L-5 CPAQ (1).docx

SOLICITATION N6134025R0004 05-DEC-24

Attachment L-5

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to offeror: Responses shall be in Times New Roman font, size 12 and not be bold.

Send the questionnaire to the: 1. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), 2. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), 3. Program Manager (PM), 4. Additional points of contact (POC) that can provide an assessment on your proposed past performance effort. Please provide all data requested in Parts I and II of the questionnaire. When completed, email the questionnaire to the POC and copy Mrs. Alana Nunez-Bennett (Contracting Officer) at alana.t.nunez-bennett.civ@us.navy.mil and Mr. Michael Yucht (Specialist) at michael.d.yucht.civ@us.navy.mil.

I. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATIVE DATA (To be completed by the Offeror)

Offeror Name:

Contract Number/Task Order:

Contract Name/Project Title:

Period of Performance:

Contract Type:

Offeror Role in Contract:

Dollar Value of Contract:

Dollar Value of Offeror Role in Contract:

Administrative Place of Contract:

Cage Code:

UEI:

Customer:

Contracting Agency:

Contract Effort Description:

II. POINT OF CONTACT (POC) Data (To be completed by the Offeror)

Name:

Position or role:

Agency:

Address:

Phone:

Email:

Other:

III. INFORMATION TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE POC

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection. Please complete the assessment below and send all pages of this questionnaire within two weeks of receipt from offeror listed above.

Assessment: (To be completed by the questionnaire POC)

Instructions to complete the assessment: Please provide responses to, 1 through 4, that are listed below the assessment rating system table. Place an “X” in the rating that best assesses the offeror’s performance in the areas listed below. Then provide examples (two examples are requested) to substantiate your rating. Please complete and forward all pages of this questionnaire to Mrs. Alana Nunez-Bennett (Contracting Officer) at alana.t.nunez-bennett.civ@us.navy.mil and Mr. Michael Yucht (Specialist) at michael.d.yucht.civ@us.navy.mil within two weeks of receipt from offeror listed on page 1.

Rating System Table:

A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor's performance. Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here's a breakdown of each category:

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

1. Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with this contract or order’s most significant requirements, I WOULD £ or WOULD NOT £ recommend them for similar requirements in the future.

2. Quality: Assess contractor's conformance to the contract/order requirements and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards. Does the contractor’s delivery and quality of services; to include meeting technical requirements and responsiveness, help to mitigate and/or resolve issues that arose during contract performance? Are reports/data accurate? What degree of Government direction was required to solve problems that arose during performance? Did the contractor maintain an adequate availability of required competent professional service employees?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

N/A

Provide examples that substantiate rating:

3. Management: Indicate your overall level of satisfaction with the contractor's management (at the local site level, program office, and headquarters). Assess contractor's business orientation (focus on meeting customer needs first, profit first, proactive and aggressive pursuit of problem solving, delays in acting on program needs - a good business partner?). Does the contractor mitigate and/or prevent high work turnover or qualification issues during performance. Is the contractor able to maintain continuity of services with uninterrupted high-quality work? Does the contractor meet end-user needs promptly without demands for contract changes? (This does not refer to work that is clearly out-of-scope). Examples might include changes in hours, inadequate contractor employee performance, and overuse of exemption for level of qualification requests.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

N/A

Provide examples that substantiate rating:

4. Cost Control: Assess the Contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract/TO cost. Is the Contractor experiencing cost growth or under-run? (e.g. labor wage rates and indirect rates) If so, discuss the causes and contractor-proposed solutions for the cost overruns. In addition, the extent to which the Contractor demonstrates a sense of cost responsibility through the efficient use of resources in each work effort will be assessed.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

N/A

Signature _____________________________________________ Date _____________ Please note that electronic signatures are acceptable. An e-mail from the originator of this document will suffice. Signatures (electronic or hand-written) verify that the signatory completed this form and agrees with the information contained within it.