N00253-13-R-0013-0001.pdf
PDF 115 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TECHNOLOGY INSERTION HARDWARE (TIH 16/18) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0025313R0013
About this file
N00253-13-0013-0001_Amendment 0001
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Amendment 0001 is issued to provide Government response to contractor-submitted questions.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
L 1 5
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 28-Aug-2013
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00253-13-R-0013
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
19-Aug-2013
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
28-Aug-2013
CODE
NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER
ATTN: KATIE HARRIGAN
KATHLEEN.HARRIGAN@NAVY.MIL
610 DOWELL STREET, BLDG 206
KEYPORT WA 98345
N00253 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N00253-13-R-0013
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 0001 Q&A
No. RFP
Section
Document
Date
Sub-
Section
Page Title Requirements
Description
Comment/
Question
Government
Response
RFP
Change
1 Section
L
8/20/13 1.0 102 General “Reference material will be provided by the
Navy on an
Electronic
Technical
Information
Center (E-
TIC).”
Current E-
TIC is missing ancilliary data to the drawing packages such as the
PIDS, CIS’s, ICD’s. When will this data be provided?
The following items are planned to be posted by 30
August on
ETIC: the
Installation
Control
Drawings
(ICDs) and
Configuration
Item
Specifications
(CISs) relevant to each unit described in the sample tasks and the
Prime Item
Development
Specification
(PIDS) for
AN/UYQ-
70(V)
None
2 Section
L
8/20/13 2.1 105 Proposal
Format and
Delivery
Every paragraph, figure, and table shall be numbered.
We typically number proposal sections to the lowest level of the outline, but not each paragraph within the text. Please confirm that the intent of this instruction is to provide heading numbering at
The intent of the instruction is for offerors to provide heading numbering at a granular level to facilitate review.
Numbering of the proposal sections to the lowest level of the outline, as addressed in the comment, is sufficient to
None
No. RFP
Section
Document
Date
Sub-
Section
Page Title Requirements
Description
Comment/
Question
Government
Response
RFP
Change a granular enough level to facilitate review, but that it is not required to separately number each paragraph within a numbered section.
meet the
Section 2.1 proposal format requirement.
3 Section
L
8/20/13 2.3 108
Volume I -
Technical
The design and development scope for
Sample Task 2 clearly defines a
TI baseline migration (TI-10 to TI-16) and affected units to address
(ECDWS,
SECD, MFS,
HDW). It then includes a forward reference to
Sample Task 5 for the affected platform classes.
Sample Task 5 identifies the same equipment and platform, but it does not include a backward reference to
Sample Task 2 for the TI baselines.
Is Sample
Task 5 bounded by the Sample
Task 2 baseline migration
(TI-10 to TI-
16), or must the production plan address kits for all possible TI baseline migrations for that platform
(e.g., TI-08 to
TI-16, TI-12
to TI-16)?
Sample Task 5 is bounded by the Sample
Task 2 baseline migration (TI-
10 to TI-16).
Other baseline migrations do not need to be addressed in
Sample Task
5.
None
4 Section
L
8/20/13 2.5 125 Volume III
– Past
Performance
Proposal
1. A list of the last five (5) relevant contracts completed by the Offeror, and up to two (2) relevant contracts for each major subcontractor
Please explain the intended difference between items 1 and 2.
Is the intent that the
Offeror submit up to
5 relevant
Item 1 requests references on contracts
COMPLETED
within the past five years.
Item 2 requests references on
Document
Date
Sub-
Section
Page Title Requirements
Description
Comment/
Question
Government
Response
RFP
Change
(subcontracts of
$2,000,000 or more per year
(hereinafter all such firms are referred to a
“major subcontractor”)), within the past five (5) years that represent similar size, scope, and technical complexity to the efforts described herein.
2. The information as set forth above for any current contract that has been underway for six (6) months or longer.
completed contracts and
5 relevant current contracts?
contracts
CURRENTLY
in performance for at least six months.
5 Exhibit
A
8/19/2013 CDRL
A031
29 Product
Drawings /
Models and
Associated
Lists
Block 4:
Drawing shall be submitted in a Government specified commercial engineering package.
Please clarify what file formats constitute a
Government specified commercial engineering package.
MS Word or
Adobe
Acrobat files are sufficient.
None
6 Exhibit
A
8/19/2013 CDRL
A003, A004, A009, A010, A011, A012, A016, A017, A018, A020, A022, A023
A024, A026, A028, Pg
3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, Block 8 Approval Code
= A
Please clarify the
Government’s
Approval process regarding
CDRLs with an Approval
Code = A.
Please clarify if the CDRL is considered approved if a formal disposition is not received
Once the contractor sends the data to the government, the data is routed to the appropriate expert for review. The expert reviews the data within the timeframe specified in
DD Form
1423-1 and
Document
Date
Sub-
Section
Page Title Requirements
Description
Comment/
Question
Government
Response
RFP
Change
A029, A030
A031, A032, A033
A034, A035, A036, A037
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, within the timeframe defined in DD
Form 1423-1.
Please clarify the contractor’s requirements to adjudicate comments and revise
CDRLs.
provides comments.
The government sends a letter to the contractor approving or rejecting the data. Should the government not approve/reject the data within the specified timeframe, data with quality issues is not required to be revised.
If the government reviews the data within the specified timeframe and identifies issues, the contractor will revise the data and resubmit it.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .