MDA693 - KTR Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 202 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N62742GDSCC
About this file
This document is an Industry Feedback Questionnaire from the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command related to a draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for the construction of a command center and power generation facility in Guam. The estimated project cost is between $250 million to $500 million.
The key details include:
- The Government is seeking feedback from industry on various aspects of the project, including challenges, construction methods, procurement periods, labor pool, and construction timeline.
- The 60-day proposal preparation period and a 30-42 month construction contract period of performance are being evaluated for feasibility.
- The Government is interested in understanding the potential for small business participation and self-performance by the prime contractor.
- Responses to the questionnaire are due by August 15, 2024, but this is not a solicitation and the Government will not provide responses to the comments received.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND PACIFIC
258 MAKALAPA DR STE 100
PEARL HARBOR HI 96860-3134
INDUSTRY FEEDBACK QUESTIONNAIRE
SPECIAL NOTICE N62742GDSCC
DRAFT RFP – PDI: GUAM DEFENSE SYSTEM, COMMAND CENTER, JOINT
REGION MARIANAS, GUAM
QUESTIONAIRE. Your feedback is important. Please respond to below questions. Note that the questions pertain to the 100% Design for MDA-693. This questionnaire is due on 15 August 2024.
Firm Name:
Firm Address:
Phone Number:
UEI #:
Name/Title of Person Completing Questionnaire:
E-mail of designated POC:
1. Concerning the project MDA-693: Would your Company more likely be (circle one):
a. Prime Contractor
b. Joint Venture (JV) partner of a Prime Contractor.
c. Subcontractor
d. Other:
2. What are your primary concerns about this procurement and award process?
3. If you are a Prime Contractor:
What percentage of work would you self-perform for a project magnitude between $250-500 million dollar command center and power generation facility in Guam? %
What percentage of the total contract value would you expect to be performed by small business through teaming or subcontracting? %
If percentage of small business performance (teaming or subcontract) is less than 20%, provide a reason why.
4. The proposal preparation period for the MDA-693 construction contract may be 60 calendar days. Do you have any comments on the feasibility of this proposal period? We are specifically interested in the feasibility of obtaining necessary letters from surety(ies) and establishment of legal partnerships.
5. Based on your review of the 100% Design for MDA-693, what project components do you see as particularly challenging or difficult?
6. Based on your review of the 100% Design for MDA-693, is the range provided for the construction value of the project realistic ($250,000,000 to $500,000,000)?
Yes / No (circle one). Comments:
7. Based on your review of the 100% Design for MDA-693, do you see opportunities for improvement or innovation with respect to?
a. Means or methods of construction.
b. Procurement periods.
c. Provision of temporary utilities.
d. Security restrictions.
e. Laydown area availability.
f. Regulatory limitations.
g. Availability or substitutions of materials a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
8. Based on your review of the 100% Design for MDA-693, is it your opinion that the local labor pool can support the construction of this project, along with other anticipated construction projects on Guam? If additional labor needs to be brought onto the island, are the current housing resources available sufficient to support the incoming labor?
9. Based on your review of the 100% Design for MDA-693, what would be the approximate crew size and hours/day required to support the project?
10. Based on your review of the 100% Design for MDA-693, please provide your opinion on a construction contract period of performance between 30-42 months. Is this a viable expectation for construction contract completion; including mobilization and logistics for labor, equipment and materials?
(YES / NO / Multiple Choice if NO)
YES, viable construction between 30-42 months
NO, not viable
If NO, please indicate a more viable range for construction contract completion:
< 30 months
> 42 months
If NO, please provide explanation of primary reasons why:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .