N00421-17-R-0007_Amendment_0001.docx

N00421-17-R-0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The depository location As specified herein. has been added.

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0001 Q&AS

N00421-17-R-0007 Questions and Answers Amendment 0001

1. Section L, Part A, 2.0 Proposal Format, Page 131: Section L indicates that proposals must be formatted using Times New Roman 12 pt. normal font and 10 pt. normal font for figures and tables. Additionally, Attachment P4, Past Performance Information Sheet, contains pre-formatted cells using 10 pt. font. Is it permissible to complete Attachment P4 and its Supplement Sheet with the 10 pt. Times New Roman font consistent with the instructions provided for Table formats?

ANSWER: Yes, the Government will accept 10 pt. font for figures, tables, and Attachments. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

2. Past Performance Information Sheet, Attachment P4: The Past Performance Information Sheet is to be completed by the Offeror, principal subcontractors, and critical team members. Should the “Team Member Type” block on Attachment P4 be completed with the company’s role on RFP N00421-17-R-0007 or that of the past performance contract reference being cited?

ANSWER: The block should be completed with the role the Team Member has under Request for Proposal N00421-17-R-0007.

3. Section J, Page 112: Attachment 7, CPARS Update Questionnaire, is referenced in Section J and Section L, Part B, Section 3.1 on page 140; however, this attachment was not provided with the solicitation. If applicable, please post the attachment to FBO.

ANSWER: Attachment 7 has been posted with this Amendment.

4. Attachment P5, Past Performance Questionnaire: Section L on page 140 instructs Offerors to send the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) to their customer within two weeks from RFP release date, which would be 17 November 2016. Further, the customer is to submit the PPQ within two weeks from their receipt. Should Attachment P5 be revised to reflect a due date to the Contracts Specialist of “1 December 2016” in lieu of 18 November 2016?

ANSWER: Completed Past Performance Questionnaire’s should be submitted to the Government no later than 8 December 2016. Attachment P5 has been updated and posted with this Amendment.

5. Section L, Part B, Volume 3, Page 140: For contracts that do not have a current CPARS Report, Offerors are directed to forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) to that contract customer’s PCO, ACO and Program Manager. However, if the past performance reference is related to a subcontracted effort, the Government PCO or ACO may not have knowledge of the subcontractor’s performance, and it is more than likely they will not respond. To be consistent with the instructions for the CPARS Update Questionnaire is it acceptable to only send the PPQ to the contract customers’ Program Manager for completion?

ANSWER: The Past Performance Questionnaire should be sent to the PCO, ACO, and Program Manager. If the PCO or ACO have no knowledge of the subcontract effort, their response will reflect that.

6. Section L, Part B, Section 3.1, Page 140: Paragraph numbers 4.1 and 4.2 are referenced in the third paragraph of Section 3.1. Instead, it appears “paragraph 4.0” on page 133 should be cited. Please confirm.

ANSWER: You are correct. Page 140 has been revised to cite paragraph 4.0. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

7. Section L, Part B, Paragraph 2.1.2, Page 136: Under the General Tasks section, Offerors are instructed to provide a written narrative of their understanding and capability to perform the requirements of the PBSOW elements that “are not addressed in the Critical Tasks (2.1.1).” Thus, it is assumed that Offerors do not need to address those PBSOW tasks that are duplicated for the different funding types. For instance, Critical Task 3.4.9 (RDT&E), and PBSOW task 3.5.9 (NWCF), 3.6.9 (O&MN) and 3.7.9 (APN) would not apply to the General Tasks section. Please confirm.

ANSWER: You are correct. Offers are only required to address the PBSOW tasking once.

8. Section L, Part B, Paragraph 2.1.1 General Tasks, Page 136: Offerors are instructed to provide a narrative of their understanding and capability encompassing a product outline and expected deliverables, areas that may impact successful performance, and an implementation plan that includes manpower utilization. It also requires a detailed description of the approach to be used for “each” of the 67 General Tasks and their multiple embedded subtasks that are not covered in the Critical Tasks section. We have completed an analysis of these requirements against the page limitation on page 132 and believe that there will only be an average of 11 lines available in 12 point font to address the detailed description for each task, after all other requisites are met. This significantly impacts the Offeror’s ability to provide a “complete” and “best value” response commensurate with Section M evaluation criteria. It is respectfully requested the Government allow 35 pages for the General Tasks section, which would equate to approximately 22 lines per task.

ANSWER: The Page Limitations on Page 132 for the general tasks has been revised to 35 pages. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

9. Section L, Part A, Paragraph 3.0, Page 132: The requirements for this section include Attachment P1, Workforce Qualification Spreadsheet; Attachment P2, Workforce Hour Matrix (referenced in Section M); eight Key Resumes; Labor Category Information; and a Key Labor Categories List. Of the 26 pages currently allotted for Workforce, eight two-page resumes will require 16 pages, and another 8 pages are anticipated to present the Labor Category Information for 20 labor categories and the Key Labor Categories List. Thus, only 2 pages remain for Attachment P1 and P2 to address qualifications for 50 personnel, and also identify labor hours for 20 labor categories across 15 task areas. Therefore, it is respectfully requested the Government revise the page limit for Section 2.2 to include an additional 20 pages for Attachment P1 and Attachment P2 to allow government the ability to fully evaluate labor qualifications and the Offeror’s suitability to perform the tasks.

ANSWER: The Page Limitations on Page 132 for the workforce has been revised to 36 pages. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

10. Attachment P1, Workforce Qualifications Matrix: Is it acceptable to adjust the column widths for the Attachment P1 table while maintaining the overall margins of the document?

ANSWER: Yes, this is acceptable.

11. Section L, Part B, Paragraph 2.2, Pages 136-137: Attachment P2, Workforce Hour Matrix, is listed in Section J on page 112, and is referenced in Section M, Part B on page 163. However, Section L, Part B, Paragraph 2.2 does not address the requirement for the Attachment P2. If the Attachment P2 is required, please revise Paragraph 2.2 accordingly.

ANSWER: The following paragraph is added to Page 136. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

2.2.2 WORKFORCE HOUR MATRIX: The offeror shall provide a breakdown of hours for each individual labor category proposed for the base and each option period of performance. The offeror must submit a labor category breakdown that covers the completion of the tasks in Section C of this solicitation in accordance with the format in the Workforce Hour Matrix (Attachment P2). Subcontractors and JV team members’ information shall be included under the prime contractor’s submission. The matrix shall demonstrate the Offeror’s ability to provide the required services with the labor mix and hours proposed.

12. Attachment P2, Workforce Hour Matrix: Offerors are instructed on page 142 to allocate Section B costs to the single CLIN levels (0001, 0101, 0201, 0301). Therefore, it would seem appropriate that the Attachment P2 would be completed in the same manner. Please confirm.

ANSWER: No. As shown in Paragraph 4.6.2, the Government will allocate labor costs to the labor CLINs.

13. Section C, Paragraph 11.0, Page 50: The labor category descriptions do not appear to include requirements for technicians providing ATEF support. While a small percentage of their tasking could be included in the other functional descriptions, most of their time is spent supporting the evaluation of installed aircraft propulsion systems. Additionally, the critical training and experience specifics required of these senior technicians is unique to this task area, facility, and extremely unique test support equipment. It is respectfully requested the Government add an Engineering Technician V (Propulsion Systems) labor category that correlates to the specific ATEF functional requirements.

ANSWER: The labor hours required to support ATEF operations were included in this labor category under the environmental section. The labor category has been revised as shown below. Section C has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

Engineering Tech V – Heading description has been changed to read Dynamics vice Dynamometer.

Proposed Function Description – has been changed to read:

Applies engineering techniques, principles, and precedents to develop, design, modify, install, test, evaluate, or operate electrical power systems, electronic, avionics, mechanical, propulsion systems, propulsion components, engines installed and uninstalled, communications, or related data processing systems for military systems or associated support equipment or components. Reviews, analyzes, develops, prepares, or applies engineering, technical, or maintenance specifications, policies, standards, or procedures. Organizes, analyzes, and prepares reports or presentations of technical data and information. Plans and performs tests and evaluations of systems equipment or components. Compiles, processes, reduces, or analyzes test data results.

14. Section C, Paragraph 11.0, Page 51: The KEY Engineering Technician labor categories do not currently require “engine and electrical power systems” experience that is essential to support AIR-4.4 Power and Propulsion tasking. How will the Government evaluate technically superior skills and expertise that are crucial to AIR-4.4’s success if these specific requirements are not delineated in the RFP labor categories?

ANSWER: See Question 13. Proposed Function Descriptions for the Engineering Technician IV, Engineering Technician III, Engineering Technician II, and the Engineering Technician Junior have been revised and are provided in this Amendment.

15. Section C, Para 11.0, Page 53-54: The labor category description for the SMEs require individuals viewed as a “master” of their subject area. However, the RFP labor category only requires a high school diploma, technical training, and 8 years of experience, which is less than that of an Engineering Technician IV. Given the complexity, uniqueness and criticality of the AIR-4.4 test facilities and test equipment, it would seem prudent that SMEs should possess higher qualifications than a Technician V which requires 12 years of experience. Therefore, it is requested the SME qualifications be revised to 15 years of relevant experience, which is consistent with the NAVAIR Standard Labor Category SME IV, and will result in lower risk and successful performance of Propulsion and Power testing and evaluations.

ANSWER: The Government concurs that 15 years of relevant experience is appropriate and is in accordance with the Standard Labor Qualifications. The labor category has been revised to require 15 years of experience. Section C has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

16. Section C, Para 11.0, Pages 49-50: To effectively fulfill PBSOW tasking, proposed personnel must possess Propulsion and Power Laboratory and Test Area operations and maintenance experience as stipulated in the “Relevant Technical Field” definition. Further, as delineated in the “Technical Curriculum”, formal education must be obtained in the relevant fields of propulsion, mechanical systems, electrical or other trades that are related to the propulsion test lab operations. However, it appears the “Technical Discipline” inadvertently omitted the requirement for education and experience in relation to Propulsion and Power Laboratory and Test Area operations and maintenance. It is requested the “Technical Discipline” definition be revised to include Propulsion and Power relevant experience.

ANSWER: Technical Discipline Definition has been changed to read as follows. Section C has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

Technical Discipline: when used in relation to educational or work experience requirements, “technical discipline” shall mean a degree or work experience in the field of Propulsion and Power, Mathematics, Engineering, or Sciences.

17. Section C, Paragraph 11.0, Page 50: The Computer Specialist and Senior Computer Specialist labor categories require a Top Secret security clearance within 20 days of contract award. However, the DD Form 254 specifies a “Secret” level. Additionally, there are no special access requirements, such as COMSEC, identified on the DD Form 254. Please clarify.

ANSWER: The answer will be provided under a separate Amendment.

18. Section I, Clause 52.22-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires, Page 92: Since this contract is subject to the Wage Determination (Attachment 3), and the tables on pages 92 and 147 assign applicable Wage Determination codes, it is clear Offerors must comply with the Wage Determination minimum wages specified for the designated labor categories. Please confirm that the hourly wages contained in the Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires/GS Equivalent data provided on pages 92 and 147 do not apply to the SCA categories.

ANSWER: The hourly wages provided in the Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires/GS Equivalent do not apply to SCA categories.

19. Section I, Clause 52.22-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires, Page 92: In accordance with SCA requirements, successor contracts must comply with predecessor contract provisions. Since the predecessor contract included Wage Determination rates for the administrative labor categories, and the PBSOW tasking is substantially the same, it appears the categories are SCA covered. Therefore, should the tables on pages 92 and 147 be revised to include SCA Codes 01312 and 01313 for the Administrative Assistant Junior and the Administrative Assistant categories to comply with Department of Labor mandates?

ANSWER: The Government agrees. The clause at FAR 52.222-42 and Section L have been revised and provided with this Amendment.

20. Section L, Part B, Paragraph 4.6.2, Page 147: Clause 5252.215-9511 on pages 167-168 states the Government will conduct a Cost Realism analysis. Will the GS Equivalent rates specified in the Labor Category table be used to determine realistic salaries for non-SCA personnel?

ANSWER: The Government may use a variety of techniques to conduct Cost Realism Analysis. The comparison of a Contractor’s proposed labor rate against the GS equivalent rate is one technique that may be used.

21. Section L, Part B, Paragraph 4.6.2, Page 147: The GS Equivalent column specifies different GS levels and pay rates for the three SME labor categories. However, there is only one SME labor category description provided on pages 53-54. Given that the candidate is designated as a “master” of their subject area, it appears that the GS-13 level would be more appropriate as opposed to the GS-11/GS-12 levels designated for the WQPL and S&T labor categories. For cost realism purposes, will the Government consider applying a GS-13 equivalency to all SME categories, which is commensurate with the skills and expertise needed to allow for the lowest risk possible to AIR-4.4?

ANSWER: The Government has reviewed the GS-Equivalents specified in the table and has determined them to be appropriate for the labor categories provided. The Government may use a variety of techniques to conduct Cost Realism Analysis. The comparison of a Contractor’s proposed labor rate against the GS equivalent rate is one technique that may be used.

22. Section L, Part B, Paragraph 2.3.5, Page 138: The Small Business Utilization Strategy requires “goals, expressed as dollars and percentages of total contract values and percentages of total subcontract values for SB Concerns and each subcategory of SB.” Given the technical volume shall not contain any reference to cost or price aspects of the offer, should the dollar amounts be deleted from the requirement?

ANSWER: Correct, dollar amounts should not appear in the technical proposal. Percentages shall be included in the Technical Proposal. The dollars and percentages shall be included in the Cost/Price proposal. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

23. In Section 2.0 on page 131 of the RFP, the Government states that, "Figures and tables can use a 10 pt. normal font." Please confirm that either Times New Roman or Arial font is acceptable for figures and tables.

ANSWER: The Government concurs that either Times New Roman or Arial font are acceptable for figures and tables.

24. In table in Section 3.0 on page 132 of the RFP, the Government states that the page limit for Volume 3 Past Performance is, "... specified herein." In section 3.1 on page 140, the Government states that, "This information shall be provided as a supplemental sheet to the Past Performance Information Sheet that is being addressed." Please confirm that the page limit for each cited contact is two pages inclusive of the Past Performance Information Sheet, Attachment P4.

ANSWER: The page limit for each cited contract shall not exceed two (2) pages excluding Attachment P4. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

25. In Section 3.0 on page 133 of the RFP, the Government states that, "The Offeror shall submit a Cross Reference Matrix (CRM) for the Technical Volume, similar to the example below, to help ensure that all solicitation requirements are addressed and to facilitate the evaluators' review of the Offeror's proposal." Please confirm that the Cross Reference Matrix is for requirements addressed in the Technical Volume only.

ANSWER: The Cross Reference Matrix (CRM) shall address the requirements contained in the technical volume only. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

26. In Section 4.0 on page 133 of the RFP, the Government states that, "However, it is requested that Volume 3 Past Performance information be submitted fourteen (14) days prior to the submission date specified in Block 9 of the Standard Form 33 of the RFP." Would the Government please provide an exact date and time that this information is due to the Government?

ANSWER: Past Performance information is due no later than 5:00 pm Eastern Time zone, 8 December 2016. Attachment P5 and Section L have been revised and provided with this Amendment.

27. In Section 5.0 on page 148 of the RFP, the Government states that, "If there are no exceptions, deviations, or waivers, the Offeror shall provide a one-page Volume 5 in the Executive Summary stating so." However, in Section 1.0 on page 135 of the RFP, the Government instructs offerors to include "Affirmation of no Exceptions, Deviations, or Waivers if Volume 6.0 is not being submitted as part of the proposal." Please confirm that the Government is requesting a one-page Volume "5" in the Executive Summary. Also, will the Government please consider excluding this one page statement from the page limit for Volume I - Executive Summary?

ANSWER: If the offeror IS taking any exceptions, deviations, or waivers, then each instance shall be explained and submitted in Volume 5. If the offeror IS NOT taking any exceptions, deviations, or waivers, then a one-page affirmation shall be provided as a separate tabbed section in Volume 1 : Executive Summary. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

28. In section 2.3.5(b) on page 139 of the RFP, the Government states, “Large Businesses shall propose a minimum of the subcontracting goals identified in the table below.” Would the Government please clarify if the 20% Small Business (SB) (Total) in the table is based on a percentage of the total contract value or total subcontract value?

ANSWER: The 20% Small business Total in the table is based on a percentage of total contract value. Section L has been revised and provided with this Amendment.

29. In section 3.1 on page 140 of the RFP, the Government states that, "If less than the five (5) past performance references are available for team members (i.e., entities that make up a JV or any other partnership or teaming arrangement), each member should submit the five (5) references individually in addition to their team member references." Would the Government please clarify this requirement?

ANSWER: If you are proposing a Joint Venture (JV) in response to this Request for Proposal, then the JV should submit a minimum of five (5) past performance references where the JV has performed tasking under a contract. However, if as the JV, there are not a minimum of five (5) past performance references for the JV, then each member of the JV is expected to submit minimum of five (5) past performance references.

30. Reference Section M, PART B, 1.0(b), on page 163 of the RFP, the Government states that, "The proposed workforce hour matrix (Attachment P2) will be assessed to determine the capability of the Offeror to support the SOW successfully" however Section L doesn't instruct the offeror where to place Attachment P2. Question: Where does the Government want offerors to place Attachment P2?

ANSWER: See Question 11 above. Attachment P2 shall be included in the Technical Proposal - Section 2.2 – Workforce.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

PERFORMANCE BASED SOW

PERFORMANCE BASED STATEMENT OF WORK

for Propulsion and Power Department (AIR-4.4) Lab Support

1.0 SCOPE

This Performance Based Statement of Work (PBSOW) sets forth the requirements for Contractor provided engineering, technical, administrative, operation, maintenance, repair, equipment and laboratory upgrades and improvements, equipment procurement, and calibration services for the Naval Air Warfare Center, Propulsion and Power Department (AIR-4.4), Patuxent River, Maryland.

1.1 BACKGROUND

AIR-4.4 is the lead activity for research, systems engineering and integration, engineering analysis and evaluation, test and evaluation, and in-service engineering support of Naval Propulsion and Power Systems. These systems include, but may not be limited to the following:

• Air breathing engines (except for ramjets) and engine integration for manned and unmanned aircraft and missiles, engine subsystems such as controls and lubrication systems;

• Auxiliary, secondary and emergency power systems;

• Helicopter transmissions and drive systems;

• Aircraft and engine fuel systems, and ground refueling systems;

• Fuel and oil for propulsion system engines, gearboxes, propellers and transmissions;

• Propulsion system performance, engine structures, fleet operations metrics; and

• Power generating; battery and power conversion systems; electrical power distribution systems; electrical power quality; electrical starting and emergency electrical power systems.

1.2 FACILITY/LABORATORY DESCRIPTION

The Contractor shall provide the people and the skills necessary for the engineering, technical, administrative, operation, maintenance, repair, equipment and laboratory upgrades and improvements, equipment procurement, and calibration services of the below test facilities and testing laboratories, including test equipment. The ability to move people from one test lab/facility to another lab/facility to meet workload demands is required to ensure an efficient execution of the mission. The facilities, systems, and equipment do not remain static as upgrades, replacements, and removal of facilities, systems, and equipment and testing requirements evolve over time to meet the requirements of the Fleet.

· Propulsion Systems Evaluation Facility (PSEF), Bldg. 2360, NAWCAD Patuxent River, MD

· Aircraft Test and Evaluation Facility (ATEF), Bldg. 1669, NAWCAD Patuxent River, MD

· Electrical Power Systems Evaluation Facility (EPSEF), Bldg. 1461, NAWCAD Patuxent River, MD

1.2.1 PSEF – The PSEF consists of numerous test areas and unique facilities to test and collect data on propulsion components and sub-systems in the following test areas:

1.2.1.1 Fuels and Lubricants Test Area (FLT): This test area consists of 30 test rigs used to evaluate specific performance properties of aircraft and ship fuels, fuel handling systems and components, and engine/drive train lubricants.

1.2.1.2 Rotor Spin Facility (RSF): This facility is a unique Department of Defense asset that tests aircraft engine compressor and turbine components for a multi-service customer base under centrifugal loads. Testing includes Low and High Cycle Fatigue, Burst and Containment and Life/Design Validation.

1.2.1.3 Altitude Environmental Chamber (AEC): This facility assesses the operational flight envelope of UAV propulsion systems, evaluates system performance, mission operability, service life and design integrity.

1.2.1.4 Helicopter Drive System Facility (HDS): This facility is a unique Department of Defense asset, which provides test and evaluation capability to a multi-service customer base with interests in both the mechanical evaluation of helicopter hardware and the evaluation of diagnostic systems and techniques through the Helicopter Integrated Diagnostics System program.

1.2.1.5 Small Engine Test Area (SETA): These test areas are used to test and evaluate turboshaft engines, auxiliary power units, aircraft starters, starter control valves and prognostics and health management technologies. Testing includes environmental effects on engine performance and life, life extension evaluations, performance evaluations and developmental hardware evaluations.

1.2.1.6 Chemistry Laboratory (CL): This test area is used to test and evaluate the chemical and physical properties of aircraft and ship fuels and lubricants. This facility provides evaluation testing for all Navy fuels encompassing ship, air and ground uses.

1.2.1.7 Battery and Fuel Cell Test Laboratory. This facility performs discharge and recharge characteristics testing as well as evaluation of systems involved in flight testing and Science and Technology development programs.

1.2.2 ATEF – The ATEF is a Hush House for the evaluation of aircraft installed and uninstalled engine propulsion system performance. This facility has the capability to test the full spectrum of aircraft power operation from ground run-up to full afterburner under numerous environmental conditions. ATEF also contains specialized instrumentation and equipment to provide instrumentation signals real time during engine operation. Capabilities include:

· Engine/Intake Crosswind/Ingestion

· Weight and Balance

· Environmental effects (rain, wind, sun, heat)

· Thrust calibration

· Residual Fuel Calibration

· X-Ray inspections

· Night Vision equipment testing

1.2.3 EPSEF – The EPSEF is a testing facility that consists of numerous test areas that are designed to evaluate electrical power generating, battery and power conversion systems, electrical power distribution systems, electrical power quality, electrical starting and emergency electrical power systems. The facility is also responsible for auxiliary, secondary, and emergency power systems.

1.2.3.1 Electrical Test Laboratory. This facility performs electrical power evaluation testing on both airborne and ground equipment during all phases of equipment development and production. Continuous testing is performed on AC/DC generators, electrical starters, power conversion equipment, batteries, power monitors, wiring, and electrical circuit breakers. The rotational drive capability of this Lab is also used to evaluate helicopter drive systems for life and diagnostic system development.

1.2.3.2 Dynamics Test Laboratory. This facility performs dynamics testing on a full range of airborne and ground equipment under either ambient conditions or extreme temperature/altitude/humidity conditions.

1.2.3.3 Environmental Test Laboratory. This test area uses unique environmental test chambers to simulate the harsh environments that airborne and ground equipment are required to withstand. The majority of this testing evaluates the components ability to perform under MIL-STD-810A-G environment.

1.2.3.4 Mobile Electrical Test Laboratories. Provides mobile data acquisition capability for aircraft ground testing conducted at Patuxent River and other Government and Contractor facilities. The mobile laboratories are used to evaluate the performance of new components and aircraft systems that interface with the electrical power generation and distribution systems while installed in the aircraft. The mobile laboratories are trucks containing test equipment and require insured personnel who can drive the vehicle and operate the test equipment within the mobile laboratory. Over the road and airfield permits/license will be required and must be obtained by the Contractor.

1.2.3.5 Wind Tunnel Test Facility. A ram air turbine generator facility provides precise control and calibrated air velocities to evaluate the performance of the turbines under controlled laboratory conditions. This facility also performs blowing rain tests.

1.2.3.6 Wiring Test Laboratory (WTL): The WTL facility is dedicated to the testing, evaluation, and monitoring of aircraft electrical interconnect system components and tools in support of the Navy Qualified Products Lists (QPL) for each component.

1.2.3.7 Aircraft Mounted Auxiliary Drive (AMAD) Stand. This test stand supports the F-18 C/D AMAD research and development and engineering investigation programs. The test stand is utilized for performing diagnostics on the AMAD unit after removal from aircraft.

1.2.3.8 Modeling and Simulation Test Laboratory. This laboratory performs electrical generator and electrical power system modeling and simulation. This could include wire diagnostics and safety of flight testing for science and technology efforts.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS (The most current version of the document shall be used)

Document Number Nomenclature

MIL-W-5088-L &

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

The following describes the types of functional effort to be performed by the Contractor:

3.1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT

(CLINS 0004, 0104, 0204, 0304, and 0404)

(NWCF)

The Contractor shall provide general administrative, secretarial, and clerical support for AIR-4.4. Typical tasks listed in order of importance shall include, but are not limited to:

3.1.1 Process travel authorizations and orders using the Defense Travel System (DTS).

3.1.2 Process Visit Requests and imputing information into the BASICS II base access system.

3.1.3 Reserved.

3.1.4 Use both the Clearance System (APACS) and the Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS) for country clearances and visitor clearances.

3.1.5 Maintain recall and muster lists.

3.1.6 Operate a computer including proficiency in the complete Microsoft Office Suite software (i.e. MS Excel, Powerpoint, Access, Word, Outlook, etc.)

3.1.7 Create and save DoD Emall shopping carts items for DoD bankcard holders to purchase. The Contractor shall not be permitted to execute the purchase.

3.1.8 Scan and transfer files.

3.1.9 Comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974 in regard to personal information protection and disclosure.

3.1.10 Answer telephones and route calls.

3.1.11 Receive, route and distribute mail and other office material.

3.1.12 Operate an office copier to copy, sort, and collate copies.

3.1.13 Maintain and update office files and records.

3.1.14 Prepare and distribute Naval messages.

3.1.15 Prepare formal correspondence, technical reports, booklets and memoranda.

3.1.16 Provide conference and workshop coordination and administrative services including development of agendas, milestone charts, announcements, schedule meeting rooms, set up and dismantle of audio/visual equipment, database tracking of events, record attendees and points of contact, record minutes at general and splinter group meetings, and operate message boards.

3.1.17 Reserved.

3.1.18 Prepare vouchers (Standard Form 1034) for standard issue safety equipment (shoes/glasses).

3.1.19 Prepare graphic art.

3.2.1 Coordinate and track cost, schedule, business, and performance standards. Provide reports as requested by the COR.

3.2.2 Maintain interface with the COR in order to understand objectives and milestones.

3.2.3 Track projects and Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) deliveries.

3.3.1 Coordinate and track cost, schedule, business, and performance standards. Provide reports as requested by the COR.

3.3.2 Maintain interface with the COR in order to understand objectives and milestones.

3.3.3 Track projects and Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) deliveries.

The Contractor shall provide engineering, technical, operation, maintenance, equipment repair, improvements, and calibration services in support of AIR-4.4 testing laboratories and test facilities based on current and projected test requirements for systems during the development phase. Typical tasks include, but are not limited to:

3.4.1 Provide training for the proper and safe operation and maintenance of both new and existing test facilities and test equipment.

3.4.2 Review and provide recommendations for project test plans and the test request forms per the Test Plan Standard Work Package.

3.4.3 Support the preparation of specialized and non-standard project test plans, test requests and development of innovative test procedures.

3.4.4 Support the availability and proper operation of appropriate facilities, instrumentation and test apparatus for the conduct of test program objectives. This could include adaptation and modification of existing test equipment/facilities.

3.4.5 Provide recommendations to the Government Project Engineer for new instrumentation and wiring configurations based on test requirements.

3.4.6 Perform pre-test setup, operation, data collection, recording, and analysis functions to support routine, as well as specialized and non-standard testing.

3.4.7 Conduct tests and analyze test data to confirm the test data is within range in accordance with Government furnished specifications or approved test plans. If out of range, notify the test engineer in writing immediately.

3.4.8 Maintain documentation of all test programs. Documentation is to include a description of the systems and/or equipment that was evaluated; the laboratory equipment and instrumentation used to run the test; calibration data; pretest and post-test performance data and the daily event log. Provide test results with findings, conclusions and recommendations to the project engineer.

3.4.9 Prepare test facility and equipment preventive maintenance schedules and perform maintenance in accordance with equipment maintenance/operation manuals and military test specifications and standards as applicable. Provide the Government written recommendations for test facility or equipment repairs, upgrades, or replacement.

3.4.10 Repair test facilities and test equipment in accordance with local guidance, manufacturer’s manuals, and Standard Operating Procedures. Repairs shall be coordinated with other test operations to ensure minimal impact with other test operations.

3.4.11 Maintain all Contractor occupied or utilized spaces (office, laboratory area, equipment room) in a safe, orderly and clean manner.

3.4.12 Remain cognizant of advances in testing technology. This may include visits or telephone inquiries to other activities, agencies and equipment manufacturers for the purpose of evaluating and observing evolving test equipment technology. Provide recommendations to the Government technical lead to upgrade and modernize test facilities and equipment to enhance functionality of the test area, and reduce test cost.

3.4.13 The Contractor shall provide inputs for the preparation of recommended performance design change specifications, engineering data, installation requirements and other technical documentation to support the upgrade, repair and/or modification of existing and capability expansion of facility/equipment testing capabilities and equipment. Procurement of any new equipment or systems, in support of existing and future test capabilities, shall be because the existing equipment and capability is determined Beyond Economical Repair (BER) or unable to meet mission requirements and a new purchase is the only way to meet the requirement. The purchase of any replacement equipment, materials and repairs or upgrades under this contract shall be limited to those required to meet the minimum requirements defined within the test plan or mission plan. Purchases shall be limited by the following:

a. The purchase of equipment, materials, and repairs or upgrades, for routine, low cost consumables (i.e. gears, bearings, seals, filters, gaskets, connectors, cables, flow meters, miscellaneous repairs, calibration effort, etc.), which do not exceed $500, and are within the scope of the contract may be purchased without Government verification.

b. The purchase of equipment, materials and repairs, upgrades and services in excess of $500 but less than $10,000, and are within the scope of the contract, may be purchased by the Contractor after COR verification and written approval.

c. The purchase of equipment, materials and repairs, upgrades and services, in excess of $10,000 but less than $30,000 and are within the scope of the contract, may be purchased by the Contractor after AIR-4.4C verification and written approval.

d. The purchase of equipment, materials and repairs or upgrades, in excess of $30,000 will be referred to the Contracting Officer, via the COR, for determination of whether or not the work is within the contract scope to maintain or enhance existing facilities

3.4.14 Support the Government during manufacturer design reviews; factory demonstrations, equipment acceptance tests and operator/maintenance/manual verification/validation efforts.

3.4.15 Install test facilities and equipment that have been purchased by the Government or the Contractor, in accordance with Paragraph 3.4.13 above. These installations shall be in accordance with equipment manuals, vendor instructions or Public Works Department Instructions which would be furnished as Government Furnished Information (GFI).

3.4.16 Support the development of test methods and procedures to facilitate the introduction of new/modified test equipment, standards and specifications.

3.4.17 Provide test facility maintenance and repair coordination for the Propulsion and Power Department. Duties shall include test facility maintenance as per the preventative maintenance plan including routine/daily test facilities inspections and any required corrective actions. Coordination with NAS Public Works (PW) for repair of equipment to maintain the required test conditions and ensure that PW maintenance activities are conducted without impact to test operations. Monitor all test equipment operation utilizing the Data Display Channel (DDC) system and adjusts set-points to provide test conditions to the appropriate test areas.

3.4.18 Conduct testing and evaluation utilizing AIR-4.4 Standard Work Packages (SWPs) and Standard Skills Packages (SSPs).

3.4.19 Conduct chemical analysis testing and reporting, including, but not limited to viscosity, flash point, heating value, density, foam, hydrogen content, surface tension, nitrogen content, tensile test, vapor pressure, water content, pour point test, sonic shear and peroxide content.

3.4.20 Conduct tests and analyze data from corrosion test apparatus, Spectroil Jr. spectrophotometer and Fiter Debris Analyzer (FDA); evaluate test results from high temperature deposition test, hot liquid process simulator, Ryder gear, Falex multi-specimen test, Rolls Royce Tribo test and others in support of the Lubricants Program.

3.4.21 Conduct tests in the Fuels and Lubricants areas including outside operations using the large fuel systems. Provide training to Contractor personnel to ensure safety when utilizing chemicals.

3.4.22 Perform electrical wiring and wiring system component qualification and other testing and in accordance with Government test acceptance criteria. The Contractor shall provide the test results to the Government. All determinations of technical acceptance or rejection will be made by the Government only.

3.4.23 Provide technical support for the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and military (MIL) specifications for wiring and wiring components. Attend and participate in technical industry meetings, conferences, and planning meetings to provide interpretation for specifications and standards technical requirements. Provide a record of discussion items, action items, conclusions and recommendations to their respective Government technical team lead.

3.4.24 Provide technical support to propulsion and power facilities including facility preparation to conduct the testing; environmental temperature control; preparing instrumentation for testing and reporting status, data acquisition and data retention. Perform information management assurance for the data acquisition systems and ensure the quality of the data for facility/laboratory systems administrators.

3.4.25 Make changes and/or modify facilities, systems, equipment, instrumentation and hardware as per engineering drawings.

3.4.26 Dismantle, prepare and preserve facilities, systems, hardware and equipment that will be placed in long term storage. Provide and maintain a written record of stored items.

3.4.27 Start, set and adjust test operating conditions, monitor test performance and operation and shut down the test facility after testing is complete.

3.4.28 Trouble shoot facility, system, equipment and hardware performance problems; advising facilities engineering of problems and potential solutions.

3.4.29 Ship and/or transport test equipment and/or test articles.

3.4.30 Maintain and update the inventory of equipment, instrumentation and hardware in all test facilities areas.

3.4.31 Support the AIR-4.4 RDT&E network which is a data sharing and exchanging system in compliance with Navy and DoD data and system security requirements. The AIR-4.4 RDT&E network is not part of the Navy Marine Corp Intranet (NMCI). Maintain, upgrade and report the network, nodes, and peripheral equipment configuration management. Recommend technical refresh dates and recommend improvements covering facility software, and data security hardware and software. Respond to and provide solutions for system trouble calls.

3.4.32 Support RDT&E Network accreditation process by collecting data, documenting systems, scanning machines and preparing documents for accreditation application submission.

3.4.33 Provide a dedicated, journey level Systems Administrator to work on the Naval Power Avionic and Thermal (NPATH) Lab computer systems. Provide computer updates, ensure network connectivity and load software programs. Ensure the NPATH modeling and data acquisition systems are functional to support each test or analysis event.

3.4.34 Maintain, support and upgrade RDT&E hardware and software including the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), once functional and out of development, test area data acquisition systems, data processing systems, control systems, and displays.

The Contractor shall provide engineering, technical, operation, maintenance, equipment repair and improvements, capability improvements and calibration services in support of AIR-4.4 testing laboratories and test facilities based on current and projected test requirements. Typical tasks include, but are not limited to:

3.5.1 Provide training for the proper and safe operation and maintenance of both new and existing test facilities and test equipment.

3.5.2 Review and provide recommendations for project test plans and the test request forms per the Test Plan Standard Work Package.

3.5.3 Support the preparation of specialized and non-standard project test plans, test requests and development of innovative test procedures.

3.5.4 Support the availability and proper operation of appropriate facilities, instrumentation and test apparatus for the conduct of test program objectives. This could include adaptation and modification of existing test equipment/facilities.

3.5.5 Provide recommendations to the Government Project Engineer for new instrumentation and wiring configurations based on test requirements.

3.5.6 Perform pre-test setup, operation, data collection, recording, and analysis functions to support routine, as well as specialized and non-standard testing.

3.5.7 Conduct tests and analyze test data to confirm the test data is within range in accordance with Government furnished specifications or approved test plans. If out of range, notify the test engineer in writing immediately.

3.5.8 Maintain documentation of all test programs. Documentation is to include a description of the systems and/or equipment that was evaluated; the laboratory equipment and instrumentation used to run the test; calibration data; pretest and post-test performance data and the daily event log. Provide test results with findings, conclusions and recommendations to the project engineer.

3.5.9 Prepare test facility and equipment preventive maintenance schedules and perform maintenance in accordance with equipment maintenance/operation manuals and military test specifications and standards as applicable. Provide the Government written recommendations for test facility or equipment repairs, upgrades, or replacement.

3.5.10 Repair test facilities and test equipment in accordance with local guidance, manufacturer’s manuals, and Standard Operating Procedures. Repairs shall be coordinated with other test operations to ensure minimal impact with other test operations.

3.5.11 Maintain all Contractor occupied or utilized spaces (office, laboratory area, equipment room) in a safe, orderly and clean manner.

3.5.12 Remain cognizant of advances in testing technology. This may include visits or telephone inquiries to other activities, agencies and equipment manufacturers for the purpose of evaluating and observing evolving test equipment technology. Provide recommendations to the Government technical lead to upgrade and modernize test facilities and equipment to enhance functionality of the test area, and reduce test cost.

3.5.13 The Contractor shall provide inputs for the preparation of recommended performance design change specifications, engineering data, installation requirements and other technical documentation to support the upgrade, repair and/or modification of existing and capability expansion of facility/equipment testing capabilities and equipment. Procurement of any new equipment or systems, in support of existing and future test capabilities, shall be because the existing equipment and capability is determined Beyond Economical Repair (BER) or unable to meet mission requirements and a new purchase is the only way to meet the requirement.