J-3_Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf
PDF 384 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Oakland ATCT WWHP Replacement Project Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-23-R-00190
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire requests evaluation of a contractor's prior work on an unspecified contract and includes questions regarding quality, performance, technical requirements, schedule, cost control, customer satisfaction, and overall assessment. The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration to replace four water-to-water heat pumps at the Oakland Air Traffic Control Tower as part of a whole building heat pump replacement project. The project scope includes mechanical, electrical, and limited architectural and structural work to integrate the new heat pumps into the existing control system. The response is due by the date specified in the solicitation number 697DCK-23-R-00190.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 697DCK-23-R-00190 Amend 0002.pdf | ||
| Question and Answers for OAKLAND ATCT WWHP Replacement.pdf | ||
| Trane-Mechanical Control As-Builts.pdf | ||
| 697DCK-23-R-00190 _AMEND 0001.pdf | ||
| OAK ATCT Sign-in pre-bid.doc | DOC document | |
| J-1_OAK_GSHP_Replacement (Final) - Specifications.pdf | ||
| J-2_Wage Determination CA20230018.pdf | ||
| 697DCK-23-R-00190.pdf | ||
| J-1a_OAK_GSHP_Replacement (Final) - Drawings.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection
Please complete this Questionnaire and email Contracting Officer at:
joni.l.haynes@faa.gov
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE:
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT: (Fixed
Price, GMP, FPI, etc.)
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A – G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
EX = Exceptional S = Satisfactory US = Unsatisfactory VG = Very Good MG = Marginal N/O = Not Observed
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
EX VG S MG US N/O
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or Architect/Engineer (as appropriate) for the project.
EX VG S MG US N/O
C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
EX VG S MG US N/O
D. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
EX VG S MG US N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
EX VG S MG US N/O
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”
EX VG S MG US N/O
G. Overall Assessment.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .