Attachment J-1 Pre-Proposal Information Form Rev 4.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00024-21-R-4202
About this file
This document contains questions and answers regarding Solicitation N00024-21-R-4202 for operation and maintenance of inactive vessels in Bremerton, Washington and a detachment in San Diego, California. The solicitation requires maintenance and upkeep of inactive ships, including tasks such as cleaning, repairs, material handling, and security. It also involves management and oversight functions. The questions clarify details around level of effort, cost proposals, key personnel requirements, and correct references to attachments in the solicitation document. Amendments to the solicitation are recommended to address inconsistencies and requests for additional information. The response date for proposals was June 16, 2022. The Navy is the issuing agency.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 95 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Bremerton InactiveShips RFP Q&A
| No. | Date Submitted | Source Document | Page | Section/Paragraph | Question | RFP Recommendation? | |
| 1 | 5/20/22 | RFP and attachments | 12,13,14,16 are examples | C.1.0,C.2.2,C.2.3,C.2.5,C.3.3.3,C.3.4.3 are examples | Attachments are not correctly referred to in text of RFP. It appears that J-1 in first 4 example paragraphs should be J-3. Attachment 4 referenced in C.3.3.3 appears to be J-6.Attachment 5 in C.3.4.3 should be J-7. Most other references to attachments in the RFP also do not appear correct. | Clarify and correct. | See amendment 3 |
| 2 | 5/20/22 | RFP, Attachment J-4 | Pg 88 | Section J and Attachments | Section J lists an attachment 4. Attachments include two files named J-4, neither of which relate to an attachment 4 or J-4 citation in section C | Clarify/correct CDRL numbering and references | See amendment 3 |
| 3 | 5/20/22 | RFP | 16 | C.3.4.3 | The location of services cited in this paragraph do not appear to be near the location for delivery of services. | clarify location | See amendment 3 |
| 4 | 5/20/22 | Attachment 20 | Cover page in attachment indicates it is the Quality Surveillance plan for Pearl Harbor Inactive Ships site. | clarify or provide correct information | See amendment 2 | ||
| 5 | 5/20/22 | Attachment 10 | File name says it is tools and material at Pearl Harbor | Clarify or provide correct information | See amendment 2 | ||
| 6 | 5/20/22 | Exhibit A | CDRLs 41-44 and 49-52 are not included | Provide these CDRLs | See amendment 2 | ||
| 7 | 5/20/22 | Exhibit A | In each CDRL the Section C reference citation appears incorrect. In most cases the appropriate paragraph appears to be the one that is one digit higher in second numeric spot. For example CDRL A001 references C.3.4.1 when correct reference appears to be C.3.5.1 | Correct referenced paragraphs in CDRLs | |||
| 8 | 5/20/22 | Exhibit A, RFP | A015 is not referenced in the RFP section C. Paragraph C.5.2.2.1 which appears to be the correct paragraph references other non applicable CDRLs | Correct or clarify CDRL requirement | |||
| 9 | 5/20/22 | Exhibit A | A021 references C.5.1.5.2.12, this paragraph does not exist in the RFP section C. There is no reference in any other paragraph to this report subject. Note - There are no sub paragraphs to paragraph 5.1. This is also apparent in several other CDRL references. | clarify what is expected by CDRL |
Bremerton RFP 5.18
| No. | Date Submitted | Source Document | Page | Section/Paragraph | Question | RFP Recommendation? | ||
| 1 | 5/18/22 | RFP & Attachment J-2 Cost Element Summary | Tab - Cost Summary | In the RFP (Section 4.2. Cost Proposal Instructions, 7. LEVEL OF EFFORT, TABLE L-3 ) Total hours do not match Attached J-2 (Tab - Cost Summary) CLIN 0X01 Hours Total | Verify the accuracy of the Total Hours | See Amendment 4 | ||
| 2 | 5/18/22 | RFP & Attachment J-2 Cost Element Summary | In the RFP (Section 4.2. Cost Proposal Instructions, 7. LEVEL OF EFFORT, TABLE L-3 ) Total hours does not match Attached J-2 (Tab - Cost Summary) Summary of Gov't Estimated Hours by CLIN and Year | Verify the accuracy of the Total Hours | See Amendment 4 | |||
| 3 | 5/18/22 | RFP & Attachment J-2 Cost Element Summary | In the RFP (Section 4.2. Cost Proposal Instructions, 7. LEVEL OF EFFORT, TABLE L-3 ) hours for Base and Option Years by Labor Categories does not match Attached J-2 (Tab - GOV Directed LOE ) LOE - Bremerton Table | Verify the accuracy of the Total Hours | See Amendment 4 | |||
| 4 | 5/18/22 | Attachment J-2 Cost Element Summary | Attached J-2 (Tab - GOV Directed LOE ) has LOE for Norfolk | Correct location name and verify LOE | See Amendment 4 | |||
| 5 | 5/18/22 | Attachment J-2 Cost Element Summary | Attached J-2 (Tab - 0X02 ) Gov't Provided Travel Cost does not match RFP (Section 4.2. Cost Proposal Instructions, 6. Cost Proposal Structure) Table L-2 Bremerton Material, Travel, & ODCs | Verify the accuracy of the ODC Dollars | See Amendment 4 | |||
| 6 | 5/18/22 | Attachment J-2 Cost Element Summary | RFP - Section B CLIN 0002 - Bremerton ODC for all Years do not match RFP (Section 4.2. Cost Proposal Instructions, 6. Cost Proposal Structure) Table L-2 Bremerton Material, Travel, & ODCs | Verify the accuracy of the ODC Dollars | See Amendment 4 | |||
| 7 | 5/18/22 | RFP | Pgs 34-40 & Pg. 16-17 of Amendment 0001 | Section C.6 & Section L 4.2 Level of Effort Table L-3 | There are a few labor positions listed in Section C Personnel that are not listed in the Level of Effort table | |||
| - Electrical Foreman / Operations Manager / Production Supervisor / Warehousemen / Custodian / Equipment Maintenance Mechanic / Security Inspector Watch Stander. | Clarify if these should be included in the LOE. | See Amendment 4 | ||||||
| 8 | 5/18/22 | RFP | Pgs 34-40 & Pg. 16-17 of Amendment 0001 | Section C.6 & Section L 4.2 Level of Effort Table L-3 | There are a few labor positions listed in the Level of Effort Table that are not listed in Section C Personnel | |||
| - Assistant Maintenance Manager / Clerk Typist / QA Monitor / Mechanic Supervisor / Welder Supervisor / Ship Fitter Welder Helper / Site Manager / Assistant Site Manager / Det. Marine Inspector / Det. Electrician / Det. Marine Mechanic / Det. Laborer | Clarify if these should be included in Section C. | See Amendment 4, detachment roles do not have separately attributable requirements | ||||||
| 9 | 5/18/22 | RFP & Attachment J-23 | Pg 33. & Pg 7 of Amendment 0001 | Section C.6.3 & Section L.3.2.1 Key Personnel | The Maintenance Manager is listed as Key Personnel under Section L.3.2.1 Key Personnel, but in Section C.6.3 and Attachment J-23 the Maintenance Manager is not listed as Key Personnel. | Clarify if the Maintenance Manager is Key Personnel. | See Amendment 4, the Key personnel are detailed in the SOW. Please disregard attachment J-23 | |
| 10 | 5/18/22 | RFP | Pg 16 of Amendment 0001 | Section 4.2, Paragraph 7 Level of Effort | The estimate manhours total in the first paragraph do not match Table L-3 | Verify accuracy of the Hours, and calculation on the Total. | See Amendment 4 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .