PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE 24R0002.docx
DOCX document 48 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USMC UNIFORM ALTERATIONS
- Solicitation number
- M0026324R0002
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template issued by the USMC Regional Contracting Office at Parris Island for solicitation number M0026324R0002. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate contractor performance across four main areas: Quality Performance, Schedule Performance, Management Performance, and Cost Control.
The PPQ requires assessors to rate contractors on a five-tier scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory) across multiple subcategories including conformance to requirements, workmanship standards, schedule adherence, program management, personnel management, and cost forecasting. The form must be completed by an authorized assessor (such as a Contracting Officer, COR, or Technical Project Lead) and submitted via email to specified USMC contracting personnel. This is strictly an evaluation template and does not contain specific performance requirements or contractor information.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE
PARRIS ISLAND
PO BOX 5069
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA 29905-5069
Past Performance Questionnaire
Instructions:
· Section II to be completed by the Offeror and provided to the assessor. The assessor, in turn, to verify Sections II through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.
· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
· Sections III through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor:
Your assistance is requested by the Regional Contracting Office (RCO), Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, SC (MCRDPI) to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: andrea.n.learn.civ@usmc.mil and nichole.d.taylor.civ@usmc.mil
I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)
Solicitation Number
Requirement
Agency
Requirement Description
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
CONTRACTOR NAME, POC & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
Contract Value
Period of Performance
Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| N/A |
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| ü |
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
V. Performance Evaluation
1. Quality Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Performance
Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Conformance to Contract Requirements
Conformance to Specifications
Standards of Workmanship *
* Standards of Workmanship: Technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.
While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.
2. Schedule Performance (Timeliness)
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Schedule Performance
Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.
| Schedule Performance |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule
Meeting Milestones and Schedules
Submitting Deliverables
While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.
3. Management Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Management Performance
Please provide rationale for assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.
| Management Performance |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Management Responsiveness
Program Management
Management Of Personnel
Management Responsiveness: Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction.
Program Management: Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices Management Of Personnel: Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.
4. Cost Control
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Cost Control
Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.
| COST CONTROL |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Price Estimates
Invoicing
Forecasting Management
Price Estimates: Ability to meet proposed prices and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates.
Invoicing: Accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of invoices submitted.
Forecasting/Management:
While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
VII. General Comments:
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
Attachment 2 - FOR OFFICE USE ONLY – SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION Page 6
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .