J - 13 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
PDF 641 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USNS HENRY J. KAISER FY 22 ROH/DD
- Solicitation number
- N3220521R4066
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of contractors. It requests ratings and comments on an unnamed contractor's performance under an unspecified contract in areas of quality, timeliness, business relations, and personnel. Respondents are asked to provide an overall performance rating using definitions of exception, very good, satisfactory, marginal and unsatisfactory. Additional comments may be included. The signed evaluation is requested to be emailed before June 21, 2022 to help evaluate the contractor for a potential future award.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Military Sealift Command for regular overhaul and dry-docking of the USNS HENRY J. KAISER (T-AO 187) in fiscal year 2022. The supporting documentation includes solicitation N3220521R4066. The Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command is the contracting agency. No further details are provided on pricing, terms, or set-asides.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| KAISER ROH N3220521R4066_AMEND 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| KAISER ROH N3220521R4066_AMEND 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| KAISER ROH N3220521R4066_AMEND 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J-5 Subcontracting Plan Assessment Checklist.docx | DOCX document | |
| J - 9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities SF-LLL.doc | DOC document | |
| J-10 Interport Differential.doc | DOC document | |
| J - 14 Technical Data Non-Disclosure (NDA).pdf | ||
| KAISER J4 2021-12-02.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-8 RFC.doc | DOC document | |
| J-3.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FY22 KAISER JA SIgned 25MAY2021_Redacted.pdf | ||
| J-7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.pdf | ||
| N3220521R4066.docx | DOCX document | |
| J - 12 Past Performance Data.doc | DOC document |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment J-13
TO: EMAIL:
PHONE:
INFORMATION REQUEST
Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract.
____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:
a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)
In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (21 June at 1700 hours, 5:00 PM EST) to Jason L. McLaughlin. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Jason L. McLaughlin at jason.mclaughlin2@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.
Thank you, Jason L. McLaughlin Contract Specialist
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:
1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.
2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
EXCEPTIONAL VERY GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSATISFACTORY
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
RATING
Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
a.) Quality of Product or Service:
Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.
c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.
d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors):
Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.
e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings
3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes No Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.
Signed:__________________________________
DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE
Exceptional Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .