Attachment_V_Past_Performance_Questioanaire.doc

DOC document 655 KB Posted

Attached to
USS Frank Cable, 1S, 2S, 1SAS, and 2SAS Switchboard Upgrades Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N32205-16-R-2019
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

Attachment V

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USS Frank Cable, 1S, 2S, 1SAS, and 2SAS Switchboard Upgrades, newest first.
File Type Posted
N3220516-R-201904.pdf PDF
N3220516-R-201903.pdf PDF
N3220516-R-201901.pdf PDF
11.10c__Frank_Cable_Technical_Manual_for_Swbds_1S _1SAS _2S _2SAS _1E_and_Cont_Unit.pdf PDF
11.10b__Frank_Cable_Technical_Manual_for_Swbds_1S _1SAS _2S _2SAS _1E_and_Cont_Unit.pdf PDF
11.10a__Frank_Cable_Technical_Manual_for_Swbds_1S _1SAS _2S _2SAS _1E_and_Cont_Unit.pdf PDF
A003_-_Test_and_Acceptance_Reports.pdf PDF
11.3__301-8496020_A _2S_Switchboard_Modifications.pdf PDF
11.9__320-8496064_- _2SAS_Switchboard_Test_Procedure.pdf PDF
11.11__302-8389031_C _Power_Dist_Sys_One-Line_Dia.pdf PDF
11.5__301-8496022_- _2SAS_Switchboard_Modifications.pdf PDF
11.13__302-4792483_E _Coordination_of_Circuit_Breakers.pdf PDF
11.8__320-8496063_- _1SAS_Switchboard_Test_Procedure.pdf PDF
11.14__803-7081124_- _WI_Prep_Guide.pdf PDF
A004_-_As-Built_Drawings.pdf PDF
11.12__302-8389010_B _Fault_Current_Analysis.pdf PDF
A001_-_Meeting_Minutes.pdf PDF
11.7__320-8496062_- _2S_Switchboard_Test_Procedure.pdf PDF
11.1__Work_Item_308.1_Upgrade_Switchboards.pdf PDF
Attachment_VI_Nondisclosure_Agreement.docx DOCX document
A005_-_Technical_Manuals.pdf PDF
11.4__301-8496021_- _1SAS_Switchboard_Modifications.pdf PDF
N32205-16-R-2019.pdf PDF
11.20__WI_308.8_Replace_1SAS_-_2SAS_Bus_Tie_Cables_94967577.pdf PDF
Attachment_VIII__-_Rate_Table_Pricing_Spreadsheet_6_2_16.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_VII__QASP_-_Frank_Cable_Switchboard_Upgrades_6_1_16.docx DOCX document
11.6__320-8496061_- _1S_Switchboard_Test_Procedure.pdf PDF
11.15__803-7080803_A _Preparation_of_CAD_Drawings.docx DOCX document
11.21__WI_308.7_Switchboard_Support_Work_Item.pdf PDF
11.18__WI_308.4_Install_Engine_Room_Supply_Ventilation_Sys_3-112-1.pdf PDF
A002_-_Weekly_Progress_Reports.pdf PDF
11.2___301-8496019_A _1S_Switchboard_Modifications.pdf PDF
11.17__WI_308.3_Replace_Power_Panel_and_Undersized_Feed_Cables_94728046.pdf PDF
Attachment_IV_Past_Performance_Data_Sheet.pdf PDF
11.16__302-8389032_A _Power_System_Load_Analysis.pdf PDF
11.19__WI_308.5_Replace_Engine_Room_Supply_Ventilation.pdf PDF
PWS_-_Frank_Cable_Switchboard_Upgrades_6_1_16.docx DOCX document
Show all 37

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO:

FACSIMILE:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION to Ms. Lauren Orrok. Information can also be sent via electronic mail to lauren.orrok@navy.mil. If you have any additional information you believe would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor, please call or email me at your earliest convenience, or provide said information as an attachment to the questionnaire below.

Thank you, Lauren Orrok

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD:

DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1.

Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

MSC V1.1 (23 July 2013)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .