20132609_BQResponse_(A0055-A0061).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION FOR THE PRODUCTION OF THE COMMON PROCESSING SYSTEM (CPS) (SB SET-ASIDE)
- Solicitation number
- N0002413R5213
About this file
Responses to Solicitation Questions A0055-A0061
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
A0055-61
| Common Question No. | Date Posted | RFP REFERENCE/DISCUSSION (if necessary) | QUESTION | NAVSEA RESPONSE |
| A0055 | 9/26/13 | Common Question No. A0018 within 20130609_BQResponse_(A0001-A0054).xlsx, and RFP: Section C- Page 53, Section 3.8.2 | In response to question no. A0018, the government states, "the contractor R&M personnel shall also support all formal and informal meetings, design reviews, working groups, and Product Oriented Surveys to the extent necessary to conduct the R&M Program in accordance with the contractual milestones and T&M requirements." The CLIN for which these costs are associated is FFP, therefore, in order for a contractor to provide a FFP for same, a specific number of each requirement is necessary. Please confirm it is the intent of the government not to change the CLIN structure to CPFF for this undefined requirement in order to accommodate a specific number for each to maintain a FFP CLIN. We will anticipate an Amendment to the RFP delineating the specific number for each meeting, review, working group, and survey, as required under a FFP CLIN. | Concur. Section C, paragraph 3.8.2 has been restated: "3.8.2 Program Review. The Contractor shall conduct, participate in and prepare for R&M program reviews on an annual basis. Agenda shall be provided five calendar days in advance of each review to provide adequate coverage of topics and participant preparation." Solicitation has been amended. |
| A0056 | 9/26/13 | Common Question No. A0016 within 20130609_BQResponse_(A0001-A0054).xlsx, | NAVSEA Response states "CDRL (A013) will be updated to reflect that the Configuration Management Plan will be required 15 days after contract award. Attachment A has been amended". However, CDRL A013 provided in Attachment A states " A draft copy is due NLT 45 Calendar days after Contract Award" Our assumption is the CDRL takes precedence over the NAVSEA response. Please confirm which has precedence. | The CDRL will take precendence and the CDRL will be due 45 days after contract award. |
| A0057 | 9/26/13 | Common Question No. A0019 within 20130609_BQResponse_(A0001-A0054).xlsx, | NAVSEA Response states "The CDRL (A023) will be updated to reflect initial report due at 15 days after contract award. Attachment A has been amended". However, CDRL A013 provided in Attachment A states " A draft copy is due NLT 45 Calendar days after Contract Award" Our assumption is the CDRL takes precedence over the NAVSEA response. Please confirm which has precedence. | The CDRL will take precendence and the CDRL will be due 45 days after contract award. |
| A0058 | 9/26/13 | Common Question No. A0052 within the questions and answers file, "20130609_BQResponse_(A0001-A0054).xlsx" | NAVSEA Response states "the Government anticipates scheduling presentations between 23 September 2013 and 18 October 2013," whereas Section L of Amendment 1 requests dates anticipated to schedule presentations between 21 October 2013 and 14 November 2013. Since the due date for proposal submissions is 3 October 2013 and Section L of the Amendment takes precedence, we wanted to bring this to your attention in case you receive questions regarding same. | Dates in response A0052 are in error. Use dates from Section L. |
| A0059 | 9/26/13 | Common Question No. A0003 within the questions and answers file, "20130609_BQResponse_(A0001-A0054).xlsx" | RFP: SECTION L - Page 153, Section 2.2.1 Supporting Pricing Data for FFP CLINs references higher level MFG P/N's containing various lower level subassemblies. It appears that some of the lower level subassemblies are EOL items. Will the government provide alternate MFG P/Ns without the EOL lower level subassemblies or is it acceptable for the Offerors to provide supporting pricing data minus the lower level EOL subassemblies? Please clarify. | Offerors shall provide supporting pricing data minus the lower level End of Life (EOL) subassemblies |
| A0060 | 9/26/13 | RFP Section B "Spare and Repairs" Table associated with Note H | Will drawings be provided for the added items? | The added items from Solicitation Amendment 1 have been removed from Note H. We are no longer requiring that the Contractor bid on these parts. Solicitation has been amended. |
| A0061 | 9/26/13 | Amendment 0001 - Section L-3, 1.0 and 1.5 (proposal delivery instructions) | In light of the current events that took place at the Washington Navy Yard, will proposals still be permitted to be hand carried and delivered in person? | Yes, please hand carry and deliver to the following address. Solicitation has been amended: |
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND/NAVSEA 00C
ATTN: MR. KHANH PHAM
SEA 02522P
BUILDING 218, THIRD FLOOR
1435 10TH STREET, S.E.
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC 20374-5144
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .