J.1.(b).7 PWS Requirements _Past Performance Relevancy Matrix.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Aircraft and Spaceflight Systems Engineering Support Services (ASSESS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80ARC023R0006
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Aircraft and Spaceflight Systems Engineering Support Services (ASSESS), newest first.
File Type Posted
RFP Sections B-M ASSESS Amd01.docx DOCX document
ASSESS RFP Questions Master.pdf PDF
RFP_ASSESS_ SF33 Amd01.docx DOCX document
RFP J.1.(a).3 Data Requirements Descriptions (DRD) Amd01.docx DOCX document
J.1.(b).4 Facilities Capital Cost of Money Factors Computation (FORM CASB-CFM) .pdf PDF
J.1.(b).5 Contract Facilities Capital Cost of Money (DD Form 1861) .pdf PDF
RFP Sections B-M ASSESS Final.docx DOCX document
Final ASSESS DRFP Q and A Government Sheet.pdf PDF
J.1.(b).8 SF-1408, Pre-award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System.pdf PDF
RFP_J.1.(b).6 Past Performance Questionnaire rev1.docx DOCX document
RFP J.1.(b).9 Technical Library .docx DOCX document
RFP J.1.(a).5 DOD Contract Security Classification Specification (DD254) -Security.pdf PDF
RFP J.1.(a).4 Installation-Accountable Government Property (IAGP).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ASSESS RFP SF33.pdf PDF
3.16.23_ASSESS RFP Cover Letter.pdf PDF
ASSESS Industry Day Attendance List.pdf PDF
RFP J.1.(b).2 ASSESS Labor Category Descriptions_Qualifications .docx DOCX document
J.1.(b).1 Cost Price Template Workbook RFP Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP J.1.(a).11 Requirements Statements List rev1.docx DOCX document
RFP J.1.(a).6 Government Furnished Software List rev1.docx DOCX document
RFP J.1.(a).1 Performance Work Statement.docx DOCX document
ASSESS Q and A Template .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J.1.(b).3 Monthly Contractor Financial Management Report Template (NF533M).pdf PDF
RFP-J.1.(a).2 Department of Labor Wage Determination No. 2015-5641.pdf PDF
RFP J.1.(a).3 Data Requirements Descriptions (DRD).docx DOCX document
Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PWS Requirements Matrix

80ARC023R0006Attachment J.1.(b).7
Proposed Allocation of PWS Requirements by Team Member
State Percentage of Requirements Proposed to be Performed on this Contract for the Offeror and its Major Subcontractor(s)
PWS
SectionPWS
Description(Insert Company Name of Prime Offeror)(Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #1, if proposed)(Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #2, if proposed)(Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #3, if proposed)(Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #4, if proposed)Total
2.1Contract Management0%
2.2.2.1Aerodynamics0%
2.2.2.2Aerothermodynamics0%
2.2.2.3Aeroacoustics0%
2.2.2.4Machine Learning0%
2.2.2.5Materials Design/Manufacturing/Test/Evaluation/Development and Implementation0%
2.2.2.6Systems Analysis, Engineering, Design, and Development0%
2.2.2.7Structures Analysis0%
2.2.2.8Engineering Risk Anaysis0%
2.2.2.9Systems Integration0%
2.2.2.10Project Management Support0%
Instructions to Offerors:

The Offeror (Prime Contractor and its Major Subcontractor(s), if proposed) must complete this PWS Requirements Matrix to state its proposed approach for which PWS requirements for this contract will be performed by the Prime Contractor, and its Major Subcontractors, if proposed. For each PWS Section above, state the percentage of work the Prime Contractor and each of its Major Subcontractors, if proposed, will perform on this contract. The percentages assigned to the Prime Contractor and its Major Subcontractor(s), if proposed, should sum to 100% for each PWS Section in Column H. In any instance where the total for a PWS Section is less than 100% in Column H then the Government will conclude that the remaining percentage of work will be performed by the Offeror's subcontracts that do not meet the criteria to clasify as a Major Subcontractor. In any instance where the total for a PWS Section is greater than 100% in Column H then the Government will reduce the percentage of work to be performed for that PWS Section for the Prime and each Major Subcontractor by the average percentage over 100% (i.e., (Proposed percentage over 100%/total prime and major subcontracts = amount each prime and major subcontractor proposed to perform). Enter numbers in the green fields only. The template will automatically sum the inputs. The Offeror may add additional colums between current Column E and F if the Offeror has more than 4 Major Subcontractors.

Examples to Offeror to Demonstrate How to Procvide Inputs in Matrix:

Example 1 (1 Prime/1 Sub): Prime Contractor is proposed to perform all the work for Section 2.1 Phase-In. Enter "100" in cell C4 and "0" in cells D4 through G4. Cell H4 will display "100%". Example 2 (1 Prime/2 Major Subs): Major Subs are proposed to perform all the work for PWS Section 2.6 Permitting & Compliance equally. Enter "0" in cell C9, "50" in cell D9, "50" in cell E9, and "0" in cell F9 and G9. Cell H9 will display "100%". Please verify that inputs accurately reflect your proposed breakdown of PWS work before submitting the completed Matrix with the Offerors proposal.

Past Perf. Relevancy Matrix

Proposed Relevance of Past Performance Contract References in Relations to the Contract PWS Requirements by Team Member (Prime and Major Subcontracors)
Identify which PWS Requirements from this Contract were Performed on Each Past Performance Reference by Team Member (Prime and Major Subcontracors)
Performed as a Prime or Subfactor on Past Performance Contract ReferencePWS Section 2.1 Contract ManagementPWS 2.2.2.1 AerodynamicsPWS Section 2.2.2.2 AerothermodynamicsPWS Section 2.2.2.3 AeroacousticsPWS Section 2.2.2.4. Machine LearningPWS Section 2.2.2.5 Materials Design/Manufacturing/Test/Evaluation/Development and ImplementationPWS Section 2.2.2.6 Systems Analysis, Engineering, Design, and DevelopmentPWS Section 2.2.2.7 Structures AnalysisPWS Section 2.2.2.8 Engineering Risk AnalysisPWS Section 2.2.2.9 Systems IntegrationPWS Section 2.2.2.10 Project Management Support
Prime Offeror Past Performance References:

(Insert Company Name)

(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)
Major Subcontractor #1 Past Performance References:

(Insert Company Name)

(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)
Major Subcontractor #2 Past Performance References:

(Insert Company Name)

(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)
Major Subcontractor #3 Past Performance References:

(Insert Company Name)

(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)
Major Subcontractor #4 Past Performance References:

(Insert Company Name)

(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)
(Insert Contract Number and Name)

Instructions to Offerors:

Offerors shall complete this past performance contract reference proposed relevancy matrix. In Column A, for each individual past performance contract reference, provide the name of the Prime Contractor or Major Subcontractor the past performance contract reference applies to. Also, include the contract number and contract name for each past performance contract reference. In Column B, include a “P” or “S” to indicate whether the Prime Offeror or its Major Subcontractor(s) was a Prime Contractor or a Subcontractor for that particular past performance contract reference. For all remaining columns, state an “X” in each column where the individual past performance contract reference included similar experience to the requirements in PWS Section identified in Row 3 of Columns B-L. The Offeror may add additional rows after row 23 if the Offeror has more than 4 Major Subcontractors.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .