N00421-20-R-0002 Amendment 0004.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Advanced Software, Computer, and Network Development and Integration in support of NAWCAD WOLF
- Solicitation number
- N00421-20-R-0002
About this file
This sources sought notice announces the Naval Air Warfare Center's intention to procure advanced software, computer, and network development and integration services in support of rapid capability requirements. Interested businesses are requested to submit capability statements by May 21, 2019 demonstrating relevant experience, technical skills, facilities, and the ability to perform the work outlined in the attached draft statement of work, which includes software development, computer-related management, documentation and testing support, certification and accreditation support, and protection solutions support. The resulting contract is anticipated to be a single-award IDIQ with cost-plus-fixed-fee labor CLINs and cost reimbursable other direct costs for travel and material over a five year period of performance split between on-site government, off-site contractor, and contractor locations.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 51 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CODE
(Hour)
PAGE(S)
until 12:00 PM local time 03 Apr 2020
X
A
X B
X C X D
EX
X
G
F 101 - 111
112 - 137
X H 138 - 144 kevin.schwertfeger@navy .mil
RATING PAGE OF PAGES
7. ISSUED BY
(Date)
IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.
Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)
1 144
(If other than Item 7)
15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO
AND
ADDRESS
SIGN OFFER (Type or print)
OF
OFFEROR
AMENDMENT NO. DATE
15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS
IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER
SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.
18. OFFER DATE
1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER
UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)
2. CONTRACT NO.
N00421 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO
See Item 7
9. Sealed offers in original and 0 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in
CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and
N/A - See Section L conditions contained in this solicitation.
10. FOR INFORMATION
CALL:
A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)
KEVIN SCHWERTFEGER 301-342-4256
11. TABLE OF CONTENTS
SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS
1 - 7
8 - 22
X I CONTRACT CLAUSES
DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X
PACKAGING AND MARKING
23 - 49
50 - 51
J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE
52 - 53
54 - 55 X K
REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND
OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 56 - 61 X
SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 62 - 86 X M
L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.
is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.
13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT
(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)
14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments
AMENDMENT NO. DATE
to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):
FACILITY
12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period
SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD
X
(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)
PART I - THE SCHEDULE
26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE
EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)
CODE CODE
B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION
22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:
10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)
23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE
PART IV - REPRESENTATIO NS AND INSTRUCTIO NS
PART III - LIST O F DO CUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND O THER ATTACHMENTS
87 - 99
PART II - CO NTRACT CLAUSES
NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AD
CODE 2.5.1.3, BLDG 433, 47060 LILJENCRANTZ RO
PATUXENT RIVER MD 20670
FAX:
TEL:
FAX:
TEL:
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
SOLICITATION
6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.
1300785100
5. DATE ISSUED
18 Feb 2020
4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID (IFB)
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
[ X ]
3. SOLICITATION NO.
N0042120R0002
Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form
GOVERNMENT POINTS OF CONTACT
Contract Specialist: Kevin Schwertfeger
Phone: 301-342-4256
E-mail: kevin.schwertfeger@navy.mil
Contracting Officer: Carolyn A. Emmart
Phone: 301-757-4074
E-mail: carolyn.emmart@navy.mil
Procuring Contracting Officer: Thomas E. Stann
Phone: 301-757-0031
E-mail: thomas.stann@navy.mil
VERBIAGE AND TERMINOLOGY
For clarification purposes, throughout this solicitation, Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) Term, Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee
(CPFF) Level of Effort, and Cost Plus Fixed-Fee (CPFF) Non-Performance Based are used interchangeably. For clarification purposes, throughout this solicitation, Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) Completion and Cost-Plus-Fixed-
Fee (CPFF) Performance Based are used interchangeably.
PRODUCT SERVICE CODE
The basic contract of this Single-Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity, Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee, and Cost
Reimbursable vehicle will have an associated Product Service Code (PSC) of AJ94, R&D- General
Science/Technology: Other (Engineering Development).
CONTRACT TYPE
The Contract resulting from this solicitation will be a Single-Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract utilizing Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) CLINs for Labor (Term and Completion). Cost Reimbursable CLINs will be used for Hazard Pay and for Other Direct Costs (Travel and Material).
ANTICIPATED NUMBER OF TASK ORDERS/CLINS:
The following information is the Government’s best estimate and is provided for situational awareness only.
-CPFF Level of Effort (LOE) tasking demands may yield approximately 10 Task Orders (TOs) per year with 15
CLINs on each TO for a total of 150 CLINs. The total number of CLINs for the duration of the contract will be approximately 750 CLINs.
-CPFF Completion Tasking demands may yield approximately 3 Task Orders (TOs) per year with 6 CLINs. The total number of CLINs for the duration of the contract will be approximately 90 CLINs.
NOT SEPARATELY PRICED CLINS
Not Separately Price (NSP) Appropriation Type CLINs and a NSP Data CLIN will be on the Basic IDIQ Contract, whereas, at the Task Order Level, CLINs will be separately priced along with NSP Data CLINs. At the IDIQ level, CLIN 0001 will contain the overall ceiling for CLINs 0002-0005; CLIN 0006 will contain the overall ceiling for
CLINs 0007-0010; CLIN 0011 will contain the overall ceiling for CLINs 0012-0015; CLIN 0016 will be the NSP
Data CLIN with no ceiling value; CLIN 0017 will contain the overall ceiling for CLINs 0018-0021; and CLIN 0022 will contain the overall ceiling for CLINs 0023-0026.
COLLABORATION LANGUAGE
The Government expects a significant amount of interplay between three large acquisitions (Irregular Airborne
Platform Engineering (IAPE), Advanced Sensor System Development and Execution (ASSDE) and Advanced
Software, Computer, and Network Development and Integration (ASCNDI)) being procured by Naval Air Warfare
Center (NAWC) Webster Outlying Field (WOLF), Airborne Systems Integration (ASI) Division. The demands of mailto:kevin.schwertfeger@navy.mil mailto:carolyn.emmart@navy.mil mailto:thomas.stann@navy.mil the projects and the inherent nature of rapid technological development necessitates cooperative contractor interaction to achieve the successful completion of each individual effort and an overall unified outcome. Therefore, while these efforts represent three distinct contracts, offerors are advised that all awarded contractors and their subcontractors will be expected to collaborate and work with the contractors and subcontractors for the other efforts.
Furthermore, it is anticipated that ASI Division will have additional acquisitions other than the three large acquisitions identified above. All awarded contractors and their subcontractors supporting any of the ASI Division procurements are expected to collaborate and work with the contractors and subcontractors for the other ASI
Division procurements.
AMENDMENT 1
Changes made to Solicitation N00421-20-R-0002 and responses to questions from industry via Amendment 0001 are outlined below. The proposal due date has not changed. All submissions shall be made in accordance with Block
9 of the Solicitation cover page.
1. Question 1: For pricing purposes, please confirm the anticipated Period of Performance (POP) dates since there is no anticipate award date listed in the Solicitation. Pages 5 - 8, Section B, Composite Rates tables start the POP on 30 July 2020; however, Attachment P3 starts the POP on 22 May 2020.
Answer 1: Attachment P3 has been updated to reflect the same PoP as Section B.
2. Question 2: On Page 112, Section L 1.1.2.1, please clarify the terms for the acronyms UDP and
RTSP. The proposal reads, “Real Time Signal Processor (RTSP) and Up Down Pair (UDP) streaming video from sensors;” should it read as, “Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) and User Datagram
Protocol (UDP) streaming video from sensors;”?
Answer 2: Section L 1.1.2.1 has been updated to Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) and User
Datagram Protocol (UDP).
3. Question 3: On page 112, Section L 1.1.2.1, should the offer account for supporting Airworthiness in the response, or can we assume this will be handled by a Third Party?
Answer 3: The following language has been included in Section L 1.1.2.1: “The offeror may be called upon to provide artifacts to support airworthiness. The oversight of airworthiness will be handled by a
Third Party.”
4. Question 4: Attachment P7’s header states P6. Can the Government provide a corrected attachment to reduce confusion by all parties?
Answer 4: Attachment P7 has been updated to state P7 in the header.
5. Question 5: In the Past Performance Information Form, is "Level of Effort" to be interpreted as the equivalent to number of hours allocated?
Answer 5: Yes.
6. Question 6: Attachment P3, Composite Rates, includes OVERTIME line items for every category. The
RFP (reference p. 122-125) includes the hours to be proposed and DOES NOT include overtime hours for every labor category. Please clarify how the Offeror is to calculate a composite OT rate for those categories that do not have OT hours.
Answer 6: Attachment P3 has been updated to only include overtime line items for labor categories that require overtime.
7. Question 7: The Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes associated with some of the labor categories are not consistent throughout the RFP. For instance the Software Developer, Senior, listed in the table on page 5 has a designation of 15-1252. In the table on page 38 this designation for the same labor category is 15-1133. Would the Government please clarify the labor category designations throughout the
RFP and in the pricing templates?
Answer 7: The SOC codes included in Section B of the solicitation were correct, with the exception of
Computer Network Architect 12-1241. The correct SOC code for Computer Network Architect is 15-1241.
The Computer Network Architect SOC code has been corrected in Section B, and Attachments P3, P6 and
P7. Other SOC codes in Sections C and L did not match Section B and have been corrected.
8. Question 8: The Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes associated with some of the labor categories do not appear to exist in either the 2010 or 2018 SOC System (e.g. Computer Network
Architect, 12-1241). Will the government please review the SOC codes to ensure consistency and accuracy?
Answer 8: The SOC code for Computer Network Architect has been corrected in Section B, and
Attachments P3, P6 and P7. Other SOC codes in Sections C and L did not match Section B and have been corrected.
9. Question 9: The contract establishes a single fee dollar per hour for the CPFF Term CLINs and a single fee
% for the CPFF completion CLINs for the life of the contract. Specifically concerning the fee dollar per hour amount: If there are significant variations in the labor mix of the task orders as compared to the labor mix from which the fee is calculated, this could introduce additional risk for the Offeror. Similarly, there is additional risk if task orders are not equally distributed across the period of performance. Would the government consider calculating the fee dollar per hour for each year of the contract instead of a single number for the entire period of performance?
Answer 9: No, the Government is not making any changes to the fee calculation. The contract will have one fee dollar per hour for the CPFF Term CLINs and one fee percentage for the CPFF Completion CLINs.
10. Question 10: This section states "Software coding is primarily low-level machine and assembly languages but may extend to high-level programming languages." Can a set of examples of this software code base, the systems it supports and the processors included be provided?
Answer 10: Assembly languages are used in many areas of software development. Some examples of assembly languages are x86 and PowerPC. High level programming languages may include C++, C#, and
Java.
11. Question 11: The RFP mentions C&A activities in several locations. Because C&A is associated with the old DIACAP Process, is it the government's intention to mean A&A, which is the new process/activity associated with Risk Management Framework (RMF) activities? Or does the Government have existing systems/environments that are ATO'd under the old C&A process that require maintenance of and migration away from C&A to A&A?
Answer 11: SOW paragraphs 3.3.1.4 and 3.3.2.1 have been updated to include A&A language.
12. Question 12: Section 3.4.6.5 states that "for the below labor categories, a Bachelor's degree is required" and lists the key personnel labor categories of General and Operations Manager Senior and Software
Developer Senior. The detailed requirements for these two KP positions in Sections 3.4.7.1 and 3.4.7.3 require a master's degree. Would the Government please clarify the minimum educational requirements for the two key personnel positions?
Answer 12: The detailed requirements in SOW Sections 3.4.7.1. and 3.4.7.3 require a Master’s Degree.
Section 3.4.6.4 provides standard experience/education substitutions for all labor categories except those noted in SOW Section 3.4.6.5. Section 3.4.6.5 lists specific labor categories and informs the Offeror that a
Bachelor’s Degree is required and cannot be substituted with experience/education. Therefore, a Master’s
Degree can be substituted with a Bachelor’s Degree and additional years of experinece for the listed categories, but there are no allowable substitutions for a Bachelor’s Degree for the listed categories.
13. Question 13: We have noticed that some of the document dates in Section J appear to be different than the actual document dates. Would the Government please clarify which document date takes precedence?
Answer 13: Section J has been updated to reflect the actual document dates.
14. Question 14: In the draft RFP, a management approach was required as a part of Volume 1. This has been removed in the final RFP; however, management is still listed as part of the evaluation criteria for Volume
1. Would the Government please advise whether a management approach should be submitted as a part of contractor's proposal?
Answer 14: Management Approach has been removed as an evaluation sub-factor in Section M, Part A, Paragraph 3.0.
15. Question 15: Can the ICD(s) and other documents (e.g. requirements/specifications) for the Maritime
Domain Awareness System (MDAS) be made available?
Answer 15: MDAS ICDs will be defined by the hardware to which they are connected. The “Aircraft sensing and detection equipment” list is provided in Section L, paragraph 1.1.2.1 of the solicitation.
16. Question 16: Section L.3.1.2 says Volume 3 should include Section B; then says Section B prices shall be provided separately in one digital data copy. Does this mean that Section B is duplicated? Or only provided separately?
Answer 16: The intent of this is to ensure that the Offeror does not include cost information outside of
Volume 3. Section B information shall be included in Volume 3. Section B submission requires a paper copy and a digital copy.
17. Question 17: This section [Section L 3.3.1] dictates that the price/cost proposals "shall be formatted on letter size (8.5 X 11) paper." Please confirm that, despite the general instructions regarding 12 pt Times
New Roman and prohibition against condensing text, that Offerors should utilize the Government-supplied pricing templates (Attachments P6 and P7) exactly as provided without modification to font or scaling.
Answer 17: The following language was added to Section L, Part A, Paragraph 2.0: “When using
Government supplied templates (e.g. Attachment P3, Attachment P6, Attachment P7), no modifications to font or scaling are required.”
18. Question 18: Management Approach is included in the technical subfactors for evaluation, but a management approach is not required in proposal submissions. Would the Government please clarify whether a management approach is required for evaluation?
Answer 18: Management Approach has been removed as an evaluation sub-factor in Section M, Part A, Paragraph 3.0.
19. Question 19: Section C, paragraph 3.4.8 states this is not a SCA designated contract and makes reference to C.F.R Part 541. However, that section of the Code Federal Regulations is related to the Fair Labor
Standards Act, not the Service Contracting Act. Please provide clarification regarding the applicability of the SCA. It is our understanding that Service Contracts over $2,500 that include SCA/SCLS-covered employees must incorporate into the contract a requirement to pay prevailing wages and benefits issued by
DOL in the form of Wage Determinations (WD).
Answer 19: This is not an SCA designated contract, and as a result, DOL wage determinations are not applicable.
AMENDMENT 2
No changes have been made to Solicitation N00421-20-R-0002 via Amendment 0002. An answer to a question received from industry is outlined below. The Government has addressed all questions received through 10 March
2020. The proposal due date has not changed. All submissions shall be made in accordance with Block 9 of the
Solicitation cover page.
1. Question 1: The RFP differentiates between the Senior SW Developer as a key position and as a non-key position but the revised P3 no longer includes that distinction. Due to one position being a key person there is the very real possibility the composite rates for these two categories would be different. Will the government please revise Attachment P3 to include separate line items for the Senior SW Developer as a
KEY and non-key position?
Answer 1: Attachment P3 is correct. The Government does not want to differentiate between composite rates for key and non-key personnel. The Government wants a composite rate per labor category only with applicable breakouts between regular and overtime rates.
AMENDMENT 3
No changes have been made to Solicitation N00421-20-R-0002 via Amendment 0003. Questions received from
Industry between 11 March 2020 and 17 March 2020 are outlined below. The Government has addressed all questions received through 17 March 2020. The proposal due date has not changed. All submissions shall be made in accordance with Block 9 of the Solicitation cover page.
2. Question 1: With the increasing disruption and impact of the coronavirus to contractor work schedules;
will there be an extension to the due date for the referenced solicitation? Due to this impact will hand delivered proposals, still be accepted?
Answer 1: The proposal due date will not be extended. At this time, hand delivered proposals will still be accepted.
3. Question 2: Has the Government considered issuing electronic delivery instructions for proposals in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and increasing telework implementation across the Government and
Industry? Electronic delivery would decrease exposure between offeror personnel during the production of proposal materials and reduce potential exposure to Government staff during receipt and handling of the materials.
Answer 2: At this time, the requested delivery method has not changed.
AMENDMENT 4
Changes made to Solicitation N00421-20-R-0002 and responses to questions from industry via Amendment 0004 are outlined below. The proposal due date has not changed. All submissions shall be made in accordance with Block
9 of the Solicitation cover page.
4. Question 1: The instructions for the Government cost workbooks explicitly states that “All dollar figures shall be carried out no further than two decimal places. Values with additional decimal places shall not be used within any calculations.” (Instructions tab, row 11). The formulas throughout both the prime and subcontractor workbooks calculate beyond the two decimal places despite only displaying two decimal places. To comply with the instructions, the offeror would have to update every formula to include a
“ROUND” function. Will the Government please amend the instructions to be consistent with the workbook formulas and require only that figures be displayed with two decimal places?
Answer 1: Attachments P6 and P7 have been updated to specify that dollar figures shall be displayed to two decimal places.
5. Question 2: Per the latest amendment No. 3 the Government does not anticipate a change in the proposal due date and deliver instructions. As we are all seeing COVID numbers jump dramatically and with the ever-changing direction by states and the federal government for closures, we wanted to respectfully request an extension to the due date (recommendation of a two-week extension) and an amendment for electronic delivery.
Answer 2: Section L has been updated to contain new language on electronic delivery through the
Department of Defense (DoD) Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE). The proposal due date has not changed; however, additional action is required by the Prime Contractor NLT than 10:00am EST
Monday 30 March 2020. Please see Section L, Part A, Paragraph 4.2.
Additional changes made by the Government to the solicitation include:
1. In Section J, added Attachment P8 – DoD SAFE Help
2. In response to Question 2 associated with Amendment 0004, the Government updated the following paragraphs in Section L, Part A: 2.2, 3.2, 3.3, 4.1, 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.3, 5.1 and 5.2
3. In response to Question 2 associated with Amendment 0004, the Government added the following paragraphs in Section L, Part A: 4.2.4 through 4.2.10
Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices
B-1
I. B-1 Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates (excluding fee) and Streamlined Ordering Procedures for Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) (Labor Term CLINs and/or Orders)
(a) Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates (provided within the tables in paragraphs (c) and (d) below) applicable to CLINs 0001-0005 only:
(1) The rates below are the Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates for each labor category, exclusive of prime fee on both prime and subcontractor labor.
i. Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates shall include direct labor rates plus all applicable burdens, to include indirect rates, applicable escalation, subcontractor fee on subcontractor labor, and subcontractor pass-through costs (exclusive of prime fee on subcontractor's labor).
ii. Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates shall not include prime fee on prime labor, prime fee on subcontractor labor, Foreign-Area Allowances, Other Direct Costs (ODCs) such as Travel and Material, and Cost of Money costs (if proposed).
iii. The Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rate is the sum of both the prime and all subcontractor labor costs, as described above, for that labor category divided by the total number of labor hours for that labor category.
(2) The Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates in paragraphs (c) and (d) are estimates, and invoicing will be based on actual costs incurred.
(b) Task Orders (TOs) that include CPFF Labor Term CLINs will be issued under this contract using the following streamlined ordering procedures:
(1) For each proposed order that includes CPFF Labor Term CLINs, the contracting officer will provide the contractor a TO and an Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE). The IGCE is an estimate of labor hours by labor category utilizing the Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) below, to calculate the total estimated cost for the proposed CLINs and/or TO.
i. The TO fixed fee is calculated using Section G Clause 5252.232-9510 PAYMENT OF
FIXED FEE (NAVAIR).
ii. Ceiling for ODCs will be priced in accordance with the Government estimate.
iii. TOs crossing multiple years will be estimated by the Government using the Hourly
Burdened Composite Labor Rates for each year in proportion to the Period of
Performance (PoP) of the TO.
(2) Within three (3) working days of receipt of the TO and IGCE, the contractor shall respond:
i. If the contractor agrees that it can perform the TO within the parameters of the IGCE, they will sign and return the DD 1155 to the contracting officer. If the requirement remains valid, a priced order will be issued to the contractor; or
ii. If the contractor does not agree with the TO and/or IGCE, the contractor shall acknowledge its disagreement within three (3) working days. Additionally, a proposal shall be submitted to the contracting officer within five (5) working days of receipt of the
TO and IGCE, addressing only the specific areas of difference in labor categories and/or hours in the IGCE. Once the differences are resolved between the contracting officer and the contractor, and the requirement remains valid, a priced order will be issued to the contractor.
(c) Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates for Government Site
LABOR TERM (Government Site Hours)
Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates (Regardless of Clearance or if Key)
Contract Labor Category
Government Site Hours
Year I Year II Year III Year IV Year V
07/30/2020-
07/29/2021*
07/30/2021-
07/29/2022*
07/30/2022-
07/29/2023*
07/30/2023-
07/29/2024*
07/30/2024-
07/29/2025*
General and Operations Manager, Senior, 11-1021
Software Developer, Senior, 15-1252
Software Developer, Junior, 15-1252
Computer and Information Research
Scientist, Junior, 15-1221
Scientist, Senior, 15-1221
Computer Hardware Engineer, Senior, 17-2061
Senior, 17-2061 (Overtime)
Computer Network Architect, Journeyman, 15-1241
Journeyman, 15-1241 (Overtime)
Computer Network Support
Specialist, Journeyman, 15-1231
(Overtime)
Specialist, Senior, 15-1231
Computer Programmer, Journeyman, 15-1251
15-1251 (Overtime)
Computer Programmer, Senior, 15-
1251 (Overtime)
LABOR TERM (Government Site Hours)
Government Site Hours
Year I Year II Year III Year IV Year V
07/30/2020-
07/29/2021*
07/30/2021-
07/29/2022*
07/30/2022-
07/29/2023*
07/30/2023-
07/29/2024*
07/30/2024-
07/29/2025*
Computer Systems Analyst, Journeyman, 15-1211
Computer User Support Specialist, Junior, 15-1232
Senior, 15-1232
Information Security Analyst, Journeyman, 15-1212
Senior, 15-1212
Management Analyst, Senior, 13-
Network and Computer Systems
Administrators, Junior, 15-1244
Administrators, Senior, 15-1244
Operations Research Analyst, Senior, 15-2031
Web Developer, Journeyman, 15-
Computer Based Training Specialist, SCA 15050
Computer Systems Analyst II, SCA
14102
Computer Systems Analyst III, SCA
14103
*Dates to be adjusted at contract award
(d) Hourly Burdened Composite Labor Rates for Contractor Site
LABOR TERM (Contractor Site Hours)
Contractor Site Hours
Year I Year II Year III Year IV Year V
07/30/2020-
07/29/2021*
07/30/2021-
07/29/2022*
07/30/2022-
07/29/2023*
07/30/2023-
07/29/2024*
07/30/2024-
07/29/2025*
Software Developer, Senior, 15-1252
Year I Year II Year III Year IV Year V
07/30/2020-
07/29/2021*
07/30/2021-
07/29/2022*
07/30/2022-
07/29/2023*
07/30/2023-
07/29/2024*
07/30/2024-
07/29/2025*
Software Developer, Junior, 15-1252
Scientist, Junior, 15-1221
Scientist, Senior, 15-1221
Senior, 17-2061
Senior, 17-2061 (Overtime)
Journeyman, 15-1241
Journeyman, 15-1241 (Overtime)
15-1251
Computer Programmer, Journeyman
15-1251 (Overtime)
1251 (Overtime)
Computer Systems Analyst, Journeyman, 15-1211
Junior, 15-1232
Senior, 15-1232
Year I Year II Year III Year IV Year V
07/30/2020-
07/29/2021*
07/30/2021-
07/29/2022*
07/30/2022-
07/29/2023*
07/30/2023-
07/29/2024*
07/30/2024-
07/29/2025*
Information Security Analyst, 15-
1212, Journeyman
Senior, 15-1212
Management Analyst, Senior, 13-
Administrators, Junior, 15-1244
Administrators, Senior, 15-1244
Operations Research Analyst, Senior, 15-2031
Web Developer, Journeyman, 15-
Computer Based Training Specialist, SCA 15050
Computer Systems Analyst II, SCA
14102
Computer Systems Analyst III, SCA
14103
*Dates to be adjusted at contract award
II. Ordering Procedures for Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) Labor Completion
(a) Task Orders shall be ordered in accordance with Section H, 5252.216-9534, Task Order Procedures
B-2 FEE:
CPFF Labor Term - Fixed fee will be calculated based on fee per hour and in accordance with 5252.232-9510
Payment of Fixed Fee (NAVAIR)(OCT 2005). The fee per hour is the total fee proposed for all periods divided by the total number of hours for all periods (541,440). The CPFF Labor Term fee per hour is $_[To be determined at contract award]_.
CPFF Labor Completion - Fixed fee will be a percentage calculated based on the total fee proposed for all periods divided by the total proposed cost for all periods, and in accordance with 5252.232-9510 Payment of Fixed Fee
(NAVAIR)(OCT 2005). The CPFF Labor Completion fee percentage is _[To be determined at contract award]_.%.
B-3 MAN-HOURS:
CPFF Labor Term (CLIN 0001) The Government estimate is 541,440 man-hours, inclusive of Overtime, for the entire work effort of CPFF Labor
Term tasking. A work year is defined as 1,920 hours exclusive of holidays and leave.
CPFF Labor Completion Tasking (CLIN 0006)
The Government estimate is 95,040 man-hours for the entire work effort for CPFF Labor Completion tasking. A work year is defined as 1,920 hours exclusive of holidays and leave.
All Tasking
The Government estimate (inclusive of CPFF Labor Term and CPFF Labor Completion) for the entire effort is
636,480 man-hours.
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0001 Lot Labor - Term - In support of SOW/PWS
CPFF
Services in accordance with Section C, Statement of Work (SOW) / Performance
Work Statement (PWS) paragraph 3.3.1.
FOB: Destination
PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: 1300785100
PSC CD: AJ94
ESTIMATED COST
FIXED FEE
TOTAL EST COST + FEE
Labor - Term - RDT&E
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0001.
FOB: Destination
Labor - Term - O&M
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0001.
Labor - Term - Procurement
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0001.
Labor - Term - NWCF
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0001.
0006 Lot Labor - Completion - In support SOW/PWS
CPFF
Services in accordance with Section C, Statement of Work (SOW) / Performance
Work Statement (PWS) paragraphs 3.3.2, 3.3.3, and 3.3.4.
Labor - Completion - RDT&E
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0006.
Labor - Completion - O&M
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0006.
Labor - Completion - Procurement
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0006.
Labor - Completion - NWCF
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0006.
0011 Lot ODC - Travel/Material supporting SOW/PWS
COST
Other Direct Cost (ODC) in support of CLINs 0001 and 0006 in accordance with
Section C, Statement of Work (SOW) / Performance Work Statement (PWS) paragraph 3.1.5 Other Direct Costs (ODCs), 5252.232-9509 Travel Approval and
Reimbursement Procedures, and 5252.242-9515 (Variation), H-1 Restriction of the Direct Charging of Material.
ODC - Travel/Material - RDT&E
COST
Other Direct Cost (ODC) Not Separately Priced (NSP) Other Direct Costs (ODC) from CLIN 0011.
ODC - Travel/Material - O&M
COST
Other Direct Cost (ODC) Not Separately Priced (NSP) Other Direct Costs (ODC) from CLIN 0011.
ODC - Travel/Material -Procurement
COST
Other Direct Cost (ODC) Not Separately Priced (NSP) Other Direct Costs (ODC) from CLIN 0011.
ODC - Travel/Material -NWCF
COST
Other Direct Cost (ODC) Not Separately Priced (NSP) Other Direct Costs (ODC) from CLIN 0011.
Administrative/Financial/Technical Data
COST
In support of Labor (Term and Completion) and ODC CLINs. Not Separately
Priced (NSP) Data in support of SOW/PWS.
0017 Lot Foreign-Area Allowances
CPFF
Foreign-Area Allowances in accordance with Section C, Statement of Work
(SOW) / Performance Work Statement (PWS) paragraph 3.1.4.1.5 to support services in accordance with sections 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, and 3.3.4.
Foreign-Area Allowances - RDT&E
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0017.
Foreign-Area Allowances - O&M
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0017.
Foreign-Area Allowances - Procurement
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0017.
Foreign-Area Allowances - NWCF
CPFF
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0017.
Foreign-Area Allowances
COST
Foreign-Area Allowances in accordance with Section C, Statement of Work
(SOW) / Performance Work Statement (PWS) paragraph 3.1.4.1.5 to support services in accordance with sections 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, and 3.3.4.
Foreign-Area Allowances - RDT&E
COST
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0022.
Foreign-Area Allowances - O&M
COST
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0022.
Foreign-Area Allowances - Procurement
COST
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0022.
Foreign-Area Allowances - NWCF
COST
Not Separately Priced (NSP) from CLIN 0022.
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
5252.211-9503 LEVEL OF EFFORT (COST REIMBURSEMENT)(NAVAIR)(VARIATION)(XX YYYY)
(a) The level of effort estimated to be ordered during the term of this contract is 541,440 man-hours of direct labor including authorized subcontract labor, if any. The contractor shall not, under any circumstances, exceed one hundred (100%) percent of the total level of effort specified in this basic contract. The estimated composition of the total man-hours of direct labor is as follows:
CLIN TOTAL Man-Hours
0001 541,440
(b) The estimated level of effort for each individual order will be established at the task order level.
(c) FAR Clause 52.232-20, "Limitation of Cost" applies to fully funded orders and FAR Clause 52.232-22, "Limitation of Funds" applies to incrementally funded orders. Nothing in this clause amends the rights or responsibilities of the parties hereto under either of those two clauses. In addition, the notifications required by this clause are separate and distinct from any specified in either FAR Clause 52.232-20 or FAR Clause 52.232-22.
(d) In the event that less than one hundred (100%) percent of the established level of effort of the contract/order is actually expended by the end of the performance period, the Government shall have the option of:
(1) Requiring the Contractor to continue performance, subject to the provisions of the FAR Clause 52.232-20 or
52.232-22, as applicable, until the effort expended equals 100% of the established Level of Effort specified in the order, at no increase in the fee of the order; or
(2) Effecting a reduction in the fixed fee by the percentage by which the total expended man-hours is less than one hundred (100%) percent of the established Level of Effort.
(e) The contractor agrees that effort performed in fulfillment of level of effort obligations under this contract shall include only verifiable effort in direct support of the work specified. It shall not include efforts such as work performed in transit to or from an employee's usual workplace, work during lunchtime activities, or effort performed at other non-work locations.
(f) In performing the contract/order, the contractor may use any reasonable combination of hours for the labor categories in support of section C of this contract/order.
Section C - Descriptions and Specifications
STATEMENT OF WORK
ADVANCED SOFTWARE, COMPUTER, AND NETWORK DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION
STATEMENT OF WORK/PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
1.0 SCOPE
The Department of Navy (DoN), Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD) Webster Outlying Field
(WOLF) Airborne Systems Integration (ASI) Division was established to support the rapid insertion and transition of advanced technologies, systems, sensors, and weapons to enable Programs of Record (PoRs), as well as deliver direct insertion of capabilities to meet urgent fleet needs. The ASI Division works with customers and sponsors to identify capability gaps and requirements; to develop programmatic strategies; to conduct technology development, article testing & evaluation; and to support technology insertion. This Statement of Work (SOW)/Performance Work
Statement (PWS) defines the requirement to support the ASI Division.
The ASI Division leverages and coordinates the efforts of industry, academia, and Government laboratories as an organic Lead Systems Integrator (oLSI) to design, develop, and deliver prototype systems to operational users.
Using systems engineering and systems of systems management approaches, the ASI Division integrates new technologies, Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS) and Government-off-the-Shelf (GOTS) capabilities, as well as other industry or Government resources in order to meet the requirements of each customer. The ASI Division has a requirement to procure services in support of rapid development, design, prototyping, low-rate production, demonstration, test, integration, technical installation, transition through Initial Operational Capability (IOC), and maintenance in the domains of cyber; Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA); situational awareness; data management and dissemination; and other rapid capability software requirements. These services include, but are not limited to, project management; research; analysis; design; parts and material procurement; demonstration; test and evaluation; and user/maintainer training.
Specifically, the ASI Division requires the contractor to support, from concept phase through test and initial deployment phase, advanced software for use on board Air, Ground and Sea platforms, weapon systems, and networks for Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) and other Department of Defense (DoD) and non-DoD organizations. This support shall include the development, design, coding, integration, demonstration, and validation of software for embedded systems, Real Time Operating Systems, and hardware and software systems into new and legacy weapon systems, platforms, and networks. Software coding is primarily low-level machine and assembly languages but may extend to high-level programming languages.
2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
2.1 Department of Defense (DoD) specifications
2.1.1 DoD 5220.22-M, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, (NISPOM), 18 May 2016.
2.1.2 SECNAV M-5510.36, Information Security Program, 1 Jun 2006.
2.1.3 DoDM 5200.01, DoD Information Security Program: Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Vol. 4, 9
Sept 2018.
2.1.4 DoDM 5400.07, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Program, 25 Jan 2017.
2.1.5 DoDI 5230.24, Distribution Statements on Technical Documents, Change 3, 15 Oct 2018.
2.1.6 SECNAV M-5510.30, Personnel Security Program, 1 Jun 2006.
2.1.7 OPNAVINST 3440.17A, Navy Installation Emergency Management Program, 1 Aug 2014.
2.1.8 SECNAVINST M-5239.1 Department of the Navy Information Assurance (IA) Program.
2.1.9 SECNAVINST 5239.3B Department of the Navy Information Assurance Policy.
2.1.10 SECNAVINST 5510.36A DON Information Security Program Instruction.
2.1.11 OPNAVINST 5239.1C Navy Information Assurance (IA) Program
2.2 DoD Standards
2.2.1 DoDM 4161.2-M DoD Manual for the Performance of Contract Property Administration.
2.2.2 DoDM 5200.2-R Personnel Security Program.
2.2.3 DoDM 5220.22M National Industrial Security Program: Procedures for Government Activities Relating to
Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI).
2.2.4 DoDM 5400.7-R, Freedom of Information Program.
2.2.5 DoDINST 6055.17 DoD Installation Emergency Management (IEM) Program.
2.2.6 DoDINST 8510.01 Risk Management Framework For DoD Information Technology (IT).
2.2.7 DoDINST 8500.01 Cybersecurity.
2.2.8 DoDINST 8500.2 Information Assurance (IA) Implementation.
2.2.9 DoDINST 8520.2 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) & Public Key (PK) Enabling.
2.2.10 DoDD 8500.1 Information Assurance (IA).
2.2.11 DoDD 8140.01 Cyberspace Workforce Management.
2.2.12 DTM 17-001 Cybersecurity in the Defense Acquisition System.
2.2.13 DTM 08-027 Security of Unclassified DoD Information on Non-DoD Information Systems.
2.3 Other Government Documents (e.g. Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Documents)
* The Government will provide access to these documents upon request
2.3.1 NAVAIRINST 3960.4C CH-1 Project Test Plan Policy for Testing Air Vehicles, Air Vehicle Weapons, and
Air Vehicle Installed Systems.
2.3.2
2.3.3 NAVAIRINST 13034.1F Airworthiness and Cybersecurity Policies for Air Vehicles and Aircraft Systems.
2.3.4 NAVAIRINST 13050.7 Change Management Policy, Procedures and Responsibilities for Aircraft Assigned to Naval Air Systems Command Aircraft Controlling Custodian.
2.3.5 NAVAIRWARCENACDIVINST 3432.1C Operations Security.
2.3.6 NASPAXRIVINST 5100 NAVAIR Safety Policy.
2.3.7 NAVSUP Publication P-409 MILSTRIP/MILSTRAP Desk Guide.
2.3.8 NAVSUP Publication P-485 MILSTRIP/MILSTRAP Manual.
2.4 Industry Documents
2.4.1 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 12207-2017 – ISO/IEC/IEEE International
Standard – Systems and software engineering – Software life cycle processes.
2.5 Others
2.5.1 14 C.F.R.Part 29.
2.5.2 ISEET Test Planning Integrated Systems Evaluation, Experimentation and Test Department, Test Planning.
2.5.3 ISEET Test Reporting Integrated Systems Evaluation, Experimentation and Test Department, Test
Reporting.
2.5.4 Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) Trusted Associate Sponsorship System (TASS) Overview Guide
Version 5.3.2, Dec 2014.
2.5.5 SWP4000-001 Cyber Risk Assessment Standard Work Package.
2.5.6 Yuma Proving Grounds.
2.5.6.1 YP-YTRO-P-1000 Range Operations.
2.5.6.2 YP-YTAA-P-2001 Aircraft Weapons and Systems Testing.
2.5.6.3 YP-YTAA-P-2601 Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations.
3.0 REQUIREMENTS
3.1 General requirements
3.1.1 Compatibility: The Contractor shall maintain the capability to prepare documents and software packages compatible with the Government Information Technology (IT) environment through the security classification of
Top Secret (TS). The current operating environment required for this contract includes:
̶ Microsoft Windows 10
̶ Microsoft Project 2016
̶ Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2016
̶ Adobe Acrobat XI (reader)
̶ Internet access
The Contractor shall maintain the ability to interface with and transfer data to and from requiring office software applications and their upgraded versions. The Contractor shall maintain state-of the-art virus software and ensure that all media are virus free when delivered. The Contractor shall be capable of Internet and Local Area Network
(LAN) communications with the ASI Division. Contractor personnel shall be capable of maintaining real-time communications, both voice and data transfer capabilities, with the ASI Division during working hours whether at
Contractor work site or on travel.
3.1.2 Work location and facilities
3.1.2.1 Work location: Approximately 40% of work will be performed at Government sites and 60% of work to be performed at Contractor site, with the exception of work performed in foreign areas. Government site(s) include
Naval Air Station (NAS) Patuxent River and Webster Field (NAS Patuxent River Annex). Contractors performing on-site support will be provided access to workspaces, office furniture, telephones, printers, facsimile machines, copy machines, shredders, computers, and network access including web servers and applicable databases or other applications necessary to carry out assigned tasks. The Government will provide all office furniture (i.e., tables, chairs, file cabinets, etc.) required to execute the efforts for those who will be located at the Government facility.
3.1.2.2 Meeting support: In support of the tasking outlined in this SOW/PWS, the Contractor shall have the capability to host and conduct meetings at classification levels up to Secret with the capacity to support a minimum of fifteen (15) persons and have Contractor furnished unclassified telephone and unclassified Video Teleconference
(VTC) capability as well as sufficient equipment to conduct meetings with presentations including compatible software as required in Paragraph 3.1.1. This support shall be provided within twenty-five (25) driving miles of
NAS Patuxent River, MD
3.1.2.3 Government material and equipment
3.1.2.3.1 As delineated in the individual Task Order, the Government will provide equipment and previously developed in-house and publicly available software at the Government facilities to perform software development;
data reduction and analysis; and related integrations efforts as applicable.
3.1.2.3.2 As delineated in the individual Task Order, the Government will provide the Contractor with the additional Government material and equipment for use during performance of the Contract. This additional
Government material and equipment shall remain the property of the Government during performance of the
Contract. The material and equipment will include, but is not limited to:
- All material centrally procured, locally purchased, General Services Administration (GSA), Defense Supply Agency, and non-stock listed items
- All raw stock required for local manufacture
3.1.2.4 Navy and Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI): The Government will provide NMCI services to include
Information Technology (IT) related hardware, software, and support necessary for the performance of this
SOW/PWS as determined by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) for on-site employees, and select offsite employees as determined by the Government. Implementation of these services shall be coordinated and conducted through the COR.
3.1.3 Contract status reporting: The Contractor shall provide the following documentation.
3.1.3.1 Monthly progress and financial status report: The Contractor shall provide a Contracting Officer’s
Management Report. (Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) A014)
3.1.3.2 The Contractor shall provide a Management Plan. (CDRL A005)
3.1.3.3 The Contractor shall provide a monthly technical report. (CDRL A012)
3.1.4 Work schedule to include Compressed Work Schedule (CWS), overtime, holidays, and installation closure.
3.1.4.1 Work schedule: The Contractor shall provide the required services and staffing coverage during normal working hours. Normal working hours are usually eight and a half (8.5) hours (including a 30-minute lunch break), from 0730 to 1600 each Monday through Friday (except on the federal holidays specified in paragraph 3.1.4.1.2).
Some supported Government offices have flexibility to start as early as 0600/0630 and end as late as 1800, Monday–
Friday.
3.1.4.1.1 Compressed Work Schedule (CWS): CWS is an alternative work schedule to the traditional five (5) eight and half (8.5) hour workdays (which includes a 30-minute lunch) worked per week. Under a CWS schedule, an employee completes the following schedule within a two-week period of time: eight (8) weekdays are worked nine and a half (9.5) hours each (which includes a 30-minute lunch), one (1) weekday is alternately worked eight and a half (8.5) hours (which includes a 30-minute lunch) and one (1) weekday is not worked by the employee. The result is eighty (80) hours worked every two (2) weeks, with forty-four (44) work hours one (1) week and thirty-six (36) work hours the other.
The Contractor may allow its employees to work a CWS schedule. If the Contractor chooses to allow its employees to work a CWS schedule in support of this Contract, any additional costs associated with the implementation of the
CWS schedule vice the standard schedule are unallowable costs under this contract and will not be reimbursed by the Government. Additionally, the CWS schedule shall not prevent Contractor employees from providing necessary staffing and services coverage when required by the Government to the COR/Alternate COR (ACOR).
3.1.4.1.2 Holidays: The Government observes the following holidays:
̶ New Year’s Day, January 1
̶ Martin Luther King Day, the third Monday in January
̶ Presidents’ Day, the third Monday in February
̶ Memorial Day, the last Monday in May
̶ Independence Day, July 4
̶ Labor Day, the first Monday in September
̶ Columbus Day, the second Monday in October
̶ Veterans Day, November 11
̶ Thanksgiving Day, the fourth Thursday in November
̶ Christmas Day, December 25
3.1.4.1.3 Installation closure: When Federal facilities are closed by the Government, or when Federal employees are officially excused from work due to a holiday or a special event, severe weather, a security threat, or any other
Government facility related problem that prevents Federal personnel from working at the Government facility, Contractor personnel assigned to work at that facility in support of such Federal employees shall follow their parent company’s policies.
While generally Contractor personnel may not perform work on-site at a Government facility without oversight from
Federal personnel, in very limited circumstances, work being performed by Contractor personnel may be deemed mission essential and performance of such mission essential work may be authorized to continue at the Government facility despite the facility being otherwise closed for normal operations. The circumstances permitting work being performed by Contractor personnel to be deemed mission essential are extremely limited and generally only apply to performance of efforts related to public health, safety, or matters related to national security. The cognizant
Contracting Officer (KO) must concur with any determination that work being performed by contractor personnel is mission essential.
3.1.4.1.4 Overtime: Overtime shall not exceed the amount specified in Section B.
3.1.4.1.5 Foreign-Area Allowances: With COR approval, the Contractor may be required to travel to and perform work within an area where Foreign-Area Allowances such as Danger Pay, Hardship Differential, Imminent Danger
Pay, and Hard-to-fill Differential are typically used. Foreign-Area Allowances will be provided in accordance with
(IAW) Department of State (DOS) guidelines.
3.1.5 Other Direct Costs (ODCs) (Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) 0011 through 0015)
3.1.5.1 Travel: Travel may include general and administrative expenses, but shall not include profit. Temporary travel to other locations in support of program tasking is required. Temporary travel locations include Continental
United States (CONUS) and Outside CONUS (OCONUS) locations.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .