Govt Response to Offeor Questions6.4.26.pdf
PDF 265 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Shipboard Sensor Support
- Solicitation number
- N0017826R3000
About this file
This document is a Government Response to Offeror Questions for the Shipboard Sensor Support task order (N0017826R3000). The solicitation is a full and open competitive task order to be awarded through SeaPort NxG under NAICS code 541330 with a five-year period of performance. This is a follow-on to the incumbent contract held by Amentum Services (N0017822F3012). The effort will be awarded as a firm fixed-price or cost-plus task order structure, though specific pricing terms are not detailed in this Q&A document.
The government addressed six offeror inquiries clarifying solicitation requirements. Key clarifications include: the past performance recency requirement will remain at three years from solicitation release (not extended to five years), with an Acceptable/Unacceptable rating approach where offerors will not be deemed unacceptable solely due to lack of recent past performance; all documents posted in PIEE represent final versions; facility clearance requirements are specified in the Statement of Work (Attachment 01); and the intentional omission of SOW Section C.3.6 from Technical Approach response requirements on Page 66 of the RFP. Offerors must submit three past performance references reflecting recent experience within the last three years, plus one additional reference for each subcontractor performing more than 10% of total labor hours.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Gov’t Response to Offeror Questions Shipboard Sensor Support
N0017826R3000
1. Section L, para 3.2 of the Draft Solicitation (dated 13 May 2026) stipulates “…Offerors shall provide three past performance references, if available, which shall reflect recent experience performed within the last three years [emphasis added] of the solicitation release date…In addition to these three past performance references, Offeror shall submit one additional past performance reference for each subcontractor proposed to perform more than 10% of the total labor hours, if available.”
Will the Government consider revising the experience currency requirement from three years to five years in order to increase the number of qualified offerors?
Answer: At this time the Government is not considering revising the past performance recency definition from three to five years. Please note that this solicitation includes recent changes to NAVSEA’s approach to Past Performance for SeaPort RFPs, where
Past Performance will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. An Offeror will not be considered unacceptable based on a lack of recent/relevant Past Performance.
2. Upon review of the B50 recompete solicitation in PIEE, we realized there was no final
SOW included. Will that be provided as an update?
Answer: All documents posted in PIEE are in their final versions.
3. There was an FCL requirement listed in the previous solicitation. Does the government wish to have this same requirement on the current RFP?
4.
Answer: The facility clearance requirement is specified in the Statement of Work, which is Attachment 01 of the RFP.
5. SOW Section C.3.6 was omitted from the Technical Approach response requirements on
Page 66 of the RFP. Was C.3.6 omitted intentionally?
Answer: This is correct. It is intentional to list specific SOW requirements rather than all.
6. I have been reading into the subject opportunity and see that the effort is planned to be competed as a full and open task order through SeaPort NxG under the NAICS 541330 with a five year period of performance. Is this an accurate understanding of the
Gov’t Response to Offeror Questions Shipboard Sensor Support
N0017826R3000 requirement? Additionally, I see that the effort is planned to be a follow-on to a contract held by Amentum Services (N0017822F3012.) Is this the correct incumbent contract?
Answer: The answer is yes to both questions.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .