J-13- Past Perf Questionaire.docx
DOCX document 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N3220526R6052
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire used by the Military Sealift Command (MSC) to collect reference information on contractor performance. The questionnaire serves as Attachment J-13 to the USNS LUCY STONE (T-AO 209) Post Shakedown Availability (PSA) solicitation (N3220526R6052) and requests responses by June 24, 2024, at 5:00 PM EST to be submitted to contracting officers Doug Jones (Jeffrey.d.jones156.civ@us.navy.mil) and Christopher Ward (christopher.s.ward1.civ@us.navy.mil).
The questionnaire requests evaluations of a referenced contractor's past performance across four specific areas: quality of product or service; timeliness or scheduling of deliveries; business relations and customer satisfaction; and key personnel and staffing including subcontractors. Respondents must rate performance using a five-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory) with detailed definitions provided for each rating level. The form also requires respondents to provide an overall performance rating, submit comments for Exceptional or Unsatisfactory ratings, and indicate whether they would rehire the contractor for future work. This is a template document designed to solicit objective feedback from past customers to support the government's evaluation of contractor performance history.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N3220526R6052 Solicitation Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| J-7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-2 USNS LUCY STONE PSA 26R6052.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-9 Disclsr Lobbying Activities SF-LLL.doc | DOC document | |
| J-14 Technical NDA.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - N3220526R6052.pdf | ||
| J-4 GFP Attachment (LUCY STONE) (PSA-2027-01-15).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form (for N10) MILK PSA.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-3 USNS LUCY STONE PSA.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-12 Past Perf Data.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-10 Interport Differential LST PSA.doc.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-8-RFC(2022.12.28).docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ATTACHMENT J-13
TO: EMAIL:
PHONE:
INFORMATION REQUEST
Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:
a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)
In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (24 June 2024 at 1700 hours, 5:00 PM EST) to Doug Jones;
Jeffrey.d.jones156.civ@us.navy.mil and Christopher Ward; christopher.s.ward1.civ@us.navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.
| Thank you, |
| Christopher Ward |
| Contracting Officer |
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:
1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.
2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.
c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.
d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.
3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.
Signed:__________________________________
DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .