S-3_Attachment_Past_Perf_Questionnaire.pdf

ATTACHMENT S-3

CUSTOMER QUESTIONNAIRES

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Contracting Officer Representatives in coordination with the cognizant Contracting Officer are requested to complete the attached past performance questionnaire to be used in evaluating past performance. Upon completion please submit to:

Commander Naval Sea Systems Command Attn: Maria E Gomez, SEA 02443

RFP N00024-14-R-4400

1333 Isaac Hull Avenue, SE Stop 2040 Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376-2040 or e-mail to maria.e.gomez@navy.mil

SOURCE SELECTION

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

OFFEROR:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

CONTRACT TYPE:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT VALUE:

CURRENT CONTRACT VALUE:

NATURE OF EFFORT:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE:

Please complete the questionnaire as a coordinated effort for the Contracting Officer. For the first 18 questions, choose the number on the scale of 1 to 4 that most accurately describes the Offeror’s performance on the contract listed above.

A “4” represents outstanding, and “1” indicates unacceptable. If the question is not applicable, circle “N/A.” Please add any comments and information that may help to determine the Offeror’s probable performance.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Cont.)

1. Evaluate the Offeror’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions. 1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Evaluate the Offeror’s adherence to schedules and mission requirements. 1 2 3 4 N/A

3. How well did the Offeror demonstrate the ability to overcome program, technical, or schedule difficulties?

1 2 3 4 N/A

4. Evaluate the Offeror’s responsiveness to technical direction. 1 2 3 4 N/A

5. Evaluate the Offeror’s technical judgment as demonstrated by the quality of its work products.

1 2 3 4 N/A

6. Evaluate the Offeror’s ability to solve business management problems without extensive guidance from the procuring activity counterpart.

1 2 3 4 N/A

7. How responsive and reasonable was the Offeror with regard to negotiating changes and modifications?

1 2 3 4 N/A

8. Evaluate the Offeror’s labor force in terms of overall qualifications to perform the work required.

1 2 3 4 N/A

9. Evaluate the Offeror’s willingness and ability to integrate as a team with the existing work force (Government and/or other Offerors).

1 2 3 4 N/A

10. Evaluate the stability of the Offeror’s work force. 1 2 3 4 N/A

11. How well did the Offeror exercise management control over his own personnel?

1 2 3 4 N/A

12. If the Offeror used subcontractor(s), how well did the Offeror exercise management control over the subcontractor(s)?

1 2 3 4 N/A

13. Evaluate the Offeror’s work control procedures. 1 2 3 4 N/A

14. How responsive was the Offeror to after hour’s emergency calls? 1 2 3 4 N/A

15. Evaluate Offeror’s cost reporting and estimating system. 1 2 3 4 N/A

16. Evaluate the responsiveness and quality of Offeror reports and documentation.

1 2 3 4 N/A

17. Evaluate the Offeror’s development and utilization of key personnel. 1 2 3 4 N/A

18. If the contract specified subcontracting goals, how well did the Offeror comply?

1 2 3 4 N/A

19. Was the Offeror cooperative in negotiations and in resolving issues? YES NO

20. Have there been any terminations of tasks due to inability to meet technical requirements or delivery schedules? If so, how many?

YES NO

21. Would you award similar contracts to the Offeror in the future? YES NO

22. What role did you play (e.g., COR, PCO, ACO)? How long? _________________

NAME (Printed)/Phone/Title SIGNATURE DATE

Comments: