J - 13 Past Performance Questionnaire - BMK 21R4011.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS CITY OF BISMARCK (T-EPF 9) Regular Overhaul/Dry Dock
Solicitation number
N3220521R4011
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and solicitation for a ship overhaul contract. The Military Sealift Command is soliciting offers for contract N3220521R4011 for regular overhaul and dry docking of the USNS CITY OF BISMARCK (T-EPF 9). Offerors are required to submit past performance information by September 3, 2021 at 3:00 pm Eastern Time to Mr. Maurice Hawkins and Mrs. Alvinia Jenkins. The past performance questionnaire requests ratings and comments on quality, timeliness, business relations, key personnel, and cost control (for cost contracts). It defines ratings of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. The solicitation references are available upon request.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N3220521R40110007.docx DOCX document
Revised J - 2 Category A Items BMK 21R4011.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Q AND A Responses 3.docx DOCX document
N3220521R40110006.docx DOCX document
Q AND A Responses 2.docx DOCX document
N3220521R40110005.docx DOCX document
Revised J - 3 Category B Items - BMK 21R4011.xls XLS spreadsheet
N3220521R40110004.docx DOCX document
N3220521R40110003.docx DOCX document
Rev 1 J - 2 Category A Items BMK 21R4011.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Rev 1 J - 1 WORK ITEMS LIST BMK 21R4011.docx DOCX document
Q AND A Responses 1.docx DOCX document
N3220521R40110002.docx DOCX document
N3220521R40110001.docx DOCX document
Q AND A Responses 1.docx DOCX document
J - 9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - BMK 21R4011.doc DOC document
J - 2 Category A Items BMK 21R4011.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J - 8 Request for Spec Clarification - BMK 21R4011.doc DOC document
J - 7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey - BMK 21R4011.docx DOCX document
J - 14 Technical Data Non-Disclosure - BMK 21R4011.docx DOCX document
J - 11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form - BMK.docx DOCX document
J - 4 GFP BMK 21R4011.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation N3220521R4011.docx DOCX document
J - 10 Interport Differential - BMK 21R4011.doc DOC document
BISMARCK REDACTED _JA.pdf PDF
J - 12 Past Performance Data - BMK 21R4011.doc DOC document
J - 1 WORK ITEMS LIST BMK 21R4011.docx DOCX document
J - 6.zip ZIP file
J - 3 Category B Items - BMK 21R4011.xls XLS spreadsheet
Show all 29

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION, 3 September 2021 at 3:00 pm E.T. to Mr. Maurice Hawkins and Alvinia Jenkins. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Mr. Maurice Hawkins at maurice.hawkins@navy.mil, and Mrs. Alvinia Jenkins at alvinia.jenkins@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Maurice Hawkins
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Mr. Maurice Hawkins

Mrs. Alvinia Jenkins Bldg SP-64 471 C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Mr. Maurice HawkinsMrs. Alvinia Jenkins
(Facsimile Number)(757) 443-2816(757) 443-5881
(E-mail Address)maurice.hawkins@navy.milalvinia.jenkins@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .