J7_Past Performance Questionnaire .docx

DOCX document 43 KB Posted

Attached to
Industrial Heating and Cooling Water Treatment
Solicitation number
FA448425R0007
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for evaluating contractors' previous work performance related to an Industrial Heating and Water Cooling Treatment contract at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey (JBMDL, NJ). The questionnaire is to be completed by previous customers or agencies who have worked with the contractor being evaluated.

The PPQ consists of four main sections: Contract Identification, Customer/Agency Identification, Respondent Identification, and Performance Information. The performance section includes 24 evaluation criteria rated on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, covering areas such as management capability, quality control, problem resolution, schedule adherence, subcontractor management, and overall performance. Key evaluation points include the contractor's ability to provide experienced managers, maintain qualified personnel, follow quality control procedures, resolve problems, meet schedules, and cooperate with government personnel. The questionnaire also asks whether the contractor received any cure notices and if the evaluator would award another contract to them.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
fileicon.png PNG image
Solicitation Amendment_FA448425R00070004 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA448425R00070003 SF 30 (1).pdf PDF
87 CES_IHCWT_Mission-Essential Statement.pdf PDF
1. PWS IHCWT (002).docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment - FA448425R00070003.pdf PDF
C- 1 Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
RFI - FA448425R0007- WATER CHEMICAL TREATMENT combined .docx May.docx DOCX document
J15_Sample of McGuire Side 1.pdf PDF
C_1 Performance Work Statement .pdf PDF
Revised Solicitation Amendment FA448425R00070002 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA448425R00070002 SF 30.pdf PDF
J18_Sample of McGuire side 4.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA448425R00070001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Bldg. 1821.pdf PDF
Bldg. 2430.pdf PDF
Bldg. 1758.pdf PDF
J4_Security Forces Appendix.pdf PDF
J2_ Ocean County Wage Determination .pdf PDF
87 CES_IHCWT CHEMICAL PRICING_IGCE.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
J3_ Burlington County Wage Determination .pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA448425R0007.pdf PDF
C1_ Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
J8_Bid Schedule .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J9_Pricing List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J6_JBDML Antiterrorism Guide.pdf PDF
J5_Antiterrorism Trifold .pdf PDF
J1_ Quality Assurance Plan.pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for an Industrial Heating and Water Cooling Treatment at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey (JBMDL, NJ) Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Jasmin Rankins at jasmin.rankins@us.af.mil.

1 Attachment Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Datethrough
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Datethrough

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel Note

If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three

(3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

For

Official

Use

Only When completed, this document is

Source

Selection

Information

IAW

FAR

2.101 and

3.104 J11_Past

Performance

Questionnaire C.

For

Official

Use

Only Page of

D. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

CodePerformance Rating
EEXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VVERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SSATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MMARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UUNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

The Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

5. Followed approved quality control plan. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

The Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

9. Identified problems as they occurred. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

12. Developed realistic progress schedules. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

13. Met established project schedules. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

15. Was responsive to contract changes. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

The Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

21. Met or exceeded small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan.

22. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract? SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

23. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

· Yes

· No

24. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain. EXPLANATION:
· Yes

· No image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .