N00024-17-R-4428_Modification_Amend_5.pdf

N0002417PR93057

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 5 revises the follow ing:

- Section B. B-1 Performance Incentive clause.

- Section I. 52.211-11 Liquidated Damages clause.

- Section L and M. Inter-port Differential.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 22

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 19-Sep-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002417R4428

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14-Aug-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-Sep-2017

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002417R4428

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 5

Amendment 5 revises the following:

- Section B. B-1 Performance Incentive clause.

- Section I. 52.211-11 Liquidated Damages clause.

- Section L and M. Inter-port Differential.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been modified:

B-1 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE

A. General

As it is in the Government’s interest to complete the USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG-79) DMP (inclusive of base and all option CLINs) ahead of schedule to allow the early delivery of the ship back to the Fleet, the Government is interested in incentivizing the early completion of the Key Events within the contractor’s control that the Government expects should be reasonably expected to lead to this outcome.

Key Event Milestones

Milestone # Milestone Milestone Completion Date Source

1 HM&E TURNOVER 4 to AIT PM_2017-0003_TPPC 2 HM&E Turnovers 5 to AIT PM_2017-0003_TPPC 3 Combat Systems Turnover 1 to AIT PM_2017-0003_TPPC 4 Combat Systems Turnover 2 to AIT PM_2017-0003_TPPC 5 Combat Systems Turnover 3 to AIT PM_2017-0003_TPPC 6 Combat Systems Turnover 4 to AIT PM_2017-0003_TPPC

All work required by Section C and Work Package SSP # TPPC-DDG79-MARMCN18-CN01associated with the Key Event milestones listed in the table above must be completed to be eligible for any incentive herein.

B. Available Incentive

The amount of any incentive payable to the Contractor, pursuant to this clause, shall be determined in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraph E using the evaluation factors set forth in paragraph C below. The total maximum incentive available pursuant to this clause is $2,000,000.00.

C. Incentive Evaluation

The milestone schedule in Reference PM_2017-0003_TPPC, including the schedule of milestones (1 through 6), reflect the Government’s critical path to complete the Availability. The Contractor shall complete all work required by Section C and Work Package SSP # TPPC-DDG79-MARMCN18-CN01 associated with the Key Event milestones listed above to be eligible for any incentive herein.

Award of this performance incentive will be determined in the following two step process:

For Milestones (1 through 6), the contractor must complete the work associated with each of the compartments associated with that milestone early to the specific compartment turnover to AIT date provided in Reference “PM_2017-0003_TPPC” to be considered early for the milestone overall.

To determine the extent that each Milestone (1 through 6) is completed early (D(x)), the number of days early that each compartment is completed must first be computed, using the following formula:

D(c)(x) = P(c)(x) – A(c)(x)

Where:

A(c)(x) = Actual completion date for compartment (c) within the milestone (x) P(c)(x) = Planned completion date for compartment (c) within the milestone (x), as provided in Reference

“PM_2017-0003_TPPC”

D(c)(x) = Days early completion for compartment (c) within the milestone (x) D(x) = The smallest value of D(c)(x) across all the compartments associated with that milestone.

Note 1: A(x) shall be based on the Government’s acceptance of the contractor meeting the requirements of Section C paragraph 3.5.

Table 1: Milestones Completion Table to Calculate D(x)

Planned

Completion Date P(c)(x)

Actual Completion Date A(c)(x)

Days Early Completion D(c)(x)

D(x)

Compartment / Milestone HM&E TURNOVER 4 to AIT 7

Electric Plant DIU 1 AUX 1 6/25/2018 6/17/2018 8 Propulsion DIU 4 MER 1 6/25/2018 6/14/2018 11

UCC 3 MER 1 6/25/2018 6/18/2018 7

ECU 1A and 1B MER 1 6/25/2018 6/16/2018 9 Repair 2 foundations installed, equipment loaded and painted iaw spec item

6/25/2018 6/17/2018 8

F/O, L/O & CRP valves associated with SA71604K in MER1. 1A/1B F/O Filt/Sep Outlet, #1MRG Pur Suct/Fill, #1CRP Pur Suct/Fill

6/25/2018 6/18/2018 7

SA 71605 Galley foundations, piping and electrical complete that impact MER 1 overhead

6/25/2018 6/17/2018 8

2 Fuel banks closed & ready to test (any two from groups 1 through 6).

Includes requirements of SA70403K and SA77829K for those tanks (MOVs, XDCRs, Press SWs, Flow Meters, TDRs

6/13/2018 6/4/2018 9

HM&E TURNOVER 5 10

All Compartments 7/30/2018 2/1/2017 12

Combat Systems Turnover 1 to AIT 7 IC & Gyro Room #1 (FWD) 7/27/2018 7/19/2018 8 IC & Gyro Room #2 (AFT) 7/27/2018 7/16/2018 11 Power Supply/Conversion Room 10/19/2018 10/12/2018 7 Power Conversion Room 10/19/2018 10/10/2018 9 Sonar Cooling Equipment Room 10/19/2018 10/11/2018 8 Auxiliary Machinery Room #1 10/19/2018 10/12/2018 7

Combat Systems Turnover 2 to AIT 8 SNAP II Computer Room (LAN R )

8/24/2018 8/16/2018 8

CSER #2 8/31/2018 8/22/2018 9

CSER #3 8/31/2018 8/23/2018 8

Combat Information Center (CIC) 8/31/2018 8/22/2018 9 Radar Room #1 9/7/2018 8/30/2018 8 Communications Center (Radio) 9/7/2018 8/29/2018 9 Radar Room #2 9/14/2018 9/4/2018 10

CSER #1 9/14/2018 9/5/2018 9

Sonar Equipment Room #1 9/28/2018 9/20/2018 8 Sonar Equipment Room #2 9/28/2018 9/19/2018 9 Sonar Equipment Room #3 9/28/2018 9/20/2018 8 Sonar Control Room 9/28/2018 9/18/2018 10 Tomahawk Equipment Room 9/28/2018 9/20/2018 8 VLS Magazine #2 (AFT) 9/28/2018 9/19/2018 9 VLS Magazine #1 (FWD) 9/28/2018 9/19/2018 9

Combat Systems Turnover 3 to AIT 6 Mast and Access Trunk 10/5/2018 9/27/2018 8 Pilot House 10/5/2018 9/28/2018 7 Director Equipment Room #1 10/5/2018 9/27/2018 8 Radar Room #3 10/12/2018 10/3/2018 9 Combat Systems Maintenance Central

10/12/2018 10/4/2018 8

CSER #4 10/19/2018 10/10/2018 9

SPY Array Room #1

(FWD/STBD)

10/19/2018 10/10/2018 9

SPY Array Room #2 10/19/2018 10/11/2018 8

(FWD/PORT)

SPY Array Room #3 (AFT/STBD) 10/19/2018 10/11/2018 8 SPY Array Room #4 (AFT/PORT) 10/19/2018 10/12/2018 7 CIWS Workshop #1 10/19/2018 10/11/2018 8 MFTA Winch Room 10/19/2018 10/13/2018 6 CIWS Control Room #1 10/19/2018 10/11/2018 8 5"/54 Loader Drum & Fan Room 10/19/2018 10/10/2018 9

SSES 10/19/2018 10/10/2018 9

CSER 3 Annex 10/19/2018 10/13/2018 6

Combat Systems Turnover 4 to AIT 7 VLS Fan Room fwd 10/26/2018 10/18/2018 8 VLS Fan Room fwd 10/26/2018 10/19/2018 7 VLS Fan Room aft 10/26/2018 10/18/2018 8 Chart Room (w/4) 10/26/2018 10/17/2018 9 CCS (VLS Alarms) 10/26/2018 10/18/2018 8 Radio Transmitter Room 11/2/2018 10/24/2018 9 CIWS Wpn & Avn Ord Eqpt Wks 11/2/2018 10/24/2018 9 CIWS Control Room#2 11/2/2018 10/25/2018 8 Electric Load Center #1 11/2/2018 10/24/2018 9 AN/SPY-1 Antenna Arrays 11/2/2018 10/26/2018 7 Director Equipment Room #2 11/2/2018 10/25/2018 8 Director Equipment Room #3 11/2/2018 10/26/2018 7 VLS Service Interface Room

(FWD)

11/2/2018 10/25/2018 8

The Step 1 incentive will be determined as follows:

For Milestones 1 through 6, the incentive earned for each milestone is computed using the following formula:

Milestone 1 D(x) * $15,000 (with a maximum D(x) of 10 days; Max incentive earned = $150,000) Milestone 2 D(x) * $15,000 (with a maximum D(x) of 10 days; Max incentive earned = $150,000) Milestone 3 D(x) * $15,000 (with a maximum D(x) of 10 days; Max incentive earned = $150,000) Milestone 4 D(x) * $15,000 (with a maximum D(x) of 10 days; Max incentive earned = $150,000) Milestone 5 D(x) * $15,000 (with a maximum D(x) of 10 days; Max incentive earned = $150,000) Milestone 6 D(x) * $15,000 (with a maximum D(x) of 10 days; Max incentive earned = $150,000)

The Step 2 incentive will be determined as follows:

The Smallest Value of D(x) across milestones (1 through 6) * $140,000, for a maximum D(x) value of 10 days. The total maximum incentive the contractor can earn under Step 2 is $1,100,000 ($110,000 * 10).

The contractor shall only receive an incentive under Step 2 if all milestones (1 through 6) dates are early. If at least one milestone is on time or late, the contactor shall not be afforded any incentive under Step 2. The incentive will not be compounded between milestones– the contractor shall only receive an incentive for the milestone with the smallest value of D(x).

Example incentive earned (based on Table 1 above):

Step 1: Milestone 1 (7 days * $15,000)

+ Milestone 2 (10 days * $15,000) + Milestone 3 (7 days * $15,000) + Milestone 4 (8 days * $15,000) + Milestone 5 (6 days * $15,000) + Milestone 6 (7 days * $15,000)

= $675,000

[note, all Milestones are capped at maximum of 10 days, therefore, milestone 2 value is capped at 10 days]

Step 2: = (6 days * $110,000) = $660,000

Total = $675,000 + $660,000 = $1,335,000

D. Performance Incentive Determining Official (PIDO)

The PIDO will be the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). The ACO will determine the Performance Incentive due to the Contractor.

E. Performance Incentive Determination and Reclama Procedures

1. Within fifteen (15) working days after the end of the availability, the Contractor shall furnish to the PIDO written documentation and such other information as may be reasonably required to assist the PIDO in its evaluation of the contractor’s performance for the factors listed in paragraph (C).

2. The PIDO will provide a final incentive determination and the contractor will be notified as provided in paragraph E.5 of this clause.

3. If the PIDO does not concur with the contractor’s letter, disagreements shall be expressed in a performance evaluation letter to the contractor. The Contractor shall submit written comments and any supporting documentation to the PIDO within five (5) working days of receiving the performance evaluation letter.

4. Based on Contractor comments or reclama, the PIDO shall make a final determination of the performance incentive earned.

5. The PIDO will notify the Contractor, in writing, of the final determination and the Contracting Officer will issue a unilateral modification to the contract to provide the Performance Incentive.

F. Finality of Incentive Determining Official's Determination of the Performance Incentive

The determinations of the amount of the Performance Incentive, if any, to be paid to the Contractor is a unilateral decision made solely at the discretion of the PIDO.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

52.211-11 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--SUPPLIES, SERVICES, OR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (SEP 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in this contract, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages, as described in the table below, per calendar day of delay.

The sum of liquidated damages, across all milestones in the table below, shall not exceed 10% of the awarded price of the Availability, including all Base and Option Items.

Milestone Contractor Responsible Equipment Liquidated Damage incurred per Day Maximum Liquidated

Damage associated with each Milestone

HM&E TURNOVER

$763 $3,052

HM&E TURNOVER

$2,400 $9,600

HM&E TURNOVER

$3,100 $12,400

HM&E TURNOVER

4 - Set 1

2 Fuel banks closed & ready to test (any two from groups 1 through 6). Includes requirements of SA70403K and SA77829K for those tanks (MOVs, XDCRs, Press SWs, Flow Meters, TDRs

$600 $2,400

HM&E TURNOVER

4 - Set 2

Electric Plant DIU 1 AUX 1 $7,400

$29,600 Propulsion DIU 4 MER 1

UCC 3 MER 1

ECU 1A and 1B MER 1

Repair 2 foundations installed, equipment loaded and painted IAW spec item

F/O, L/O & CRP valves associated with SA71604K in MER1. 1A/1B F/O Filt/Sep Outlet, #1MRG Pur Suct/Fill, #1CRP Pur Suct/Fill SA 71605 Galley foundations, piping and electrical complete that impact MER 1 overhead

HM&E TURNOVER

$8,000 $32,000

HM&E TURNOVER

$500 $2,500

HM&E TURNOVER

$1,200 $2,400

Milestone Combat System Space

Numbers

Combat System Space Names Liquidated Damage incurred per Day

Maximum Liquidated Damage associated with each Milestone

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 1 -

Space Set 1

4-94-0-C IC & Gyro Room #1 (FWD) $2,951 $67,873

3-300-0-C IC & Gyro Room #2 (AFT)

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 1 -

Space Set 2

3-126-2-Q Power Supply/Conversion Room

$6,000 $6,000

3-319-0-Q Power Conversion Room 4-42-0-Q Sonar Cooling Equipment Room 4-126-0-E Auxiliary Machinery Room #1

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 2 -

Space Set 1

2-220-1-Q SNAP II Computer Room (LAN Room)

$235 $11,045

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 2 -

Space Set 2

2-126-2-C CSER #2 $9,861 $354,996

1-300-0-C CSER #3

1-126-0-C Combat Information Center

(CIC)

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 2 -

Space Set 3

03-128-0-C Radar Room #1 $1,111 $39,996

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 2 -

Space Set 4

2-126-1-C Communications Center (Radio) $732 $30,012

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 3- Space Set 1

06-157-0-T Mast and Access Trunk $1,429 $24,293

04-130-0-C Pilot House

05-131-0-Q Director Equipment Room #1

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 3- Space Set 2

01-274-1-C Radar Room #3 $714 $13,566

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 3- Space Set 3

01-130-0-Q Combat Systems Maintenance Central

$1,091 $10,910

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 4 -

Space Set 1

04-150-0-C Chart Room (w/4) $1,000 $3,000

1-268-0-C CCS (VLS Alarms)

Milestone Liquidated Damage incurred per Day

Maximum Liquidated Damage associated with each Milestone

ALO $8,200 $385,400

PCD $7,000 $140,000

Milestone Location Liquidated Damage incurred per Day

Maximum Liquidated Damage associated with each Milestone

Commence Crew Move Aboard

Mayport, FL $4,569 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Pascagoula, MS $3,957 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Kittery, ME $5,914 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Mobile, AL $3,957 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Norfolk, VA $0 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Sea Trials Begin Mayport, FL $1,558 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Pascagoula, MS $376 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Kittery, ME $2,944 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Mobile, AL $1,298 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Norfolk, VA $0 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

Ship Moves to

NAVSTA

Norfolk, VA $186,516 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

(b) If the Government terminates this contract in whole or in part under the Default--Fixed-Price Supply and Service clause, the Contractor is liable for liquidated damages accruing until the Government reasonably obtains delivery or performance of similar supplies or services. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

(c) The Contractor will not be charged with liquidated damages when the delay in delivery or performance is beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor as defined in the Default--Fixed-Price Supply and Service clause in this contract.

*In regard to the milestone “Ship Moves to NAVSTA”, if the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in this contract, such that their failure delays the completion of work that may be outside of the scope of the Contractor’s contract, such as AIT & 3rd Party Trade efforts and Government & 3rd Party test and trials, and this failure delays the Navy’s ability to return the vessel to the fleet at the milestone “Ship Moves to NAVSTA” the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages.

(End of clause)

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation:

No. Document

Attachment S-1 Technical Capabilities Data Sheet Attachment S-2 Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment S-3 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form Attachment S-4 Past Performance References Attachment S-5 Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) also form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation:

No. Document Attachment J-1 Specification Package No. [SSP TPPC-DDG79-NSSA17-CNO1] Attachment J-2 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References (Errata 4)

Attachment J-3 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates v1 Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook v3 Attachment J-5 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan Attachment J-6 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award)

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) A001-A003; A005-A009; A011; A012; A014 (Does not include A004, A0010, or A0013) Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) B001-B009 Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) C001-C002

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Fixed-Price contract for the FY18 Depot Modernization Period (DMP) CNO Availability for USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79). The Government anticipates awarding a single contract through a best value source selection process. The Government expects the best value to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price and will thus use the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with

FAR 15.101-2

***Offerors (Prime Contractors) shall contact the Procuring Contracting Officer, Jamillah Powell at jamillah.powell@navy.mil and the Contract Specialist, LCDR Bran Sherman at bran.sherman@navy.mil to receive the established dates, included as Attachment J-3. These milestones will not be distributed publicly on FBO.

ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Jamillah Powell, Contracting Officer, and LCDR Bran Sherman, Contract Specialist, at jamillah.powell@navy.mil and bran.sherman@navy.mil. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offeror requests for information (RFIs) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 13 September 2017 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC.

The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after this date and time. Furthermore, offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after this date and time. RFIs should reference a solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment S-3) provided with this solicitation.

mailto:jamillah.powell@navy.mil mailto:bran.sherman@navy.mil

Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making a single award on or around 21 December 2017.

Offerors must provide a period of 120 calendar days from the proposal due date for Government acceptance of the offer (Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).

2.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

Proposal Due Date: All copies of proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be received by the Government at the address below no later than 29 September 2017 at 03:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. Electronic submittal of proposals will not be accepted. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.

Proposal Submission:

Proposals shall be sent to:

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Attn: Roland Gartmann Building 51, Code 429 Norfolk Naval Shipyard Portsmouth, VA 23709

Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD UNOPENED DIRECTLY TO C-431”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the contents of the package.

Offerors shall submit:

Volume Title Number of Paper

Originals (See Note 1) Number of

Paper Copies Number of CDs

(See Notes 2 &3) I Price Proposal 1 0 2 II Technical Proposal 1 1 4

Note 1: Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, originals should be separately wrapped inside the container, and clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box MUST clearly indicate its contents.

Note 2: The CDs must be scanned to ensure that the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses.

The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.

Note 3: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in Microsoft Office Suite 2007 or Adobe Acrobat. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. In cases where the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal conflict, the hard copy shall take precedence. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious. No fields shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

3.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

Ship Checks: USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79) will not be available for ship checks prior to the proposal submission due date. Similar sister ships, USS BULKELEY (DDG 84) and USS BAINBRIDGE (DDG 96) may be available. Similar sister ships may be utilized for ship checks of all work items within this RFP. Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS BULKELEY (DDG 84) and USS BAINBRIDGE (DDG

96) between 10 August - 24 August 2017 at Naval Base Norfolk, Virginia. Please note: These dates are subject to last minute change. To schedule a ship check, offerors shall email a "Request for Ship Check" to Jamillah Powell and LCDR Bran Sherman at jamillah.powell@navy.mil and bran.sherman@navy.mil, respectively. Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Mid Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center (MARMC) and ship's Commanding Officers. Contractors conducting MARMC related work efforts must visit MARMC security website for latest forms and instructions at http://www.marmc.navy.mil/visitors.html.

Specifications and associated reference documentation: The Government will provide, upon request, CD/DVDs including Attachment J-1 Work Items and Work Item References not already in the possession of the Offerors or subcontractors, commercially available, listed under 52.211-2, or available through the following websites:

https://jedmics.net/ https://webjed.nnsy.navy.mil/ https://psjed.psns.navy.mil/

Offerors or subcontractors may request a CD/DVD by contacting LCDR Bran Sherman at bran.sherman@navy.mil.

Alteration of Solicitation: Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Proposal Information: Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, offerors are advised that statements such as: “the offeror understands”, “the offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

Amendments: The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

Teaming Arrangements: Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique Commercial and Government Entity code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. Proposals which do not follow this direction may be rejected as non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Hard Copy Proposals: All pages shall be double-sided on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with a one-inch margin. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum font size of 12-point. Each side of the page will count as one “page”.

Any type contained on graphics pages will not be smaller than 10-point font. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions (if required) shall contain revision numbers and date of the proposal revision submission.

Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section

5.0 where required.

Page Limits:

• The cover letter is limited to three (3) pages

• Non-price proposals shall be limited to five (5) pages for the Technical Capabilities Data Sheet

(Attachment S-1) for Factor 2 – Technical Capabilities

• There are no other page limitations http://www.marmc.navy.mil/visitors.html

5.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT

VOLUME I

a. Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:

b. Cover Letter,

c. Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,

d. Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),

e. Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),

f. Completed Section B carrying forward information from Attachment J-4, and

g. Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing and Labor & Material Burden Rates (

Attachment J-4)

Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

• Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal,

• CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor,

• Notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications, and

• Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).

In addition to the above, the following information is requested to be provided in the cover letter:

o Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more.

o For any WI with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in Attachment J-4, provide an explanation as to why. In addition, if applicable:

- For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined)

(although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

- For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation.

Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

Subcontracting Plan: A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from a small business concern.

Completed Section B and Attachment J-4 : Offerors must propose on all contract line items (CLINs), complete the clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)” in Section B, complete the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing and Labor & Material Burden Rates (Attachment J-4) to be considered responsive.

The contractor must submit prices for the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing and Labor & Material Burden Rates (Attachment J-4) in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the CLIN price shall govern. The Labor & Material Burden Rates must match the rates provided in the Section B clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)”. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B clause rates shall govern.

For Attachment J-4, offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields.

The RFP specified 247,616 labor hours and $4,034,263 included for material in the Labor & Material Burden Rate worksheet contained in Attachment J-4 are for evaluation purposes only. The proposed labor and material burden rates included in Attachment J-4 and inserted in Section B, Note A paragraph (7) shall be the fixed rates used for negotiating growth and new work during the entire availability regardless of how many labor hours and material dollars are negotiated and procured.

A Price Differential shall be applied to all offerors to evaluate the price based on place of performance. Include the value for the price differential as follows:

Location* Differential Mayport, FL $4,165,467 Pascagoula, MS $4,685,966 Kittery, ME $5,862,259 Mobile, AL $5,236,858 Norfolk, VA $0

*Offeror’s whose location is not listed in the above inter-port differential table shall submit a bidder’s question requesting an inter-port differential be calculated for the location of the offeror’s proposed place of performance for the USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79) FY18 DMP.

009-72 Supporting Price Information: As part of the Price proposal package, the offeror shall submit other than cost and pricing information sufficient for the Contracting Officer to validate the offerors price associated with completing the requirements of 009-72. This other than cost and pricing data shall include both a narrative description, including the basis of all labor and, material estimates and a quantitative and traceable price estimate by cost element to complete these requirements.

VOLUME II

Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be comprised of four factors, Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor, Factor 2 – Technical Capabilities, Factor 3 - Past Performance, and Factor 4 – Resource Capacity as follows:

Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor: Offerors must provide the following:

• Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5) with the top portion filled out.

• A letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79) and a dry-dock capable of docking the USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79). Evidence must be provided to demonstrate the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed period of its use.

• Demonstrate holder of Master Ship Repair Agreement or proof of MSRA Equivalency.

MSRA Equivalency (Applicable to Non-MSRA holders only): Offerors that do not hold an MSRA must submit MSRA equivalency documentation to demonstrate sufficient organization and facilities capabilities. (Specific documentation requirements provided upon inspection request).

To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess an MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in an MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of an MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection. All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1300, local time, Washington DC on 1 September 2017. Requests shall be sent to Jamillah Powell and LCDR Bran Sherman at jamillah.powell@navy.mil and bran.sherman@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of offeror eligibility. All inspections will be completed by a representative from Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC). All offerors requesting equivalency inspections will receive a copy of the final inspection prior to the date of contract award.

The on-site inspection will supplement documentation provided with the offeror’s proposal.

The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey or to require other evidence of technical, production, managerial, financial, and similar abilities to perform prior to the award of any proposed contracts;

regardless of whether the offeror has an existing MSRA. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

Factor 2 - Technical Capabilities: Offerors shall complete the Technical Capabilities Data Sheet (Attachment S-1), provided with this solicitation for a previous availability or equivalent project performed by the offeror. Offerors may not exceed a total of five (5) pages between the data sheet and the narrative.

The Offeror shall provide this documentation for contracts/projects demonstrating relevant experience as a Prime contractor. The Government is looking for experience in executing projects of same or similar type and complexity of work as required by this solicitation. For purposes of this solicitation, the Government considers an offeror’s Technical Capability relating to the following types of projects/contracts to be relevant:

a. Performance as a prime contractor of a ship repair availability similar in complexity and magnitude as the proposed USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79) availability, including approximately six (6) months production duration and 75,000 man-days in magnitude, using the same or similar personnel, processes and equipment the offeror is proposing to use to meet the solicitation requirements, to be relevant.

OR

b. Performance as a prime contractor of the construction of a ship of similar size and complexity and composition as a DDG 51 Arleigh Burke class ship or a comparable naval vessel of similar type and complexity using the same or similar personnel, processes, and equipment the offeror is proposing to use to meet the solicitation requirements.

The project shall have been completed or be substantially complete within the past three (3) years from the date of the initial solicitation. The project provided must be considered relevant based on its own features rather than demonstrating relevant experience as a combination of projects. Offerors are advised that the Technical Capability Factor is "prime contractor" specific. Newly formed joint ventures may propose projects by the separate members of the joint venture as prime contractors. An offeror may not use the Technical Capabilities of an affiliated "prime contractor" to meet the Technical Capability Factor requirements.

Factor 3 – Past Performance: The Government requires recent and relevant performance information on all Offerors based on the past and present efforts provided by the Offeror and data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s past performance as a prime contractor. In the evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance, the Government reserves the right to contact former customers and Government agencies and other private and public sources of information.

Offerors with recent and relevant past performance shall submit information concerning contracts which offerors consider relevant in demonstrating their ability to perform the proposed effort. Offerors shall identify portions of the contracts that are relevant. Offerors are requested to provide information for up to five (5) previous contracts where the effort is recent and relevant to the effort required by this solicitation.

• “Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation. If the offeror has not completed any contracts as the prime within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation, information on recent and relevant subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted.

• “Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation.

− Scope: Experience in the areas defined in the Solicitation Section C Statement of Work.

− Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation.

− Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation. For complexity, not only will the tasks performed by the offeror be considered, but also the offeror’s ability to coordinate tasks (e.g., concurrent performance requirements).

Offerors shall provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the similarity of the contracts to the requirements of this solicitation; with a detailed description of the work performed for the contract. Offerors are responsible for the accuracy of all data provided.

An offeror that does not have recent and relevant past performance to provide for consideration is requested to affirmatively state that it does not have recent and relevant past performance for the Government to consider.

Past performance information that is documented as a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) and available in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the offeror may list it in Past Performance References, Attachment S-4. Attachment S-4 shall be used to identify the source of Past Performance information (e.g., CPARs).

For Past Performance information that does not have a current CPAR associated with it, the offeror may submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), Attachment S-2 to its customer to complete. Each proposal shall include no more than a total of five (5) PPQs; one per contract identified. The offeror will complete Part A of the Questionnaire. The Offeror shall provide the entire Past Performance Questionnaire, with Part A completed, to each customer for them to complete Parts B and C. Customer evaluation will not be included as part of the page count in this volume submitted by the Offeror. The Offeror shall instruct their customers to complete the Past Performance Questionnaires and return them before the closing date of this solicitation. The Offeror’s proposal shall identify the customer point of contact and which of the listed contacts that each questionnaire was sent to be completed. This will let the Contracting Officer know whether all questionnaires from all of the Offeror’s references were received.

E-mail to:

Jamillah Powell, Contracting Officer, jamillah.powell@navy.mil and

LCDR Bran Sherman, Contract Specialist, bran.sherman@navy.mil

Any questionnaire received after the proposal due date/time may be considered as late and may not be considered in the Offeror’s past performance evaluation. The Government, at its discretion, will determine whether or not questionnaires received after the proposal due date will be considered.

In addition, the offeror shall provide for all Past Performance References included in Attachment S-4, a short description of the work performed and why the offeror considers it relevant to the requirements of this solicitation.

Government may validate past performance information with the source regardless of whether it is provided under a CPAR reference or a PPQ.

All offerors (including small business offerors) are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page. In addition, large businesses are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219- 9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DOD

CONTRACTS)) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page. Attachments to these narratives, including any eSRS information, is not included in the page limits.

Factor 4 – Resource Capacity: Offerors shall provide Integrated Production Schedule (IPS) documentation for the USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79) DMP inclusive of the “Initial IPS” elements of NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60 as well as the Manpower Curves (Total) and the Manpower Curves (Trades) associated with the 009-60 “Schedule of Record”. Offerors shall provide the documentation in accordance with format requirements of FY17 (CH-1) NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60. The offeror shall provide the reports in the electronic formats required by FY17 (CH-1) 009-60 and in paper (hard copy) format. The hard copy of the Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Offerors shall integrate all work included in the Work Package. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, reports do not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team (AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Navy Intermediate-Level schedules.

Manpower Curves (Total) and Manpower Curves (Trade) – In addition to the requirements of 009-60, the offerors shall provide Total and Trade Manpower Curves including the following information:

• The total and trade manpower resources currently employed by the offeror and expected to be employed by the offeror during the Availability period of performance.

• The total and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance.

• The total and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other expected requirements during the Availability period of performance.

Offerors shall provide a narrative affirming that the offeror has the manpower resources, by craft/trade/supervisor/support, available to complete the requirements of the availability, accounting for manpower resource required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract and manpower resources required to complete outstanding proposals and any other expected requirements during the Availability period. Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources, the offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and period of performance for each subcontract requirement.

There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

1.0 GENERAL

The Government intends to award a single Fixed-Price contract to the offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government after evaluation in accordance with the evaluation factors below. The USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79) FY18 DMP Availability shall be competed on a coast-wide basis (East and Gulf coasts).

Offerors are advised that the Government intends to make award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions with Offerors, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary (see paragraph (f)(4) of FAR 52.215-1). Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price, technical and past performance standpoint. Statements and representations made in the Offeror’s proposal may be subject to verification by other sources or through an onsite survey by Navy evaluators.

Offerors are advised that except for past performance information, the Government will not evaluate any proposal information not contained within the body of the proposal. Letters of transmittal and/or cover letters that forward the proposal to the Government are not considered part of the body of the proposal.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Government will make a source selection using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) approach described in FAR 15.101-2. Award shall be made to the technically acceptable offeror, who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104, who offers the lowest evaluated price proposal.

In order to make a Best Value determination, the Government will evaluate the four (4) non-price factors for acceptability and the offeror’s total evaluated price as described in FAR 15.404. The factors are:

Non- Price Factors Factor 1: Eligibility Factor Factor 2: Technical Capabilities Factor 3: Past Performance Factor 4: Resource Capacity

Price Factor Factor 5: Price Factor

EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor:

Basis of Evaluation - The objective of this factor is to determine whether the offeror has ownership or committed access to a pier capable of berthing and a dry dock capable of docking the USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79) FY18

DMP.

The Government will assess the offeror’s eligibility using the Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet provided in Attachment S-5 of the solicitation.

In order to be considered eligible for award, the offeror must:

• Have a letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the DDG 79 and a dry-dock capable of docking the DDG 79 at time of contract award.

Evidence must be provided to prove the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock in performance of this contract.

• Have a co- signed current Master Ship Repair Agreement or submit documentation for MSRA Equivalency.

Factor 2 – Technical Capabilities:

The objective of this factor is to gauge the offeror's management and technical experience as a prime contractor in completing work similar to the USS OSCAR AUSTIN (DDG 79) FY18 DMP or other comparable vessel of similar size and complexity based on its response to the requirements identified in Section L of this solicitation.

A relevant experience event is a single project/contract that demonstrates relevancy as defined in Section L requirements for this factor. To be rated as Acceptable in the Technical Capabilities factor, offerors must provide a relevant event, that includes both technical and management…