N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (5) - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 22 KB Posted

Attached to
Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services (CANES) Training Virtual Environment
Solicitation number
N00039-18-R-0009
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N00039-18-R-0009 - DD2345 - Export Controlled Information Instruction (Rev 1).pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (2a) - TO 0001 - CANES Training VE SOW - Rev 04 - 04-12-18-REV.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (8) CANES Training VE Technical Documents (REV 1).pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (1) - CANES Training VE Base SOW - Rev 03 - 04-04-18.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Exhibit (A) - CANES Training VE - CDRL DD1423 - Rev 1 - 02-26-18.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - RFP QA Set 3 - 5 Apr 18 - Final.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (2) - DRAFT TO 0001 - Rev 02 - 04-04-18.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Amendment 0008 - 04-19-18.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - PKI Certificate Information.docx DOCX document
N00039-18-R-0009 - Amendment 0001 - 1 March 2018.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - RFP QA Set 2 - 20 Mar 18 - Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - RFP QA Set 6 - 18 Apr 18 - Final.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Amendment 0002 - 3-20-18.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (7) - Small Business Participation Data - Rev 01 - 3-8-18.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - RFP Q&A Set_1 - 01 March 18.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Conformed RFP through Amendment 0008 - 04-19-18.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - RFP QA Set 4 - 9 Apr 18_Final.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - GWBS Mod F.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00039-18-R-0009 - Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (3) -N00039-18-R-0009 - DD254 - 11-07-17.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (6) - Reference Information Sheet - Rev 1.doc DOC document
N00039-18-R-0009 - Amendment 0007 - 04-18-2018.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (2b) -Exhibit (A) - TO 0001 - CANES Training VE - CDRL 1423 - Rev 1 - 02-26-18.pdf PDF
N00039-18-R-0009 - Attachment (4) - Section L Cost Summary Spreadsheet - Rev 02 - 4-4-18.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00039-18-R-0009 - RFP QA Set 5 - 13 Apr 18 - Final.pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOLICITATION N00039-18-R-0009

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

N00039-18-R-0009

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 1 of 4
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command
SPAWAR CONTRACTS, 4301 PACIFIC HIGHWAY

SAN DIEGO, CA 92110-3127

Return to:

TO: Susana Wiker AGENCY: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command EMAIL: susana.l.wiker@navy.mil

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive contract. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service - Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence;

b.) Cost Control - Within budget, current accurate and complete billings, actual cost/rates reflect closely to negotiated cost/rates, cost efficiency measures, adequate budgetary internal controls;

c.) Schedule - Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed;

d.) Business Relationships - Effective management, businesslike correspondence, responsive to contract requirements, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, proactive, effective Contractor recommended solutions, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program;

e.) Customer Satisfaction - Satisfaction of end users with the Contractor’s service.

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, and any other pertinent information, within ten (10) working days. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you very much!

Karen Rainville
Contracting Officer

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

N00039-18-R-0009

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 2 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE:

Name (print) Code Phone

Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:

ACCEPTABLE
UNACCEPTABLE

a.) QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

b.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

Competition Sensitive For Official Use Only

N00039-18-R-0009 [DATE]

ACCEPTABLE
UNACCEPTABLE

c.) SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

d.) BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(4) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

e.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(1) The products/services provided adequately met the needs of the program.

(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the Technical Point of Contact.

(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

N00039-18-R-0009

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 4 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

NOTE: For statements indicating “Not Acceptable,” please provide a brief explanation on the NARRATIVE EXPLANATION page.

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:

File details come from the government source that posted it.