MDNR_Cheboygan State Park_ACM LCP Survey Report_2023_0116 w Attachments.pdf

PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS AND LIMITED LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SURVEY

CHEBOYGAN STATE PARK – TOILET AND SHOWER BUILDING

4490 Beach Road Cheboygan, MI 49721

Project #188BS22769

PREPARED FOR:

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

PREPARED BY:

Atlas Technical Consultants LLC 46555 Humboldt Drive, Suite 100 Novi, Michigan 48377 January 16, 2023

Page | 1

46555 Humboldt Drive, Suite 100 Novi, Michigan 48377

(248) 669-5147 | oneatlas.com

January 16, 2023

Mr. David M Dekett Unit Supervisor Clear Lake State Park 20500 M-33 North Atlanta, Michigan 49709

Subject: Pre-Demolition Asbestos and Limited Lead-Containing Paint Survey Cheboygan State Park – Toilet and Shower Building

Andrew DeLodder State of Michigan Asbestos Inspector Atlas Technical Consultants LLC

Respectfully submitted, If you have any questions, please call us at 248.669.5140.

Response Act of 1987 (AHERA).

Construction Industry Standard (29 CFR 1926.1101), and the Asbestos Hazard and Emergency specified in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Asbestos certified asbestos inspector. The sampling was conducted in accordance with sampling criteria and December 7 and 8, 2022 by Industrial Hygienist, Mr. Andrew DeLodder, State of Michigan The pre-demolition asbestos and lead-containing paint sampling was conducted on December 7 and lead-containing paint (LCP) prior to demolition activities.

sampling was to identify and collect samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) limited lead-containing paint survey performed at the above referenced site. The purpose of this Atlas is pleased to present this report detailing the findings of the pre-demolition asbestos and

Dear Mr. Dekett:

Cheboygan, MI 49721 4490 Beach Road

Atlas Technical Consultants LLC Project Manager Martin Gamble

Page | i

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Pre-Demolition Asbestos Survey

2. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

2.1 General Property and Building Information

2.2 Exterior Finish Descriptions

2.3 Interior Building Descriptions

3. PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors

3.3 Laboratory Analytical Methodology

3.4 Sampling Results

4. LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SAMPLING

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.2 Lead-Containing Paint

6. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

TABLES

Table 3-1 ACM Sampling Results

Table 4-1 Lead-Containing Paint Sampling Results

APPENDICES

Appendix A Asbestos Laboratory Report Appendix B Lead-Containing Paint Laboratory Report

Page | 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew DeLodder completed the pre-demolition asbestos and limited lead-containing paint survey of the Toilet and Shower Building, located in Cheboygan State Park located at 4490

Beach Road, in Cheboygan, Michigan on December 7 and 8, 2022.

Thirty-six (36) asbestos bulk samples, taken from twelve (12) homogenous areas, were collected and submitted for analysis by PLM. Of the 36 samples submitted, fifty-seven (57) sample layers were analyzed.

The results of laboratory testing indicated that none of the suspect materials contain asbestos.

Three (3) representative samples of paint, taken from interior and exterior areas of the building, were collected and submitted for analysis by Flame AAS. The results of laboratory testing indicated that three

(3) samples contained levels of lead greater than the laboratory reporting limits.

If any additional materials are discovered during renovation/demolition activities, such materials must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise.

Page | 3

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of this project was to conduct a pre-demolition asbestos and limited lead-containing paint survey of the Toilet and Shower Building in Cheboygan State Park located at 4490 Beach Road, in

Cheboygan, Michigan (herein referred to as “the property”).

1.2 Pre-Demolition Asbestos Survey

The scope of the pre-demolition asbestos survey included the following:

Review of existing asbestos reports for the building, if available;

Survey of the property building(s);

Identification of accessible suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs);

Collection and analysis of bulk samples of suspect friable and non-friable materials.

2. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

2.1 General Property and Building Information

The purpose of this project was to conduct a pre-demolition asbestos and limited lead-containing paint survey of the Toilet and Shower Building.

General property and building information is presented in the following table:

General Property and Building Information

Date of Inspection: December 7, 2022 & December 8, 2022

Inspectors Andrew Delodder, Inspector # A48677

Property Address: 4490 Beach Road, in Cheboygan, Michigan

Property Owner Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Building Description: Cheboygan State Park Restroom Building

2.2 Exterior Finish Descriptions

The exterior of the building included brick and masonry with a shingled-sloped roof.

2.3 Interior Building Descriptions

The interior finishes of the building included plastered walls and ceiling, and floor tiled floors.

3. PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS SURVEY

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew DeLodder conducted the pre-demolition asbestos inspection of the Toilet and Shower building on December 7 and 8, 2022. Mr. DeLodder is a State of Michigan Certified Asbestos

Inspector’s (Certification No. A48677). The building was visually inspected for the presence of building materials that are suspected to contain asbestos. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected and placed into individual containers for transport to a National Voluntary Lab Accreditation Program (NVLAP)-accredited laboratory for analysis. Materials typically known as non-asbestos items (i.e. fibrous glass, foam rubber, wood, etc.) were not sampled. The asbestos inspection consisted of the following three basic procedures:

Page | 4

> Conducting a visual inspection of the structures;

> Identifying homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspect surfacing, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials; and

> Sampling accessible, friable and non-friable suspect materials.

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

Prior to collecting any samples, homogenous areas (HAs) were identified. A homogeneous sampling area can be described as one or more areas of material that are similar in appearance and texture and that have the same apparent installation date, appearance and function. Actual number of samples collected from each homogeneous sampling area may vary, based on the type of material and professional opinion of the inspector.

3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors

From the list of suspect homogeneous areas, a physical assessment was performed for each material on the list. A physical assessment includes evaluating the condition, assessing the potential for disturbance, and determining the friability of each material. By definition, "friable" materials are those that can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Each material identified was further classified into one of three categories: surfacing materials, thermal systems insulation (TSI) and miscellaneous materials. Each of the three categories have specific sampling requirements, outlined below.

Surfacing Materials: Refers to spray-applied or troweled surfaces such as plaster ceilings and walls, fireproofing, textured paints, textured plasters, and spray-applied acoustical surfaces.

Thermal System Insulation: Refers to insulation used to inhibit heat gain or loss on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and various other building components.

Miscellaneous Materials: Refers to friable and non-friable products and materials that do not fit in any of the above two categories such as resilient floor covering, baseboards, mastics, adhesives, roofing material, caulking, glazing, and siding. This category also contains wallboard and ceiling tile.

All materials were assessed related to their condition in one of the three categories: good (intact), fair

(damaged) or poor (significantly damaged) per Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 763. Material with localized, significant damage was also assessed as poor.

3.3 Laboratory Analytical Methodology

Bulk samples were analyzed by Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc. (ETL) using polarized-light microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining (Method Reference: 40 CFR Part 763, Volume 47, No. 103, May

27, 1982 pg. 23376). This laboratory participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP #201028-0), a quality assurance program for PLM analysis, and is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as well as accreditation requirements under 15 CFR Part 25.

Copies of the laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody forms are included in

Appendix A. Positive sample results are reported in percent asbestos by volume of the sample and the type of asbestos material within the sample. Other common non-asbestos components may also be noted on the analytical reports.

3.4 Sampling Results

Bulk samples were collected from the site building and analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), EPA

Method 600/R-93/116.

The following table provides a summary of accessible suspect and confirmed ACMs from the Site buildings:

Page | 5

Table 3-1 ACM Sampling Results

Sample ID/Material

Location of

Materials Material

Estimated Quantity

Asbestos Content

1-CC-A,B,C EA 1,3,4

Concrete Chip- Poured Concrete Pad/

Exterior Concrete

NA ND

2-EC-A,B,C EA 2,3,4

Exterior Caulk- Brown Window/

Door Frames/ Roofline

NA ND

3-EC-A,B,C EA 1

Exterior Caulk- Black, Perimeter of Fiberglass Window

NA ND

4-RM-A,B,C EA 5

Roofing Materials-

Black Asphalt Shingle

NA ND

5-GM-A,B,C FS 1,2,3

Ceramic Tile, Grout & Mortar-

6” Red Floor Tile

NA ND

6-GM-A,B,C FS 1

Ceramic Tile, Grout & Mortar-

12” Red Floor Tile

NA ND

7-IC-A,B,C FS 1,2,3

Interior Caulk-

Gray, Soft, Along Wood Trim

NA ND

8-BM-A,B,C FS 2,3 Brick Mortar- Glazed Block Wall NA ND

9-GM-A,B,C FS 2,3

Ceramic Tile, Grout & Mortar-

1” Multi-Colored Bathroom Counter

NA ND

10-IC-A,B,C FS 2,3

Interior Caulk- White, Perimeter of Toilets Sinks, & Urinals

NA ND

11-IC-A,B,C FS 5

Interior Caulk- Gray, Hard, Perimeter of Door Frames

NA ND

12-PI-A,B,C FS 5

Pipe Insulation-

Fiberglass Wrapped in Duct Tape

NA ND

EA=Exterior Area FS Functional Space NA=Not Applicable ND= None Detected

In the event additional suspect material is discovered during renovation activities, this material should be treated as presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) in accordance with regulations 29 CFR

1926.1101 and 1910.1001 and other applicable state and local regulations and either sampled to confirm or nullify asbestos content or be treated as ACM and handled accordingly.

4. LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SAMPLING

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew DeLodder conducted the lead-containing paint (LCP) sampling of the Toilet and Shower building on December 7 and 8, 2022. The sampling included physical sampling of paint coatings that were deemed representative of the predominant paint coatings observed.

Three (3) paint chip samples were collected and submitted to Accurate Analytical Testing Laboratory, 30105

Beverly Road, Romulus, Michigan for lead analysis. Bulk samples were analyzed using the Environmental

Protection Agency's Test Method SW 846-7420 and 3050B using Flame AAS to determine lead concentration in percent (%) by weight. Copies of the laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix B.

Page | 6

The following table provides a summary of the LCP sampling:

Table 4-1 Lead-Containing Paint Sampling Results

Sample ID Sample Location Color Lead

Content

1-LBP-Brown Exterior & Interior Paint Brown 0.0068

2- LBP-White Interior Paint White 0.0234

3- LBP-Beige Interior Paint Beige 0.0405

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The results of laboratory testing during the pre-renovation asbestos survey conducted at the property indicate that the following materials sampled were found to contain asbestos:

Sample ID/Material

Location of Materials

Material Estimated Quantity

Asbestos Content

None Contain Asbestos

If any additional materials are discovered during renovation/demolition activities, such materials must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise.

5.2 Lead-Containing Paint

Three (3) representative samples of paint, taken from interior and exterior areas of the Toilet and Shower building, were collected and submitted for analysis by Flame AAS. The results of laboratory testing during the limited lead-containing paint sampling conducted at the property indicate that the three (3) samples contained levels of lead greater than the laboratory reporting limits.

The presence of lead-containing paint requires, under OSHA 1926.62 requirements, that the contractor performing renovation, surface preparation, and other activities that impact or potentially impact the lead-coated components, evaluate potential worker exposures to airborne lead. This evaluation can be based, for the specific activities denoted in 1926.62, on objective data obtained by the contractor on other, similar, worksites within the prior calendar year. In addition, lead-containing paint and lead-coated waste and construction debris must be evaluated and, on a case-by-case basis depending on this evaluation, quantitative analysis be performed on these waste steams to ensure compliance with EPA waste disposal regulations.

The presence of Lead-Containing Paint (LCP) and/or Lead-Based Paint (LBP) does not, in itself, trigger regulatory compliance actions. However, when these materials are disturbed, the requirements of OSHA

(1926.1101) and EPA may become operative. Appropriate actions in terms of removal methods, emissions control, worker protection, and waste disposal should be considered by the general contractor and applicable subcontractors while completing renovation activities.

Page | 7

6. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on conditions that were noted during the NESHAP inspections conducted on December 7 and 8, 2022 performed by Atlas. Selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling were based on EPA Guidance documents, Atlas’s observations, and the assumption that building vintage and renovation history information presented to Atlas allowed the proper designation of homogenous materials for each building.

This document does not contain the elements necessary for an Abatement Work plan, and this document does not contain, nor should it take the place of technical specifications for ACM removal.

Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against changes to material from future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions against present ACM material in locations not investigated.

The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user.

APPENDIX A

ASBESTOS LABORATORY REPORT

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To:

Attention:

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Novi, Michigan 48377

Project Location: Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

Client Project: 188BS22769

253265ETL Job:

Report Date: 12/16/2022

Robert Smith

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1432922 Asbestos01-CC-A 12/16/2022

1432923 Asbestos01-CC-B 12/16/2022

1432924 Asbestos01-CC-C 12/16/2022

1432925 Asbestos02-EC-A 12/16/2022

1432926 Asbestos02-EC-B 12/16/2022

1432927 Asbestos02-EC-C 12/16/2022

1432928 Asbestos03-EC-A 12/16/2022

1432929 Asbestos03-EC-B 12/16/2022

1432930 Asbestos03-EC-C 12/16/2022

1432931 Asbestos04-RM-A 12/16/2022

1432932 Asbestos04-RM-B 12/16/2022

1432933 Asbestos04-RM-C 12/16/2022

1432934 Asbestos05-GM-A 12/16/2022

1432935 Asbestos05-GM-B 12/16/2022

1432936 Asbestos05-GM-C 12/16/2022

1432937 Asbestos06-GM-A 12/16/2022

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1432938 Asbestos06-GM-B 12/16/2022

1432939 Asbestos06-GM-C 12/16/2022

1432940 Asbestos07-IC-A 12/16/2022

1432941 Asbestos07-IC-B 12/16/2022

1432942 Asbestos07-IC-C 12/16/2022

1432943 Asbestos08-BM-A 12/16/2022

1432944 Asbestos08-BM-B 12/16/2022

1432945 Asbestos08-BM-C 12/16/2022

1432946 Asbestos09-GM-A 12/16/2022

1432947 Asbestos09-GM-B 12/16/2022

1432948 Asbestos09-GM-C 12/16/2022

1432949 Asbestos10-IC-A 12/16/2022

1432950 Asbestos10-IC-B 12/16/2022

1432951 Asbestos10-IC-C 12/16/2022

1432952 Asbestos11-IC-A 12/16/2022

1432953 Asbestos11-IC-B 12/16/2022

1432954 Asbestos11-IC-C 12/16/2022

1432955 Asbestos12-PI-A 12/16/2022

1432956 Asbestos12-PI-B 12/16/2022

1432957 Asbestos12-PI-C 12/16/2022

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

Reviewed by:

Summary

Sample Layer MasticMethod

PLM 57Emily Nowacki

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432922

01-CC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432923

01-CC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432924

01-CC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432925

02-EC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432926

02-EC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432927

02-EC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432928

03-EC-A

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseBlackExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432929

03-EC-B

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseBlackExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432930

03-EC-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseBlackExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432931

04-RM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBlackRoofing Materials- Asphalt

Shingle Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432932

04-RM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBlackRoofing Materials- Asphalt

Shingle Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432933

04-RM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBlackRoofing Materials- Asphalt

Shingle Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432934

05-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432934

05-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432934

05-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432935

05-GM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432935

05-GM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432935

05-GM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432936

05-GM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432936

05-GM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432936

05-GM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432937

06-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432937

06-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432937

06-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432938

06-GM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432938

06-GM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432938

06-GM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432939

06-GM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432939

06-GM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432939

06-GM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432940

07-IC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432941

07-IC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432942

07-IC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432943

08-BM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayBrick Mortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432944

08-BM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayBrick Mortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432945

08-BM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayBrick Mortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432946

09-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432946

09-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432946

09-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432947

09-GM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432947

09-GM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432947

09-GM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432948

09-GM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432948

09-GM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432948

09-GM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432949

10-IC-A

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseWhiteInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432950

10-IC-B

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseWhiteInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432951

10-IC-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseWhiteInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432952

11-IC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432953

11-IC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432954

11-IC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432955

12-PI-A

PLM 8% OtherPLM 90% Fiberglass

PLM 2% Cellulose

YellowPipe Insulation

Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432955

12-PI-A

PLM 25% OtherPLM 75% CelluloseGrayDuct Tape

Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Restroom Building; Cheboygan State Park

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253265

188BS22769

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432956

12-PI-B

PLM 8% OtherPLM 90% Fiberglass

PLM 2% Cellulose

YellowPipe Insulation

Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432956

12-PI-B

PLM 25% OtherPLM 75% CelluloseGrayDuct Tape

Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432957

12-PI-C

PLM 8% OtherPLM 90% Fiberglass

PLM 2% Cellulose

YellowPipe Insulation

Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432957

12-PI-C

PLM 25% OtherPLM 75% CelluloseGrayDuct Tape

Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Dave Cousino

Analyst:

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

A % Asbestos result of "Trace" indicates that the analyzed material was found to contain less than 1% asbestos and would not be considered an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM).

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

APPENDIX B

LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT LABORATORY REPORT

Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Paint by EPA SW-846 Method 7000B/3050B*

Client Project :

868388

12/22/2022

12/23/2022

Date Reported :

Date Analyzed :

Date Received :

AAT Project :

Phone :

Email :

Fax : 248-669-5147 dawn.lecesne@oneatlas.com

248-669-5140

Dawn LeCesne

Atlas Technical Consultants

Attn :

Client :

4490 BEACH ROAD CHEBOYGAN MI 49721Project Location :

188BS522769

Novi, MI 48377

46555 Humboldt Dr.

30105 Beverly Road

Romulus, MI 48174

Ph: 734-629-8161; Fax: 734-629-8431

Sampling Date : 12/07/2022

12/23/2022

Lab Sample ID Result Lead

(% by weight) PPMSample DescriptionClient Code

Calculated R L

(% by weight)

1-LBP-BROWN EXT AND INT BROWN PAINT8066981 68 0.0068 0.0026

2-LBP-WHITE INT WHITE PAINT8066982 234 0.0234 0.0013

3-LBP-BEIGE INT BEIGE PAINT8066983 405 0.0405 0.0052

Analyst Signature

Tom Hamlin

868388 AAT Project:Date Printed: 12/23/2022 12:00PM

ND = Not Detected, N/A = Not Available, RL = Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 5 ug/sample. For true values assume (2) significant figures. The method, batch, and sample Quality Control are acceptable unless otherwise stated. AAT internal SOP S218. The laboratory operates in accord with ISO 17025 guidelines and holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA-LAP and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT, LLC current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as received by the lab. Results in mg/cm2 are calculated based on sample area dimensions supplied by the client.AAT will not assume any liability or responsibility for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Reproduction of this document other than in its entirety is not authorized by AAT, LLC. AAT does not blank correct reported values. Sample data apply only to items analyzed. Current EPA/HUD Interim Standard for lead in paint samples is: 5000 PPM (parts per million) or ug/g which is equivalent to 0.5% by weight. EPA definition of lead-based paint: 1.0 mg/cm2. New York City Regulatory Limits: 0.25% by weight or 0.5 mg/cm2 for investigations for a child. MD and Philadelphia definition of lead-based paint: 0.7 mg/cm2. Note: Samples are stored for 15 days following report date. *=

Validated modified method

AIHA LAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042

Atlas Technical ConsultantsTo :

Attn :

Phone :

AAT Project :

Client Project :

Date Reported :

Project Location :

Email :Dawn LeCesne

248-669-5140 dawn.lecesne@oneatlas.com

868388

188BS522769

4490 BEACH ROAD CHEBOYGAN MI 49721

46555 Humboldt Dr.

Novi, MI 48377

30105 Beverly Road

Romulus, MI 48174

Ph: 734-629-8161; Fax: 734-629-8431

12/23/2022

Sample CompletedAnalysis RequestedClient Code Analyst

8066981 12/23/2022Lead Paint1-LBP-BROWN Tom Hamlin

8066982 12/23/2022Lead Paint2-LBP-WHITE Tom Hamlin

8066983 12/23/2022Lead Paint3-LBP-BEIGE Tom Hamlin

Quality Assurance Coordinator

Reviewed By Elyse Bidle

868388 AAT Project:Date Printed: 12/23/2022 12:00PM

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify AAT immediately. Thank you.

NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, Michigan State Lab # 9996