N00024-16-R-4306_Conformed_Copy_through_Amendment_0005.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Mid-Atlantic CVN Private Sector Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00024-16-R-4306
About this file
Amendment 0005 Conformed Copy
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CODE
(Hour)
PAGE(S)
until 10:00 AM local t ime 27 Jan 2016
X
A X B X C X D
EX
X
G F
X H jimettra.lundy@navy .mil
RATING PAGE OF PAGES
7. ISSUED BY
(Date)
IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.
Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)
DO-A3 1 208
(If other than Item 7)
15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO
AND
ADDRESS SIGN OFFER (Type or print)
OF
OFFEROR
AMENDMENT NO. DATE
15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS
IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER
SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.
18. OFFER DATE
1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER
UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)
2. CONTRACT NO.
N00024 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO
See Item 7
9. Sealed offers in original and 5 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in
CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and
SEE SECTION L
conditions contained in this solicitation.
10. FOR INFORMATION
CALL:
A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)
JIMETTRA S LUNDY (757)396-1018
11. TABLE OF CONTENTS
SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS
X I CONTRACT CLAUSES
DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X
PACKAGING AND MARKING
J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE X K REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND
OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA X
SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) X M
L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.
is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.
13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT
(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)
14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments
AMENDMENT NO. DATE
to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):
FACILITY
12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period
SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD
X
(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)
PART I - THE SCHEDULE
26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE
EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)
CODE CODE
B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION
22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:
10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)
23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE
PART IV - REPRESENTATIO NS AND INSTRUCTIO NS
PART III - LIST O F DO CUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND O THER ATTACHMENTS
PART II - CO NTRACT CLAUSES
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)
1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030
FAX:
TEL:
FAX:
TEL:
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
SOLICITATION
6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.
N0002414NR91606
5. DATE ISSUED
30 Oct 2015
4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID (IFB)
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
[ X ]
3. SOLICITATION NO.
N00024-16-R-4306
Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form
CVN PRIVATE SECTOR MAINTENANCE SECTION B CLIN SUMMARY
CLIN CONTRACT
TYPE CLIN DESCRIPTION
0001 CPIF
INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION
IN FY16-17
0002 COST AWARD FEE CLIN FOR CLIN 0001
OPTION 0003 CPIF
CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE - REPAIRS/ALTS BTW CNO
IN FY16-17
OPTION 0004 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0003
OPTION 0005 CPIF EMERGENT REPAIRS IN FY16-17
OPTION 0006 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0005
OPTION 0007 NSP PROVISIONED ITEM ORDERS
0008 NSP DATA
0009 NSP PROVISIONING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
OPTION 0010 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN 77 DPIA IN FY18
OPTION 0011 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0010
OPTION 0012 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN 77 DPIA IN FY18
OPTION 0013 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0012
OPTION
0014 CPIF
INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION
IN FY17-18
OPTION 0015 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0014
OPTION
0016 CPIF
CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE - REPAIRS/ALTS BTW CNO
IN FY17-18
OPTION 0017 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0016
OPTION 0018 CPIF EMERGENT REPAIRS IN FY17-18
OPTION 0019 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0018
OPTION 0020 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN 75 PIA IN FY19
OPTION 0021 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0020
OPTION 0022 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN 75 PIA IN FY19
OPTION 0023 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0022
OPTION 0024 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN78 PIA IN FY20
OPTION 0025 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0024
OPTION 0026 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN 78 PIA IN FY20
OPTION 0027 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0026
OPTION
0028 CPIF
INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION
IN FY18-19
OPTION 0029 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0028
OPTION
0030 CPIF
CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE - REPAIRS/ALTS BTW CNO
IN FY18-19
OPTION 0031 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0030
OPTION 0032 CPIF EMERGENT REPAIRS IN FY18-19
OPTION 0033 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0032
OPTION 0034 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN 69 PIA IN FY20
OPTION 0035 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0034
OPTION 0036 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN 69 PIA IN FY20
OPTION 0037 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0036
OPTION
0038 CPIF
INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION
IN FY19-20
OPTION 0039 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0038
OPTION
0040 CPIF
CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE - REPAIRS/ALTS BTW CNO
IN FY19-20
OPTION 0041 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0040
OPTION 0042 CPIF EMERGENT REPAIRS IN FY19-20
OPTION 0043 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0042
OPTION 0044 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN 77 PIA IN FY21
OPTION 0045 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0044
OPTION 0046 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN 77 PIA IN FY21
OPTION 0047 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0046
OPTION 0048 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN 74 PRE-DEF IN FY20
OPTION 0049 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0048
OPTION 0050 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN 74 PRE-DEF IN FY20
OPTION 0051 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0050
OPTION
0052 CPIF
INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION
IN FY20-21
OPTION 0053 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0052
OPTION
0054 CPIF
CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE - REPAIRS/ALTS BTW CNO
IN FY20-21
OPTION 0055 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0054
OPTION 0056 CPIF EMERGENT REPAIRS IN FY20-21
OPTION 0057 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0056
OPTION 0058 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN TBD PIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0059 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0058
OPTION 0060 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN TBD PIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0061 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0060
OPTION 0062 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN TBD PIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0063 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0062
OPTION 0064 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN TBD PIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0065 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0064
OPTION 0066 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN TBD PIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0067 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0066
OPTION 0068 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN TBD PIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0069 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0068
OPTION 0070 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN TBD DPIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0071 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0070
OPTION 0072 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN TBD DPIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0073 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0072
OPTION 0074 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN TBD DPIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0075 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0074
OPTION 0076 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN TBD DPIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0077 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0076
OPTION 0078 CPIF EXECUTION PLANNING FOR CVN TBD DPIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0079 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0078
OPTION 0080 CPIF ACCOMPLISH FOR CVN TBD DPIA IN FY16-21
OPTION 0081 COST AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0080
Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
CLIN
Number
1 Lot
IAPA FY16-17
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY16-17 INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND
ADMINISTRATION (IAPA) REQUIREMENTS FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES C, D & E
FOB: Destination
PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: N0002414NR91606
TARGET COST
TARGET FEE
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
SHARE RATIO ABOVE TARGET
SHARE RATIO BELOW TARGET
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0001
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
ESTIMATED COST
OPTION RPRS/ALTS FY16-17 BETWEEN CNO AVAILS
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY16-17 REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS BETWEEN CNO
SCHEDULED AVAILABILITIES FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78 CLASS
SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON ROADS,
VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0003
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION FY16-17 EMERGENT RPRS/ALTS BTW AVAIL
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY16-17 EMERGENT REPAIRS FOR CVN 68 AND 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0005
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES
OPTION PROVISIONED ITEMS ORDER
PROVISIONED ITEMS ORDER (PIO) FOR ITEM(s) 0001 - 0006, AND 0009 AND, IF OPTION EXERCISED, ITEM(s) 0010 THROUGH 0081
(EXCLUDING AWARD FEE CLINS)
SEE SECTION C
NOT SEPARATELY PRICED
SEE NOTES A, B, D & E
DATA
DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR ITEM(s) 0001 - 0007, AND, IF OPTION EXERCISED, ITEM(s) 0010 THROUGH 0081 (EXCLUDING AWARD FEE
CLINS)
SEE EXHIBITS A AND B - CDRL(s) ATTACHED
PROVISIONING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
PROVISIONING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION (PTD) FOR FOR ITEM(s) 0001 - 0007, AND, IF OPTION EXERCISED, ITEM(s) 0010 THROUGH 0081
(EXCLUDING AWARD FEE CLINS)
SEE EXHIBIT C - CDRL(s) ATTACHED
OPTION EXECUTION PLANNING CVN 77 FY18 DPIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USS GEORGE H.W. BUSH
(CVN 77) FY18 DRYDOCKING PLANNED INCREMENTAL
AVAILABILITY (DPIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0010
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION ACCOMPLISH CVN 77 FY18 DPIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS GEORGE
H.W. BUSH (CVN 77) FY18 DRYDOCKING PLANNED INCREMENTAL
AVAILABILITY (DPIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0012
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION IAPA FY17-18
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY17-18 INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND
ADMINISTRATION (IAPA) REQUIREMENTS FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0014
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION RPRS/ALTS FY17-18 BETWEEN CNO AVAILS
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY17-18 REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS BETWEEN CNO
SCHEDULED AVAILABILITIES FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78 CLASS
SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON ROADS,
VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
SEE NOTE F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0016
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION FY17-18 EMERGENT RPRS/ALTS BTW AVAIL
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY17-18 EMERGENT REPAIRS FOR CVN 68 AND 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0018
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION EXECUTION PLANNING CVN 75 FY19 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS HARRY S. TRUMAN (CVN
75) FY19 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0020
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION ACCOMPLISH CVN 75 FY19 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS HARRY S.
TRUMAN (CVN 75) FY19 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY
(PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0022
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION EXECUTION PLANNING CVN 78 FY20 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS GERALD R. FORD (CVN 78)
FY20 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0024
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION ACCOMPLISH CVN 78 FY20 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS GERALD
R. FORD (CVN 78) FY20 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY
(PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0026
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION IAPA FY18-19
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY18-19 INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND
ADMINISTRATION (IAPA) REQUIREMENTS FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0028
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION RPRS/ALTS FY18-19 BETWEEN CNO AVAILS
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY18-19 REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS BETWEEN CNO
SCHEDULED AVAILABILITIES FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78 CLASS
SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON ROADS,
VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
SEE NOTE F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0030
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION FY18-19 EMERGENT RPRS/ALTS BTW AVAIL
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY18-19 EMERGENT REPAIRS FOR CVN 68 AND 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0032
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION EXECUTION PLANNING CVN 69 FY20 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER
(CVN 69) FY20 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0034
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION ACCOMPLISH CVN 69 FY20 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS DWIGHT
D. EISENHOWER (CVN 69) FY20 PLANNED INCREMENTAL
AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0036
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION IAPA FY19-20
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY19-20 INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND
ADMINISTRATION (IAPA) REQUIREMENTS FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0038
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C & E
OPTION RPRS/ALTS FY19-20 BETWEEN CNO AVAILS
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY19-20 REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS BETWEEN CNO
SCHEDULED AVAILABILITIES FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78 CLASS
SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON ROADS,
VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
SEE NOTE F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0040
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION FY19-20 EMERGENT RPRS/ALTS BTW AVAIL
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY19-20 EMERGENT REPAIRS FOR CVN 68 AND 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D & E
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0042
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION EXECUTION PLANNING CVN 77 FY21 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS GEORGE H.W. BUSH (CVN
77) FY21 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0044
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION ACCOMPLISH CVN 77 FY21 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS GEORGE
H.W. BUSH (CVN 77) FY21 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY
(PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0046
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION EXECUTION PLANNNING CVN 74 FY20 PRE-DEF
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE USS JOHN C.
STENNIS (CVN 74) FY20 PRE-DEFUELING SMART START (PRIOR TO
RCOH) AVAILABILITY
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0048
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION ACCOMPLISH CVN 74 PRE-DEFUEL RCOH
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR USS JOHN C. STENNIS (CVN
74) FY20 PRE-DEFUELING SMART START (PRIOR TO RCOH)
AVAILABILITY
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0050
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION IAPA FY20-21
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY20-21 INTER-AVAILABILITY PLANNING AND
ADMINISTRATION (IAPA) REQUIREMENTS FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0052
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION RPRS/ALTS FY20-21 BETWEEN CNO AVAILS
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY20-21 REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS BETWEEN CNO
SCHEDULED AVAILABILITIES FOR CVN 68 AND CVN 78 CLASS
SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON ROADS,
VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
SEE NOTE F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0054
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION FY20-21 EMERGENT RPRS/ALTS BTW AVAIL
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH FY20-21 EMERGENT REPAIRS FOR CVN 68 AND 78
CLASS SHIPS HOMEPORTED IN AND/OR VISITING THE HAMPTON
ROADS, VA AREA
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0056
COST
SEE SECTION C
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION EXECUTION PLANNING CVN TBD FY16-21 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS TBD (CVN TBD) FY16-21
PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0058
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION ACCOMPLISH CVN TBD FY16-21 PIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS TBD (CVN
TBD) FY16-21 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0060
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS TBD (CVN TBD) FY16-21
PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0062
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS TBD (CVN
TBD) FY16-21 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0064
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS TBD (CVN TBD) FY16-21
PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0066
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS TBD (CVN
TBD) FY16-21 PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (PIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0068
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION EXECUTION PLANNING CVN TBD FY16-21 DPIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS TBD (CVN TBD) FY16-21
DRYDOCKING PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (DPIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0070
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
OPTION ACCOMPLISH CVN TBD FY16-21 DPIA
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS TBD (CVN
TBD) FY16-21 DRYDOCKING PLANNED INCREMENTAL
AVAILABILITY (DPIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0072
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS TBD (CVN TBD) FY16-21
DRYDOCKING PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (DPIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0074
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS TBD (CVN
TBD) FY16-21 DRYDOCKING PLANNED INCREMENTAL
AVAILABILITY (DPIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0076
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE EXECUTION PLANNING FOR THE REPAIR AND
ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR USS TBD (CVN TBD) FY16-21
DRYDOCKING PLANNED INCREMENTAL AVAILABILITY (DPIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0078
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
CPIF
ACCOMPLISH THE REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS FOR USS TBD (CVN
TBD) FY16-21 DRYDOCKING PLANNED INCREMENTAL
AVAILABILITY (DPIA)
SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, E & F
TOTAL TGT COST + FEE
MINIMUM FEE
MAXIMUM FEE
OPTION AWARD FEE FOR CLIN 0080
COST
SEE NOTES A, B & E
NOTE A
EXERCISE OF OPTIONS
By written notice to the Contractor, the Contracting Officer may exercise, if at all, any of the Option Items identified in Section B and require the Contractor to provide, within the performance period specified in Section F, the work described in Section C for such Option (s) at the estimated cost and fee set forth in Section B. The Option(s) may be exercised after the Contractor’s receipt of the Specification Work Package in accordance with the procedures stated in Section C, but in any event, the Option(s) shall be exercised, if at all, within the time frames listed in FAR clause 52.217-7, in Section I-2 of this solicitation.
NOTE B
GOVERNMENT RIGHT TO NOT EXERCISE FUTURE OPTIONS
Whether to exercise an option is solely within the Government's discretion. However, part of the Government's decision to exercise an option or options may be based on how well, in the Government's determination, the Contractor has been performing the contract. The Government reserves the right to not exercise future option(s) if, among other reasons:
Contractor's Management & Technical Award Fee-based Performance Rating (PR) scores are evaluated as:
"Yellow" for any availability within the first year of contract performance
"Green" for any availability within the second year of contract performance
"Purple" for any availability within the third year of contract performance
Contractor’s Cost Performance:
Final Cost, excluding growth reservation, exceeds Target Cost by more than 8%, within the first year of contract performance
Final Cost, excluding growth reservation, exceeds Target Cost by more than 6%, within the second year of
Final Cost, excluding growth reservation, exceeds Target Cost by more than 5%, within the third year of
Contractor’s Schedule Performance:
In first year of contract performance, up to 2 missed major milestones and the possibility of impacting the contract completion date
In second year and subsequent years of contract performance, up to 1 missed major milestones and the possibility of impacting the contract completion date.
NOTE C
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
All work under this contract is to be performed as follows:
Planned Incremental Availability (PIA)/Drydocking PIA (DPIA) work will be performed at the Government’s Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY) and Naval Station Norfolk in the Norfolk, VA area, unless otherwise stipulated in the work package.
For continuous maintenance periods, including emergent type work and interim availabilities, work will be performed at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY) and Naval Station Norfolk in the Norfolk, VA area, unless otherwise stipulated in the work package. The Contractor may be required to provide non-scheduled repair support to ships in remote locations.
Inter-availability planning and administration (IAPA) and Execution Planning functions may be performed at the Contractor’s facility, at various Government activities, or onboard vessels, in accordance with specification work items.
NOTE D
COST OF MONEY FOR FACILITIES CAPITAL
The Cost of Money for Facilities Capital is not a fee-bearing cost under this contract. However, such amount is included in the Estimated Cost for purpose of the “LIMITATIONS OF COST” clause of this contract.
NOTE E
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPOSING FEE
Offerors shall propose a fee (exclusive of small business incentives) of ten (10.0%) of the proposed CLIN/Sub- CLIN cost, which includes four percent (4.0%) award fee and six percent (6.0%) incentive fee, as stated in the clause “DETERMINATION OF FEE” (note that the overall proposed fee of 10.0% is not the same as the maximum overall fee of 11.0%, the difference being 1.0% between the target cost incentive fee of 4.0% and the maximum cost incentive fee of 5.0%). The Government will NOT permit the “tiering” of profit or fee on any subcontract. The Government will NOT permit any “profit-on-profit” or “fee-on-fee” on any subcontract. The only exception to this requirement is a subcontractor awarded a fixed price contract in a competitive environment where cost and pricing data were not available.
NOTE F
TRAVEL COSTS
Travel costs are not fee-bearing costs under this contract. The Contractor shall obtain prior written approval by the ACO per trip occurrence. Travel shall be funded under a separate SLIN under each CLIN. All estimated and incurred travel costs shall be in accordance with FAR 31.205-46. Additionally, the Contractor shall not charge, and the Government shall not pay, any transportation costs under this contract associated with transporting Contractor or subcontractor personnel between the Contractor’s facility (or subcontractor’s facility), and any other worksite to perform unscheduled availabilities (e.g. Continuous Maintenance and Emergent Maintenance) located at Norfolk Naval Shipyard or Norfolk Naval Station. Transportation costs include, but are not limited to, bus fare, car fare, train fare, or boat fare, paid by the work force, or paid by the Contractor on behalf of the work force.
RESERVED CLINS TO ACCOMPLISH NON-SCHEDULED REPAIR AND ALTERATION
REQUIREMENTS (SEE NOTES A, B, C, D, & E)
Reserved CLIN(s)
USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER (CVN 69) 0100 - 0199
USS JOHN C. STENNIS (CVN 74) 0200 – 0299
USS GEORGE H. W. BUSH (CVN 77) 0300 - 0399
USS HARRY S. TRUMAN (CVN 75) 0400 - 0499
USS GERALD R. FORD (CVN 78) 0500 - 0599
CVN 68 CLASS SHIPS VISITING 0600 - 0699
DIRECT AND INDIRECT RATE CAP
In accordance with the Contractor’s Proposal, dated (FILL-IN)*, and Attachment J-7, the Contractor’s direct rates are capped for the full five Contractor fiscal years of scheduled performance and indirect rates are capped for the full three Contractor fiscal years of scheduled performance. Direct labor rates shall be capped for the full five Contractor fiscal years as follows:
Capped Direct Labor * Base Year Option Year 1 Option Year 2 Option Year 3 Option Year 4
FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Direct Labor Category
In the event there are material changes resulting from the Navy’s future ship repair workload during the contract’s period of performance, at the discretion of the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), the ACO may re-assess the limitations of the capped labor rates to determine whether the terms of the capped labor rates require revision. In the event a revision to the capped labor rates is required, the Administrative Contracting Officer and Contractor shall negotiate to determine the rate ceilings to be applied, provided that no agreement shall be made which would increase the costs paid by the United States under this contract.
For the first three years of contract performance, the indirect rates under this contract are capped in accordance with the requirements of the contract clause included herein, “LIMITATIONS ON INDIRECT COST RATES” (NAVSEA) (OCT 1990). Indirect rates shall be capped for the full three Contractor fiscal years as follows:
Capped Indirect Rates * Base Year Option Year 1 Option Year 2
FY2016 FY2017 FY2018
Indirect Rate Category
*To be filled-in by Offeror
DETERMINATION OF FEE
FEE DEFINED:
Fee payable under this contract shall be evaluated in two (2) Phases. Phase I will evaluate incentive and award fees.
Phase II will evaluate Small Business Contracting performance. The award fee evaluation will be based on the Contractor’s performance in the areas of Management and Technical.
The incentive fee evaluation will be determined based on the Contractor’s performance in the areas of Schedule and Cost. The maximum fee payable under this contract (including both the incentive and award fees) shall not exceed eleven percent (11.0%) and the minimum fee payable shall be zero percent (0.0%). Fee will be split between incentive fee and award fee as follows: Incentive Fee maximum is seven percent (7.0%) broken down as five percent (5.0%) maximum for cost and two percent (2.0%) maximum for schedule. Award Fee maximum is four percent (4.0%) broken down as two percent (2.0%) maximum for management and two percent (2.0%) maximum for technical. There will be no roll-over of any unearned fees.
PHASE I: AWARD AND INCENTIVE FEE
AWARD FEE:
(Applicable to all CLINs except 0007, 0008 and 0009)
The Contractor may earn an Award Fee for performance in the Management and Technical areas as determined by the Fee Determining Official (FDO). The Government's purpose in granting an award fee is to encourage and reward superior Contractor effort directed toward performance in the Management and Technical areas of this contract. The specifics for evaluation are set forth in the following paragraphs:
A. Award Fee Evaluation Period: An Award Fee Evaluation Period shall be established on a semi-annual basis, tentatively every six months beginning at contract award.
B. In the event of discontinuance of the work, the Award Fee otherwise payable shall be determined in accordance with the Section H clause 5252.249-9015 of the Special Contract Requirements, entitled "AWARD
FEE DETERMINATION IN EVENT OF TERMINATION OR DISCONTINUANCE."
C. Award Fee Process: The Contractor’s performance will be evaluated in two categories: Management and Technical. Specific Award Fee Pool values will be made available by the ACO after award and/or exercise of option(s), provided that, in accordance with DFARS 216.405-2(1), in any annual contract period, a minimum of 40% of the potential Award Fee available for the full contract year shall be allocated to the award fee pool for the final evaluation period, defined as the last evaluation period within each one-year period.
1. Scope of Work Evaluated:
The Award Fee Evaluation will include all CLINs except 0007, 0008, and 0009.
2. Evaluation Categories and Factors: The Contractor's performance during each Award Fee Evaluation Period will be evaluated in the following areas:
a. Management (50%)
b. Technical Performance (50%)
The Contractor will be notified of changes in the evaluation categories and factors as well as any adjustments to the weighing of categories, if any, prior to commencement of each evaluation period.
Unsatisfactory performance under an award fee criterion may result in an increased weight for that factor in subsequent evaluation periods.
3. Award Fee Evaluation Board (AFEB): The Contractor's performance for Award Fee Evaluation Periods will be conducted by an AFEB consisting of five voting members but not more than eight:
• Chairperson (MARMC Code 100 or designated representative)
• Administrative Contracting Officer (MARMC Code 400 or designated representative)
• Type Commander (TYCOM) Representative
• PEO Carriers Representative
• MARMC Code 300 (Waterfront Ops)
• NNSY Representative
• Recorder (MARMC Representative, Non-voting)
4. Fee Determining Official (FDO): The FDO, PEO Carriers In-Service Aircraft Carrier Program Manager (PMS 312), shall make determinations of the award fee due to the Contractor based upon the performance evaluation conducted by the AFEB established pursuant to paragraph 2 above.
5. Award Fee Determination and Reclama Procedures:
a. Within sixty (60) working days after the end of each evaluation period under the contract, the Contractor shall furnish to the AFEB such information as may be reasonably required, including a statement of cost incurred, to assist the AFEB in evaluating the Contractor’s performance during that evaluation period.
b. Within ninety (90) calendar days after the end of each evaluation period under the contract, the AFEB shall meet to assess and derive an evaluated Award Fee earned for that period as determined by reports submitted by the contractor as well as Government agents.
c. Within ten (10) working days after the AFEB meeting, the AFEB shall prepare the performance evaluation letter and present it to the FDO. A copy will be provided to the Contractor upon transmittal to the FDO.
d. Within five (5) working days from receipt of the copy of the performance evaluation letter, the Contractor may submit to the FDO any comments with respect thereto. In support of his comments, the Contractor may furnish a written description of his performance during the period under consideration.
This description shall clearly identify specific evaluation categories, factors and elements, and the Contractor's own rating thereof.
e. Within five (5) working days from the receipt of the Contractor evaluation comments, the FDO shall provide the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) a final performance evaluation and determination of the award fee.
f. Within five (5) working days from receipt of the final determination, the ACO shall notify the Contractor in writing of that final determination and issue a unilateral modification to the contract to provide for the award fee.
6. Finality of Fee Determining Official's Determination: Determinations of the FDO with respect to the amount of the award fee to be paid to the Contractor are unilateral decisions made solely at the discretion of the Government.
7. Award Fee Computation:
a. The AFEB may use any information, Contractor deliverables, or other materials available to evaluate the Contractor in the categories of Management and Technical, as illustrated herein. The categories will have appropriate weights assigned, which were established, prior to start of the Award Fee Evaluation Period.
b. The AFEB shall determine through the use of information, Contractor deliverables, or other materials, specific adjective grade to be assigned for each category as follows:
(i) Dark Blue (Excellent)
(ii) Purple (Very Good)
(iii) Green (Good)
(iv) Yellow (Satisfactory)
(v) Red (Unsatisfactory)
c. The AFEB shall determine and assign a numerical score within each adjective category.
d. A weighted average will be computed by multiplying the numerical score assigned within each adjective category by the weight assigned to the specific overall category. The weighted average for each of the two categories will be summed to derive a numerical Performance Rating which will represent the overall rating for award fee calculation.
e. The actual amount of award fee will be calculated in accordance with the Performance Rating section below, in addition to the Management and Technical charts that follow.
(i) Performance Ratings: The following performance ratings are derived from Table 16-1 under
FAR 16.401:
Award Fee Adjective Rating
Award-fee Pool Available to be
Earned
Description
DARK BLUE
(Excellent)
91% - 100% Contractor has exceeded almost all of the significant award-fee criteria and has met overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract in the aggregate as defined and measured against the criteria in the award-fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.
PURPLE
(Very Good)
76% - 90% Contractor has exceeded many of the significant award-fee criteria and has met overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract in the aggregate as defined and measured against the criteria in the award-fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.
GREEN
(Good)
51% - 75% Contractor has exceeded some of the significant award-fee criteria and has met overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract in the aggregate as defined and measured against the criteria in the award-fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.
YELLOW
(Satisfactory)
No Greater than 50%
Contractor has met overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract in the aggregate as defined and measured against the criteria in the award-fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.
RED
(Unsatisfactory)
0% Contractor has failed to meet overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract in the aggregate as defined and measured against the criteria in the award-fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.
(ii) Award Fee Determination: The relationship of the percent of award fee pool paid for each contract line item evaluated during the Award Fee Evaluation period (subject to the determination of the FDO) to the performance rating will be as follows:
Award Fee = Numerical score (expressed as a percentage with a maximum of 100%) X Award Fee Pool for that period
For numerical scores 50-75, the award fee earned by the contractor will be 50% of the Award Fee Pool for that period.
Note: A performance rating of 49 or below is deemed unsatisfactory. The contractor is not entitled to any award fee for a rating of 49 or below.
MANAGEMENT (50%)
DARK BLUE PURPLE GREEN YELLOW RED
91-100% 76-90% 51-75% No Greater than 50% 49-0%
CONTRACTOR'S
MANAGEMENT
CONTRACTOR'S
MANAGEMENT
CONTRACTOR'S
MANAGEMENT
CONTRACTOR'S
MANAGEMENT
CONTRACTOR'S
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM SYSTEM SYSTEM SYSTEM SYSTEM
Management System
Effectiveness
Management System
Effectiveness
Management System
Effectiveness
Management System Effectiveness
Management System
Effectiveness The Contractor met contractual requirements, and the management team demonstrates a policy of total corporate commitment across all levels of the organization. The management team effectively develops and implements process improvements in support of planning and production efforts, and proactively facilitates a coordinated and integrated production effort across their area of authority. Upper management is actively involved in management of the availability, efficiently coordinating all production efforts.
The Contractor met contractual requirements, and the management team actively engages in continuous process improvements throughout the organization to improve planning and production efforts.
Management fosters a cooperative customer service program that anticipates and responds to the Government requirements.
Contractor integrates ship’s work, training and habitability requirements into the overall production plan, maximizing efficiencies and maintaining schedule and cost.
The Contractor met contractual requirements, and the management team effectively utilizes lessons learned to identify and preclude adverse incidents that impact schedule, cost or quality. The contractor manages schedules and tracks all availability activities, identifying problems and coordinating resolutions while maintaining schedule.
Contractor establishes management procedures to identify behind schedule conditions and unfavorable variances.
Contractor applies systems and procedures and provides timely identification of scheduling problem areas to permit prompt management action to correct unsatisfactory conditions.
Contractor management team is unavailable and ineffective, requiring Government intervention to prevent avoidable incidents and schedule disruptions.
Management does not provide adequate response to changes in work scope, operational or crew training requirements, and have major impact to schedule or cost.
Production efforts are not coordinated.
Contractor provided notification of excess funds by the 50-60% point in the availability.
Contractor provided notification of excess funds by the 61-70% point in the availability.
Contractor provided notification of excess funds by the 71-80% point in the availability.
Contractor successfully executed the performance of work to meet cost goals.
Contractor did not notify the Government regarding excess funds.
Contractor completed documentation of CFRs and RCCs on time and did not delay or affect the overall availability schedule. Cost estimates and supporting documentation were
Contractor completed documentation of CFRs and RCCs on time and did not delay or affect the overall availability schedule. Cost estimates and supporting documentation were
Contractor completed documentation of CFRs and RCCs on time and did not delay or affect the overall availability schedule. Cost estimates and supporting documentation were
Contractor completed documentation of CFRs and RCCs on time and did not delay or affect the overall availability schedule. Cost proposals were submitted with sufficient data to support the accuracy and derivation of the price.
Contractor average turnaround time for completion of work item/CFR/RCC pricing growth exceeded 15 days and negatively affected the end date of the availability.
consistently received in less than five days of determination, and the settled cost to proposed cost ratio was consistently accurate.
consistently received in less than five days of determination, and the settled cost to proposed cost ratio was 95-97%.
consistently received in less than five days of determination, and the settled cost to proposed cost ratio was 90-94%.
Contract costs are documented and the program is on schedule relating to the task milestones and/or completion dates. The Government is notified immediately regarding negative changes to the milestones and plans for recovery.
Documentation identifies variance analysis information for any work item with a variance of +/- 10% and variances in excess of $10,000, whichever is higher.
Contractor-provided EAC to BAC ratio remained within + or – 3% for the last 25% of the Availability.
Contract costs are documented and the program is on schedule relating to the task milestones and/or completion dates. The Government is notified immediately regarding negative changes to the milestones.
Documentation identifies variance analysis information for any work item with a variance of +/- 10% and variances in excess of $10,000, whichever is higher.
Contractor-provided EAC to BAC ratio remained within + or – 5% for the last 25% of the Availability.
Contract costs are documented and the program is on schedule relating to the task milestones and/or completion dates.
Documentation identifies variance analysis information for any work item with a variance of +/- 10% and variances in excess of $10,000, whichever is higher.
Contractor-provided EAC to BAC ratio remained within + or – 8% for the last 25% of the Availability. .
Contract costs are documented and the program is on schedule relating to the task milestones and/or completion dates.
Documentation identifies variance analysis information for each work item with a variance of +/- 10% and variances in excess of $10,000, whichever is higher.
EAC/BAC ratio is not finalized until end of the Availability.
Contract costs were not documented or provided as required, and the program is not on schedule relating to the task milestones and/or completion dates. EAC to BAC ratio was greater than 20%
Contractor is highly effective in communicating, coordinating and information sharing between the contractor, government agencies, and its significant subcontractors
Contractor is effective in communicating, coordinating and information sharing between the contractor, government agencies, and its significant subcontractors.
Contractor established routine communicating, coordinating and information sharing between the contractor, government agencies, and its significant subcontractors
Contractor facilitated the communication, coordination and information sharing between the contractor, government agencies, and significant subcontractors.
No coordination plan existed or process evident.
The Contractor does not manage communication, coordination and information sharing between the contractor, government agencies, and its significant subcontractors.
90% or more of the COPAs received provided detailed estimates with all trades and subcontractor breakdowns and complied with cost/pricing data submission requirements of
FAR 52.215-21.
COPAs were submitted in accordance with the RFP target date, proposal deemed complete with all supporting documentation included technical and cost review within 10% of the independent government estimate and ready to put on contract at submission with no revisions necessary.
67-89% of the COPAs received provided detailed estimates with all trade and subcontractor breakdowns and complied with cost/pricing data submission requirements of
FAR 52.215-21.
COPAs were submitted in accordance with the RFP target date, proposal deemed complete with all supporting documentation included technical and cost review within 10% of the independent government estimate and ready to put on contract at submission with no revisions necessary.
51-66% of the COPAs received provided detailed estimates with all trade and subcontractor breakdowns and complied with cost/pricing data submission requirements of
FAR 52.215-21.
COPAs were submitted in accordance with the RFP target date, proposal deemed complete with all supporting documentation included technical and cost review within 10% of the independent government estimate and ready to put on contract at submission with no revisions necessary.
Contractor submitted cost proposals with sufficient data to support the accuracy and derivation of the price.
Justification provided for costs were inadequate or did not comply with cost/pricing data submission requirements of
FAR 52.215-21.
The milestone plan and production schedule was submitted in accordance with NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60 with no discrepancies.
Significant issues were highlighted and updated accurately as they occurred. Potential changes to the schedule were identified to the Government quickly to avoid impacts to the overall schedule.
The milestone plan and production schedule was submitted in accordance with NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60 with no discrepancies.
Known issues were highlighted and updated accurately as they occurred.
The milestone plan and production schedule was submitted in accordance with NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60 with no discrepancies.
Contractor provided and maintained an integrated milestone plan and timely production schedule with no discrepancies.
A formal scheduling system was not maintained, or the scheduling system did not integrate planned activities by multiple maintenance providers, or no progress updates provided or were inaccurate or late.
In assessing the Contractor’s management, evaluators will consider, among other things, facts applicable to technical, schedule, cost, and subcontractors.
In assessing the Contractor’s management, evaluators will consider, among other things, facts applicable to technical, schedule, cost, and subcontractors.
In assessing the Contractor’s management, evaluators will consider, among other things, facts applicable to technical, schedule, cost, and subcontractors.
In assessing the Contractor’s management, evaluators will consider, among other things, facts applicable to technical, schedule, cost, and subcontractors.
In assessing the Contractor’s management, evaluators will consider, among other things, facts applicable to technical, schedule, cost, and subcontractors.
– Were contractor actions and decisions in keeping with the Navy desire to reduce cost/time of maintenance?
– Were contractor recommendations focused on efficiency as well as effectiveness, including use of lean manufacturer process?
– Did contractor demonstrate effective application of lessons learned to improve performance and efficiency?
– Did the customer’s housekeeping expectations exceed the requirements in NAVSE Standard Items, resulting in additional cost?
– The contractor’s overall approach to the program is reflected in all other areas of CPARS. Without effective, proactive management the scores in CPARS categories would be directly affected.
– Has the contractor demonstrated an overall improvement in performance (avail to avail) vice just during one discreet award fee period?
– Has the contractor demonstrated cost savings through the use of process improvement initiatives?
– Does the contractor have a sustained program in place to work with vendors, suppliers and subcontractors to help improve their performance?
NOTE – These elements will also be examined as they relate to Contractor’s IAPA
TECHNICAL (50%)
DARK BLUE PURPLE GREEN YELLOW RED
91-100% 76-90% 51-75% No Greater than 50% 49-0%
CONTRACTOR'S
TECHNICAL
PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTOR'S
TECHNICAL
PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTOR'S
TECHNICAL
PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTOR'S
TECHNICAL
PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTOR'S
TECHNICAL
PERFORMANCE
Technical Technical Technical Technical Technical
Reports, execution planning products, procedures and data requirements were comprehensive, accurate, and delivered on time or early. Reports identified all potential problem areas and the path(s) to resolve them.
Reports, execution planning products, procedures and data requirements were comprehensive, accurate, and delivered on time or early. Reports identified potential problem areas.
Reports, execution planning products, procedures and data requirements were comprehensive, accurate, and delivered early with no deficiencies.
Reports, execution planning products, procedures and data requirements were comprehensive, accurate, and delivered on time.
Reports, execution planning products, procedures and data requirements lacked specificity and were delivered late or after documented issues could be resolved.
Contractor-procured material was correct, available, and supported all planned work to beat schedule goals by over 10%.
Contractor-procured material was correct, available, and supported all planned work to beat schedule goals by 6-10%.
Contractor-procured material was correct, available, and adequately supported planned work to beat schedule goals by up to 5%.
Contractor-procured material was successfully executed for the performance of work to meet schedule goals.
Contractor-procured material was delayed and correction required Government participation to resolve. Some issues were not disclosed in sufficient time to apply corrective actions within the availability period.
A comprehensive quality assurance program was documented and executed. Work completed that was assessed by the Government was found to be 100% accurate and complete.
A comprehensive quality assurance program was documented…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .