N00421-15-R-0011-0001_ETS_QA.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
AIR 5. 4. 3 Engineering and Technical Support Services
Solicitation number
N00421-15-R-0011
Issued by

About this file

N00421-15-R-0011 Questions and Answers

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N00421-15-R-0011-0002_ETS.docx DOCX document
N00421-15-R-0011-0002_ETS_QA.docx DOCX document
N00421-15-R-0011-0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_-_Personnel_Qualifications.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_Labor_Categories_and_Requirements.pdf PDF
CDRL_A002_-_Project_Financial_Summary_ENG.pdf PDF
CDRL_A004_-_OPSEC_Plan_ENG.pdf PDF
CDRL_A001_-_Monthly_Financial_Summary_ENG.pdf PDF
CDRL_A003_-_Monthly_Status_Report_ENG.pdf PDF
CDRL_A005_-_Technical_Reports__ENG.pdf PDF
N00421-15-R-0011_ETS_RFP11-6-2015.docx DOCX document
Attachment_P6-_Prime_Subcontractor_Cost_Breakout_Spreadsheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_2_-_Personnel_Qualifications.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_7-_QASP.docx DOCX document
Attachment_P4_Past_Performance_Matrix.doc DOC document
Attachment_P5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Package_for_Services.doc DOC document
Attachment_P8_Fully_Burdened_Labor_Rates.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_4_-_CDRL_A001_Format.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_1_-_Labor_Categories_and_Requirments.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_CDRL_A002_Format.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_P7-_Subcontractor_Cost_Breakout_Spreadsheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
Questions_ _Answers_from_DRAFT_RFP_ _Industry_Day.docx DOCX document
AIR_543_Engineering_Pre-Solicitation_Conference-Industry_Day_Brief.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment_3_-_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-_Funding_Types.docx DOCX document
N00421-15-R-0011_ETS_DRAFT_RFP.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A003_-_Monthly_Status_Report_ENG.pdf PDF
Attachment_P8_Fully_Burdened_Labor_Rates.xls XLS spreadsheet
CDRL_A005_-_Technical_Reports__ENG.pdf PDF
Attachment_1-_Labor_Categories_and_Requirements.pdf PDF
CDRL_A004_-_OPSEC_Plan_ENG.pdf PDF
Attachment_7-_QASP.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A001_-_Monthly_Financial_Summary_ENG.pdf PDF
Attachment_P7_-Subcontractor_Cost_Breakout_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_P5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Package_for_Services.doc DOC document
Attachment_P6-_Prime _Subcontractor_Cost_Breakout_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4_-_CDRL_A001_Format.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL_A002_-_Project_Financial_Summary_ENG.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Personnel_Qualifications.pdf PDF
Attachment_P4_Past_Performance_Matrix.doc DOC document
Show all 41

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

N00421-15-R-0011 AIR 5.4.3 Engineering Technical Support Services Questions & Answers

1. QUESTION:

Section L, Part B, Section 3.0 Past Performance, Paragraph 3.1, May the Offeror submit up to 3 past performance references for itself, and also 3 for each principal subcontractor and critical team member? Or is the total number of past performance references (covering both prime and subcontractors) limited to 3?

ANSWER:

Both the prime and subcontractor should provide summaries, and all references should be for prime contracts. Please see the Amended Solicitation 0001 for details.

2. QUESTION:

Section L, Part B, Section 3.0 Past Performance, Paragraph 3.1: States the Offeror shall submit 3 summaries of past performance. Section 3.1 goes on to state that “All summaries should be efforts performed by the prime contractor”. Would the Government please clarify whether the 3 Past Performance summaries should be contract efforts performed “BY” the Prime Contractor (i.e. Prime Offeror) only – or – that the 3 Past Performance Summaries may include efforts by the Prime Offeror or its principal subcontractors or critical team members, performing “AS” the prime contractor for the effort?

ANSWER:

Please refer to the Government's response to Question 1.

3. QUESTION:

Section L, Part B, Section 4.3 Cost/price Information, Paragraph 4.3.4.3.2. Would the Government please clarify direction regarding escalation of labor?

ANSWER:

The solicitation will be amended to provide clarification of the escalation on labor. Please refer to the Amended Solicitation 0001 for details.

4. QUESTION:

Attachment 1, Category Number 19 states that the Subject Matter Expert IV has 15,360 regular hours. This annual total is equivalent to 8 FTEs at 1920 hours per FTE. Attachment 2, Category 19.2 Subject Matter Expert IV has two labor category descriptions—19.2.1 (Aviator SME) which is applicable to 4 FTEs, and 19.2.2 (UAV SME) which is applicable to 3 FTEs. What is the labor category description that the eighth FTE should be associated with?

Attachment (2) Labor Category 19.2.1 (Aviator SME) is applicable to five (5) full time equalivants. Please refer to the Amended Solicitation 0001 for details.

5. QUESTION:

Section L, Part B, Section 3.0 Past Performance, Paragraph 3.2: If an Offeror has received recent CPAR evaluations on a past performance reference, is completion of the past performance questionnaire still required?

Offeror are permitted to submit copies of their recent CPAR evaluations.

6. QUESTION:

Section L, Part A, Paragraph 2.2 states the Offeror will provide 1 complete printed copy and 1 complete electronic copy of the proposal to the PCO. The table under Paragraph 3.1 states 3 copies for Volumes 2 and Annex 1. Will the Government please provide clarification and specify the number of proposals that need to be submitted for each format, i.e., electronic and paper?

The solicitation will be amended to distinguish between electronic and paper copy submission formats in table 3.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT AND VOLUMES. Please see the Amended Solicitation 0001 for details.

7. QUESTION:

Would the Government please clarify the discrepancy between Attachment (1) and Attachment (2), for Category 7- Testing Support. Attachment (1) shows a Junior Systems Analyst and Systems Analyst., however, Attachment 2 shows a Junior Systems Analyst and Senior Systems Analyst.

Please refer to the Amended Solicitation 0001 for changes made to Attachment (1) and Attachment (2).

8. QUESTION:

Would the Government please clarify the discrepancy between Attachment (1) and Attachment (2), under Category- 8 Project Technician. Attachment (1) shows Engineering Technician II and III and Attachment (2) shows Engineering Technicians I and III.

Please refer to the Amended Solicitation 0001 for changes made to Attachment (1) and Attachment (2).

9. QUESTION:

Why do the labor categories shown on the P-6 and P-7 Attachments differ slightly than those shown in Attachments (1) and (2)?

Offerors shall match the appropriate labor category from Attachment (1) and Attachment (2) and utilize the labor category for Attachments P-6 and P-7 as applicable.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .