Q_AND_A_Responses_2.docx

DOCX document 30 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS ROBERT E. PEARY: Regular Overhaul/Dry-Docking Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N32205-18-R-4250
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

Q and A #2

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USNS ROBERT E. PEARY: Regular Overhaul/Dry-Docking, newest first.
File Type Posted
0941_A_FW_Stern_Tube_Lubrication_System_Installation_T-ALT_403__Rev_1.doc DOC document
N32205-18-R-4250_Amendment_0004.docx DOCX document
0013_A_PROJECT_PLANNING_AND_MONITORING_(REP_FY18_only_19March18).docx DOCX document
N32205-18-R-4250_Amendment_3.docx DOCX document
0030_B_CONTINUATION_OF_SERVICES_REV_FEB_14.doc DOC document
Revised_J_-_3_Category_B_Items_PEARY_Rev__1.xls XLS spreadsheet
N32205-18-R-4250_Amendment_2.docx DOCX document
Revised_PEARY__WI_Index_ROH_DD_2018.doc DOC document
0024_NSP_Physical_Security_at_Private_Contractor's_Facility__MARCH_2017_..__(2).doc DOC document
Revised_J_-_2_Category_A_Items_PEARY_Rev__1.xls XLS spreadsheet
Q_AND_A_Responses_3.docx DOCX document
8498002_-_Stern_Tube_Fresh_Water_(Closed_Loop)_with_Piping_in_Overhead_o.._.pdf PDF
N32205-18-R-4250_Amendment_0001.docx DOCX document
Work_Item_1001_reference_page_2_5363431_M.pdf PDF
0556A_REV_Steering_Gear_Preventive_Maintenance_7-10_Year.doc DOC document
0105A_REV_Preservation_of_House_Rev_1.docx DOCX document
PEARY_SOLICITATION_2018_ROHDD.docx DOCX document
Q_AND_A_Responses_1.docx DOCX document
J_-_14_Technical_Data_Non-Disclosure.docx DOCX document
J_-_2_Category_A_Items_PEARY.xls XLS spreadsheet
N32205-18-R-4250.docx DOCX document
J_-_11_Dry_Dock_Evaluation_Form.docx DOCX document
J_-_10_Interport_Differential.doc DOC document
J_-_12_Past_Performance_Data.doc DOC document
J_-_7_MSC_Ship_Repair_Facility_Survey.doc DOC document
J_-_9_Disclosure_of_Lobbying_Activities_SF-LLL.doc DOC document
J_-_3_Category_B_Items_PEARY.xls XLS spreadsheet
J_-_13__PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx DOCX document
J_-_8_Request_for_Spec_Clarification.doc DOC document
J_-_14_Technical_Data_Non-Disclosure.docx DOCX document
SYNOPSIS_N32205-18-R-4250_USNS_ROBERT_E._PEARY.docx DOCX document
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND

N32205-18-R-4250

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS #2

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

QUESTION #1:

WI 112.7.7- How much surface area is expected to be degraded?

ANSWER: -100 sq. ft

QUESTION #2:

WI 231.7.2- Three J Boxes are listed to be GFM, but 4 are to be installed. Is the SOW correct or the GFM list?

ANSWER: -3 Boxes to be installed, 1 box was previously installed

QUESTION #3:

WI 504.7.14- Are the replacement hoses GFM hoses? If so, why is the contractor responsible for the mill deliverables?

ANSWER: -New wire to be provided as GFM

QUESTION #4

WI 504.7.14- Are the replacement hoses GFM hoses? If so, why is the contractor responsible for the mill deliverables?

ANSWER: -KTR is NOT responsible for mill reports.

QUESTION #5

WI 504.19.1.M- Are the bolts not being provided as GFM? If so, why is the contractor responsible for the mill deliverables?

ANSWER: MSC has procession of bolts.

QUESTION #6

WI 941- Reference 2.1.1 is listed as 530-8495285 Rev A, the drawing provided is 530-8496453 Rev-. Please provide the appropriate drawing.

ANSWER: -Provided via SEPCOR

QUESTION #7

WI 1001- Reference 2.5 is missing 2 of the 3 pages. Please provide the full reference.

ANSWER: See attachment

QUESTION #8

1. Can we grit blast to an SP-10 the entire area (or a large section) and then pressure wash the area to clean the substrate, the resulting blast standard would be a WJ-2 with the desired anchor profile and no surface contaminates. The only coating changes would be to omit zinc where specified and replace it with another coat of epoxy.

The paint manufacturer should have no problem with this procedure as it would provide a cleaner surface that is free of salts, chlorides, dust, etc and performed in past MSC projects

2. Item 105 Super Structure. Please note existing PSX (top coat) would need to hand sanded prior to applying to ensure best adhesion properties.

ANSWER:

1. Item 105-See U/W hull amended item

2. Item 915-No PSX in this Spec

QUESTION #9

Item 112 Specification directs in paragraph 7.7 to power tool clean. Please provide the percentage of the RAS Stations which would require this spot power tool work? i.e. 1%,5%,10% etc. Additionally, what power tool standard SP-3 or SP-11?

ANSWER: 30%

QUESTION #10

Item 113 provide the percentage of rust that should be estimated for each unit? i.e. 1%,5%,10% etc

ANSWER: 30%

QUESTION #11

Additionally is the following an acceptable work scope for item 113

•Spot power tool to an SP-3 all areas of rust
•Hand Sand all remaining areas
•Solvent wipe entire area
•Apply two (2) spot coat of OFM to power tooled areas
•Apply one (1) full coat of OFM to entire area

ANSWER: Yes

File details come from the government source that posted it.