TCAPPROVEO BHT-20683·FMS..12

HOVER CEILING OUT OF GROUND EFFECT

TAKEOFF POWER 0° TO 46°C

GENERATOR 22.3 AMPS ANTI-ICE OFF

SKID HEIGHT 40FT (12.2 METERS} N2 ENGINE RPM 100%

WITH ANTI-ICE ON GROSS WEIGHT IS 260 LBS {117 .9 Kg) LESS

PARTICLE SEPARATOR WITH CARGO HOOK

OAT- °C

(10.0) (11.8} (13.6) (15.4)

GROSS WEIGHT - LBS. X 100

GROSS WEIGHT- (Kg) X 100

Figure 4 .. 3. Hover ceiling (Sheet 7 of 12)

206B3-FMS12 ·4-3· 7

October 6, 2000 13

TCAPPROVED BHT -20683-FMB-12

HOVER CEILING IN GROUND EFFECT

TAKEOFF POWER WITH PARTICLE SEPARATOR INSTALLED

0° TO 46°C

GENERATOR 22.3 AMPS ANTI-ICE OFF

N2 ENGINE RPM 100% SKID HEIGHT 2.0 FT (0.6 METERS)

WITH ANTI-ICE ON GROSS WEIGHT IS 245 LBS ( 111.1 Kg) LESS

0 1 0 20 30 40 50 20 24 28 32

OAT-°C {9.1) (10.9) (12.7) (14.5)

9ROSS WEIGHT - LBS. X 100

GROSS WEIGHT - (Kg) X 100

Figure 4-3. Hover ceiling (Sheet 1 of 12)

October 6, 2000 7

OFFERED AIRCRAFT

CAP ABILITIES

Croman Corporation Aerospatiale SA315B LAMA

Croman Corp is pleased to offer their helicopter services with supporting flight and maintenance crews. Croman has a wide range of experience with reconnaissance, external load operations including sustained remote logging operations, general delivery, and precision placement of rooftop equipment, ski lifts, the construction of power lines, and wildland firefighting.

Croman offers one of the highest levels of expertise available anywhere in the helicopter industry, with seasoned flight and ground support crews, skilled in all facets of project planning and execution, delivering performance with precision.

Croman's aerial operations began with timber harvesting to complement and expand their conventional logging operations. Croman has successfully accomplished a variety of missions performing all work satisfactory and on schedule.

In 45 years of service Croman has never defaulted on a contract.

COMPANY

Operations Croman Corp's current operational helicopter fleet includes seven heavy lift Sikorsky S-61 's, three Croman SH-3H's, two Bell Jet Rangers, and one Aerospatiale Lama. Croman Corp has operated helicopters for over 35 years, averaging in excess of 3,000 flight hours per year.

Our experienced flight crews are among the most experienced and best in the industry.

Croman operates under the provisions ofF AA Part 133 External Load operations, Part 135 On-Demand Charter operations, and Part 137 Agricultural Aircraft operations. Croman has operated helicopters supporting remote area operations in the Western United States, Alaska and Canada since 1976. Operations include aircraft charter, government contracting, and precision placement of HV AC units, power-line construction, firefighting, aerial timber harvesting, external cargo and many other projects. There is additional historical information on our web site: www .croman.net.

Facility Croman Corp's corporate facility is located in White City, Oregon and employs an average of 135 people. Croman is an FAA Approved 14 CFR 145 Repair Station (JYER440F). We have complete in house helicopter maintenance capability and hold certification for FAA Class III Repair Station with additional ratings for the Sikorsky S-61 Airframes, General Electric CT- 58 Series gas turbine engines, line maintenance for Allison 250-C20 and C20B and a limited hydraulic rating for the repair and overhaul of Sikorsky S-61 servos. The facility is comprised of hanger space, component overhaul shops for engines, transmissions, rotor heads, tail rotor heads, gearboxes, and hydraulic shop for repair and overhaul of servos and a machine shop. In addition, the facility includes corporate offices for administration, accounting, purchasing, and a shipping/receiving department. Croman also operates a certified heliport.

Quality Control Croman is committed to providing quality services and has developed a comprehensive program that addresses security, parts, processes, personnel training and certification. This program includes annual audits to ensure that the aircraft and personnel meet or exceed company expectations as well as maintaining regulatory agency and contract requirements.

This program has been inspected and approved by the Department of Defense Air Mobility Command and is an integral component of the services we provide to the U.S. Department of Defense. The program includes our FAA approved 135 operations manual and incorporates pilot training programs. The pilot training program provides a framework for standardization and a curriculum for initial, transitional, upgrade and recurrent training. Pilots must meet and maintain Croman requirements of certification and flight experience to achieve Pilot-in Command status.

Safety Accident prevention is a top priority in this company. Croman Corp is dedicated to safety in all aspects of their operations and has earned a solid record of competence through a variety of challenging industrial, agricultural, forestry, and special project assignments. It is the intent of this company to provide a safe workplace, to prevent work related injury and damage to property. Croman has adopted a Safety Management System (SMS) design that meets aviation standards, and supports and maintains their commitment to safety. Croman's SMS is also accepted by the USFS. The safety culture of Croman guarantees more reliable and safe operations in the air and on the ground.

.r--

Management and Staffing

Croman Corp's management is very straight forward. B.L. Kaufman and Dwain Cross are the owners; they have been involved with Croman Corp since the late 1950's and are involved with daily operations of the company offering over 45 years of helicopter support experience.

Croman assigns a Program Manager to each program Croman is involved. The Program Manager is responsible for the overall coordination of the program including contract administration, contract compliance and ensuring the correct equipment and personnel are assigned to each program. Brian H. Beattie is Director of Operations for Croman and manages Croman's Exclusive Use and Call-When-Needed Helicopter Programs for the USFS and the DOL Additionally, Mr. Beattie currently manages Croman's US Navy Commercial Air Services- Hawaii Program.

Dan Leach is the Flight Safety Officer for Croman. Mr. Leach reports directly to the owners.

He has been employed by Croman since 1983 and held the position of Chief Pilot for over 20 years. His accomplishments include Certified Flight Instructor, Commercial Helicopter Pilot rating with S-61 Type Rating and FAA designated Pilot Proficiency Examiner in the S-61.

His flight experience of over 20,000 hours and operational skill provides valuable insight to this position.

Dan Maurice is Chief Pilot for Croman. His accomplishments include over 13,000 hours as Pilot in Command. He holds 14 CFR VFRIIFR Instructor and Check Airman certification for the S-61. He holds an Airline Transport Pilot certificate Rotorcraft-helicopter, instrument helicopter SK-61, SK 64 (VFR) rating. His duties for Croman since 2004 include Pilot In Command, Pilot Proficiency Examiner, and Assistant Chief Pilot.

Greg Williams is the Director of Maintenance for Croman. Mr. Williams reports directly to the owners. He has been employed by Croman since 1977 and has been the Director of Maintenance since 1990. Greg has held an Airframe & Powerplant certification since 1971.

Croman mechanics assigned to the helicopters report directly to Greg.

Richard Snapp is Croman's Human Resource Manager and Safety Manager. Mr. Snapp reports directly to the owners. Richard has been employed by Croman for over 30 years.

Much of that time was in the field working directly with the helicopter. He has coordinated projects and personnel and knows what it takes to maintain safe and efficient operations.

Richard ensures Croman's compliance with all Federal and State employment regulations, OSHA compliance, Alcohol and Drug testing requirements and manages Croman's Safety Program.

These summaries are just a quick glimpse of the experience and skill level of Croman' s management team. Croman's Management Team is focused on providing dedicated customer support, accomplishing the mission, and fostering a cooperative, collaborative environment.

,...---_ Croman Corporation Aerial Operations Organizational Structure:

B.L. Kaufman & Dwain Cross Owners

I Brian H. Beattie

Director of Operations

I I I I I

Richard Snapp Greg Williams Dan Maurice Daniel Leach

Human Resources/Safety Director of Maintenance Chief Pilot Flight Safety

Director

1 I I r Mechanics

Command Fuel Truck Drivers

Pilots

Co-Pilots

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE

Maintenance Facility Croman Corp's main facility is located in White City, Oregon. Croman is an FAA Approved 14 CFR 145 Repair Station (JYER440F) with Airframe Class III, Limited Power Plant, and Limited Accessory authority. Our facility is comprised of administrative offices, hanger space, and component overhaul shops for engines, transmissions, rotor heads, tail rotor heads, gearboxes, and hydraulic shop for repair and overhaul of servos. In addition, the facility includes parts shipping/receiving department and the operation of a certified heliport.

Croman's helicopter fleet is maintained to the highest standards by a work force of maintenance technicians located in White City, Oregon and supported in the field by FAA certified A&P technicians.

On Site Helicopter Maintenance Croman Corp will provide FAA certified Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) mechanics to service the helicopter while under contract. The mechanics will be supported by our facility in White City, Oregon. Component overhaul and life limited items are tracked using a computerized system and weekly reports are provided to each aircraft for component maintenance planning. Each day the mechanics will complete prescribed preflight and post flight inspections of the helicopter. The inspections will be documented on the Croman Corp daily maintenance flight log. Any discrepancies found are noted and addressed. Croman typically provides a service van that also serves as a mobile office to support the helicopter.

The service van is equipped with all of the technical manuals required to service and maintain the helicopter including tools, supplies, oils, greases, cleaning supplies and other equipment required to keep the helicopter airworthy and serviceable. The support vans also maintain an inventory of commonly replaced items to ensure reliability. Croman Corp maintains a complete inventory of parts and components at the main facility in White City, Oregon.

Should there be a need for a part or component due for overhaul not maintained in the support vans, the item can be transported to the helicopter in a matter of hours.

Ground crew will be outfitted with the appropriate personal safety gear and equipment including hand held radios to stay in constant communication with crews and the helicopter.

FUEL

Fuel logistics are provided in the form of 350 to 5,000 gallon dedicated fueling vehicle, dependent on type of helicopter and fueling requirements. Specialized pumping equipment on board the refueler is used to accommodate "hot" refueling via a single point, pressure refueling system on board the helicopter(s). In the case that multiple helicopters are provided, multiple refuelers are provided. In addition over wing fueling can be accommodated.

Croman's refueling trucks meet all applicable Department of Transportation requirements.

The designated driver/operator meets all licensing and duty limit requirements and is HAZMA T certified for fuel handling.

Croman standard practice includes, spill prevention control and countermeasure plans for all their operations. Approved containment methods used are determined for each project and can vary from complicated containment pits to tarp covered areas with absorption materials in place. When working in sensitive water sheds areas such as a stream restoration project, where fuel storage is necessary, Croman uses a dual walled tank system filled from a mobile unit. The "Enviro-Safe double walled, vacuum-monitored tank system is designed for overfill protection and storage, atmospheric and emergency venting and 100% secondary capacity. Containment measures remain in place as needed.

Typical Light Fuel Service Vehicle

Pressure Refueling Nozzle t:.!! .• r- ~r

~' !I 'II

'~ i -tit

Duel Wall Tank

Fuel Filtering System

PAST PERFORMANCE

Croman Corp has operated helicopters in the Western United States, Alaska and Canada since 1976. Operations include aircraft charter, government contracting, precision placement of HV AC units, Power-line construction, Firefighting, Timber Harvesting, remote area operations, including external cargo general delivery and many other projects. For the past six years Croman has supported the US Department of the Army providing Exclusive Use helicopter services to Yakima, W A Training Facility for the primary purpose of wildland fire management activities as a result of training exercises. We have extensive experience with wildland firefighting and currently hold Call When Needed contracts for aerial firefighting services with the United States Forest Service and the Department of Interior. Croman also has Call When Needed contracts with the Oregon Department of Forestry, the California Department of Forestry, and the Washington Department ofNatural Resources. Additionally, Croman provides Exclusive Use services to the Department of the Navy under Part 135 and Part 133 authorization.

These past performance references are provided as a sample of the many programs in which Croman is involved. Performance evaluations are provided to give you a broader view of Croman as a service provider.

Contract Type of Date Completed Contact Number Contract !406-05-80-2627 OAS Exclusive Use 2005-2011 Tina Young (208) 433-5021 N!OPC30!16 Helicopter Fire Seasons USOOI, National Business Center, Aviation Management

Yellowstone National 300 E. Mallard St Park Boise, ID 83706-3991

AG-04H!-B-ll-9201 OAS/USFS Region 6 2011-2013 Ben McGrane 54!-504-7273 Call When Needed 1740 SE Ochoco Way Helicopter Services Redmond, OR 97756

N I 000 19-06-D-0027 U.S. Navy Exclusive 2005-2013 Charlie Myers (301) 342-5043 Use Helicopter Support 47123 Buse Rd Services Contract Patuxent River, MD 20670

Dl2PC00166 001 Type III CWN 2010-2013 Michael Willis (208)433-5019 300 E. Mallard St Boise, ID 83706-3991

D13PC00105 001 Type Ill CWN 2013-2014 Janice Haener (208) 433-5035 300 E. Mallard St.

Boise, lD 83706-3991

W911S808D0007 Dept. of Army 2008-2013 Ralph Chavez, Contracting Officer 253-982-3887 W91158-ll-D-0015 Exclusive Use Fire Seasons Russ Melcher (509) 577-3002

Firefighting Helicopter Ft Lewis Yakima WA Service Mission & Installation Contracting Command

Box 339500, MS 19 Joint Base Lewis-McChord, W A 98433-9500

AG-0248-12-5017 USFS National Call- 2011-2013 Fred Geijsbeek (208) 387-5347 When-Needed Fire Seasons USDA Forest Service- Contracting Helicopter Services 3833 S. Development Drive

Boise, lD 83705 AG-024B-C-08-9433 USFS Exclusive Use 2007-2012 Frank Gomez (208) 387-5347

Firefighting Fire Seasons USDA Forest Service- Contracting Helicopter Services 3833 S Development Drive

Boise, ID 83705 CWN Firefighting 2003-2013 Neal Laugle (503) 945-7508 Helicopter Services Oregon Department of Forestry Contract 2600 State Street

Salem, OR 97310 EU Firefighting 2004-2010 Travis Medema (503) 945-7271 Helicopter Services Fire Seasons OregonDepartmentofFo~try

Contract 2600 State Street Salem, OR 97310

CWN Firefighting 2003-2013 Barry Lloyd, Helicopter Program Manager(916) 561-3330 Helicopter Services California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Contract Aviation Management Unit

5500 Price A venue McClellan, CA 95652

GROMAN CORPORATION

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SUPPORT

Bradshaw 552499950 31 years 24 months 12 months 30 years 10 years

4/22/97

Burgess 3574007 16 years 24 months 12 months 6 years 16 years 13 years

2/10/09

Oliver 533563345 33 years 24 months 12 months 33 years 5 years

3/31/83

Pickard 532523028 31 years 24 months 12 months 21 years 3 years 10 years

2/13/81

Pugmire 3534280 28 years 24 months 12 months 22 years 4 years

Smith 3187110 41 years 24 months 12 months 17 years 4 years

2751578 22 years 24 months 12 months 3 years 11 years 7 years

460089866 32 years 24 months 12 months 11 years 27 years 7 years

5/4/83

I

GROMAN CORPORATION

FUEL TRUCKSUPPORT

COL MF401337C

COL A0730425

COL 25220170

COL 3327568

YES

YES

YES

YES

l?

C:·

F.or .ft.rllM~ an' .. '' ' t ·~ .

• tn(JN.

" ' 'r,,, .. , , c ,:, W?u ...

r:tna.slbrt ·total ~f 2·3.8t1 . , . I. , .. · ·~·...,•s .. •e ~~~~·'·~ •:<-~ ··.t"' t. 1,-

ARMY

,. C'

CWN Managers Assignme~t CJose-Out J'bi.s form is to ~prove the'qu•liry level ofCt.U·Wbm.Needed Helicopter contracU. Yourrematb wm BUilt us in improving our interagency standa:d.s for CWNheliCOJ!tcr contra~and cOJFBCton •

.er~71f;JSGI..brm~ vo.h.,. ~ , YOIVN81:be:E.;r.~.AI'.:f't..<P.It{1/?' E-mail: / Agcaey: v.)r.S AO AssipmcmDa~ ~;:/~r Release Date: ?//~9 Phone No: ~;rrT"·;z27i Use a Scale from 1 to S: (S} = e~c.eeds all requirements (l) ... dOcs not m'Cd requue.Dents

), Was the helicopter kept clean lt.Dd neat? £"' QualiJ)'Commeotslfr~ ~~M:iv

2. Did the fuel trucJc provide reliable service? , Quality Comments: f&6' 7Gt»r ~/r

3. Did tbe compmy keep you fully infonned on the cpnditioo of the crew.~. cr.~~ tNck? .

Qualitycommems: yEs. :r.4e /~,...e ~r h:r9 /hHrMer:::f/ da./'"/ /1/4/n~/XLI'Ge /.Q-0..17/?J~ l~h~ 1" /k ~/ ~7;~ /tx.a.¢;,; a.h~J? ~ .

4. Didthe~abidebyaJJprovi~of~c~~ f> . .

Cottcontrorcomm~ c;e:w ~~ ,c:u...,~ .lr;""e/henr/~· df'Yr /?¢c- ~aqrfr17 o.r~K.nJ4t:Yr ~'?9 ~rfjR .

5. Would you take Y6ur next assignment widl thil ~ · .

Coat contrvJ Commem11 /.J[j~NIOYre.f )/tf"'S'

6. Was dle crew and helicopter supponed by the company in a timely Jll8DDCII'1 1/ if(<)' Timelinea of performance Commen~ ~

1. Durinl aJI)' mechanical problems, were you tnronncd of the problem ad the prosn:- of the work beiDa doni~~ tO •

~ tbe . ~ c ~/o 1;. ~~<=~ ~~r:,.£~;?;)~ aJ .tu:-r ./G-'4' /~~li . /J

Tne mcu vt orm&Dcc · ~ts~ .. V V t/ - / 1-· ~ rrt~5d~~/?Ja.ln~e. . /t

I. Did the flight crew I fuel truck hncchanic arrive on time ach day?

Tuaclineas ofpcriormanc:e Commcmu; ~ , // · • rlerCll'>'"/~,ecw-kr ............... , _ff,e. ~r~ 1/H?-e

9. Wae =w 'Jl!lf. lmndlrKI with little or no confusion, IJid, was liMn a briefing~ • ...........meis boillr • /J e~~sed7 . c .li%r:s"'P.echa:.hrc:J, d.r/~ rc?a.r~.,~f>.J.j ~~WI~ ·

Bus!pS re ons OIJU'Z!CD~~ .

~s~4i,h tfm~~ ~h · . .

JO. Wm you treated like a prefcmd customer? t/£""5. /II/ t:ret:t/~~ ~/.~·~5'5/fJ.17;,f Bumeur«:Jati~C.9.]M1~/.,; ~rtk,-4 ~U:~ Jf>9.if ~(J..,//ff, A#'"~hne/

~~HJenr~//forr .<e--'i..W-"7~ rk~~/~.e~~ -?ceh4~e ;t/ ~r ... ould you like someone to contact you about this contractOr? YIN ,41.? ILa::fer c::;f'~'$'".

::WN HELICOPTER CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Contractor"s Name: CROMAN Make/Model: HS3-H FAA# : N611 CK

Your Name: Wendell Hansard

- twsignment Start Date: 02/05/09

. E-Mail: Wehans@aol.com

Release Date: 02/20/09 Phone# :

Agency: USFWS

281-743-1289

Rank on Scale from 1 to 5: (5} =Exceeds all Requirements~ (1} = Does not meet Requirements

1 Was the helicopter kept neat and clean? Rank: I 5 J Comments: Helicopter was kept clean at all times.

2 Did the fuel truck provide reliable service? Rank: t 5 I Comments: No problems with fuel truck. Very fast tum around times when needed

3 Did the company keep you fully infonned on the condition of the crew, helicopter Rank: I 5 I and fuer truck?

Comments: was informed of all maintenance before it was performed. Company supplied all required and requested documentation on travel & maintenance

4 Did the contractor abide by aU provisions of the contract? Rank: I 5 I Comments:

5 Would you take your next assignment with this contractor? Rank: I 5 I Comments:

I 6 Was the helicopter supported by the company in a timely manner? Rank: I 5 I Comments:

7 During any mechanical problems, wete you infonned of the problem and the Rank: I 5 I progress of the work being done to fix the aircraft?

Comments: No mechanical problems during my assignment. Normal scheduled maintenance performed when due.

8 Did the flight crew, fuel truck and mechanic arrive on time each day? Rank: I 5 I Comments:

9 Were crew changes handled with little or no confusion, anCf was there a briefing Rank: I 5 I between crew members being exchanged?

Comments:

10 Were you treated like a prvferred customer? Rank: I 5 I Comments:

I

)1 Would you like someone to contact you about thts contractor? Yes: I I No: lXII

Complete at the end of your assignment and E-Mail or FAX to the Contracting Officer!

REQUIRED HCM-16 (DRAFT 2004)

Solicitation No. AG-0248-S-08· 3 Large Fire Support Helicopter Services

SECTION C

. DESCRIPTION/.SPECIFICATIONSIEXHIBITS

::· .:r·:

···,· .. , ... EXHJBIT 15: .. ,

PERFORMANCE REPORT . . '

To be completed at the end of the Mandatory Availability Period

CONTRACTOR'S NAME: I":R.0/1"7.-41.../ ( r,e.,P CONTRACT# ~M./!.-/L-C/M-'f:!il£1 AIC N-# G /:SCI< YOURNAME: #.r:::"PI'..e-f ~X7o.AJ EMAil: T:..-;-e.X.1"CJn I£».. .A /,H~J...e.:'~ ~I!' I"AGENCY~ """R:-W'"\

. YOUR ASSIGNMENT DATE: ~ -Z-R-OR RELEASE DATE: /t:J -·:!t-Ot:! . PHONE# =.51./ ~ZL

1. Was the helicopter kept clean and neat? .

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2 [J 3 [.I 4 [] 511 I ·EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS QUALITYCOMMENTS:_1716 ~.,ocfl-,r.Jt WAS f.le..t&.-t iu&~"- kePr; .

2. Did the fuel truck provide reliable service?

· DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I HJ 2[] 3[] 40 5M I EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

QUALITY COMMENTS:~ P@f:3'-eMS PO 17?/1 p.v/5" t.. -rR.t)c;~ ~ . !

. ·' 'I•

' 3 .. Did the company keep you fully lnfonned on the condition of the crew helicopter, and fuel truck? Yes"}g NoL.J DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2 0 3 [J . 4 [] 5l2!l I EXCEEDS ALL REQWREMENTS

QUALITY COMMENTS: /9~ S'C#el/~€':!5 W~ A7:> vA;Vet;;. .

K~I.J "7CJ IYI~. ~Gc.. /V

4. Did the contractor abide by all provisions of the .contract?· Yes_,mN~J.

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 10 2U 3LJ 4U 518 I EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

COSTCONTROLCOMMENTS: 'MiA..J/MAz- 'j;jc;W,JT'/htS. '7)o.;j~//J(5 ~ ~10"1:> • . . . . . "'"' . . J .

• ,: •. ·::• • '.' •,' ' • ' ' I

5.. · Would you take vour next assignment with this contractor? Yet"jgNoO DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2 [J 3 lJ 4 0 5'1K I EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

_:T CONTROL COMMENTS:_z-#..CO ;Uo r:'J6otJLem-.5 z..<.:> 1Tt-/ 77-/r-5' COJVTRA.cr~ R._

- 6. Was the crew and helicopter supported by the company In a timely manner? Yes "D.( NoU

~MEUNESS OF PERFORMANCE COMMENTS: /V~6b!:'l:> . C<J"J'11:PcJAJ fSJ,...I13' r.e;:;,e .. /:!.efPA//?w ',(.)GR.t:: 7:J6t:-.l'tJ61l€D /N T'rt~ M-OST_·.-6~/C/<BA.:/ /)f£,.,MJS ~/f)&.G.'1

7. During any mechanical problems, were you informed of the problem and the progress of t~~rk being done ~o fix the aircraft? · . Yes No[] .·

DOES· NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2{] 3 LJ 4 L.J 5lS. I ~CEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS IMELI!IESS ~F ... PE~FORMANCE COMMENTS~ ~AS AJOT/,r::"'G'i::>.. /.~ • ,(/'DI/'AIJ~ t:JF ~~~f.G~{~"'''!uA..I7eAJ!f C6 /Tell'tS A~ /~JHCI:>tA/Et.-(f OF Ml'f

8. Did the flight crew/fuel truc.k/mechanic arrive on time each day? Yes~No_bl

)OES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2[]• 3[] 4[] ~ I . EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

MELINESS PERFORMANCE COMMENTS: .A/eve 12._ -L.A~-. .. ' .

9. Were crew changes handled with little or no confusion~ _and, was there a briefing between cre~mbers being exchanged? . · Yes . No[]

•OES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I . 1 LJ 2 [J 3 [] 4 [J 5-&!f I EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS ISINESS RELATIONS COMMENTS: Q(,;/5',e~ ..W /T# /NC::olf'i JI'J(!S ,l()l{)'p ~' ~Lf?W.S /I?WJf.)f{5 Ot;Cu~ " .

10. Were you treated like a preferred customer? Yes...,M:N~ OES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2 0 3 [] 4 [] ~ I EXCEEDS ALl REQUIREMENTS

SINESS RELATIONS COMMENTS:

.,_ ., u..;e;ee ·er..e.r (_:.ov.l'f-/ ~ov~ '"'"""--P 'l!'JSSpONue.o /AJ./feiJ s-~ 70 ... fr'2A~ Bti~LJG~'" · · · c;l

CWN HELICOPTER CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

To be completed 1ft the end of your tour.

This form is to improve the quality level of can-when-Needed Helicopter Contracts. Your remarks will assist us in improving our interagency standards for CWN Helicopter Contracts and Contractors.

Contractor's Name:Cr-ct~1CU'\ Cot·co{o ... +'\o~"' Contract#:AG-02"/G' ( -C?f·- 'f 39/f/ AIC N#: l.ol J <:. K Your Name: (~Ol~ [}e._ f-1tJ'SS E-Mail: dr:l<fY){/5S (? ..,f;- ..fecJ. LJS" Agency: US F_) YourAssignmentDarte: 4/;J(,::/0<'1 IReleaseDate: 1Phone#:4D'- 'i(;l/-J~'-/3 _j

1 Was the helicopter kept neat and clean? v .. 0 No 0 DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 tsa 5 D EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

QUALITY f • \_ .1 J , . • • ' . ..- I 1,['1 COMMENTS: ~1-;!?cA, Wh i iti, f-r- i:...J(J..) t..Y.;._ "-

2 Did the fuel truck provide reliable service? v .. [8. No 0 DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 rgJ. 5 D EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

QUALITY u A fl - COMUEHTS: r \~ fl4 ·1e d 1-l 0 i f t ~} V~J 1 c-J e. \I

3 Did the company keep you fully Informed on condition of the crew, helicopter, and fuel truck? vn!X' No 0

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 D 5 ~ EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

QUALITY

COMMENTS:

4 Did the contractor abide by all provisions of the contract? v .. I2J No 0 DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 D 4lXJ 5 D EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

COST CONTROL

COMMENTS:

5 Would you take your next assignment with this contractor? v .. ~ No 0 DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 D 5jgf EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

COST CONTROL

COMMENTS:

6 Was the crew and helicopter supported by the company In a timely manner? vn~ No 0 DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 k8l 5 D EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

TIUEUNESS OF

PERFORMANCE

COMMENTS:

7 During any mechanical problems, were you informed of the problem and the progress of the work being done 1\A' D to fix the aircraft? Y~ No

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 ·D 4 D 5.(S{1 EXCEEDS All REQUIREMENTS TIMELINESS OF . • • P=E W.:Lil ; 1)-G;('rv-,Q.J abc..+ vpc.chn')j MG.Inkr)~f'ltt

8 Did the flight crew/fuel truck/mechenic arrive on time each drrj? vnC8( No 0

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 D 5 RJ EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

TIMELINESS OF

PERFORMANCE

COMMENTS:

9 Ware crew changes handled with little or no confusion, anci, was there a briefing between crew members 1'\A D being exchanged? v.~ No

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 t8J 5 D EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

BUSINESS

RELATIOHS

COMMENTS:

10 Were you treated like a preferred customer? v.l2ij' NoD

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 D 5 [XJ EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

:n::s \Je.(y ("~o.-.(.!J +t>;~+ c~I.J, I l:t•J.: fcrwMd 1c {.,4cdL'"'.J w;'-K -/-1-,eA 4_)e~,,., {

COMMENTS:

Would you like someone to contact you about this contractor? v•D No [SZj Complete at the end of your assignment and FlU'. to contracting @ 20&-387·5384 or email to jontume~.fed.uc

HCM-16 (0312006} REQUIRED

Solicitation No. AG-0248-S-08· 3 Large Fire Support Helicopter Services

SECTION C

DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/EXHIBITS

EXHJBfT 15

PERFORMANCE REPORT

To bft completed at the end of the Mandatory Availability Period

CONTRACTOR'S NAME: f ~Pe>.-Y~-6-t\ t:.,p;t CONTRACT I: /1~--C..~- C.--.;; c... '/:tfle, AJC N416t3r'.K / 6/lt'..Ls...

YOUR NAME: 7 cr• ::;E:~Iu.LI I EMAil.: 75~ ..... '1: ~ /! I~ h '""'J·u~·:, !"!~ AGENCY~Z'c.;V'I_

. YOUR ASSIGNMENT DATE:., .... f..J'-"1' / z,, 'l ! RELEASE DATE: 0{:, o/ ~-'-".:"" PHONE It: ';'f I "'·, 'l. ;I.J~ ~

1. Was the helicopter kept clean and neat?

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1[] 2 [] 3 [] 4 [] 5~ J EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

QUALITY COMMENTS: /J/1?..1' /?.AFt V-.i.O~ t..:...JA-::J-Hf:t:>- A'!: NCE.D.~b (./5' u .{) (. (.... '1 "'0,;4 11. .... <1-

2. Old the fuel truck provide reliable service?

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2 lJ 3 [J 4 [] 5I!SI I EXCEEDS All REQUIREMENTS

QUALITY COMMENTS: ,;,<.) C lf,>O D t:'>ec...tt..h~~"'? ~·l-fs·TC,;"' .

Af'-" / :r :S<-'r::s WliH I /'/F. t/2-•.H:J:.:... ·-:rf2- F '-'E.. f.-

3. Did the comoany kHD vou tullY Informed on tM condition of the cNw hellcoDter and tu.l truck? Yes~ No[J

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2 0 3 [J ... [] 5'8 I EXC~S ALL R~UIREMENTS

QUALITY COMMENTS: .1:. t:.-UAc; r:./)J.../'TI.V,Jt(Jc. L..-1- !'"'-" Cr>/ ... fj,..<fC....,_ LU'T ft 7~c C'--,.v T-EJCC""T'op_ 72'-ltG:<,,€/!J/.VO Ao~"' t'-'1(),4L (.:.f.J..£0 /F Ttt"'!:. /A.Jc:, or.fi..JT .A..ICf.."'hC'h _Al:;}D/7,....,.v,:J,. ,e(..- r_:H'rs.

4. Did the contractor abide bv all DrOviaiOM of the contract? Yes~N~J.

DOES NOT MEET REQUIReMENTS I 1 [J 2 U 3 (J 4 D 5 .D I EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

· COST CONTROL COMMENTS: /9 C.< , /~tr> .. •? ;J: "3 1-:J.V 5 l.~·P-'--"- /:.,~,--.,..~ I I

5. · Would vou take your next assignment with thl8 contractor? Yee...Il9_N~J.

,... ._ DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2 [] 3 0 4 0 5 1!:9 I EXCEEDS ALL RE;QUIREMENTS

J6-~0N,.C?L CO~ME~l!j~~.Ct~ 7~~--A~ -at .. /~ ~--P5 t»r7rl ~~"'/J/t€/JCivR.:::; r.'ft..£ ....... o.S..:: -1 ·- (-<- P6P.~> .... "'A../J .... £;L_ t'(l.$~..;.,..n~-<!7£D W.-?;1-j TN/'5 C./J.'.JT/':.K.;

eve~?£ . 1/C/-'M, /I£LPf=t;t:J..- /1/ .. n:::: l!o..e.P 1-<J.L

8. Was the crew and helicopter supported by the company In a timely manner? YesaNoO

TIMEliNESS OF PERFORMANCE COMMENTS: F-(l~,' .5 /-~t-'/D'5'D iM/f/1~-'DI~<TI'Ct-f .J=.._-./'_

.· d~ P,5,..'?-:_-... .,_v/'J,/t:< _ u....->~:.f.;

A~ ~/P-t"8C t>n.S 'r A/ .C-:D5.

7. During any mechanical problems, ware you lnfonned of the problem and the prognsa of th: Erk being dona to fix the aircraft? Yea ~

· DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] 2[] 3 [] 4 0 5 1:21 I ~CEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE COMt.l;NTS: pt€ C.f(.(;JV /C.::> c.uCR_C VC fP-'1 /'1 -::r:~s~/Yl~'/J/S ~~-~n::~ ,-:,..Ht::-·,C...;?.~~--s r'-"R- :R£>".-rJ.~-, He ~r"'L- c.-v /IH

8. Old the flight cntwlfuel truck/mechanic arrive on time each day? Yes'Jiij .. NoO

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [] .2[]• 3[] 4 [] 5~ I EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

TIMELINESS PERFORMANCE COMMENTS: ./l c: L Cf!£1.o ,.AJ'..."?JZf:.~ _,'S,.?/r'~"':c,.... n)...) 7//-1¥. 0/?_. /1 /f'C" f=' -/ /./'>,:. -... .CD 0. I . , ,- -

9, Were crew changes handled with little or no confusion, and, was there a briefing between crew members being exchanged? _ Ye~NoO

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 0 2 [J 3 [] 4 [] 5 ~ I EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

BUSINESS RELAnONS COMMENTS: 7 ,+.r-/ .... C Cft.!li I.Jf.Y5"'5 . -- - "-VCI'!.C /'(...A:;> p.e_._.,s U::..1V25· c.u // tZ-' (' 12f:l.U

1 o. Were you treated like a preferred customer? Yes):$'.1NOU DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS I 1 [J 2 0 3 [J 4 D 5ll£J I EXC_gEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMENTS:

/it.,_ <..."'"lf" I liC 1-">£:-..;pr_f' L (',..r'l M.£ ;u C;n)JII<!C/ U...J/1 H _. / ~~.f.-4/ ~-~ '/11€' Vc/."1 wet~, /Lio /Ssu~s A7 I"~ L..,:_

SECTION C

DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/EXHIBlTS

EXHIBIT 15

PERFORMANCE REPORT

~--· ·· ···· To be completed ai'fhe end of your"tolii: __ _

\This form is to improve the qu;a\lty level of c'aii~When-Needed Helicopter Contracts. Your remarks will assis_t_ j~_i_l}_}mproving our interagency_~~.ndards for ~YIIN Helico ter Contra_cts and Contractors_:________ -m---------!1 I CONTRACTOR'S NAME:t.&om/.W J CONTRACT# :~tt-c:z -C.- g_ <i - * % l AIC N-# f..;.12CK i-'lOUR N~ME:R :e;;tSlj <e -f.: _ ___J EMAii..: ro·_ _ ... cam ! AGENCY: - S ---

1 YOUR ASSIGNMENT DATE: 0 RELEASE DATE: I ! ?HONE#. 7~ -~ I(..

1 1. Was the helicopter kept clean and neat?

joOES N~T MEET REQ(:fi~§MENTS ,- _ 1 0 ·:2·0 3 Q .. '! 0 5"]${ ____ j ... EXCEEDS ALL REg~~REMENTS 1 QUALITY cOMMENTS: A/(! .wtZs.he..d :J-f'-1-u ~ vf!.l"r ,..,,.55 .... &7( .. .:5<:-rV;-<:-<.. -1-rcu l~r 1 {,..oa.5> c.lt2-o-l't 4 :Pelf o~m z;;J.

;- 2. Did the fuel truck orovide reliah...,.te_s_e-rv-ic_e_?-----------------------

1 DOES NO'f __ ~.§ET REQUiREt,1gNTS ; ····· 1 0 2 U 3 0 --~E 5 cr-- E'-CQ.!;EDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

I QUALITY COMM;:NTs:-vnvU LVCv cJ u.xt.rs i.)((Ll IQ..lk 4 Q_o{.,(.lft''l\ ~ f was a..f ~ f w<:.t/ 1 m a • 11-fct r n iL<!,, Fi ___ 3. Did "ihe company keep you·f~ informed- o:r:_9:!e condition of the crew, heiico ter, and fuel truck? Yes NoCI

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS . 1IJ 2 0 3 4 5 1 EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

!QUA~.lTYCOMMENTS:(k 1 s .!Pa$.J-Vt'\.. ---T~,fiOO.I. A;fi;. · "<•''?""" w,<f<.. yLrq MfT. .. o;:;··f~T ..f-od.cw\Vt. 1:1'ft·;:th ... adu.~l pc.:f;;rMa.;nl.!.e...._ ftu an:.wm be.:-~ mqtn"m.ukd ot pcs,r-fv.z

11 Tf, +t4c;L,_ c) 11d ma. ft'l r ct. til u:l a h tCJh ?:.;,ta...,==f...::~c...=.::..;..f-'r"='e"""""-'-'r n_...e""s.=~· ---------:-:,.----....-::- 1 4. Did the contractor abide by all provistons of the contract? Yes No j DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS ! 1 D. 2 0 3 0 4 D 5 s EXCEf?DS ALL REQUIREM_ENTS

COST CONTROL COMMENTS:

I 5. Would you take your next assignment with this contr~ctor? Yes ~D i DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS j 1 0 2 D 3 D 4 CJ 5 D ' _E_¥XCEEDS Al..L REQUIREMENTS lcosTCONJROLCOMMENTS: 1 /oak.{n;.;;.;arJ +o ,711 '1 .fuf,.(. 1~aSS/<!IhZ.....'f w:'f/... ~tS 1 v't..f'dor.

6. Was the crew and helicopter supported by the company in a_:!_l_!lely.manner? Yes J~J·ioiT

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE COMMENTS:

I 7. Dunng any mechamcal problems. were you informed of the problem and the progress of the work bemg ~O.!]'S t --

1 the aircraft? Yes 0 NoD N!/4 I DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS ;-· 1 :0 2 "0 3 0 4 0 50 EXCEEDS-ALL REQUIREMENTS ! TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE COMMENTS: n c> ~II)+~"- e._ j s .5 /.-(Jl.$ b '-- <: ~ r 12..J., I / 8. ~~<!the flight crew/fuel truck/mechanic ar~ive on time each- ~y? ... Yes~oD II

: DOES NOT MEET REQUIREM§.!:lTS 1 0 2 0 3 0 --~ 0 5 $ -· ! EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS i TIMELINESS. PERFORMANCE COMMENTS: Pi}c-fs fa~ I:: /S'm1l1(.{ft2- la4 nc. /1 I"'Lf~'r~ttnA"~T !_>e.rrwf->1 .. I f.(L wetL ?fu.>cU.IS ~t[all(}tle...,. .. --------,.--tr 9. We crew cha1\9es hand. led with little & no confusion, and, w. as there a briefing between c~ew members being exchanged? Yes !i(NoO ·--::D:-:::o=-=;=.?.:-:J:_J,.,._o=T=MEET RE9Y~B§_!<1ENTS _ 1 0 2 0 3_0 --;n:J 5 ~--------~--EXCEEDS ALL REQUiR:-;;;e-;;;M;E;:-;NT:::S:::--R

! BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMENTS:

i 10. Were you trEiaiecfii'i\ei preferred customer? ---· Yes &f NoD --II ,--DOES NOJ: __ ~~.EET REQUIREMENTS . -· _1_0 2 D 3 0 4 0 5 ti _§XCEEOSALLREQUlREM-EIIiTS

! BUSINESS REL.ATIONS COMMENTS:

I! Would you like someone to contac(vou about this contractor? ·- Yes 0 No'S'

Complete at the end of your assignment and FAX to contracting @ 208-387-5384 or email to ie : ,IIJZ. lts!Js I

May 21 2012 4:38PM Boulder Outdoor Cent 303-444-8520 page 1 i;: k.

1.:

CWN HELiCOPTER ·CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION To be r;omp/flt/wlllt the find of your trwr.

This form is to improve the quality level of Caii-Wben-NaedcH:I Halicopt.er Contracts: Your narmirts will assia us in improving our ' ;..- tntaragancystandards for CWN Helicopter Contracts and Contractors. ·

Contractor's Nama: C .r o ~ ""'- Contract#: A" -o24/ &~8.-/~- 'S {)I 7 AICN1#:6,t~Ck

Your Name: £~-.c.. We,.- Jr L.aJ ll..w.t.er (+} E•Mall: I',... -/., fL tf 0 c.-1 Z..:J (. t:> l'1f IAsancy: ~-rr IIX.

Your Assignment Date: 5'";4 r h ~ )ReleaSe Date: ~<~lrt .. ~Phone#:

1 was thll helicoP'er kept nut ancs e1e .. 1 v-J81 .. D

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 30 •0 ~~ EXCEEDS AI..L REQUIREIIENTS .

~. ~t~"'f'kr-· ~ t.~"'e.A. loP~"- .p·~s:b.le.

2 Did the fuel truck provide rtliabte .-Mce? y-~ -o

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 30 •0 5~ EXCEEDS AI..L REQUIREMENTS ; ,

~: Y'c.:l fJr-'b\eY'-S 3 Did the company bap you .fUlly infonfted on conc:Hflon of the crew, helicopter, and "fuel truck? v•B. NoD

DOES NOT IIEET REQ~MENTS 10 20 3.0 40 518J EXCEEDS AU. REQUIREMENTS .

~:~~ c..s.~ .. 'c..Gt~'ls>...,. ~ ~~~\..-\ c..t'-e ..._.

4 Did lhe contractor abide by all provisions of the contract? ~~ NoD ~

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 aD 40 5~ EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS .

IXI&T CONTII.DL

COIIM!MTS:

5 Would you take your next a..tgnment witt. this contractor? y-~ NoD DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 30 4[J s12'] EXCEEDS A1..L REQUIREMENTS r--.

COST CONTROL -f-.' ?~·l-IT (ilt.l,., ;.. ~·I./

·j ~

COIIM!NTS: 711,. . e- .. "'<........ c:re:..- "-'"'"f

6 Was Che c;rew and helicopter supported by the company In a llmety manner? v .. r&'f NoD ..

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 zO· 30 40 5~ EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS '

TIIIELINISS OF

PI!RHIRMANCE ..

COIIIItHTI:

7 During My mecm•iea~ probieru, were you Informed of the pn~blem and the prog- of the wort: being done ~~ to fix the aircraft? Y• HoD·.

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 30 40 s~ EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

TWELIIESS OF

.Ill/ 1'1'1.<.,,.. l.ut.; .. c:._c... ~ 'P..//1'...1<,(. 1-.-'-<---·, I'I!RfCIIUIANCI W"-( ,~

COUMI!NI'S:

8 Did the flight creWtfuel truCk/mechanic arrive on time eadl day? · y~ •D

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 30 •0 5~ EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS. ;

TIUELIN£SS OF ..

PIIRFOIOIANC:E

COIIIiliiNJS:

9 Were craw changes handkld. with little or no confusion, and, was there a briefing between c:Nw rnernlx!l'$ y~~ -D being exchangeCIJ

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 30 •0 sKJ EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREIIEN'IS

BUSINESS

RELA'TJONS

CDMIIEIITS:

;: 10 Wera you treated like a .,_,.rred customer? v•5a bo DOES NOT MEEt' REQUJREIIENTS 10 zO 30 40 5~ EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

/- IIUSINES8 """6 ;, li ~0 "/- t ,;.l.)"" ~, .... // ~J- J-._..,4- ~~· ,;~ ....... RELATlDIIS

CONIII!NTS:

Would you Diet ~ne to~ you Gout tfUe contractor? • . . vaO No [XI .'

Complete at,_ 41nd Ofiyo~.~r assignment and FAX to contracting@ Z0~-5384.or email to jontu ...... -;-_fed • ..- ·

HCM-16 (03-2006) REQUIRED

CWN Managers Assignment Close-Out To completed at the end of:yoortour

This foml is to .improve the quality level of Can-When-Needed Helicopter conttacts. Your remarks will. assist us in improving our mtemgency standards for CWN helicopter contracts and contractors. Contractors Name __ _

YourN~:"e.b%~·G.~~'6 E-mail:(?.~'Bfi"i"'-<t~®~JS'§.~~~~~~?;.,::~~-:-:-~:--:-- Your Assignment Date: <.o ftc/ ,g · Release Date: t.f \!l { '\ ~ · Phone No: <fis. ""N~ H.p)A Use a Scale from 1 to 5: (5) = eEeeds all requirements (1) = does not meet requirements

1. Was the belkopter kept clean and neat? "l~ Qualicy Comments: (.,.~ 0 ·· ·

2. Did the fuel truck provide reliable service? '{ E:.'S QwiliryCo~nm=.--------------------~----------~----------------------

3. Did the company'k\! you fully informed on the conditionl,fthe crew, helicopter, and fuel truck? ~ ~S Quality Comments:~~}.. "M I(· Mono.~ '•oSas-eeJ. ,£ Jb.=t"A o<; lruc..L • 1b+. H'ttk

C'rtnb .t,h:u. •·'o\ ftf>• .:o . . • •

4. Did the contractor abidci by an provisions of the contract?~ Co~contteiConmEn~~l--~----------~-------------------------------------------------

5. Would you take your next assigmlient ~this contractor? .. ~U::"5 Cost control Comments· ·

6. Was the crew and he1icopter. supported by the company in a timely.manner? 'ft:S . .

T".Jmelin'ess of performance Comments: l\,.,o. \ t;o s==eo.A.P. 1i>kr.~ a c. Ot'"t7\o~'P'»Q<'). •&&? re~v.,\~ t \ ' . v - to,.

7. During any mechanical problems, were you infonned of the problem and the progress of the work being done to ' fix the aircraft? "<' ~

Timeliness of performance Comin.ents: . ..

. 8. Did the flight crew I fuel truck I mechanic mive on time each &,y?"l6 ~ T~lin~of~eCoumxm~~=-~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~S~A-~~~~~~------------------------------------

9. Were crew c~es handled with little qr no confusion, and. was there a briefing between crewmembers being exchanged? ~/A- · Business relations ~ominent5: ·

10. Were you treated like a preieiTed CUstomer? '1 e:s BusmeSsrelations~ents: f..t-0.4-.: "'~ ~t:r~'<. ~\""'......_ "'- ~~.A.;.'"' A~''l.:l~~~\

Would you like someone to contact you about this contractor? Y~

Complete at end of your assignment and FAX. to contracting 208-387-5384 . .

CWN HELICOPT ~ CONTBAC:rOR PERFORM >'iCE EVALUATION

Tolbe completed afthe end of your tour. ~- '·

This form Is to improve the quality level of cai~W,nen~Need .. Helicopter Contracts. Your remarks will assist us In Improving our Interagency standards for CWN Helicopter COntract$ and COntractors.

;--· - Contractor's Name: La; Ma 1\J Cn'(}C> ;

contractt:AC:t -¢2.!f_B- B ... JJ.~s-fll7 AIC N#: btl CK

Your Name: :Sha.vv r-.J tJiserJ E-Mail::<;}..,.,,_, • tJI'f.eiV p, Sw:ft:.fl!u\1, us

Your Assignment Date: o{phfi /rz ... IRe18Ue Dat8: , t>71 Qb/ n .. !Phone#: Zl t - '{zs··. 77 qS, 1 Was the helicopter kept neat and clean?

j Yes~ NoD i

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 3D 4[R) sO EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

QUAUTY ~

COMMENTS:Cuw '~ C!vl P'if:e({evJ. ··10\o 4, I.N<Il.Shi~.ffkPc["u+frP l.fof.t'rllf' {& (' ( ,MJ, 2 Did the fuel truck provide reliable service? · \,.) \1

Yeag( NoD

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 2D 3D 4~ sO EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

QUALITY

coMMENTS:J:it.'vt'<-s: 1vPrt> IHv.w, ..c ,: Hr!o\<1 (!: f.?.'t'l?\~.{.1 ~~(\. ft.., !:hit> fltt ,...~ 14 ~f' .. .t 3 Did the company keep you fully Informed o~ condition iJt the crew, helicopter, and fuel truck? Yee0 NoD

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 aD 4[2;1 sO EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

QUALITY

COMMENTS: :::: lJJ<> .( 4-ltAJtA..ul> uf u ( "''{ ....,.....\} l1l.. 1::::>~ ~p I~ ""'"'.

4 Did the contractor abide by all provisions of the contract?

0 I " Yes~ NoD

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1D 2D 3D 4[Z) sO EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

COST CONTROL

COMMENTS: "Pi (of> IA1'L'It wt.\.\ i ~(~ o/, Ccrvf.-"-"1 ;

5 Would you take your next assignment with this contractor? vu.b8l NoD

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 30 40 s[ZI EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

COST CONTROL .

I COMMENTS: W!L~ a:. ?\<ta...$!.l.-t fr, WH~ t;A.?1t+1:.. (l~,.._. (.,.(<tw. \.)u'!l. ~-t.~ ..- Pl•s.t..i- 47; w,r~ w,·ft,.

6 Was the crew and helicopter supported by the Company In a timely manner?

v

Yee~ NoD '

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 30 40 s[hl EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

TIMEUHESSOF We W ""- fi'\Ai~ ... .,.. Z"S$1Al. e>'f') fW t«niO<(, 7/1.- ""fl.t fA'ti'I.P~ ~t ... J~t" g•r i3dv -b ffe

PERFORMANCE

COMMENTS: \,lU; b~ h<>1 1\ .._, ~ ~·.,._) 7/3/rz...

7 During any mechanical problems, were you Informed of the problem and the progress of the work being done v .. fSJ NoD to fix the aircraft?

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1D 2D 30 40 s(gl EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

TIMEUNESSOFQ\..<t+ fl'l.t&...,.<c ,rov.-6-t. ~· ~t"i''-'. f'>k.l~ &p.f•S ,.P t'"'t /'141n.~ad~'"' o6 l((p-f 1K<. in ~ PERFORMANCE ,.If ·

COMMENTS: l...w>P J\.."\'C ~ M<r.in; 11.41<...... . A.S f>t>;..., ~~.

8 Old the flight crew/fuel truck/mechanic arrive ~time each day?

v vesf29- NoD

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 10 20 aD 4~ sO EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

TIMELINESS OF

PERFOfiiiANCE

COMMENTS: f V( If\;( CltV V\J'-5 f(,.p« 0 {1. .f.(~ """ .. ~ .J:,e.vd S"" -to ,._.; w:r. f'A.M.

9 Were crew changt;s handled with little or no confusion, and, was ther'i a briefing between crew mem~ Yes~ NoD being exchanged?

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1D 20 3'D 4[gl sO EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

BUSINESS

RELATIONS 'i( COMMENTS: e \.: <-~ v-l...S ~~ 14re 1'W -tvtl'l;i-WJ fw,l;lf'; + w~~ \.tp fc> -s Pt' e J ,f#r ft.t iV r. Pf- sit; 4.

1 0 Were you treateclllke a preferred customer? " v.~ NoD

DOES NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS 1D 20 aD 40 s[gj EXCEEDS ALL REQUIREMENTS

BUSINESS

RELATIONS &.~

::£ Ne~~,.. lldf l:lk I • ......vt.s ~IV ouJs,"kl()fovl"" ft./Lc.qo'~ COMMENTS: C.<'t.W ~ VV6(J.. . ....;;'fl.

Would you like someone to contact you abcMJ!. th' ~n.~r?.~ · ,. Tkchef(~,u!. ~> VII$:-J NoD

Complete at the end of your assignment and FAX to contracting @ 208-387-5384 or email to jontumor@fs.fed.us

HCM·16 (03-2006) REQUIRED

BID IFB PBA-1326

ATTACHMENT A

BID SUBMITTAL

Bid Results will not be given by telephone. For bids results, please visit the BIDS website.

"" "' Vendor Name: Olathe Spray Service Inc. *Signature: ~llL~

Address: P.O. Box 40 Name (print) L. Deven Felix City, State, Zip Olathe CO 81425 Title Pilot Date 21 Oct 13 Phone: 970 323 5580 Fax: 970 323 6238 FEIN/SSN 84-0782730 Email: deven@olathespray.com

MONTROSE BASE

Item Description Unit Price 1)

A. Be1147 with Soloy conversion, Bel1206B3 Jet Ranger, or MDSOOD or better capability

Helicopter offered: Bell 4 7 So loy

B. Special project helicopter Helicopter offered: _____________ _

C. The State reserves the right to hire a Long Ranger, MD530F, Eurocopter SA-315-B Lama (or similar model with matching capabilities approved by authorized CPW representative) outside of this contract for big game counts at elevations over 12,000 feet ASL.

Bid price/flight hour (Dependent on bid proposal, State can guarantee up to 260 hours).

2) Overnight allowance (per diem) per crew member per night.

(Note: For high cost areas, rates will be based on most current CONUS per diem rates utilized by the State of Colorado)

3) Service Truck mileage Rate per mile

4) **Please indicate the price you currently pay for Jet A fuel

5) **Please indicate at what location you purchase your fuel

6) Indicate the number of personnel to be used to complete the job:

7) Indicate the Location of the Helicopter(s) and service truck(s):

$704.00

$129.00

_$2.50_

Olathe, Colorado

8) Indicate experience with three similar projects and a reference for each including name and phone number:

a. 2003- 2013 Colorado Parks and Wildlife helicopter service contract, Scott Wait, CPW SW Region Senior Biologist (970) 375 6745 b.

c.

9) The following table must be completed for all pilots

Activity as Pilot-in-Command

Helicopter

Weight Class 1

Turbine or reciprocating engines as applicable 2

Total Flight Hours

Make, model, and subsequent series 3 4552

Make and model in preceding 60 days 53

Make and model in preceding 30 days 3.1

Typical terrain 4 while engaged in similar work, including wildlife capture, big game inventory work, 4552 wild horse herding ..

Typical terrain 4 in make and model 4552

Total helicopter time last 12 months 522

Contact for Verification/Reference

Logbooks 1 and 2

L. Deven Felix

10) Please list any accidents you or any of your crew members have had in the last 6 months:

None

Bid price/flight hour Cost See above -----

Ferry Time (if applicable) will be considered as part of the guaranteed hours.

Ferry time of aircraft to and from the point of use from the designated base or such temporary location from which the helicopter is operating, will be paid at the hourly flight rate. If a service truck is required, mileage to and from the point of use from the designated base will be paid at the rates stipulated. State will not be responsible for ferry time to andfrom the Contractor's home base.

The designated base is the Craig, Colorado, airport. During the contract period the State will pay flight time from this base. If the Contractor's home base is elsewhere he must provide service from and coverage from the designated base(s).

Temporary bases may be established at the State's discretion. Additional allowances for airport use cost and overnight allowances will apply when performing services from temporary bases.

*By signing the vendor acknowledges that they meet or exceed the minimum qualifications and specifications stated in the entirety of this Invitation for Bid (IFB). The state reserves the right to request copies of any referenced documents or inspect to ensure that the standards stated in the IFB are met prior to award. Failure to meet these specifications will result in the vendor being non responsive.

**These items will not be evaluated; They are simply for calculating potential fuel hardship increases.

The state may request supporting documentation supporting any rates submitted per section XJO.O.l.F.3. of IFB PBA-1326

The vendor must be registered and in good standing with the Colorado Secretary of State, to bid on this solicitation. A copy of the vendor's certificate of good standing must accompany this form.

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

CERTIFICATE

I, Scott Gessler, as the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado, hereby certify that, according to the records of this office, OLATHE SPRAY SERVICE, INC.

is a Corporation formed or registered on 01/25/1979 under the law of Colorado, has complied with all applicable requirements of this office, and is in good standing with this office. This entity has been assigned entity identification number 19871363570.

This certificate reflects facts established or disclosed by documents delivered to this office on paper through 10/18/2013 that have been posted, and by documents delivered to this office electronically through 10/21/2013@ 12:45:47.

I have affixed hereto the Great Seal of the State of Colorado and duly generated, executed, authenticated, issued, delivered and communicated this official certificate at Denver, Colorado on 10/21/2013@ 12:45:47 pursuant to and in accordance with applicable law. This certificate is assigned Confirmation Number 8669981.

Secretary of State of the State of Colorado

*********************************************End of Certificate********************************************

Notice: A certificate issued electronically ftom the Colorado Secretary ofState 's Web site is (ully and immediately valid and effective. However, as an option, the issuance and validity of a certificate obtained electronically may be established by visiting the Certificate Confirmation Page of the Secretary of State's Web site, http:!lwww.sos.state.co.uslbiz!Certi{icateSearchCriteria.do entering the certificate's confirmation number displayed on the certificate, and following the instructions displayed. Confirming the issuance of a certificate is merely optional and is not necessary to the valid and effective issuance o(q certificate. For more information, visit our Web site, http://www.sos.state.co.usl click Business Center and select "Frequently Asked Questions."

CERT _ GS _ D Revised 08120/2008