N0042122R0178 P00002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of Amendment 0002 is to update Att L-2 CE, Att L-3, Att. L-5 CRM, Att. L-6 Minimum Manning, Exhibit A CDRL A011, Section L Paragraph 4 Electronic Proposal Submission, Section L Volume 6 Contract Administration 6.f., and PWS paragraph 7.1. Additionally, Amendment 0002 extends the proposal due date to 11/01/2022 8:00am EDT.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 24

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Oct-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0042122R0178

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08-Sep-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Oct-2022

CODE

NAWCAD PROCUREMENT GROUP

21983 BUNDY ROAD, BLDG 441

PATUXENT RIVER MD 20670

N00421 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0042122R0178

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 25-Oct-2022 08:00 AM to 01-Nov-2022 08:00 AM.

The following have been added by full text:

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES

Amendment 0002:

The purpose of Amendment 0002 is to:

1. Update Att. L-2 Table CE-1 to read, “performed at least one (1) site with at least one detachment.”

2. Update Att. L-3 Block 14 to remove “high performance aircraft” and add “fixed wing jet powered”.

3. Update Att. L-5 Cross Reference Matrix to include PWS 9.6.2 (Maitenance Manager) in Section L reference 4.3, Supply Chain Management of the matrix.

4. Update Att. L-6 Minimum Manning to include Column E to identify “Collateral Duties/Quantity for Each”, to separate the NALCOMIS Admin/Maintenance Admin Specialist into separate positions (NALCOMIS IT and Logs and Records Technician), and to added the material expeditor position.

5. Update CDRL A011 Block 16 to read, “Initial shall be submitted 5 DACA. Initial deliverable will be reviewed by the COR and IPTL within thirty (30) days after submission IAW Block 12. Final submission shall be submitted within ten (10) days of receipt of government comments.”

6. Update Section L, Part A, Paragraph 4 Electronic Proposal Submission to extended the request date for Volume 3 Past Performance information to 8 days before final proposals are due.

7. Update Section L, Part B, Volume 6 Contract Administration 6.f. to delete “Documents such as Specification(s), PWS, SOW, etc. that are provided for evaluation of the Technical Factor should be referred to here and provided only once. The final document from the Technical Volume will be used when a model contract needs to be established vice creating a new document.”

8. Update PWS paragraph 7.1 to state two expeditors as opposed to two supply personnel.

Amendment 0001:

The purpose for Amendment 0001 is to add the response date and time to Section A and extend the due date from 2022/10/24 11:00 am EDT to 2022/10/25 08:00 am EDT.

The following have been modified:

POINTS OF CONTACT

CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE: TO BE DETERMINED AT CONTRACT AWARD

(1) This requirement will be conducted on the basis of full and open competition and the resulting contract will include Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract line item numbers (CLINs) for Aircraft Maintenance and Transition Phase-In, Labor Hour CLINs for Over & Above and Overtime/Weekend/Holiday, cost reimbursable (no fee) CLINs for Other Direct Costs (travel and material) and New-Site Standup, and Not Separately Priced (NSP) CLINs for Transition Phase Out and Technical Data.

(2) The resulting Single Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract will have an ordering period of five (5) years with one three (3) year option period.

(3) The Contractor will be required to have the appropriate facility security clearance as stated on the DD Form 254 (Attachment 3) at award. A Secret clearance or an interim Secret clearance with a favorable adjudication will be required for personnel identified in Section C, Attachment (1) Viper Maintenance Group Aircraft Maintenance & Contractor Logistic Support (VMG CLS) Performance Work Statement (PWS), by the end of transition-in period prior to first day of full performance. The Contractor will not be authorized to access any classified information until a final DD Form 254 is incorporated as an Attachment to the resulting contract.

(4) The Offeror’s proposed price will be incorporated in Section B of the contract upon award.

(5) The North American Industries Classifications System (NAICS) is 488190. The Product Service Code

(PSC) is J015 and shall be used when reporting to Sam.gov.

(6) This contract contains a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), Service Contract Act (SCA) labor standards requirement. Labor categories subject to the SCA are specified in Section C, Attachment (1) VMG

CLS PWS.

POINTS OF CONTACT

Contract Specialist: Sheryl Pope, Sheryl.m.pope.civ@us.navy.mil Procuring Contracting Officer: Bret Middleton, bret.c.middleton.civ@us.navy.mil

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

EXHIBIT/ATTACHMENT TABLE OF CO

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A

CDRLs A001-A034

06-OCT-2022

Attachment 1 Viper Maintenance Group Aircraft Maintenance & Contractor Logistic Support Performance Work Statement (PWS)

41 06-OCT-2022

Attachment 2 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

(QASP)

13 11-JUL-2022

Attachment 3 DD254 (For Bidding Purposes Only) 4 09-MAY-2022 Attachment 4 Government Furnished Property (GFP) 21-JUL-2022 Attachment 5 DynCorp Collective Bargaining Agreement

(CBA)

33 01-APR-2022 to 31-

MAR-2025

Attachment 6 Churchill County (NAS Fallon), NV Wage

Determination (WD)

21 21-JUL-2022

Attachment 7

Attachment 8

Kings County (NAS Lemoore), CA Wage Determination (WD) Over and Above Work Request (OAWR) Form

27-JUN -2022

09-JUN-2022

Attachment 9 RESERVED- Minimum Manning

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

PART A GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. GENERAL

Offerors are required to submit sufficient information concerning all evaluation factors to enable Government personnel to fully assess the capabilities of the Offeror to perform all requirements. The proposal must be sufficient in detail and scope to enable evaluation and provide the evaluators a clear understanding of the Offeror’s approach, expertise, and capability as required by the solicitation. Proposals must demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of all requirements and associated risks and is able, willing, and competent to devote the resources necessary to meet all requirements. The Offeror shall not alter or rearrange the solicitation. The burden of proof for all substantiation within the proposal rests with the Offeror. Offerors are advised that the Government may incorporate any part of the Offeror’s proposal deemed beneficial to the Government, into the final contract, without discussions. Alternate proposals are not acceptable.

In presenting material in the proposal, the Offeror is advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Clarity, brevity, and logical organization should be emphasized during proposal preparation. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to present enough information to allow the Government to evaluate its proposal without discussions. Unsubstantiated statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can or will comply with the specifications, or paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof are considered inadequate and may render a rating of unacceptable.

The Offeror shall include any data necessary to illustrate the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. There is no need to repeat information in more than one volume. The detailed information must be included in the most logical place and summarized and referenced in other areas if an overlap exists. Do not provide elaborate brochures or other presentation material beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal.

Throughout these instructions, “Offeror” is defined as the prime contractor with its CAGE code identified in Block 15A on Standard Form (SF) 33, Solicitation, Offer, and Award. A “Joint Venture” (JV) is a partnership or teaming arrangement that is formed for the purpose of responding to this solicitation when the prime contractor consists of more than one legal entity. “JV Team Members” are the entities that make up a Joint Venture. The term “entity” is used to mean any or all of the following: prime contractor, JV, JV team members, any subcontractor, and corporate parent, division, subsidiary, or affiliate (e.g., any contractor with a different CAGE Code/Unique Entity ID/DUNS than the Offeror). The following entities are defined as principal entities and only principal entities will be used in the past performance evaluation: (a) the prime contractor; (b) JV Team Members; and (c) other entities that are proposed to perform at least 20.00% of the proposed total price for the contract; and (d) entities that are proposed to perform a critical function, whether technical or financial, in the performance of the resulting contract. Critical functions are defined as: providing Key Personnel, or Personnel performing Safe for Flight functions. Offerors are advised that in order to demonstrate work commitment, each principal entity must be identified in Volume 5 Price and associated with a commensurate dollar value.

2. PROPOSAL FORMATING

2.1 Electronic Formatting and Applications

This section provides information to the Offeror on the electronic format and application software used for proposals. Proposal Submission instructions are included in Section 4. The Offeror shall format proposals using a Times New Roman 12-point normal font (no reduction permitted). 10-point font is acceptable for Tables and Graphics. Use of the software and procedures described in this section will ensure that the proposals received are suitable for reading electronically. All pages shall be numbered with volume and page numbers. All proposal information shall be marked with “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104”.

Table G-1 (Proposal Structure identifies the proposal structure, file naming conventions, and suggested page counts for each volume.

2.1.1 Operating System and Applications

The Government uses Microsoft Windows 10 Operating System to access proposals. Submit proposal information using the following applications: Microsoft Word 2016, Microsoft Excel 2016, Microsoft PowerPoint 2016, and Microsoft Project 2016; however, provide letters and other signed documents as fully searchable Portable Document Format (.pdf) file. Use of other application software for submission of proposals is unacceptable.

2.1.2 Hyperlinks

The Offeror shall not use hyperlinks in proposal volumes.

2.1.3 Virus Free Electronic Submission

Offerors are responsible for ensuring that its electronic proposal is virus free. The Offeror shall certify, in its proposal cover letter, that all electronic proposal information delivered throughout the evaluation (e.g., original proposal submission, responses to evaluation notices, Final Proposal Revisions) has been or will be checked for viruses and certify that its files are/will be virus free. The Offeror should specify the software, version, and virus definition used/that will be used to check the data.

2.1.4 Multimedia

The Offeror should not embed sound or video (e.g., MPEG) files within the proposal submission.

2.1.5 Graphics

Large files require greater computer system resources and are discouraged. The Offeror is encouraged to:

a. Simplify the color palette used in creating figures and minimize the use of color print or graphics to the maximum extent possible;

b. Minimize size of graphics files; and

c. Avoid scanned images.

2.1.6 File Naming Conventions and Proposal Structure

The Offeror shall follow the basic structure of the file naming convention in Table G-1 (Offeror Electronic File Naming Convention and Proposal Structure) for electronic file submissions (e.g., proposal volumes, attachments, appendices). Offeror’s shall keep the file name as short as possible (i.e., under 40 characters) so that the files are accessible on Government share drives. Files with longer names may become corrupt or inaccessible.

Suggested page counts for each volume, if any, are also specified in Table G-1 (Electronic File Naming Convention and Proposal Structure). The title and table of contents pages, as well as tables, are not included in the suggested page count. The Offeror should provide one folder for each volume or annex, containing all electronic files requested within the volume or annex. Please submit each volume, book, or annex as one file if possible. Offerors should not provide each section/paragraph as separate files.

Table G-1 Offeror Electronic File Naming Convention and Proposal Structure

Volume Number

Title File naming convention

Suggested Page Count

1 Executive Summary Vol 1 ES#.docx As needed L-1 Executive Summary Tables:

Table ES-1 Offeror Summary Table ES-2 Relevant Contract Summary

Vol 1 Att L-1 ES Tables.xlsx

2 Corporate Experience Prerequisite

Vol 2 CE#.docx As needed

L-2 Corporate Experience Substantiation (Table CE-1

Vol 2 Att L-2

CE

Corporate Experience Substantiation)

Substantiation.x lsx

3 Past Performance Vol 3 PP#.docx As needed L-3 Past Performance Contract Data Vol 3 Att L-3

PP-1.xlsx

L-4 Past Performance Questionnaire Vol 3 Att L-4 PPQ.docx

4 Technical Vol 4

Tech#.docx

L-5 Cross Reference Matrix Vol 4 Att L- 5CRM.xlsx

L-6 Minimum Manning Vol 4 Att L-6 Minimum Manning.xls

L-7 Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD)

Vol 4 Att L-7 SBPCD.docx

5 Price Vol 5 Price#.docx

As needed

L-8 Prime Contractor Price Summary (PCPS)

Vol 5 Att L-8 PCPS.xlsx

L-9 Other Entity Cost Summary

(OECS)

Vol 5 Att L-9 OECS.xls

6 Contract Administration Vol 6 CA#.docx

Annexes

Annex A Executed Contracts/Task Orders and Relevant Portions of Final Versions of Previous SOW/PWSs and other supporting documentation for Past Performance and Corporate Experience

AnnA Rel SOW PWSs#.pdf and/or AnnA Rel SOW PWSs #.docx Please note:

The Offeror should provide both a .pdf and .docx version if they are available. If not, a .pdf version only is acceptable.

Annex B Release of Adverse Past Performance Authorization Letters;

and/or Past Performance Point of Contact Information

Annex B PP Release Ltr#.pdf; and/or Annex C PP POC Info#.docx

Annex C Small Business Subcontracting Plan Ann C SBSP.docx

Annex D DCAA/DCMA Reports, Audits, and Determinations

Annex D

DCAA/DCMA.

docx and Annex E

DCAA/DCMA.

pdf

Annex E Joint Venture Teaming Agreements Ann E REP JTA#.pdf

3. PROPOSAL CONTENT AND VOLUMES

The Offeror must present its proposal information in a manner that facilitates a one for one comparison between the information presented and Section L proposal instructions. Proposal information shall be structured such that its paragraph numbers/letters correspond to the proposal instructions paragraph numbers/letters, although the Offeror may add lower tier sub paragraphs.

Information submitted as an Annex to a particular proposal volume could include manuals, specifications, plans, procedures, and company policies, as well as other information requested in “Part B Specific Instructions”.

Price information, (e.g., dollar values and/or hourly rates) shall not be included in any volume other than Annex C ((Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and Attachment L-7 (SBPCD)); Volume 5 Price, and Volume 6 Contract Administration.

Table G-4 lists the attachments provided to the Offeror within Section L.

Table G-2 Section L List of Attachments

Section L Attachment Number Electronic File Title Attachment Name L-1 Vol 1 Att L-1 ES Tables Executive Summary Tables:

Table ES-1 Offeror Summary Table ES-2 Relevant Contract Summary

L-2 Vol 2 Att L-2 CE Substantiation Corporate Experience Substantiation (Table CE-1 Corporate Experience Substantiation)

L-3 Vol 3 Att L-3 PP-1 Past Performance Contract Data L-4 Vol 3 Att L-4 PPQ Past Performance Questionnaire L-5 Vol 4 Att L-5CRM Cross Reference Matrix L-6 Vol 4 Att L-6 Minimum Manning Minimum Manning L-7 Vol 4 Att L-7 SBPCD Small Business Participation

Commitment Document (SBPCD) L-8 Vol 5 Att L-8 PCPS Prime Contractor Price Summary

(PCPS)

L-9 Vol 5 Att L-9 OECS Other Entity Cost Summary

(OECS)

4. ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

Note: All Proposals shall be UNCLASSIFIED and valid for 365 days

All volumes of the proposal shall be submitted electronically through the Solicitation Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) at https://piee.eb.mil. No other submissions, such as mail, hand-carried, or other electronic system (e.g., DOD SAFE) are authorized by the solicitation unless specifically authorized by the Contracting Officer pursuant to paragraph 4.2 below. For instructions on how to post an offer, please refer to the Posting Offer demo: https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf.

It is the Offeror’s responsibility to follow the registration instructions found on the PIEE website. It is advised that all potential prime Offerors and their subcontractors ensure the proper company points of contact are registered in the site based on their CAGE codes and have the proper roles assigned well in advance of the solicitation closing date. Subcontractors are only required to register in PIEE if they want to submit their proprietary proposal information separate from the prime offer. Documents submitted by the subcontractor directly to the Government must have the prime contractor’s name, CAGE, and RFP number on the first page of the document.

It is also the Offeror’s responsibility to confirm receipt of proposals and all electronic communications. Screen shots of the submission should also be taken to validate a submission was accepted in the PIEE system against this solicitation. The Government is not obligated to search for incorrectly submitted proposals in PIEE.

The submission date for all Volumes shall be no later than the date and time specified in Block 9 of the SF 33 of the RFP. It is requested that the Past Performance Volume information be submitted 8 days prior to the submission date specified in Block 9 of the SF 33 of the RFP.

4.1 If there is an unanticipated PIEE System outage within 24 hours of the proposal due date and the outage has interrupted normal Government processes so that proposals cannot be received by the exact time specified in the solicitation, the Contractor shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer. This notification shall occur prior to the proposal submission deadline and shall be made in writing. The notification may be in conjunction with verbal notification, but verbal notification alone shall not be sufficient. The Offeror shall obtain written approval from the Contracting Officer to submit the proposal via an alternate method as shown in paragraph 4.2 or the Contracting Officer may advise the Offeror that the Government will follow the procedures set forth in FAR 15.208(d) for amending the solicitation closing date.

4.2 The following alternate methods may be utilized when authorized by the Contracting Officer in accordance with paragraph 4.1.

4.2.1 Contractor Proposals Submitted by Carrier: The Offeror shall submit electronic CD-ROM proposals via United States Postal Service or through a commercial carrier with next day delivery using the address provided below.

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER – AIRCRAFT DIVISION

Code: AD252 Sheryl Pope

21983 Bundy Rd. Bldg. 441

Patuxent River, MD 20670-1547

Solicitation Number: N00421-22-R-0178

4.2.2 Hand Carried Proposals: Hand carried proposals must be delivered to the address above, attention Catrina Vitez and/or Sheryl Pope, Phone #301-757-9714. If a proposal or amendment is hand carried, the Contractor must have current base access to delivery of the proposal. Without base access, the Contractor may not get beyond the installation security gate to deliver its proposal. Guards are not authorized to accept proposals. Each Volume shall be on a separate CD-ROM. Delivery time shall be coordinated with the contracting office to ensure availability to sign for the package.

Regardless of which alternate method is used, the Offeror shall package the CD-ROMs in the most efficient manner possible grouping like volumes to the maximum extent possible. Each Volume shall be on a separate CD-ROM. The package shall include all proposal volumes including the digitally signed document(s) submitted as part of the Cost/Price Volume. The package shall include a packing slip detailing the contents to include the volume number, title, and copy number. Also, the package shall be stamped or marked “Controlled Unclassified Information” and “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.”

5. CHANGES TO SOLICITATION

For any changes and additional information to the solicitation, please go to website:

https://sam.gov/content/opportunities

Search the database for the solicitation number N00421-22-R-0178

6. TECHNICAL LIBRARY

A competition library of applicable documents related to this solicitation is available upon request to the Contract Specialist, Ms. Sherry Pope, sheryl.m.pope.civ@us.navy.mil and the contracting officer, Ms. Catrina Vitez, catrina.m.vitez.civ@us.navy.mil. The data contained in the competition library is for informational purposes only.

The Government does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information. The Offeror will receive an email from the SAFE system to gain secure access to the data through the website https://safe.apps.mil.

PART B SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS

1. VOLUME 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to price aspects of the offer.

The following is a list of Section L Attachments that the Offeror shall use to provide information for this volume:

Attachment L-1 Executive Summary Tables (ES-1 (Offeror Summary) and ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary))

The purpose of the Executive Summary is to provide the Government with an overview of the Offeror’s entire proposal, excluding price. The Executive Summary volume should be divided into the sections outlined below:

a. Offeror Summary Table

(1) The Offeror shall complete Table ES-1 (Offeror Summary), provided in Attachment L-1 (Executive Summary Tables), according to the instructions within the attachment, and submit it within this section and as a separate electronic file. This table summarizes the Offeror and its entities’ proposed type and level of work, indicating a commitment to that effort during contract performance. Offerors are advised that in order to demonstrate work commitment, each entity identified in Table ES-1 (Offeror Summary) must be identified in Volume 5 (Price) and associated with a dollar value commensurate with the Percent of Total Proposed Price identified in Table ES-1 (Offeror Summary). Therefore, this table must be a reflection of what is proposed in Volume 5 (Price).

(2) For the Past Performance and Corporate Experience evaluations, contract references that relate to a different CAGE code/Unique Entity ID/DUNS than the proposed entity will be considered if the CAGE code/Unique Entity ID/DUNS was created or changed as a result of a corporate acquisition, reorganization, merger, or other administrative reason and refer to the same division at the same physical location for where the work is being performed or from where the work is being directed in accordance with the proposed roles and responsibilities. All current CAGE Codes/Unique Entity ID/DUNS must appear in Table ES-1(Offeror Summary Table) which indicates a commitment of work for those entities.

To facilitate the Relevancy determination for Past Performance and Corporate Experience, the Offeror shall provide a written explanation if multiple CAGE codes/Unique Entity ID/DUNS for the same physical location are applicable to one entity. The written explanation shall detail the distinct roles and responsibilities for entities with different CAGE codes/Unique Entity ID/DUNS at the same physical location for where the work is being performed or from where the work is being directed. The description shall include all changes in the organization as a result of a corporate acquisition, reorganization, merger, or other administrative reason and explain how the changes impact the relevance of any contract references provided.

Note: “Place of Performance” for this solicitation pertains to the physical location of the prime or other entities that are deploying personnel or responsible for the work; not the Government site where the work is being performed. If work is being performed at a contractor site, then that would also pertain to Place of Performance.

(3) Additionally, if applicable, Offerors shall submit the legal document and associated agreements that established the Joint Venture and identifies the roles of each member of the JV. Note: All Joint Ventures that are proposed shall provide the Joint Venture legal document with agreement(s) in Annex E (Joint Venture Agreement(s)).

b. Relevant Contract Summary Table

The Offeror shall complete the Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary) provided in Attachment L-1 (Executive Summary Tables), for all contracts proposed as relevant for Past Performance and Corporate Experience for the principal entities. The Offeror shall complete the table according to the instructions within the attachment and submit it within this section and as a separate electronic file. The contract references designated in Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary) shall be used in completing Volume 3 Table PP-1 (Past Performance Contract Data), and Volume 2 Table CE-1 (Corporate Experience Substantiation). For example, the contracts identified as P1, T1, or S1 in the Relevant Contract Summary Table are the same P1, T1, or S1 contracts identified in the Past Performance Contract Data Table, which are the same P1, T1, or S1 contracts identified in Table CE-1 (Corporate Experience Substantiation). If the version of Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary) that was submitted as part of the early Past Performance data has changed (e.g. a contract was deleted or added), it shall be identified in a narrative paragraph following Table ES-2 with a brief explanation of why it was added or removed.

* Contracts deleted and added should be identified in a narrative paragraph following Table ES-2.

2. VOLUME 2 CORPORATE EXPERIENCE PREREQUISITE

The Offeror shall address the following Corporate Experience prerequisite in the Prerequisite Volume.

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to the price aspects of the offer.

The Offeror shall utilize the following Attachment to provide information for this volume:

Attachment L-2 Corporate Experience Substantiation (Table CE-1 (Corporate Experience Substantiation))

The Offeror shall complete Table CE-1 according to the instructions within Attachment L-2. Only applicable contract references where the Offeror or a Joint Venture Team Member performed as the Prime Contractor or Joint Venture Team Member (e.g., P1, T1) designated in Table ES-2 should be used in completing Table CE-1.

2.1 CORPORATE EXPERIENCE

The Offeror shall identify and submit one contract reference that meets all of the 2.1 Corporate Experience Criteria.

For the purpose of demonstrating Corporate Experience, a contract reference is defined as:

a. A Contract of any type except Indefinite-Delivery Contracts (see FAR Subpart 16.5)(“D” type contracts); or

b. A single Delivery/Task Order (DO/TO) from an Multiple Award Contract; or

c. A single (DO/TO) or a set of aggregated DOs/TOs from the same single award IDIQ contract.

The Offeror shall demonstrate that the Prerequisite Corporate Experience reference submitted for evaluation in Table CE-1 was performed under the same CAGE/Unique Entity ID/DUNS included in Table ES-1(or if different, is explained in the Offeror’s Executive Summary), meets the definition of Recency (defined in Section M), and meets the criteria specified below:

a. Performed for at least one whole year as the Prime Contractor or a JV Team Member, where the entire year of performance occurred within the recency period;

b. Managed thirty (30) or more aircraft simultaneously;

c. Performed at least one (1) site with at least one detachment; and

d. Performed O, I, and D level of maintenance on fixed wing jet powered aircraft utilizing

COMNAVAIRFORINST 4790.2 Naval Aviation Maintenance Program and/or equivalent maintenance utilizing Air Force Instruction 21-101 Aircraft and Equipment Maintenance Management, and/or Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations

When submitting aggregate TOs as an applicable contract reference, it is requested that the Offeror limit the number of TOs included to only address the criteria above and not submit TOs with redundant or non-relevant performance information. The Offeror shall not submit information pertaining to individual employee experiences as part of its proposal; the Government will not consider this information in the Contract Experience evaluation.

2.2 CONTRACT REFERENCE SUBSTANTIATION

For the contract reference included in Table CE-1, the Offeror shall provide the following in Annex A:

A copy of the cover page of the contract (or applicable awarded Dos/TOs for D type contracts) and a complete copy of the contractually executed final version of the substantiating documents (drafts are not acceptable) including the full contract, modifications (conformed copies are preferred, if possible), statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS), and any other elements of the contract (e.g., Specification, CDRLs) that demonstrates compliance with each aspect of the Contract Experience criteria.

In order to demonstrate compliance with the Contract Experience criterion the requirement must be: 1) specifically identified in the SOW/PWS; 2) supported through other documents provided in Annex A; or 3) verifiable by the Points of Contact (or their successor) provided by the Offeror in Attachment L-2.

Within Annex A, the Offeror shall clearly identify the contract reference number from Table ES-2 and the Offeror shall highlight, in yellow, the portions of the documents that clearly identify that the contract reference meets each of the pass/fail requirements identified in Section 1.1. The Offeror shall denote which highlighted areas correspond to each requirement within Table CE-1.

3. VOLUME 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to the price aspects of the offer.

The following is a list of Section L Attachments that the Offeror shall use to provide information for this volume:

Attachment L-3 Past Performance Contract Data (PP-1) Attachment L-4 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

For this volume, the Offeror shall identify all relevant contracts (where for the purpose of these instructions the term contract also refers to delivery order or task order), or those portions of a relevant contract, where performance meets the definition of recency (defined in Section M) for the principal entities, identified in Table ES-1 (Offeror Summary). The relevant contracts provided for each principal entity shall be relative to its proposed role and responsibilities identified in Table ES-1 (Offeror Summary). Commercial contracts may be included. Offerors shall also identify relevant contracts that meet the definition of recency (defined in Section M) that had any show-cause notices, cure notices, or termination for default.

In Annex A (Final Versions of Previous Statement of Work (SOW)/Performance Work Statement (PWS)/Other Supporting Documentation for Past Performance and Corporate Experience), the Offeror shall provide electronic copies of the cover page(s) and a complete copy of the contractually executed final version of the substantiating documents (drafts are not acceptable) including the full contract, modifications (conformed copies are preferred, if possible), statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS), and any other elements of the contract (e.g., Specification, CDRLs) from each contract or delivery/task order reference identified in Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary). Additionally, for contract references that contain delivery/task orders, provide the work description for each specific delivery/task order. For contract references where the entity performed as a subcontractor, the Offeror shall also provide a complete electronic copy of the SOW/PWS or other documentation of the agreement between the prime and subcontractor that clearly defines the portions of the work effort of the Prime’s SOW/PWS that the entity performed as a subcontractor.

For all contracts identified in ES-2 that do not have an Assessment Report in CPARS, or where the last assessment for an active contract in CPARS is more than 12 months old, the Offeror shall forward a copy of Attachment L-4 Past Performance Questionnaire to that contract’s Procuring Contracting Office (PCO), Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), and Program Manager (PM); or commercial contractor equivalents. Please forward all questionnaires within two weeks from this solicitation’s release date to allow adequate time for the recipient to respond.

Note: The Offeror should reference this solicitation’s number when distributing the past performance questionnaires to customers. The Offeror should include instructions for the customers to send completed questionnaires within two weeks of its receipt via e-mail to sheryl.m.pope.civ@us.navy.mil . The Offeror shall ensure that all points of contact are current and include an email address and phone number. The Offeror shall not conduct follow-up actions with regard to this questionnaire, other than to confirm receipt by the recipient. The Government may contact customers identified by the Offeror to obtain follow-up Past Performance Information as needed.

Offerors are reminded that the Government reserves the right to use information to evaluate past performance obtained from sources other than those identified by the Offeror. The Government may send additional questionnaires and/or obtain information from sources identified by the Government evaluation team.

3.1 Authorization Letter(s)

The Offeror should submit a signed “Release of Adverse Past Performance Authorization Letter(s)” with written consent from each principal entity (including JV team members), authorizing the release of adverse past performance information to the Prime. The signed letter(s) should be provided in Annex B. This authorization letter allows the Government to coordinate past performance issue(s) with the Prime Offeror. For any principal entity (including JV team members) that does not provide an authorization letter with such written consent, the Offeror shall provide point of contact information for each principal entity. This contact information shall include a name, address, phone number, and email address (including JV team members), with whom the Government may coordinate any issues and obtain responses as needed. Offerors are advised that if it does not submit the Release of Adverse Past Performance Authorization Letters with written consent, then the Government will address any past performance issues directly with the principal entity (including JV team members), and the Offeror will forfeit the opportunity to participate in any related discussions.

3.2 Relevant Contract Data

For each contract identified for past performance in Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary), the Offeror shall complete Table PP-1 (Past Performance Contract Data), according to the instructions within the attachment and submit it within this section and as a separate electronic file. Please note that this form is a summary of the principal entities’ relevant contract data. All detailed information and comparative analysis of the past performance contract references to this solicitation’s requirements shall be provided in Volume 3 (Past Performance), Section 3.3 (Evaluation), of the Offeror’s proposal. The contract references designated in Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary) shall be used in completing Volume 3 (Past Performance) and all contract references shall be numbered the same throughout all of the Offeror’s proposal volumes (i.e., the contracts identified as P1, S1, T1, etc.)

If a contract has D.O.s/T.O.s, provide a separate contract reference and separate PP-1 tab for each D.O/T.O. The Offeror may use one reference number/PP-1 tab for multiple D.O.s/T.O.s if they are the same work effort and performed under the same CPAR; however, identify the period of performance for each. Do not provide a contract reference to the basic contract.

If the Offeror is proposing as a JV, the Offeror should provide the relevant contracts for the JV as a whole, and for each team member of the JV.

3.3 Evaluation

The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance and systemic improvement information remains with the Offeror.

For each contract identified in Table PP-1 (Past Performance Contract Data), the Offeror shall provide contract data regarding relevancy, past performance information, demonstrated systemic improvement, as described below, organized by contract reference. As this information is presented in the proposal, demonstrate the relevancy of the principal entities past performance with respect to this solicitation’s requirements. For any contract references where the principal entities are aware of problems, the Offeror shall describe the issues in section 3.3.b (Past Performance Information). For each past performance problem identified, describe the status of the systemic improvement efforts in section 3.3.c (Demonstrated Systemic Improvement).

a. Relevancy: Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the referenced contracts are deemed relevant, as defined by Section M, to this solicitation’s requirements. To demonstrate relevancy, Offerors shall provide a comparative analysis to the scope, magnitude, and complexity of this solicitation’s requirements. Within the comparative analysis, Offerors should identify the relevant portions (sections, paragraphs, and page numbers) of the referenced contract’s SOW/PWS (Annex A) to clearly identify how past efforts performed are similar to this solicitation’s requirements. In addition, the referenced sections only need to be identified and the full text does not need to be broken out separately from the complete SOW/PWS.

For a discussion on CAGE Code/Unique Entity ID/DUNS, refer to section 1.0 Volume 1 (Executive Summary).

Offerors should be advised that the CAGE Code/Unique Entity ID/DUNS for each referenced contract is considered as part of the Relevancy determination, which determines if the contract reference will be included in the Past Performance evaluations. Note: Any information regarding CAGE Code/Unique Entity ID/DUNS should be included within Volume 1 (Executive Summary) and does not need to be repeated here.

Offerors are advised that contracts assessed as not recent or relevant by the Government will not be considered in the Past Performance assessments.

b. Past Performance Information: For the relevant contracts provide a brief description of past performance in delivering quality services. Include in these descriptions any information that demonstrates the level of performance obtained, where available; provide quantifiable measures/trends to demonstrate past and current performance. Also describe past problems, including when they occurred, what the circumstances were surrounding the situation, and what the consequences were as a result of the problem.

The Offeror shall include all metric requirements (title and percent) and what was actually achieved for all performance periods as part of this description. Ensure formulas and definitions are provided to support the metric requirements. The Offeror shall include supporting documentation (e.g. COR/QA monitoring forms) that verifies performance as part of Annex A.

c. Demonstrated Systemic Improvement: Identify systemic improvement actions taken to resolve any past problems identified in 3.3.b (Past Performance Information). Provide the records of such results and indicate where they are documented, preferably in Government record systems. Describe the techniques, elements, and tools used to correct problems on the reference contract and, if applicable, how these techniques, elements, and tools may be used for the contract to be awarded as the result of this solicitation. Provide quantifiable evidence or metrics that substantiate or demonstrate claims of improvement and to demonstrate that the past problem will not occur on the contract to be awarded as the result of this solicitation. It is incumbent upon the Offeror to explain the relevance of the data provided and substantiate that improvements from past performance problems are being made. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds in the information provided by the Offeror. Consideration for discounting problems may be given when those problems are addressed through demonstrated systemic improvement. Demonstrated systemic improvement may be indicated by information as it relates to preventing recurrence of past problems, including: identification of the root cause of a problem, a corrective action plan that systemically addresses the past problem, how and when the plan was implemented, documented timeframe to demonstrate when corrective action was implemented and became successful; and performance data, preferably through Government records, to show performance improvements. With regard to performance improvement data, explain the likelihood to which the problem will not reoccur on during the performance of this prospective contract based on the amount of time that good performance was sustained in consideration of the nature of the past problem and effort.

4. VOLUME 4 - TECHNICAL

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to price aspects of the offer.

The following is a list of Section L Attachments that the Offeror shall use to provide information for this volume:

Attachment L-5 Volume 2 Table T-1 Cross Reference Matrix (CRM) Attachment L-6 Minimum Manning Attachment L-7 Small Business Participation Document (SBPCD)

The Offeror shall complete Table T-1 (Technical CRM), provided in Attachment (L-5) and submit as a separate electronic file. The Technical CRM is included to help the Offeror develop its proposal and to ensure traceability of Section L paragraphs to the requirements. The Offeror’s Technical CRM may be identical to the one provided or revised to add information. For example, the Offeror’s Technical CRM may cross-reference its proposal volumes, paragraph numbers, and pages to specific solicitation requirements identified within the table, as well as other parts of the proposal that contain relevant information.

In this volume, provide the information described below:

Throughout the Technical Volume the Offeror should identify any proposed capability, approach or feature that reduces risk inherent in the program. Specifically, explain the benefits to the Government in technical terms and the degree of impact it will have to risk.

4.1 Transition Phase-in Plan

Provide a Phase-In Plan that addresses the elements listed in the solicitation, PWS, paragraph 5.1. Describe the Offeror’s approach to initiating this program and provide a detailed Plan Of Action and Milestones (POA&M) for actions that will be required to begin performing in accordance with the requirements of this solicitation, including obtaining base access, and leasing of facilities. Identify the major challenges with regard to start-up and provide an approach to mitigate risk. Provide a detailed plan to train personnel during transition, including method for incorporation of lessons learned at previous site transition(s), and formal certification/licensing procedures for personnel. Provide a POA&M for the development of the work instructions, procedures, and planning documents that are needed to begin the program. The Offeror shall submit a detailed time phased manning plan that indicates staffing and function during transition. Indicate an eventual "ramp-up" to achieve full manning levels on or before the first day of full performance.

4.2 Staffing Approach

In the following section the Offeror shall demonstrate the proposed manning, personnel skill levels, expertise, and experience are adequate to perform the work required by this solicitation. Provide a staffing plan that includes the following:

4.2.1 Manning Approach

a. Manning –The Offeror shall complete and submit Attachment L-6 (Minimum Manning) showing the Offeror’s proposed manning in accordance with the Attachment L-6 (Minimum Manning) instructions. The Offeror’s total proposed manning in Attachment L-6 shall be consistent with the Offeror’s total manning and labor category breakout proposed in pricing attachment L-8 (Prime Contractor Price Summary). The Offeror shall provide a breakout of manning for each site by position, by labor category and by the number of personnel assigned. Specifically, provide definition of work year capabilities of the work force (equivalent man hours/year analysis). Ensure positions with collateral duties are identified within the Manning Chart.

Offeror’s are advised the Government will not accept any justification for proposing below the Government’s minimum manning requirements, which are based on the requirements for CLINs 0X02, 0X05, and 0X06;

however, the Offeror may propose an approach that exceeds the minimum manning requirements. Please describe any benefits to the Government associated with the Offeror’s proposed manning approach. In addition, the Offeror must propose whole heads (i.e. full time employees) at or above the minimum whole heads specified in Attachment L-6 (Minimum Manning).

The size of the Fleet is expected to grow during the period of performance of the contract. CLINS 0X03 and 0X07, provide for an increase in O and I level maintenance to support the increased number of aircraft and meet performance metrics. Each additional aircraft requires a minimum of five (5) aircraft mechanics in accordance with Attachment L-6. Offerors shall provide the additional proposed manning per each additional aircraft under CLINs 0X03 and 0X07, using the appropriate section of each operating site tab in attachment L-6 (Minimum Manning).

b. Manning Distribution – Provide the proposed maintenance organizational structure by department. For each department describe the composition, responsibilities, and titles for all on-site and off-site personnel. Identify all indirect labor classifications, titles, responsibilities.

c. Personnel - Describe the processes used in hiring, recruiting, and retaining personnel for each geographical location covered by the proposal. Specifically address recruiting and hiring in at NAS Lemoore, which will be a new site. Describe the approach used to fill all positions required for each labor category and the approach for retention.

d. Training - Provide certification and skill level to fulfill the requirements described in the PWS. Describe how training certifications will be met and kept current.

4.2.2 Key Personnel

For all proposed current or contingent Key Personnel, the Offeror shall provide a resume that demonstrates the experience and specialized qualifications of each proposed key position identified below:

(i) Site Manager (1-NAS Fallon, NV);

(ii) Maintenance Manager (1-NAS Fallon, NV);

(iii) Maintenance Operations Manager (1-NAS Fallon, NV);

(iv)…