(Attach_2)_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Armory Storage Solutions
- Solicitation number
- M67400-18-R-0013
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M67400-18-D-0026_(FINAL).pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_Pricing_Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| M67400-18-R-0013_Amend_3_(Attach_1)_Requirements_Documents.pdf | ||
| M67400-18-R-0013_Amend_2_Instruction_to_offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| M67400-18-R-0013_Amended_Instruction_to_offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| Responses_to_Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| (Attach_3)_Sample_Order.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| M67400-18-R-0013_.pdf | ||
| (Attach_1)_Requirements_Document.docx | DOCX document | |
| M67400-18-R-0013_.pdf | ||
| (Attach_2)_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| (Attach_1)_Requirements_Document.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
*Please denote if the vendor was either the Prime or Subcontractor in supporting your requirement.
Instructions:
· Sections I through III are to be completed by the Offeror and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror on a recent, relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, is to verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.
· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
· Sections III through VII are to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the Marine Corps Installations Pacific (MCIPAC), Regional Contracting Office to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to Marcus.Schnars@usmc.mil no later than 25 June 2018 1300 EST
I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)
| Solicitation Number |
| M67400-18-R-0013 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Armory Storage Solutions |
| Customer/Agency |
| MCIPAC |
| Project/Requirement Description |
| Armory Storage Solution |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The information listed below is
| |_| Correct | |_| Incorrect |
| CONTRACTOR |
NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract Number
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
Contract Value
Task Order Value (if applicable)
Performance Period / Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
III. Assessor Information Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other (Specify)
IV. Evaluation Definitions
Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.
| Exceptional (E) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
V. Performance Evaluation
1. Management Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s management performance?
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of management performance in the following areas.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Management Availability & Responsiveness
Program Management
Management of Personnel
Integrated Product Team Management
Management Availability & Responsiveness: Contractor team management (key personnel, program managers, etc.) availability and responsiveness to Government requests; timeliness and completeness in response; quality of problem identification and mitigation; effective business relations, teamwork, AND customer satisfaction.
Program Management: Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices.
Management of Personnel: Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget.
Please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.
2. Staffing Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s staffing performance?
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of staffing performance in the following areas.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Staffing to Requirement
Standards of Workmanship
Meeting Schedule for Milestones or Deliverables
Staffing to Requirement: Providing the appropriate mix of labor meeting the Government’s requirement.
Standards of Workmanship: Technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.
Please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.
3. Overall Performance
What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
General Comments:
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it.