Attachment_17_-_SMAW_Mod_2_Vendor_QA_Combined_021315.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Shoulder-Launched Multi-Purpose Assault Weapon
- Solicitation number
- M67854-15-R-1000
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
Questions and Answers
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M67854-15-R-1000-0002.pdf | ||
| M67854-15-R-1000-0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_8_ICS_Comp_Matrix_Final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit_1_SMAW_MOD_2_CDRLS_12015.pdf | ||
| Attachment_10_GFP_List_Part_B_Final.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_5_GFP_Part_A_Final.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_12_Staffing_Matrix_Final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_9_PTD_Spares_Repair_Parts_List_Template_Final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_15_MT_SE_Template_Final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_6_E7901_EO-TK_SL3_Final.pdf | ||
| M67854-15-R-1000.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_11_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Final.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_7_SOW_Comp_Matrix_PSPEC_Comp_Matrix_Final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_01_SMAW_MK-153_Mod_2_SOW_1.20.15.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_13_Production_Facility_Readiness_Report.Site_Survey_Checklist_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_16_SMAW_Mod_2_Stepladder_Pricing_Matrix.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Combined
| # | Document/Section | Paragraph/Ref Description | Question/Issue/Concern | Response |
| 1 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | The Find (item) numbers specified in the notes do not match the listing in the BOM. | The BOM and/or the Find numbers in the notes require updating. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 2 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | The drawing for find no.25, drawing # 82A5027A1261, Pin,Dowel was not included in the data pack. | We need a copy of this drawing. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 3 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing refers to find no. 27, drawing 82A5027A1290, as a Washer, Flat-Stainless Steel. Drawing 82A5027A1290 is for a Spring, Helical Torsion. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 4 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 45, drawing 82A5027A1208, as a Sear. Drawing 82A5027A1208 is for a Screw, Machine-Pan Head, Slotted which is find no.21 on the parts list. The drawing no. for the Sear should be 82A5027A1281 | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 5 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 46, drawing 82A5027A1210, as a Safety-Firing Mechanism. Drawing 82A5027A1210 is for a Generator,Single Pulse-Firing Mechanism. The Generator,Single Pulse-Firing Mechanism, drawing 82A5027A1210 is find no. 9 in the parts list. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 6 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 47, drawing 82A5027A1219, as a Ring, Retaining, External-Appoximated. Drawing 82A5027A1219 is for a Washer, Flat, Stainless Steel. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 7 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 48, drawing 82A5027A1222, as a Actuator, Generator Charge. Drawing 82A5027A1222 is for a Washer, Lock-Internally Toothed. The drawing number for the Actuator, Generator Charge is 82A5027A1260. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 8 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 49, drawing 82A5027A1223, as a Lever Assembly, Manual Control-Selective. Drawing 82A5027A1223 is for a Set Screw-Hex Socket, Flat Point. The drawing number for the Lever Assembly, Manual Control-Selective, is 82A5027A1238. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 9 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 50, Part # DIN 7 M2.5M6X18-A2, as a Guard, Trigger. The drawing number for the Guard, Trigger is 82A5027A1227. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 10 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 52, drawing 82A5027A1294, as a Plunger, Detent. Drawing 82A5027A1294 is for a Grip, Handle, Firing Mechanism. The drawing number for the Plunger Detent, is 82A5027A1258. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 11 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 53, drawing 82A5027A1270, as a Pin, Dowel. Drawing 82A5027A1270 is for a Lead, Electrical. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 12 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 54, drawing 82A5027A1281, as a Cushion, Wire Retaining. Drawing 82A5027A1281 is for a Sear. The drawing number for the Cushion, Wire Retaining, is 82A5027A1298. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 13 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 55, drawing 82A5027A1285, as a Cable Assembly-Switch Electrical. Drawing 82A5027A1285 is for a Frame Assembly-Firing Mechanism. The drawing number for the Cable Assembly-Switch Electrical, is 82A5027A1297. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 14 | TDP Drawing 12024A3000 | This drawing referes to find no. 57, drawing 82A5027A6640, as a Cover, Firing Mechanism Assembly. The drawing number for the Cover, Firing Mechanism Asssembly, is 12024A3100. Cover Firing Mechanism Assembly is already on this drawing as find no. 12. | Drawing correction needed. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 15 | TDP Drawing 12024A3101 | No material is specified. | Update material specification. | Material is 2024 Aluminum QQ-A-250/4 T351. Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing. |
| 16 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1261 | Pin, Dowel | We need a copy of this drawing. | Attachment 4 is updated with the corrected drawing, 12024A3000, removing reference to this part . |
| 17 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1235 | The 2024 aluminum specified to manufacture this part is not readily available. | Would like to request that 7075 or 6061 aluminum be added as an alternative for 2024 aluminum for manufacture of this part. | Proposals shall be based on solicitation documents as posted. |
| 18 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1286 | The 2024 aluminum specified to manufacture this part is not readily available. | Would like to request that 7075 or 6061 aluminum be added as an alternative for 2024 aluminum for manufacture of this part. | Proposals shall be based on solicitation documents as posted. |
| 19 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1287 | The 2024 aluminum specified to manufacture this part is not readily available. | Would like to request that 7075 or 6061 aluminum be added as an alternative for 2024 aluminum for manufacture of this part. | Proposals shall be based on solicitation documents as posted. |
| 20 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A6050 | The 2024 aluminum specified to manufacture this part is not readily available. | Would like to request that 7075 or 6061 aluminum be added as an alternative for 2024 aluminum for manufacture of this part. | Proposals shall be based on solicitation documents as posted. |
| 21 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A6171 | The 2024 aluminum specified to manufacture this part is not readily available. | Would like to request that 7075 or 6061 aluminum be added as an alternative for 2024 aluminum for manufacture of this part. | Proposals shall be based on solicitation documents as posted. |
| 22 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A6173 | The 2024 aluminum specified to manufacture this part is not readily available. | Would like to request that 7075 or 6061 aluminum be added as an alternative for 2024 aluminum for manufacture of this part. | Proposals shall be based on solicitation documents as posted. |
| 23 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1020 | The bond assembly table on sheet 1 specifies the ply orientation as 0 degrees for plys 3 and 4. | Based on the instructions in notes 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 to "wind circumferential layers", the orientation angle should be 90 degrees (or at least close to 90.) | Correct. Orientation for ply 3 and 4 is 90 degrees. Attachment 4 is updated to reflect this requirement in the bond assembly table. |
| 24 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1020 | Note 6: where is "zone E-3" and the arrows referenced in this zone? | Drawing correction needed. | Zone E-3 is now C-4. The updated Attachment 4 shows the arrows. |
| 25 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1020 | Both sheets of the drawing have designations in bold, i.e., (M101), (M102), (M110), (202), (204), etc. To what do these designations refer? Is there a controlling specification missing from the solicitation package that needs to be taken into consideration for the proposal? | Drawing correction needed. | Specification is not missing, no drawing will be updated for this issue. See Classification of Characteristics Block and reference DOD-STD-2101 for requirements and guidance information. |
| 26 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1020 | Detail C: what is the "direction of load"? The arrow seems to be missing | Drawing correction needed. | Load is to the right. Attachment 4 is updated to show the arrow. |
| 27 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1020 | This drawing is based on using fiber materials pre impregnated with resin. Would the customer consider using a "wet wrap" construction technique if the resulting part meets or exceeds the performance requirements found in the drawing notes? | Drawing correction needed. | Proposals shall be based on solicitation documents as posted. |
| 28 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1020 | Note 2.2.6: “… O.D. MACHINING AFTER CURE IS NOT ALLOWED EXCEPT WHERE NOTED.” There is no area noted on the OD where machining is allowed and the OD tolerances are tighter than can be held with the specified production process. Note 7 does seem to address an area where OD machining is allow, however, this note has its own issues | Drawing correction needed. | Machining to maintain O.D. is allowed for proper fit of the front and rear Ring End. Attachment 4 is updated to include this Information. |
| 29 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1020 | Note 7: This note directs the machining of an area of the OD, but the indicated area for the machining is not found on the drawing. This note also seems to refer to an area under the mount of the “…SPOTTING RIFLE MOUNT ASSEMBLY (FIND NO. 9 OF 82A5027A6101)…” This part no. is not included in the TDP (and by its nomenclature, probably shouldn’t be included.) | Drawing correction needed. | Machining to maintain O.D. is allowed for proper fit of the front and rear Ring End. Attachment 4 is updated to include this Information. |
| 30 | TDP Drawing 82A5027A1020 | We observe that there is no coating specified for any part surfaces other than the instruction “…COVER MACHINED SURFACES USING FIND NO. 9.” found in note 7. If the resolution to point 6) above is to hold the specified OD tolerances (which will require machining), is it the customer’s intention to coat the entire external surface with resin? | Drawing correction needed. | All machined surfaces will be covered with Resin as referred to in the drawing. A note is added to the drawing in Attachment 4. |
| 31 | TDP Drawing 120242000 | Does this drawing define the scope of the "Launcher Tube Only" as required in CLIN's 1002,2002,3002 & 4002 | Specify drawing that defines the scope of CLIN's 1002, 2002, 3002 & 4002 | These CLINs are referring to drawing 82A5027A1012 as detailed in the SOW. |
| 32 | Fabrication Specification PRF15003A1000 | Section 4.2 requires that a pre-production lot of 3 units be subjected to testing IAW environmental conditions set forth in Section 3.3. | Is the Supplier responsible for performing these tests (or having them performed)? Also, are the 3 pre-production units included in the sub-set of 10 of 56 units to be furnished under CLIN 0001? | Refer to Attachment 3, Fabrication Specification Para. 4.1.1 for responsibilities. The three pre-production units are included in the sub-set of ten. |
| 33 | MBS Peformance Solicitation Para. 3.1.5 Engagement Range | Para. 3.1.5 Engagement Range – States: “MBS shall provide the operator with the ability to engage targets from 50 meters out to a range of 1000 meters…” This requirement was updated relative to the final draft PCD dated 15 August 2014, which specified the engagement range as 15 meters to 500 meters, the maximum effective range of the weapon. The implication of this increased engagement range is to require the system to provide an elevation offset of up to 568 mils (~32°) to accommodate the Novel Explosive (NE) rocket to a 950 meter range at the cold operating temperature extreme of -32°C. | Is the government aware this would require any thermal weapon sight with a field of view less than 32 degrees to be mounted to an MBS bracket capable of switching the MBS between two different elevation offsets relative to the centerline of the launch tube’s bore to ensure sufficient field of view is available for reticle offset at upper spec-limit engagement angles? | Proposals shall comply with requirements of solicitation documents as posted. |
| 34 | MBS Peformance Solicitation Para. 3.2 Target Recognition | The MBS shall be capable of recognizing infantry, vehicle, and structure targets under normal day and night conditions as well as periods of reduced visibility (man-made and natural obscurants) and out a range of 750m. The MBS should be capable of recognizing infantry, vehicle, and structure targets under normal day and night conditions as well as periods of reduced visibility (man-made and natural obscurants) and out a range of 1000m. | Would the government please provide industry with details on how to model system DRI range performance? Typically this requirement would include modeling parameters such as target size, target delta T, scene contrast, V(50) for use, atmospheric condition, etc. | This information will not be provided as a part of this solicitation. |
| 35 | Section L-3.2 Proposal Volume Requirements | Table L-1 Volume Requirements Appendix (I-E) ILS (a) Interim Contractor Support (ICS) and L-3.4.6.1 Interim Contractor Support indicates that Offerors shall submit populated ICS analysis format and make recommendations to maintenance tasks and levels required to support the SMAW MK-153 Mod 2. In L-3.4.4 Sub-Factor 2 MBS Performance and Design; If MBS is comprised of individual components, those components shall be no less than a TRL 9 as separate operating components. | Is Industry required to submit Section J Attachment 8 and the Provisioning Technical Data (PTD) for those parts that have completed the catalog process, assuming that only TRL 9 systems are actually “mission proven” through successful mission operations and that those same systems are fully fielded in the Marine Corps inventory? | Offerors shall comply with all submission requirements in Section L to include Section J, Attachments 8 and 9. |
| 36 | Section L-3.4.6.1 Interim Contractor Support (ICS), Section J Attachment 8 ICS Analysis Format | Directions references SOW 3.11.2.1 within the Tier 1 Assessment/Screening Block. This SOW reference is not contained in the document that has been provided. | Can the Government please provide the correct SOW reference? | Sample provided at Attachment 8 is for format only. Data contained, to include SOW reference, is not applicable to this solicitation. The offeror is not required to recommend banding structure. |
| 37 | Section L-3.4.6.1 Interim Contractor Support (ICS) | The SMAW Maintenance Manual, TM 08673A-25&P/2A; Maintenance Manual, Launcher, Assault, Rocket, 83 mm (SMAW), Would be beneficial for providing the best possible ICS package. | Would the Government provide the Manual to industry? | The SMAW Mod 2 maintenance manual is not available. Attachment 4 contains all launcher information required to respond. |
| 38 | Section L-3.4.3 Sub-Factor 1 – Production Capability, Appendix (I-D) First Article Test Program | The Contractor shall develop the First Article Test (FAT) plan IAW CDRL A009 and conduct the FAT to demonstrate the adequacy and suitability of the Contractor’s production processes and procedures for conforming to the requirements in the SMAW MK-153 Mod 2 TDP. The Contractor shall conduct the FAT at the Contractor’s facility with Government representation. | Does the Government desire a FAT plan that addresses all the verification procedures (MBS PSPEC Part 4), including 4.3.4.2.3 (U) Firing Shock, The MBS shall be subjected to a live firing test? | Yes, the Government anticipates reviewing a DRAFT FAT plan IAW the SOW para. 3.2.4.1. Live fire will not be conducted as part of the FAT. |
| 39 | Section L-3.4.3 Sub-Factor 1 – Production Capability, Appendix (I-D) First Article Test Program | The Contractor shall develop the First Article Test (FAT) plan IAW CDRL A009 and conduct the FAT to demonstrate the adequacy and suitability of the Contractor’s production processes and procedures for conforming to the requirements in the SMAW MK-153 Mod 2 TDP. The Contractor shall conduct the FAT at the Contractor’s facility with Government representation. | Does the Government only desire a FAT test plan that addresses the requirements provided in Fabrication specification section 4.2.1 (U) Preproduction Lot Inspection, or the requirements contained within the MBS PSPEC as well? | The DRAFT FAT plan shall address the SMAW MK-153 Mod 2 System IAW the SOW para. 3.2.4.1. |
| 40 | Section L-3.4.3 Sub-Factor 1 – Production Capability, Appendix (I-D) First Article Test Program | The Contractor shall develop the First Article Test (FAT) plan IAW CDRL A009 and conduct the FAT to demonstrate the adequacy and suitability of the Contractor’s production processes and procedures for conforming to the requirements in the SMAW MK-153 Mod 2 TDP. The Contractor shall conduct the FAT at the Contractor’s facility with Government representation. | Will the Government provide the desired format for the FAT test plan? | Offeror shall provide the DRAFT FAT Plan IAW CDRL A009 and DID Requirement. |
| 41 | Solicitation Document | The Industry Day and the original Request For Information referenced a total procurement quantity of 1,156 items. This solicitation only gives a monetary figure. Obviously, unit pricing will impact the deliverable quantity. Is there a target figure of deliverable items beyond the original 56 items? | Section M-3.3 (e) provides the anticipated quantities based on the Government's current information. | |
| 42 | Attachments | Fabrication Specification PRF15003A1000 section 4.4.2.1 | This section references the use of a “Firing Circuit Test Set 82A5027A8080” to check the electrical contact. This item is not listed as Government Furnished Property on Attachments 5 and 10 (Parts A and B). Will this item be furnished by the USMC to conduct this test? | Attachment 3, Fabrication Specification, is updated and provided to reflect removal of the firing circuit tester (Millijoule Meter). |
| 43 | Technical Data Package | Tube, Filament Wound, 82A5027A1020 | Location of and method of assembly of the Eyelet Assemblies (82A5027A1023, 85A5027A1026) in the Tube, Filament Wound, 82A5027A1020 is unclear. It can not be determined how they are held in place during the winding. Request a copy of the mandrel drawing to evaluate fabrication processing. | Offeror shall develop production processes. No drawings will be provided. |
| 44 | Technical Data Package | Tube, Filament Wound, 82A5027A1020 | The ply application instructions don’t specify an end return on Tube, Filament Wound, 82A5027A1020. This affects the programming of the winder and it affects how much material is required. Several options are possible, but without the mandrel configuration, it can’t be determined. Request a copy of the Mandrel drawing to clarify these issues or a clarification on the end return of the plies. | Offeror shall develop production processes. No drawings will be provided. |
| 45 | Technical Data Package | Tube, Filament Wound, 82A5027A1020 | The Pressure Test in section 4.1 of Tube, Filament Wound, 82A5027A1020 is unclear. The figure shows a zone clearly marked as Test Area on the tube. Another zone at the end of the tube is shown, but there is marking on these dimensions. Are only these areas to be pressure tested? Is the entire zone between the areas to be tested, and these are just plug locations? | The test area lies between the two boundaries as identified by the dimensions. |
| 46 | Technical Data Package | Tube, Filament Wound, 82A5027A1020 | The Leak Test in Section 11 of Tube, Filament Wound, 82A5027A1020 indicates that the Pressure shall be “183.5±36.5 LBF”. It is assumed that LBF is pounds force. This is not a pressure dimension. Request clarification. | Attachment 4 is updated to reflect PSI. The value is correct and remains the same. |
| 47 | Technical Data Package | Technical Data Package | The Technical Data Package was obviously created from a solid model Computer Aided Design package. Is it possible to get a copy of the model files to facilitate the development of Computer Numerical Control toolpaths and layout of jigs and fixtures? | This information will not be provided as a part of the solicitation. |
| 48 | CDRLs | The CRDLs request documents that may already exist (SAR, TDP, ICD, etc.). Will these documents be provided as a baseline for us to update as necessary? | No, these are vendor developed items for delivery. The required TDP is for the MBS and for the integration of the MBS to the 1913 rail on the launch tube assembly. | |
| 49 | Statement Of Work | Technical Data Package | If a conflict exists between the Performance Specification and the Technical Data Package, which document takes precedence? | The Order of Precedence clause shall rule, 52.215-8. If any conflicts are noted between the Performance Specification and the Technical Data Package, they should be addressed as assumptions in your proposal. |
| 50 | Statement Of Work | Technical Data Package | The Technical Data Package is supplied, but why is it a deliverable? | The required TDP is for the MBS and for the integration of the MBS to the 1913 rail on the launch tube assembly. |
| 51 | Solicitation Document | D/O 0001 | Item D/O 0001 do the remaining 46 rounds count as production deliveries? | Yes. |
| 52 | Attachments | Ammunition for testing is not shown on the Government Furnished Property attachments (5 and 10). Will the USMC provide ammunition for testing? | No. The Government will not provide ammunition for independent vendor testing before LRIP delivery. | |
| 53 | Statement Of Work | First Article Testing requirements are not clearly delineated. Is there a specific test plan required? | Refer to Para. 3.2.4.1 of the SOW. The Contractor shall develop the First Article Test (FAT) plan IAW CDRL A009. A DRAFT FAT Plan is required with the proposal as detailed in Section L. | |
| 54 | Statement Of Work | Section 3.4.1 | Is there a list of the critical dimensions and parts that need to be measured? | Dimensions will be addressed in Government developed PCA Plan. |
| 55 | Solicitation Document | Item 0003/0004/2003/3003/4003, is there a list of common parts that break that should be included within the spare parts/repair list? | The offeror shall provide data for the Firing Mechanism and the MBS components. | |
| 56 | Technical Data Package | Drawing 12024A5100, Shipping Case | TDP drawing 12024A5100, Shipping Case, for the Polyethylene Foam – Need more information on material specification. Stated in Note 2 is “MATERIAL - PCF POLYETHYLENE FOAM, COLOR BLACK”. PCF stands for “pounds per cubic feet” this number is not provided. Need the density requirement. | Contact information for the recommended vendor specified is listed on the drawing. |
| 57 | SOW | 3.2.4.1 | SOW 3.2.4.1 states, the Contractor shall repeat the FAT if there is a delay in production of greater than 180 days. Please confirm it is the Governments intent to place orders in a timely manner to prevent a production break of greater than 180 calendar days? | The Government will issue orders upon receipt of annual appropriations. |
| 58 | Can pertinent portions of the FAT be conducted on the associated subassemblies (e.g. launch tube) prior to the system level FAT? | The Contractor shall develop the First Article Test (FAT) plan IAW CDRL A009. A DRAFT FAT Plan shall be submitted in accordance with Section L. | ||
| 59 | Is MK153 ballistic dispersion data available for representative SMAW rockets? Need to understand the MBS angular and range accuracy requirement relative to the expected dispersion. | Ballistic data tables and the MBS PSPEC provide all required information to submit a proposal. | ||
| 60 | In support of L-3.4.4 Sub-Factor 2, please provide the USMC completed OT&E report that documents the successful test and evaluation at Dahlgren, completed in 2014. | This information will not be provided as a part of this solicitation. | ||
| 61 | Per Table Section L-1, Volume Requirements in Section L-3.2, the number of paper copies for Appendixes I-K and I-L is shown as "Original plus 2 copies." The number of paper copies of Appendixes I-A thru I-J are listed as "Original plus 8 copies." Since all Volume I appendices will be bound together with the main Technical volume in a three-ring binder, is it acceptable that the number of paper copies for Appendix I-K and I-L be increased to "Original plus 8 copies?" | Yes, Section L table was updated for I-K and I-L to 8 copies. | ||
| 62 | Please provide a 3D CAD model of the launcher, drawing 12024A1000 that is depicted in Figure 1 of doc # PRF15003A1000. | This information will not be provided as a part of the solicitation. | ||
| 63 | Please provide the "System P-spec for the MK153 Mod 2 SMAW Launcher" (doc # 20130430) since there is an implied compliance specified in the SMAW Mod 2 Fab Spec (in PRF15003A1000 PRIME ITEM FABRICATION SPECIFICATION). | The Attachment 3, FABSPEC, list of documents was corrected to remove this reference. | ||
| 64 | Please provide the 82A5027A8080 (Millijoule Meter) (and sub tier drawings) (legible copy) called out in the SMAW Mod 2 Fab Spec (in PRF15003A1000 PRIME ITEM FABRICATION SPECIFICATION). | Attachment 3, FABSPEC, is updated to remove the firing circuit tester (Millijoule Meter). | ||
| 65 | Please provide the document: 82A5027A6250, which is called out on drawing 12024A2000 note 1.3. | Attachment 4 is updated with the drawing reference removed from the notes. | ||
| 66 | Please provide the document: WS-35677, which is called out in SMAW Mod2 Fab Spec and Drawing 12024A3000 Note 1. | WS-35677 is the SMAW MK-153 Mod 2 System Performance Spec. Reference to this document is deleted in the updated Attachment 3. | ||
| 67 | Please provide the document: 12024A4000 Sight Targeting Assy, which is called out on drawing 12024A5400. | This is a placeholder, the vendor will be developing the Sight Targeting System (MBS) and providing the drawing to the Government. | ||
| 68 | The Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon (SMAW) solicitation documents do not reference any restrictions on the number of proposals which can be submitted by a single company. Please confirm USMC will accept more than one proposal from a single company. | More than one proposal will be accepted under this solicitation from a single offeror. |
Attachment (17) Q&A
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .