Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_KSH.docx

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

*Please denote if the vendor was either the Prime or Subcontractor in supporting your requirement.

Instructions:

· Sections I through III are to be completed by the Offeror and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror on a recent, relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, is to verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.

· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

· Sections III through VII are to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the Marine Corps Installations Pacific (MCIPAC), Regional Contracting Office to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to Marcus.Schnars@usmc.mil no later than 29 June 2018 1630 EST

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The information listed below is

NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract Number

Type of Contract

Contract Value

Task Order Value (if applicable)

Performance Period / Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

III. Assessor Information Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other (Specify)

IV. Evaluation Definitions

Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s management performance?

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of management performance in the following areas.

Management Availability & Responsiveness

Program Management

Management of Personnel

Integrated Product Team Management

Management Availability & Responsiveness: Contractor team management (key personnel, program managers, etc.) availability and responsiveness to Government requests; timeliness and completeness in response; quality of problem identification and mitigation; effective business relations, teamwork, AND customer satisfaction.

Program Management: Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices.

Management of Personnel: Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget.

Please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

2. Staffing Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s staffing performance?

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of staffing performance in the following areas.

Staffing to Requirement

Standards of Workmanship

Meeting Schedule for Milestones or Deliverables

Staffing to Requirement: Providing the appropriate mix of labor meeting the Government’s requirement.

Standards of Workmanship: Technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.

Please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

3. Overall Performance

What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

General Comments: