Attachment J-1 Performance Work Statement 20 Jan 2020.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0002420R6303
About this file
The Performance Work Statement outlines the requirements for the detailed design, fabrication, and installation of a Waterside Security Barrier System at three commercial shipyards located in San Diego Bay for the Naval Sea Systems Command. The effort includes engineering design, material procurement, fabrication, and installation of the WSB system in accordance with the submitted design, as well as training on system maintenance and operation and an initial suite of spare parts. The Contractor must provide design documentation, complete fabrication and installation, conduct training, and supply spare parts. Key deliverables involve design reports, specifications and drawings due within 60 and 90 days of award. The Contractor shall install the WSB system at General Dynamics, BAE Systems, and Huntington Ingalls Industries shipyards per the requirements.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
20 January 2020
DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
for
Design-Build of Waterside Security Barriers in San Diego for General Dynamics (National Shipyard Service Company-- NASSCO), BAE Systems Maritime (BAE), and Huntington-Ingalls Industries (HII)
1.0 OBJECTIVE
The objective of this Performance Work Statement (PWS) is to specify the requirements for the design-build of a Waterside Security Barrier (WSB) system at three commercial shipyards located in San Diego Bay.
The contract will include the engineering design of the waterfront barrier system, the procurement of material, fabrication, and installation of the WSB system in accordance with the submitted design (CLIN 0001), the training of personnel on the maintenance and operation of the new WSB system (CLIN 0002), and an initial suite of spares and repair parts (CLIN 0003).
This PWS provides detailed requirements for the required work. The Contractor shall:
1. Provide a detailed design for the WSB system at each shipyard, with the documentation and procedures for each work task required to satisfy the contract requirements.
2. Provide documentation demonstrating that the WSB design solution meets the minimum performance requirements delineated in section 2.1.
3. Complete the required fabrication and installation of the WBS system.
4. Provide training on maintenance and operation of the WBS system.
5. Provide an initial suite of spare and repair parts.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
This requirement is for the detailed design, fabrication, and installation of a WSB system for the following commercial shipyards in San Diego bay:
1. General Dynamics (NASSCO);
2. BAE Systems Inc.;
3. Huntington-Ingalls Industries (HII).
Enclosure C-1 describes these sites. Figure 1 shows the master layout plan of the WSB system for all three shipyards.
2.1 Minimum Performance Requirements for Waterside Security Barriers The Contractor shall validate WBS system performance through actual test data, modelling/simulation, or other means acceptable to the Government and provide documentation of this validation. The Navy has issued minimum standards for waterside security barriers that protect U.S. Navy assets. This design/build project requires that the WSB system meet the performance requirements listed in Table 1.
Figure 1. Complete WSB Layout for HII, BAE and NASSCO
Table 1. Summary of Waterside Security Barrier Requirements
Attribute Type Description Requirement Force Protection (kinetic energy stopping power)
Minimum stopping power energy 3.14 million ft.-lbs.
Force Protection (kinetic energy stopping power)
Percent of stopping power retained after max of 3 impacts by threat vessel
97% of total effectiveness
Survivability (environmental impacts)
System shall withstand stresses generated by environmental conditions as shown in Table 2
See Table 2
Survivability (environmental impacts)
System shall remain upright & floating in the conditions listed in Table 2
See Table 2
Survivability (towing)
System shall be able to be towed up to a speed of 5 knots in the conditions shown in Table 2
See Table 2
Survivability (connection redundancy)
System shall not contain any single-points of failure
Back-Up Connectors
Force Protection (threat delay)
System shall delay an attacker (excluding use of explosives)
5 minutes
Force Protection (small threat prevention)
System shall prevent the passage small craft such as sea kayaks
Small craft exclusion
Survivability (observation)
System shall allow watch standers to observe threat craft staging on other side of WSB with the naked eye.
Minimized blockage of through-visibility Vessel Operation – Through Access
Designated barrier segments shall be capable of opening and closing as gates. All segments and moorings buoys must be removable by some means to allow infrequent vessel handling evolutions.
Vessel access and maneuvering
Navigational Suitability Shall feature signage/lighting per maritime law USCG Compliant Availability (design life) Shall be constructed of materials that have a
1) useful life of:
2) require overhaul after:
15 years ≥ 5 years
Sustainment (interchangeability)
Individual barrier modules shall be interchangeable to the maximum extent possible.
Module Interchangeability
Sustainment (reduced total operating cost)
Components shall be resistant to UV, corrosion, fouling, impact, abrasion, cracking.
Meets Unified Facilities Criteria or applicable ASTM Standards for specified use
Sustainment (reduced total operating cost)
All materials shall be corrosion resistant or coated /painted
Meets Unified Facilities Criteria or applicable ASTM Standards for specified use
Sustainment (transportability)
Disassembled barrier shall be transportable by commercial means
Transportability
Sustainment (environmentally suitable)
Shall be designed in full compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations
Environmental compliance
3.0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
The following are requirements that have been stipulated by the Navy and the commercial shipyards for the design of a WSB system to be installed at their facilities.
Specific design criteria for each of the three shipyards are provided below. The Contractor shall utilize the most economical order of operations for completing the project.
The design tasks are summarized below and specified in further detail in Enclosure C-3.
The Contractor shall complete and deliver to the Government the required draft design no later than 60 calendar days after contract award.
3.1 Common Design Specifications for All Three Shipyards
The commercial shipyards in San Diego require a water barrier system that can be periodically removed in its entirety and then reinstalled. This is necessary to allow certain shipyard operations. The bottom moorings may remain in place if they do not pose a hazard to navigation. The Contractor can assume that shipyard divers are available to disconnect mooring components to assist in meeting this requirement. The shore terminations are not required to be removable. The following performance specifications are identical for all three locations:
3.1.1 WSB Moorings
The Contactor shall design the WSB moorings to meet the performance specifications given in Table 1 and the environmental design conditions in Table 2. Each shipyard has provided the mooring coordinates for the existing lines of demarcation as now deployed.
These coordinates define the security perimeter and in many cases the gate locations and widths that are required for vessel movements. Alternative mooring arrangements may be utilized in the design, provided they protect the same overall perimeter and meet the requirements for gate locations and minimum widths.
The WSB segments will move from side to side depending on the tide, wind, waves etc.
The mooring designs shall ensure that the WSB segments do not cross over adjacent property lines as defined by the security perimeter. Additionally, all moorings shall be designed to accommodate ship movements through the ability to be removed from their installed locations and then re-installed. The mooring anchors themselves may remain in place provided the Contractor can demonstrate that they will not impede safe navigation.
The WSB mooring design shall avoid and minimize environmental impacts, including, but not limited to, chain swinging and chain scour at the sea floor. The placement of moorings shall avoid submerged aquatic vegetated habitat, generally found in areas with a water depth of -15 ft. mean lower low water or shallower, to the maximum extent practicable.
The Contractor shall specify the equipment and methodology required for each mooring installation, temporary removal, and re-installation as well as the estimated time required for accomplishing that work. The Contractor’s specified work methods and equipment shall meet all applicable environmental regulations including emitted sound levels in San Diego Bay.
Table 2. Environmental Design Conditions
Parameter Operational Value
Survival Value
Hourly Wind Speed (include gusts in analyses) 26.3 knots 48.7 knots Current Speed 0.6 knots 0.6 knots Waves Hs (ft)/Tp (s) 2.9 ft/3.5 s 4.0 ft/4.7 s Low Water Below MSL MLW = -2.0 ft MLLW = -2.94 ft
NOTE -- Encl. C-3 provides guidance about how the shipyards prefer to remove and re-install the existing barriers.
NOTE – Driven pilings are not acceptable as moorings for this project due to their permanent nature. The moorings to be installed for this project must be removable.
3.1.2 Shore/Pier Terminations
The Contractor shall design each shore or pier termination in accordance with best commercial practices and the requirement to maintain a secure perimeter. Any gap between the shoreline or pier shall not exceed one foot. The terminations shall be designed so that the attached barrier segment can be disconnected by a workboat crew or diver to allow the complete removal of the segment as required for shipyard operations. This may be accomplished by any reasonable means (shackles, bolted connector flanges, latching mechanisms, etc.).
3.1.3 Barrier segment movement
Certain barrier segments must be designed to minimize their surface excursion. This is to prevent intrusion into nearby berths, navigation channels, or across commercial property lines. The Contractor shall constrain barrier movement as specified for each barrier segment. See Encl. C-3 for detailed instructions.
3.1.4 Gates
Gates are required at each activity for both small craft and ship movements.
Connections to mooring elements for segments designated as gates shall be designed with a latching mechanism that meets the minimum requirements of Table 1. All gate mechanisms shall be designed to allow the removal and re-connection of the entire WSB segment as required for shipyard operations. The Contractor shall design vessel gates to the specified widths at the indicated locations. The Contractor shall provide a detailed description of the designed gate system and its operating principals and procedures. The description shall include any operational limitations due to environmental conditions or any other factor. The gate system description shall also include any necessary equipment or infrastructure that may not be part of the gate itself, such as a barrier handling boat.
3.1.5 Design Report/Permitting
All Contractor submittals for this project shall be furnished to the Government in digital format and hard copy upon request. The Contractor shall prepare a design report documenting the design solution for each of the three shipyards. The design documents shall include sufficient information to provide a complete project description as required by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) regulations, including figures that meet USACE Los Angeles District maps and drawing standards. The report shall document the suitability of the design solution, the design process, and all assumptions, supporting calculations, and any other relevant data such as environmental impact avoidance and minimization measures. The report shall include an installation process including necessary coordination, installation sequencing, installation methodology, and required equipment. The report shall include a list, for each shipyard, of recommended spares and repair parts for the installed system. The recommended spares shall be further broken out by critical and routine spares. Critical and routine spares may be defined by the contractor. The report shall also document the minimum training requirements for operation and maintenance of the installed systems.
The written report shall be provided in MS Word 2016 format, with drawings of the design solution in AutoCAD 2016 format. The drawings shall provide detail down to the component level of the final design for moorings, shore terminations, and WSB elements sufficient to support a detailed technical evaluation against the project requirements. In order to expedite environmental permitting, the Contractor’s design report shall include a summary compilation of all components, their materials, location, whether on the surface or seafloor, and installation methods of the final design. In the event that supplemental information is required, the Contractor shall provide all submittals as requested by the contracting officer to support the successful permitting of the design solution. The Government will coordinate site visits to all three shipyards at a date mutually acceptable to all parties as early as is practicable.
3.2 Design Tasks for the Huntington-Ingalls Shipyard (HII)
See Figure 2 and the design task details in Enclosure C-3 for all WSB elements. The coordinates for all system moorings are located in Table 1 of Encl. C-3.
3.2.1 Task #1 – Design Shore terminations A and G
The Contractor shall design a solution for shore terminations A and G. These shore terminations shall be installed at or against the stone seawall. Figure 1 of Encl. C-3 provides a picture of the seawall at termination A. The shore terminations shall be designed using best commercial practices that meet all security criteria. Any gap between the termination and the shore shall not exceed one foot. In accordance with Section 3.1.2, these terminations must allow the WSB segments to be readily disconnected by a one or two person crew working from the shore or a boat.
3.2.2 Task #2 – Design all Mooring Elements for HII
The Contractor shall design a mooring solution for HII that results in the layout shown in Figure 2 and meets the requirements for gate locations and widths.
3.2.3 Task #3 – Design Small Boat Gates B-C and E-F
The Contractor shall design a solution for small boat gates approximately 50 feet wide at these locations. The gates shall hinge or open to the East. The gates shall be designed to be easily operated from a small boat with a two person crew.
Figure 2. WSB Layout for HII
3.2.4 Task #4 – Design WSB Segments A-B, C-D, D-E, and F-G
The Contractor shall design solutions for the segments defined by the points A-B, C-D, D-E, and F-G as shown in Figure 2. Note that segments C-D and D-E must function as ship gates providing clear openings of minimum width as listed in Table 3. Segments A- B and F-G need not function as gates but must be constrained to move no more than 10-ft from their centerline rest positions, due to nearby pier structures and to conform to commercial property lines.
Table 3 Segment lengths for HII
Segment Designation
Segment Length (ft)
Description
A-B 1094.0 North boundary B-C 65.0 Small boat gate C-D 586.0 Ship gate, full width D-E 550.0 Ship gate, full width E-F 65.0 Small boat gate F-G 1138.0 South boundary
3.3 Design Tasks at the BAE Shipyard (BAE)
See Figure 3 and design task details in Enclosure C-3. All coordinates for system moorings are located in Table 1 of Encl. C-3.
3.3.1 Task #5 – Design Shore terminations H and Q
The Contractor shall design a solution for shore terminations H and Q. The shoreline at the BAE shipyard is largely rip-rap, as shown in Figure 4 of Encl. C-3. The shore termination shall be designed using best commercial practices that meet all security criteria. Any gap between the termination and the shore shall not exceed one foot. In accordance with Section 3.1.2, these terminations must allow the WSB segments to be readily disconnected by a one or two person crew working from the shore or a boat.
Figure 3. Layout of WSB System for BAE Shipyard
3.3.2 Task #6 – Design All Mooring Elements for BAE Shipyard
The Contractor shall design a mooring solution for BAE that results in the configuration shown in Figure 3 and meets the requirements for gate locations and widths. Note that mooring point N must provide connections for three WSB segments as shown.
3.3.3 Task #7 – Design WSB segments H-I, I-J, J-K, K-L, L-M, M-N, N-O, O-P, & P-Q The Contractor shall design solutions for the segments defined by the points H through Q as shown in Figure 3. Note that segments K-L, L-M and M-N must function as ship gates providing clear openings of minimum width as listed in Table 4. Boundary segments J-K, N-O, O-P, and P-Q as listed in Table 4 need not function as gates but must be constrained to move no more than 20-ft from their centerline rest positions, due to nearby pier structures and to conform to commercial property lines. Boundary segments H-I and I-J likewise need not function as gates but must be constrained to move no more than 10-ft from their centerline rest positions.
Table 4. Segment Lengths for the BAE Shipyard Segment
Designation Segment Length (approximate ft)
Description
H-I 470.0 North boundary I-J 467.0 North boundary J-K 324.0 North boundary K-L 480.0 Ship gate, full width L-M 467.0 Ship gate, full width M-N 470.0 Ship gate, full width N-O 170.0 South boundary O-P 394.0 South boundary P-Q 404.0 South boundary
3.4 Design Tasks at the NASSCO Shipyard
See Figure 4 and design task details in Enclosure C-3. All coordinates for the existing system moorings are located in Table 1 of Encl. C-3.
3.4.1 Task #8 – Design Shore termination W
The Contractor shall design a solution for shore termination W. This termination shall be installed at a concrete quay wall as shown in figure 5. The shore termination shall be designed using best commercial practices that meet all security criteria. Any gap between the termination and the shore shall not exceed one foot. IAW section 3.1.2, these terminations must allow the WSB segments to be readily disconnected by a one or two person crew working from the shore or a boat.
3.4.2 Task #9 – Design all Mooring Elements for NASSCO Shipyard The Contractor shall design a mooring solution for HII that results in the layout shown in Figure 4 and meets the requirements for gate locations and widths.
Figure 4 WSB System at the NASSCO Shipyard
Figure 5. Location of Shore Termination W
3.4.3 Task #10 – Design WSB segments N-R, R-S, S-T, T-U, U-V, and V-W The Contractor shall design solutions for the segments defined by the points N through W as shown in Figure 4. Note that all segments with the exception of V-W must function as ship gates providing clear openings of minimum width as listed in Table 5.
Table 5. WSB Segment Lengths for NASSCO
Segment Designation
Segment Length (approximate ft)
Description
N-R 376.0 Ship gate, full width R-S 620.0 Ship gate, full width S-T 740.0 Ship gate, full width T-U 644.0 Ship gate, full width U-V 697.0 Ship gate, full width V-W 1315.0 South boundary
3.5 Fabrication and Installation
The Contractor shall provide all materials, ancillary materials, material procurement, material handling, fabrication, shipping, staging, assembly equipment, assembly labor, and overall project management and supporting documentation (i.e. project execution plan, safety and accident prevention plan, environmental protection plan, permit documentation, reports, etc.) as necessary to install the WSB design specified for each of the three shipyards. The Contractor shall provide a Marine Construction Supervisor who shall also be qualified and act as the Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) per the latest version of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers EM385-1-1, Safety and Health Requirements Manual.
NOTE – The Contractor shall anticipate a delay of approximately six months between the design process and construction to allow the Government to perform the necessary environmental analyses and obtain permits/authorizations based on the Contractor’s design and supporting documents. The Government will be responsible for the following requirements:
1. Analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act;
2. Rivers and Harbors Act permit(s) from USACE;
3. Clean Water Act water quality certification from Regional Water Quality Control
Board;
4. Coastal Zone Management Act consistency determination from the California
Coastal Commission;
5. Endangered Species Act and Essential Fish Habitat Consultations with National
Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as applicable.
6. Naval Ordnance Safety and Security Activity Explosives Safety Submission
Determination Request, as applicable. Naval Ordnance Safety and Security Activity Explosives Safety Submission Determination Request, as applicable.
The Contractor shall be responsible to obtain and comply with any additional federal, state and local permits and authorizations, as applicable. The Contractor shall not commence fabrication or onsite work prior to the receipt of all necessary authorizations and approval from the Government to begin work.
3.6 General Onsite Requirements.
The majority of this work will likely take place on the water or at the Contractor’s laydown area. While Contractor personnel are on site, they shall be responsible for securing all materials and equipment that may be stored at the shipyards during the project period of performance. The Government will assist the Contractor in establishing liaison with the proper shipyard offices to coordinate the stowage of materials and equipment. The Contractor shall be required to abide by all shipyard regulations, including but not limited to security, safety, environmental, fire, traffic, hazardous waste disposal, emergency spill actions, photography, heavy weather procedures and the operation of watercraft. Construction shall be in compliance with all project-specific environmental authorizations based on the Contractor’s design, to include acoustic emission regulations in San Diego Bay. The Contractor shall draft and submit a Local Notice to Mariners to the U.S. Coast Guard and the Government as specified in the permit(s) prior to the start of construction.
3.6.1 Security Checks
Routine security checks may be performed on the Contractor’s vehicles or vessels when entering the controlled restricted water areas of the San Diego shipyards. Hot work permits may be required for any welding performed onshore at the shipyard. The contract COR will assist with coordination if required.
3.6.2 Laydown Area and Worksite
The Government does not have a laydown area or worksite available on Government property in the area of the San Diego Shipyards. Therefore, the Contractor shall be required to utilize commercial spaces in the area. Laydown and worksite areas shall be identified in the Environmental Protection Plan described in section 3.11.3 herein.
3.7 Material Handling
The Contractor shall provide all material handling equipment to perform the tasks described in this PWS.
3.8 Crane Inspection and Safety
All cranes employed by the Contractor, both land and marine must be inspected and approved by a Navy Crane Center representative prior to commencing work onsite. All cranes must comply with the requirements of NAVFAC P-307; Weight Handling Equipment Program Management, in addition to any specific requirements the shipyards may have for cranes working at their facility. Information about such cranes shall be submitted per Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) A001. Rigging or lift straps must be certified and inspected. It will be to the Contractor’s benefit to have any cranes, overhead winches or rigging inspected prior to mobilization, because this will allow the crane owner to make any necessary repairs and avoid rejection at the work site. The contract COR will be available to coordinate with the Contractor and the Activity to have the crane inspected before arrival onsite.
The Contractor shall exercise extreme caution when lifting any mooring component. All lift plans shall be reviewed and approved by a designated contract representative before starting work. The project execution plan (PEP) shall include a detailed procedure for lifting, transferring and deployment of anchors and mooring components. See section
3.11.4 concerning required safety plans for crane operations.
3.9 Demobilization
Upon completion of this contract, the Contractor shall ensure all Government equipment and materials are stored properly as coordinated with the COR. The Contractor shall provide an accurate inventory of any spare WSB components stored at the worksite at the conclusion of the contract. All work areas shall be cleaned of debris and left in original condition. All construction materials, debris, trash, etc. shall be recycled or disposed of in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
3.10 Project Management
The Contractor shall provide overall project management, including project planning, scheduling, and coordination with Government and shipping agencies, to include tracking material shipments and cost reporting. Management responsibilities shall include:
3.10.1 Managing Subcontractors and Suppliers
The Contractor shall be responsible for selecting, managing, and coordinating subcontractors and material and equipment suppliers, as needed.
3.10.2 Managing Field Operations
The Contractor will be responsible for managing field operations, to include coordination with relevant offices at the three commercial shipyards, to ensure all operations are conducted in accordance with applicable operating procedures. These agencies include: Security, Port Operations, Fire, Safety, Environmental, and Facilities. The contract COR will assist with this coordination. The Contractor shall monitor field operations to ensure that work tasks are conducted in accordance with established Government and shipyard procedures for safety and environmental protection. The Government will fund, contract, schedule and manage pre- and post-construction biological surveys as required by permit(s). The Contractor shall coordinate the construction schedule with Government environmental staff to ensure that biological surveys are conducted per necessary protocols. Eelgrass is present within/in the vicinity of the project footprint. Construction activities shall avoid impacting the eelgrass to the maximum extent practicable and as required by the permit(s).
3.11 Plans, Reports, and Submittals
The required reports and submittals for the design portion of the contract are located in sections 3.11.1 and 3.11.2 as CDRLs A0001 and A0002. The required reports and submittals for the fabrication and installation portion of the contract are located in sections 3.11.3 through 3.11.9 as CDRLs A003 through A009. The Contractor shall be responsible for submission of all required CDRLs A001 through A011. Specific requirements of these CDRLs are as follows:
3.11.1 Design Report
The Contractor shall submit a design report per paragraph 3.1.5 and in accordance with CDRL A001. The draft report shall be submitted no later than 60 calendar days after contract award. The Government will review the report within 21 calendar days and provide feedback to the Contractor. The final report shall be submitted no later than 90 calendar days after contract award. The design report shall not be considered final until the Government has provided explicit approval of CDRL A001.
3.11.2 Design Specifications/Drawings
The Contractor shall submit design specifications and drawings per paragraph 3.1.5 and in accordance with CDRL A002. Design specifications shall be in an engineering format as working specifications and drawings for fabrication and installation of the complete WSB system. Drawings shall be in AutoCAD 2016 format, and any 3D models of the proposed system shall be in STEP or Autodesk Inventor format. The draft specifications and drawings shall be submitted no later than 60 calendar days after contract award.
The Government will review the specifications and drawings within 21 calendar days and provide feedback to the Contractor. The final versions shall be submitted no later than 90 calendar days after contract award. The design specifications and drawings shall not be considered final until the Government has provided explicit approval of
CDRL A002.
3.11.3 Project Execution Plan (PEP)
The Contractor shall prepare a PEP in accordance with CDRL A003. The plan shall identify the subcontractors, material, equipment, and planned schedules for executing the tasking of this PWS at the Activity. The PEP shall also contain:
1. Bill of materials;
2. Material & equipment delivery execution schedule;
3. Subcontractor Management Plan with the selected subcontractors that will be providing project support;
4. Procedures for compliance with most recent version of crane regulations (EM
385-1-1 and P-307), as applicable;
5. Welder certifications and welding inspection procedures (as applicable);
6. Material Certifications (as applicable) per CDRL A008;
7. Material packing procedures, to include material arrangements in containers and/or dunnage and tie-down requirements for shipping;
The PEP establishes the responsibilities of participating organizations and provides guidelines and procedures to be followed during the accomplishment of the work. All project schedules shall include all project milestones to document compliance with requirements identified in the RFP and all environmental permit(s)s and authorizations.
The Contractor shall submit a draft copy of the PEP to the Government no later than 30 calendar days after the initial site visit in accordance with CDRL A003. The Government will review the plan for approval within 10 calendar days and provide feedback to the Contractor. The final version of the PEP shall be submitted to the Government no later than 45 calendar days after the initial site visit in accordance with CDRL A003. The PEP and drawings shall not be considered final until the Government has provided explicit approval of CDRL A003.
3.11.4 Accident Prevention Plan (APP)
The Contractor shall submit an Accident Prevention Plan (APP) prior to commencing onsite work, in accordance with CDRL A004. The plan shall meet the minimum basic outline requirements specified in Appendix A of the EM385-1-1. The plan shall comply with the latest editions of CFR-29, Army COE EM385-1-1 and NAVFAC P-307 for any potential crane activity.
NOTE – The Contractor’s APP shall specify that, if a crane lift involves any lift point (clump bails, capture plates, etc.) that might be structurally compromised by corrosion, etc. then that lift will be declared a ’moderate risk’ and conducted as specified in
NAVFAC P-307.
The APP shall discuss in detail the safety requirements and procedures while conducting land- and water-based operations. The plan shall also address procedures for safely lifting barrier and mooring components of unknown condition, and shall include emergency telephone numbers in the event a worker is injured on the job.
Procedures for transportation of injured personnel to the nearest hospital shall be defined. Work cannot proceed until the APP has been accepted by the Government.
Pursuant to FAR clause 52.236-13: Accident Provision, Alt. I (NOV 1991), the Contractor shall meet with the contract Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and other designated Government representatives to discuss and develop mutual understandings relative to the safety requirements of Federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations.
The Contractor shall notify the COR immediately of any recordable occupational injury or illness, lost time, accident, or property damage of $1,000 or more. The Contractor shall submit OSHA Form 101 or 200, or other forms that contain the same information, for each recordable occupational injury or illness (first aid cases are not recordable), lost time, accident, or property damage of $1,000 or more, or which results in job site accidents, within 6 calendar days of an accident. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer immediately by telephone of any fatalities, major accidents resulting in five or more disabling injuries, or property damage/material losses over $100,000 for any one accident.
The Contractor shall conduct a daily safety briefing for all project personnel prior to the commencement of each day’s activities.
The Contractor shall submit a draft copy of the APP to the Government no later than 45 calendar days prior to starting work onsite. The Government will review the plan within 10 calendar days and provide feedback to the Contractor. The final version of the APP shall be submitted to the Government no later than 30 calendar days prior to starting work onsite. The APP shall not be considered final until the Government has provided explicit approval of CDRL A004. Work cannot proceed until the Government has approved the APP.
3.11.5 Environmental Protection Plan (EPP)
The Contractor shall submit an environmental protection plan prior to commencing work onsite, per CDRL A005. The plan shall address environmental protection requirements while conducting land- and water-based operations. Work cannot proceed until the Government has accepted the EPP. The EPP shall address the following:
1. Required permits and certifications.
2. Means and methods for implementation of avoidance and minimization measures and compliance with all environmental permits/authorizations, including minimizing turbidity, monitoring for the presence of green sea turtles (GST) and marine mammals, and protection of submerged aquatic vegetation, i.e. eelgrass.
3. Plan for the management of materials, debris, trash, dust, cement or concrete washings thereof, and oil or petroleum products and debris, including recovery of these substances due to an accidental discharge into waters of the US.
4. Locations of all equipment and material storage and staging areas, worksites, and transit routes.
5. Disposal of hazardous waste (as applicable).
6. Explosive Safety (as applicable).
The Contractor shall include in the EPP a section entitled ‘Hazardous Waste (HW) Plan’. The HW Plan shall identify the procedures for tracking any hazardous waste, either brought to the work site or generated at the work site, pursuant to FAR clause 52.223-3: Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data (JAN 1997). This includes a list of the HW planned for use at the site and procedures for the use, labeling, storage, and disposal of the HW.
For each HW identified, the Contractor shall include a discussion of response procedures in the event of a spill. The EPP shall include an appendix with the Safety Data Sheets (SDS’s) for all identified HW. A copy of the EPP shall be present at the project site at all times.
In accordance with US Navy HW minimization regulations, the Contractor shall substitute non-hazardous materials if possible to reduce the generation of HW, and include a statement of this substitution in the EPP.
The Contractor shall submit a draft copy of the EPP to the Government no later than 45 calendar days prior to starting work onsite. The Government will review the plan within 10 calendar days and provide feedback to the Contractor. The final copy of the EPP shall be submitted to the Government no later than 30 calendar days prior to starting work onsite. The EPP shall not be considered final until the Government has provided explicit approval of CDRL A005.
3.11.6 Daily Onsite Status Reports
The Contractor shall provide daily status reports when Contractor personnel are deployed to the worksite, in accordance with CDRL A006. The reports shall contain an accurate description of the tasks accomplished that day and those planned for the next workday. The reports shall provide data regarding presence or absence of GSTs or marine mammals within monitoring or shutdown distances of in-water construction, per the permit(s) and per the following standard best management processes:
1. The Navy and its Contractors shall instruct all personnel associated with the project of the potential presence of protected species and the need to maintain a 20-meter (m) buffer (or as defined by the permit(s)) and avoid collisions with sea turtles and marine mammals. All construction personnel are responsible for observing water-related activities for the presence of these species.
2. The Navy and its Contractors shall advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing sea turtles or marine mammals, which are protected under the ESA and the MMPA.
3. All stoppages and sightings of protected species within monitoring zones must be reported to the Navy Region Southwest Regional Environmental Coordinator’s office or any office as indicated in the permit(s) for inclusion in the annual report on the Maintenance and Construction Program.
The daily report shall include a list of the personnel onsite, working hours, weather, and summary photo documentation of the day’s activity. The Government will assist the Contractor to coordinate with the shipyards regarding camera use at their facilities. The report shall also include tasks planned for the next workday as well as any issues impacting the project execution, including planned or proposed resolution. Finally, the reports shall include the sum of hours worked by Contractor and subcontractor personnel during the reporting period. The reports shall be e-mailed to the contract COR by close of business on the following workday.
3.11.7 Monthly PM Status Reports
The Contractor shall provide monthly status reports for the duration of the contract, in accordance with CDRL A007. The reports shall contain an accurate description of the tasks accomplished that month and those planned for the next month along with an up-to-date schedule for the duration of the project. The report shall also include any issues impacting the project execution, including planned or proposed resolution. Finally, the reports shall include the sum of hours worked by Contractor and subcontractor personnel during the reporting period. The reports shall be e-mailed to the contract COR by close of business on the last workday of the month.
3.11.8 As-Built Documentation
The Contractor shall submit as-built drawings and documentation of the installed WSB system based on a post-construction survey and in accordance with CDRL A008. The Contractor shall provide an as-built site plan within 30 calendar days of job completion, with all coordinates geo-referenced. The geo-referenced coordinates must indicate the location of all new structures and their features, or the modification of existing structures and their features, within navigable waters. Post-installation bathymetry at each mooring location shall be included. All drawings shall be delivered in AutoCAD 2016 and PDF format.
The header of the as-built drawings and documentation should include the following information: project name, surveyor's name and company, area surveyed (acres), type of survey method, date of survey, geographic control points (for example:
latitude/longitude, plane coordinates), geographic coordinate system (use NAD83), geographic projection, units (use US Survey Feet), and tide gage location. For all subsurface structures include elevation (z coordinate) datum indicated as a negative below mean lower low water, and also indicate the survey system and bin sizes as appropriate.
Along with as-built drawings and documentation, contractor shall provide a technical manual that describes the operations, maintenance and sustainment of the system throughout its lifecycle. The technical manual shall contain the following information:
1. Introduction (functional overview, barrier layout, safety precautions)
2. System and Component Description (summary and purpose of each component in the WSB, barrier assembly plans)
3. Normal Gate Operation (routine and emergency modes of operation, equipment and personnel requirements for operation, safety and weather limitations, common operating errors)
4. Maintenance Procedures (routine and emergency maintenance procedures, description and illustration of worn or defective barrier components/ materials, corrosion protection plan, Component maintenance/ refurbishment plan)
5. Reference list.
The technical manual shall contain illustrations or images of the components and assemblies described.
3.11.9 Quality Control (QC) Documentation
The Contractor is responsible for the quality of all work performed under the resulting contract, including subcontracted products and services. This includes responsibility for administering an internal Quality Control Plan, administering self-inspections, and reporting on these elements. Contractor format for the Quality Control Plan shall follow ISO-9001:2015 standards. The Contractor shall submit quality control documentation for the proper fabrication, assembly, and installation of the WSB in accordance with CDRL A009.
4.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT, MATERIAL AND INFORMATION
4.1 Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)
No GFE will be provided for this contract.
4.2 Government Furnished Material (GFM)
No GFM will be provided for this contract.
4.3 Government Furnished Information (GFI)
No GFI will be provided for this contract.
4.4 Supplemental Information
Table 6 provides a list of the supplemental information provided by the Government for this PWS.
Table 6
Item #
Supplemental Information
PWS
Paragraph 1 Enclosure C-1 – Description of San Diego Shipyards 2.0 2 Enclosure C-3 – Work Task Instructions 3.0 (all)
5.0 CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)
CDRLs listed in Table 7 apply to the design of the WSB system while the CDRLs in Table 8 apply to the fabrication and installation of the WSB. All CDRLs will utilize DD Form 1423, as provided by the Government.
Table 7 System Design CDRLs
Table 8 Fabrication and Installation CDRLs
CDRL Deliverable Item
PWS
Paragraph Due Date
A001 Design Report (draft & final) (assumptions & criteria)
3.11.1
Draft: 60 calendar days after contract award Gov’t Review: 21 calendar days Final: 90 calendar days after contract award
A002 Design Specifications (Final Engineering Specs and Drawings)
3.11.2
Draft: 60 calendar days after contract award Gov’t Review: 21 calendar days Final: 90 calendar days after contract award
CDRL Deliverable Item
PWS
Paragraph Due Date
A003 Project Execution Plan 3.11.3
Draft: 30 calendar days after initial site visit Gov’t Review: 10 calendar days Final: 45 calendar days after initial site visit
A004
Accident Prevention Plan IAW EM385-1-1 Appendix A and
NAVFAC P-307
3.11.4
Draft: 45 calendar days prior to starting work Gov’t Review: 10 calendar days Final: 30 calendar days prior to starting work
6.0 SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURES
When the Contractor has verified that the WSB system is installed and fully functional, the Contractor shall submit a written request for an acceptance test to the COR, providing 5 calendar days advance notice. The COR, Government Technical Representative, NAVFAC and NAVSEA Representatives and shipyard representatives will witness the test. The acceptance test shall include operation of all gates at each of the three shipyards and a visual inspection of WSB components to include moorings.
The Contractor shall conduct the final acceptance test with gate operators present to demonstrate operation of gates within the WSB. The Government shall take possession of the system once all identified deficient items or incomplete work are verified complete and after the acceptance test is complete. Final acceptance will be documented and processed using a form DD-250.
7.0 MAJOR MILESTONES
The Contractor shall inform the contract COR upon completion of the project’s major milestones, as listed in Table 10.
Table 10 Major Milestones
Milestone Event 1 Complete the WSB design 2 Complete fabrication for first shipyard and mobilize for installation 3 Complete WSB install for first shipyard 4 Complete WSB install for second shipyard 5 Complete WSB install for third shipyard
A005 Environmental Protection Plan
3.11.5
Draft: 45 calendar days prior to starting work Gov’t Review: 10 calendar days Final: 30 calendar days prior to starting work
A006 Daily Onsite Status Reports
3.11.6 COB next working day when deployed at the Activity
A007 Monthly PM Status Reports
3.11.7 COB last working day of the month
A008 As-Built Documentation
3.11.8 30 calendar days after completion of on-site work
A009 Quality Control Plan
IAW ISO-9001:2015
3.11.9
Plan: 45 days prior to starting work Specific work task documentation:
3 working days after completing the related work task
B001 Training Materials 8.0 Concurrent with contractual acceptance of the installed WSB system.
C001 System Spares and Repair Parts List
9.0 Concurrent with contractual acceptance of the installed WSB system.
6 Delivery of Final Documentation and Deliverables
8.0 INITIAL TRAINING AND TRAINING MATERIALS
The Contractor shall develop a qualification standard for WSB operation and maintenance. After the completion of the WSB system at each shipyard the contractor shall provide initial training on operation and maintenance of the installed WSB system to Government and shipyard personnel under CLIN 0002 of the contract. The contractor shall also provide the written training materials necessary for the operation and maintenance of the installed WSB system in accordance with CDRL B001 under CLIN 0003. The training and qualification shall be conducted for three personnel at each shipyard. The training plan, materials, and qualification of shipyard personnel shall be completed after the installation of the WSB system and prior to contractual acceptance of the installed WSB system.
9.0 SYSTEM SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
The Contractor shall provide an initial suite of spares and repair parts for the installed systems, to be delivered under CLIN 0003 of the contract. The suite of spares and repair parts to be provided shall be derived from the list specified in the Design Report (paragraph 3.1.5) and submitted in accordance with CDRL C001. The quantity of spares shall be enough to sustain the system at each shipyard for a period of one year.
10.0 CONTRACT POINTS OF CONTACT
Points of contact regarding this contract are listed in Table 11.
Table 11 Points of Contact
Name & Title Activity & Address Contact Information Contracting Officer: Kevin Seger
Naval Sea Systems Command
(NAVSEA)
1333 Isaac Hull Ave. SE Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376-2060 kevin.seger@navy.mil 202-781-0894
Contract Specialist:
Jamie Oppenheimer
Naval Sea Systems Command
(NAVSEA)
1333 Isaac Hull Ave. SE Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376-2060 jamie.oppenheimer@navy.mil 202-781-3467
COR/NTR:
Michael Pollard
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Command (NAVFAC EXWC) 1000 23rd Ave. Port Hueneme, CA 93043 michael.j.pollard2@navy.mil 805-982-3855
11.0 SPECIAL SHIPPING, PACKAGING & HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS
The Contractor shall package and label all components before shipment to the Activity.
Small parts, fasteners, etc. may be packaged together and labeled accordingly. All components shall be packaged using best commercial practices to minimize damage and maximize efficiency in shipping. No metal-to-metal contact between dissimilar metals during shipping is acceptable. The Contractor shall take care to use packaging techniques and material that protects the coating on all parts. Any damage incurred during shipment shall be the responsibility of the Contractor, and shall be corrected by the Contractor with repair or replacement of the damaged component. Materials should be scheduled for delivery directly to the Contractor’s work site, as directed.
12.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE
Table 12 provides a ‘Performance Requirements Summary’, which outlines the performance standards, the acceptable quality levels (AQLs), and the methods of surveillance the Government will use to conduct quality assurance.
The Government is responsible for conducting the verification elements cited in the methods of surveillance column of the Performance Requirements Summary to determine whether the Contractor has met the stated performance standards and AQLs.
If the Contractor has not met the minimum requirements, the Contactor will be asked to develop a corrective action plan to show how and by what date it intends to bring performance up to the required levels.
Changes to performance standards, AQLs, and methods of surveillance will be incorporated only via contract modification completed by the contracting officer.
Table 12 Performance Requirements Summary
Required Services (Tasks)
Performance Standards
Acceptable Quality Levels
Methods of
Surveillance
Submit a PM report of scheduled, completed, and outstanding tasks monthly IAW CDRL A007
100% of reports accurately depict current status
Pass/Fail
File reviews, periodic inspections, random, observations, complaints
Administer quality control program including subcontractor management in accordance with QCP
IAW CDRL A010
Contractor is in compliance with QCP
File reviews, periodic inspections, random observations, complaints
Draft Safety, Environmental, and Project Execution Plans.
Contractor in compliance with PWS
Report Review
Final Safety, Environmental, and Project Execution Plans.
Comments implemented as noted by review
Report Review
ENCLOSURE C-1
WSB INSTALLATION AT THE SAN DIEGO SHIPYARDS
Description of the HII, BAE & NASSCO Shipyards in San Diego
1.0 Introduction. The following information provides a summary of these government contractors who perform major ship repair and maintenance for the U.S. Navy. These descriptions are derived from Internet or public domain sources. All three companies routinely service naval warships and certainly need the increased security provided by passive water barriers.
2.0 Location. Figure 1 shows locale of the three shipyards, HII, BAE and NASSCO.
The companies are located adjacent to each other on the eastern shoreline of San Diego Bay, just south of the downtown tourist region and south of the Coronado Bridge.
Figure 1 Locale of HII, BAE and NASSCO Shipyards
3.0 HII Fleet Support LLC, HII San Diego Shipyard Inc. HII Technical Solutions’ Fleet Support Group, hereafter referred to as ‘HII’, is located under the eastern terminus of the Coronado Bridge, as shown in Figure 1. This company has expertise in marine engineering analyses and design services; naval architecture studies; shipyard industrial engineering; HM&E/C4I installation and support services; and waterfront systems modernization, testing, and maintenance.
The HII shipyard in San Diego has craftsmen who are skilled in the arts of shipfitting, welding, pipefitting, machinery, repair, marine electrical repair and installation, sheet metal repair and fabrication, boiler repair, and preservation (blast and paint).
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .