J2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Micrographic Duplication and Processing
- Solicitation number
- 030ADV24R0015
- Issued by
-
Library of Congress
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation from the Library of Congress seeking micrographic duplication and processing services. The solicitation seeks a contractor to provide duplicated copies of approximately 700 sheets of 105-millimeter microfiche, 5,000 reels of microfilm, and 500 feet of raw 35-millimeter microfilm in need of processing. The contractor will also print exposed microfilm to ensure collection materials are not lost to degradation, as the Library of Congress has limited in-house capacity for the full scope of work required. The past performance questionnaire is sent to references to evaluate offerors' performance on similar prior contracts and includes sections to identify the reference, contract, and evaluator, followed by scales to rate offerors on factors such as quality, schedule, cost, personnel, communication, and an overall satisfaction score.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers (030ADV24R0015).pdf | ||
| 030ADV24R0015 0001.pdf | ||
| 030ADV24R0015 - Final Solicitation.pdf | ||
| J1 - Pricing Schedule and Estimates.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT J2 –PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
030ADV24R0015 – Micrographic Duplication and Processing
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A.
Contractor: _______________________________________ B.
Agency Contract number:____________________________________
C.
Contract type:______________________________________ D.
Was this a competitive contract? Yes
No
E.
Period of performance: _________________ F.
Contract cost or price:___________________________________ G.
Description of work:____________________________________________________________________ Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or fully terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Default______
Convenience______
Pending Termination______ If any applies, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc): ____________________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A.
Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________________ B.
Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A.
Evaluator's name and title: __________________________________________________________________________.
B.
Evaluator's phone/fax number: _______________________________________________________________________.
C.
Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:_____________________.
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor's performance by placing an "X" in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
· Not Applicable: N/A
· 1: Performance clearly below the contract performance standard or requirement
· 2:
Performance occasionally does not meet minimum contract performance standard or requirement
· 3:
Performance that meets the minimum contract performance standard or requirement
· 4:
Performance that meets and occasionally exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement
· 5:
Performance that almost always exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement
| 1. Overall satisfaction |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
Overall satisfaction with performance. Would you (the reference) choose to work with this offeror again?
| 2. Quality |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
Rate the effectiveness and applicability of the plans and strategies delivered and the actual implementation of those.
| 3. Schedule |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
Schedule includes delivery consistency, on-time performance, and flexibility in responding to emerging issues.
| 4. Cost/Price |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
Cost/price refers to the offeror’s ability to manage the work within the agreed upon cost or price.
| 5. Personnel |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
Rate the quality of the contractor’s staff in executing the project work scope.
| 6. Contract Management |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
This includes quality and timeliness in sourcing, invoicing, and reporting under the contract.
| 7. Communication and problem resolution |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
This includes the offeror’s ability to communicate and solve problems in a timely and effective manner.
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor's greatest strengths in performance of the contract?
What were the contractor's greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
Would you hire this contractor in the future to perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
| YES |
| NO |
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire with the Subject: RFQ 030ADV24R0015 to Colleen Daly at cdaly@loc.gov and Tiffany Lucas at tluc@loc.gov.
Attachment J1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .