MUOS Past Performance Questionnaire 20200514.docx

(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Modification Upgrade of the Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) Capable Satellite Communications (SATCOM) System

RFP: FA8552-20-R-0007

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (Government or Commercial, please specify)

A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Role in the Program/Work Performed As:

_____ Prime _____ Subcontractor _____ Vendor/Supplier

F. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

G. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

H. Period of Performance:

1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ___________________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): ____________________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable): ___________________

I. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

J. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

K. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

L. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency name: __________________________________________________________ B. Address: _________________________________________________________________________ C. Customer or Agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

D. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name/Role of Evaluator Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager, etc.) __________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number/email: ________________________________________________________

D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

NOTE: In Section 4, should your response be other than “satisfactory (S),” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” in Section 5 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.

NOTE to Past Performance Evaluation Team: The following are SAMPLE questions. Past Performance evaluation teams MUST construct a simple and concise PPQ, tailored to seek out key information tied to the significant aspects of the planned acquisition. Teams should develop as few questions as possible. Avoid questions that can be answered with a “yes” or “no” but instead, include probing and direct questions to draw out only the required information desired.

1. How did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification?

2. How was the quality of technical system operations & maintenance testing and certification efforts?

3. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

4. How adequate/effective was the System Engineering Process?

5. How adequate/effective were the contractor’s environmental safety procedures?

1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

5. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations (if applicable)?

6. How did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts?

7. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)?

1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

1. To what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

2. How effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!