor, Factor 4. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to Price. In determining the best value to the Government, the Government need not quantify the tradeoffs that led to the best value decision.

Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions.

Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

2.3 NON-PRICE EVALUATION FACTOR

The technical rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements through an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks of a proposal.

A combined technical/risk evaluation considering risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings shall be used. The technical risk evaluation shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings listed in the following table. Adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign an overall rating to each technical proposal and to assign a rating for each technical factor.

Use upper case letter ratings for major technical factors as well as the overall rating. The addition of plus (+) or minus (-) to an adjective rating is not allowed.

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Rating Description

Outstanding (O) Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good (G) Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable (A)

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal (M)

Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable (U) Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

Definitions: The following definitions are provided to assist evaluators in the evaluation of each non-cost/price factor.

a. Strength: An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

b. Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

c. Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

d. Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

SAFETY EVALUATION

Per NAVFAC ATLANTIC and NAVFAC EURAFCENT, solicitations utilizing source selection procedures for procurements in overseas locations shall contain a “Safety” technical evaluation factor. This factor shall be included as a stand-alone evaluation factor and not as a sub-factor or an element of the Past Performance evaluation factor. This action will result in the selection of contractors that have consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and the ability to properly manage and implement safety procedures for themselves and all tiers of subcontractors under their purview.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract’s requirements. One performance confidence assessment rating is assigned for each offeror after evaluating the offeror’s recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the contract requirements.

There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, (including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information).

• An offeror’s past performance will be considered recent if the projects submitted for the offeror were completed no more than five (5) years prior to issuance of the solicitation.

• An offeror’s past performance will be considered relevant if the projects submitted for the offeror:

a. Have a total value of at least $40,000. (If a project was awarded in a currency other than US dollars, the offeror must convert the non-US dollar currency into US dollars using the appropriate exchange rate as of the day the contract for the submitted project was awarded).

b. Is for renovation; repair; maintenance; replacement; alteration; demolition; or NAVFAC construction category II, III, and IV tasks performed under a single order or contract.

c. Reflects the capability to perform multiple projects and disciplines simultaneously.

• The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.

This source selection requires a greater level of discrimination within the past performance evaluation, therefore, the relevancy ratings in the following table shall be used:

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The SSEB will review all past performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate these into the performance confidence assessment. A separate quality assessment rating is not required; rather, the past performance confidence assessment rating is based on the offeror’s overall record of recency, relevancy and quality of performance.

In the case of offerors for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past contract performance. In this case, the offeror’s past performance is unknown and assigned a confidence rating of “neutral.” Although the SSEB may not rate an offeror that lacks recent, relevant past performance favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance, the SSA may determine that a “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating is worth more than a “Neutral Confidence” past performance rating in a best value tradeoff as long as the determination is consistent with stated selection criteria.

Performance Confidence Assessment. This source selection requires a greater level of discrimination within the past performance evaluation, therefore, the SSEB shall use all confidence ratings identified in Table 3 below.

Table 3. Performance Confidence Assessments Adjectival Rating Description

Substant

Satisfact

Neutral

Limited

No Conf

PART II.

2.4 PR

F coefficien in Section result in t orders req coefficien negotiate will be ef multiply 0001 thro solicitatio priced ite

T

Total Eva

F for the la tial Confidence tory Confidenc

Confidence

Confidence fidence

EVALUATIO

RICE EVALU

For the purpos nt for Contract n 00010 – Soli the offeror bein quiring the nee nt of 1.0 for thi ed at the time o ffective for the the proposed c ough 0004. Des on for a descrip ems.

The Estimated aluated Price.

For solicitation st 5 Fiscal Yea e ce

ON FACTORS

UATION FACT

es of establishi t Line Item Num icitation Contra ng ineligible fo ed for a profess is CLIN. For p f each task ord base period an coefficients by scription of Co ption of what i

Amounts for C n purposes Tab ars.

Based on Governm perform t Based on Governm perform t No recent performan rating can favorably Based on Governm perform t Based on Governm successfu

S / RATING S

TOR

ing coefficient mbers (CLIN) act Form. Failu or award. CLIN sional engineer projects that req der. The coeffic nd all option pe their associate oefficients – Re s and what is n

CLINS 0001 th ble 4 has been p n the offeror’s r ment has a high the required eff n the offeror’s r ment has a reaso the required eff t/relevant perfo nce record is s n be reasonably y or unfavorabl n the offeror’s r ment has a low e the required eff n the offeror’s r ment has no exp ully perform th

SCHEME

s for this contr 0001 through ure to offer a co N 0005 will be r’s stamp. The quire a profess cients will beco eriods. On the ed multiplier to efer to the Gen not to be includ hrough 0004 ar provided to dem recent/relevant expectation th ffort.

recent/relevant onable expecta ffort.

formance record so sparse that n y assigned. Th ly on the factor recent/relevant expectation tha ffort.

recent/relevant pectation that th he required effo ract, the offeror 0004 on the C oefficient for C a placeholder Coefficient Sc ional engineer ome a part of t Coefficient Sc o arrive at an E neral Requirem ded in the prop re to be added monstrate the h t performance r hat the offeror w t performance r ation that the of d is available o no meaningful c e offeror may n r of past perfor t performance r at the offeror w t performance the offeror will ort.

r shall provide oefficient Sche

CLINs 0001 th for the design chedule will alw r’s stamp, these the contract up chedule, the off

Estimated Amou ments in Section posed Coefficie together to arri historical value record, the will successful record, the fferor will succ or the offeror’s confidence ass not be evaluate rmance.

record, the will successfull record, the l be able to e a proposed edule, provided hrough 0004 wi price for task ways include a e costs will be on award and fferor is to unt for CLINs n C of the ents for pre-ive at the e of task orders lly cessfully s sessment ed ly d ill a s

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror’s price proposal shall be separate from the technical proposal. Complete and submit the following:

1) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including Solicitation Number;

name, address, telephone and email address of the Offeror; in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), the name of the JV MUST BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED;

Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal; DUNS Number and CAGE or NCAGE Code of the Offeror, in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), provide a DUNS Number for each member of the JV.

2) Completed (Blocks 14 through 20c), signed and dated Standard Form (SF) 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award. In block 14, please include a point of contract with a valid phone number and email address. Offerors shall provide a CAGE/NCAGE code in block 14.

3) Letter from the offeror’s surety. The letter is to verify the offeror has at least a $3M aggregate bonding capacity.

4) Completed Coefficient Schedule.

5) A bulleted list, identifying all cost factor categories included in your coefficient. At a minimum, your coefficient is to include the cost elements identified in the General Requirements, Paragraph C.4 and its subparagraphs. This narrative is limited to one (1) 8.5” x 11” page, one inch margins, Times New Roman size 12 font.

6) Societa’ Organismi d’Attestazione (SOA) Certification Requirement. Submit information required by Paragraph 1.2 of Section 00100.

7) Acknowledgement of all amendments.

8) Joint Venture (JV) Agreement (if applicable).

9) If available, the offeror’s Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio (applicable to Italian offerors) – Original, unexpired and not older than six (6) months at the date of proposal submission of the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio) inclusive of the anti mafia nulla osta statement reading: "Nulla osta ai fini dell'articolo 67 del Decreto Legislativo n. 159 del 6 settembre 2011 (gia Art 10 della legge 31 maggio 1965, n. 575) e successive modificazioni. La presente certificazione è emessa dalla C.C.I.A.A. utilizzando il collegamento telematico con il sistema informativo utilizzato dalla prefettura di Roma" or any similar statement having the same scope as provided for by applicable Laws.

If the offeror has attempted and is unable to obtain the certificate from the Chamber of Commerce that includes the Anti-Mafia Nulla Osta statement, include an explanation why not along with official correspondence from the Chamber of Commerce, if available. This documentation is to be included in your Price Proposal.

10) If available, the Chamber of Commerce Certificate mentioned in paragraph above for each of its subcontractors. If the offeror has attempted and is unable to obtain the certificate from the Chamber of Commerce that includes the Anti-Mafia Nulla Osta statement for its subcontractors, include an explanation why not along with official correspondence from the Chamber of Commerce, if available. This documentation is to be included in your Price Proposal.

11) Financial Statements – The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. If a new Joint Venture (JV) is being proposed, include the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each firm, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization.

12) Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital from an independent financial institution which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract.

13) The Government intends to pay invoices in accordance with the clause for Wide Area Work Flow. To do this, your firm must have a U.S. bank or a U.S. bank affiliate associated with your local bank. With your proposal, identify the name of your U.S. bank or affiliate for purposes of paying invoices.

Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the Total Evaluated Price (TEP) of all CLINs on the Coefficient Schedule. To calculate the TEP the Government will:

1. Calculate each contract contract-line item number (CLIN) price by multiplying the proposed coefficient for each CLIN by the corresponding estimated value of work.

2. Sum the price for all CLINs to arrive at TEP.

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

• Comparison of proposed coefficients received in response to the RFP;

• Comparison of proposed coefficients with the Government Estimate;

• Comparison of proposed coefficients with available historical information;

• Comparison of proposed coefficients with market average.

The Government reserves the right to conduct a price realism analysis of proposed prices to determine risk of unreasonable low proposed prices when compared to offeror-proposed prices submitted in response to the solicitation or in comparison with the IGE.

2.5 NON-PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS:

This One-Phase procurement will result in the award of an Indefinite Quantity Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) contract.

In making the best-value award decision, the government will evaluate Factors 1-4 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that technical factors (i.e., Technical Approach, Experience and Safety) are equal to each other and when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance). The combined non-price factors are approximately equal to price.

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Management Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. It is the Government's intent to award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to hold discussions if they are deemed necessary.