Amendment 002 N00019-10-R-0069 Q A 012111.doc

Q# 001 T34/T44/T6 CLS RFP, N00019-10-R-0069-0002, QUESTIONS/ANSWERS

Q:

Amendment 0002 removed the $3M from CLIN 0166 while keeping it a CPFF CLIN.

Question: The PWS is not specific as to what equipment the contractor is expected to procure, nor does it provide enough information about the facilities (dimensions, are the spaces fan rooms, rest rooms or offices, etc.) to determine how to go about building an estimate. During the site visit to Corpus Christi, offerors were not allowed to visit the T-6 hangar because it was undergoing rehabilitation. The building diagram provided in Amendment 0002 has no dimensions included, nor does it identify the above or location of outlets, type(s) of power, etc. Since no site survey has been allowed to ascertain the condition of the hangar facilities (Rooms, shops, currently installed equipment, etc.), request the government provide more information on the description and condition of Hangar 51 and its facilities. If the government does not provide information before proposal due date, then request CLIN 0166 to be identified as “TBN” to be negotiated after contract award.

A:

The T-6 Hangar will be number 58, vice 51 as referenced in this question. The Government has added the notional drawing of Hangar 58 to PWS Enclosure 1, Corpus Christi, RFP Attachment 18 under Amendment 0003.

Q# 002 T34/T44/T6 CLS RFP, N00019-10-R-0069-0002, QUESTIONS/ANSWERS

Q:

Discussion: The RFP contained an attachment titled “CBA MOA’s”. This document does not contain an MOA for satellite site personnel assigned to Redstone Army Airfield, Huntsville, AL, or Fort Bragg, nor does there appear to be a CBA or AWD for these two locations.

Question: Does the Government intend to release either an MOA or CBA/AWD to address personnel assigned to the satellite sites at Redstone Army Airfield, Huntsville, AL, or Fort Bragg, NC?

A:

The CBA for Huntsville, AL and the AWD for Ft. Bragg, NC have been added to Section J of the RFP under Amendment 0003.

Q# 003 T34/T44/T6 CLS RFP, N00019-10-R-0069-0002, QUESTIONS/ANSWERS

Q:

Discussion: CLIN 1428AA contains a band of flight hours ranging from 6,000 to 6,500 hours. The next quarter for this CLIN (1528AA) is blank with no flight hours, however the following quarter (CLIN 1628AA) returns back to the 6,000 to 6,500 flight hour level.

Question: Is it the Government’s intent to leave CLIN 1528AA blank and at 0 flight hours or should the offeror only propose 6 ranges for CLIN 1528 as opposed the 7 ranges in the other quarters?

A:

The RFP is updated under Amendment 0003.

Q# 004 T34/T44/T6 CLS RFP, N00019-10-R-0069-0002, QUESTIONS/ANSWERS

Q:

Discussion: CLIN 1450AA contains a band of aircraft from 104 to 107. The next quarter for this CLIN (1550AA) is blank with no aircraft, and the following quarter (CLIN 1650AA) returns back to the 104 to 107 aircraft level.

Question: Is its the Government’s intent to leave CLIN 1550AA blank and at 0 aircraft or should the offeror only propose 6 ranges for CLIN 1550 as opposed the 7 ranges in the other quarters?

A:

The RFP is updated under Amendment 0003.

Q# 005 T34/T44/T6 CLS RFP, N00019-10-R-0069-0002, QUESTIONS/ANSWERS

Q:

Discussion: Transient services for NAS Fallon were removed from the PWS in Amendment 0002, but Section B still identifies priced CLINs for NAS Fallon.

Question: Will the Government please reserve the CLINs identified for NAS Fallon?

A:

The RFP has been updated under Amendment 0003.

Q# 006 T34/T44/T6 CLS RFP, N00019-10-R-0069-0002, QUESTIONS/ANSWERS

Q:

Question:

Please advise if a conformed RFP will be issued that incorporates changes from 0001 and 0002.

A:

No; the contractor shall acknowledge the RFP and all amendments upon submission of their offer. See Block 14 of each Amendment.