IFB_25_26-10_Addendum_1.pdf
PDF 24 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Monroe Hall Renovations
- Solicitation number
- IFB 25/26-10
- Issued by
- Florida
About this file
This Addendum #1 to Invitation for Bid (IFB) 25/26-10 is issued by the City of Sanford, Florida Finance Department Purchasing Division on April 8, 2026, to provide clarifications and additional documentation for the Monroe Hall Renovations project. The addendum does not change the bid due date of April 28, 2026, at 2:00 PM Local Time. The addendum incorporates several attachments into the solicitation documents: Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), Form 00200, a pre-bid non-mandatory sign-in sheet, site photographs, and Change Order Law information. The addendum addresses no specific bidder questions in its Q&A section. All bidders must acknowledge receipt of Addendum #1 by signing and returning the acknowledgment form prior to bid submission or by including the addendum receipt with their bid package; failure to comply may result in disqualification.
The key substantive additions include federal compliance requirements under 2 CFR Part 200 regarding procurement standards for full and open competition, procurement methods (sealed bids, proposals, and noncompetitive procurement), and specific requirements for contractors developing specifications or statements of work. Additionally, 23 CFR Part 172.7 procurement procedures for Federal-Aid Highway Program funded engineering and design services are included, detailing qualifications-based selection methods, evaluation criteria, negotiation procedures, and conflict of interest standards. The addendum also incorporates Florida Senate Bill CS/CS/SB 712 provisions regarding construction regulations, including requirements for local government approval or denial of change orders within 30 days and prohibitions against penalizing large-volume construction bidders or rewarding small-volume bidders in public works project bidding processes. These federal and state regulatory additions establish compliance frameworks applicable to the Monroe Hall Renovations project procurement and execution.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PUR-F-212 Rev. 11/2016
City of Sanford | Finance Department | Purchasing Division 300 N. Park Avenue Suite 236, Sanford, Florida 32771
Phone: 407-688-5028 or 5030 | Fax: 407-688-5021 | Email: purchasing@sanfordfl.gov ADDENDUM
#1 IFB 25/26-10 MONROE HALL RENOVATIONS
DATE: April 8, 2026
TO: All Bidders/Proposers
FROM: Frank Mascola
City of Sanford Purchasing Division
SUBJECT: IFB 25/26-10 MONROE HALL RENOVATIONS| ADDENDUM #1
This addendum is issued to provide additional information, clarification, corrections, additions, deletions and/or answers to questions concerning the above referenced solicitation. All information provided in this addendum is incorporated into the solicitation document as set forth therein. All other parts of the solicitation have been maintained as originally distributed. This addendum supersedes any verbal and/or other instructions given to any bidder/proposer qualified to respond pursuant to the requirements set forth in the solicitation document.
I. DUE DATE
This Addendum does not change the solicitation due date. As such, the solicitation response is due no later than April 28, 2026 at 2:00 P.M. Local Time.
II. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (Q&A)
The City has received the following question(s) concerning the solicitation:
N/A
III. CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND/OR CLARIFICATIONS
CFR 200 was not included in the original solicitation. It has been attached. Photos of the site, Form 00200 and New Change Order Law information have also been included.
IV. SIGN-IN SHEET
Pre-Bid Non-Mandatory Sign in Sheet
V. ATTACHMENTS
CFR 200.
Form 00200.
Pre-Bid Non-Mandatory Sign in Sheet Photos Change Order Law
Respondents must acknowledge receipt of this Addendum by signing this form below and returning it to the Procurement Division prior to the hour and date specified for receipt of bids/proposals or by including this Addendum with your submittal. Failure to comply may result in disqualification of your response.
mailto:purchasing@sanfordfl.gov
PUR-F-212 Rev. 11/2016
City of Sanford | Finance Department | Purchasing Division 300 N. Park Avenue Suite 236, Sanford, Florida 32771
Phone: 407-688-5028 or 5030 | Fax: 407-688-5021 | Email: purchasing@sanfordfl.gov ADDENDUM
#1 IFB 25/26-10 MONROE HALL RENOVATIONS
Acknowledgment is hereby made of Addendum #1 to IFB 25/26-10 MONROE HALL RENOVATIONS.
Name of Firm/Company Contact Email
Street Address City, State, Zip Code
Telephone Number Fax Number
Authorized Person Printed Name Authorized Person Title
Authorized Person Signature Date of Signature mailto:purchasing@sanfordfl.gov
Title 2 —Federal Financial Assistance Subtitle A —Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance Chapter II —Office of Management and Budget Guidance Part 200 —Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards Subpart D —Post Federal Award Requirements Procurement Standards
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 503; 31 U.S.C. 6101-6106; 31 U.S.C. 6307; 31 U.S.C. 7501-7507.
Source: 89 FR 30136, Apr. 22, 2024, unless otherwise noted.
§ 200.319 Competition.
This content is from the eCFR and is authoritative but unofficial.
(a) All procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320.
(b) To ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, or invitations for bids must be excluded from competing on those procurements.
(c) Examples of situations that may restrict competition include, but are not limited to:
(1) Placing unreasonable requirements on firms for them to qualify to do business;
(2) Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding;
(3) Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies;
(4) Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts;
(5) Organizational conflicts of interest;
(6) Specifying only a “brand name” product instead of allowing “an equal” product to be offered and describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement; and
(7) Any arbitrary action in the procurement process.
(d) The recipient or subrecipient must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations:
(1) Are made in accordance with § 200.319(b);
(2) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the property, equipment, or service being procured. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the property, equipment, or service to be procured. When necessary, the description must provide minimum essential characteristics and standards to which the property, equipment, or service must conform. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to clearly and accurately describe the technical requirements, a “brand name or equivalent” description of features may be used to provide procurement requirements. The specific features of the named brand must be clearly stated; and
2 CFR 200.319 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Competition. 2 CFR 200.319 (Jan. 13, 2025)
2 CFR 200.319(d)(2) (enhanced display) page 1 of 2
(3) Identify any additional requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors that will be used in evaluating bids or proposals.
(e) The recipient or subrecipient must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products used in procurement transactions are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open competition. When establishing or amending prequalified lists, the recipient or subrecipient must consider objective factors that evaluate price and cost to maximize competition. The recipient or subrecipient must not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period.
(f) To the extent consistent with established practices and legal requirements applicable to the recipient or subrecipient, this subpart does not prohibit recipients or subrecipients from developing written procedures for procurement transactions that incorporate a scoring mechanism that rewards bidders that commit to specific numbers and types of U.S. jobs, minimum compensation, benefits, on-the-job-training for employees making work products or providing services on a contract, and other worker protections.
This subpart also does not prohibit recipients and subrecipients from making inquiries of bidders about these subjects and assessing the responses. Any scoring mechanism must be consistent with the U.S.
Constitution, applicable Federal statutes and regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
(g) Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with § 200.320(c).
2 CFR 200.319 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Competition. 2 CFR 200.319(d)(3)
2 CFR 200.319(g) (enhanced display) page 2 of 2
Title 2 —Federal Financial Assistance Subtitle A —Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance Chapter II —Office of Management and Budget Guidance Part 200 —Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards Subpart D —Post Federal Award Requirements Procurement Standards
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 503; 31 U.S.C. 6101-6106; 31 U.S.C. 6307; 31 U.S.C. 7501-7507.
Source: 89 FR 30136, Apr. 22, 2024, unless otherwise noted.
§ 200.320 Procurement methods.
There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319.
This content is from the eCFR and is authoritative but unofficial.
(a) Informal procurement methods for small purchases. These procurement methods expedite the completion of transactions, minimize administrative burdens, and reduce costs. Informal procurement methods may be used when the value of the procurement transaction under the Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold as defined in § 200.1. Recipients and subrecipients may also establish a lower threshold. Informal procurement methods include:
(1) Micro-purchases —
(i) Distribution. The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold defined in § 200.1. To the extent practicable, the recipient or subrecipient should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers.
(ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the recipient or subrecipient considers the price reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history, or other information; and maintains documents to support its conclusion. Purchase cards may be used as a method of payment for micro-purchases.
(iii) Micro-purchase thresholds. The recipient or subrecipient is responsible for determining and documenting an appropriate micro-purchase threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures. The micro-purchase threshold used by the recipient or subrecipient must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. The recipient or subrecipient may establish a threshold higher than the Federal threshold established in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) in accordance with paragraphs (a)(1)(iv) and (v) of this section.
(iv) Recipient or subrecipient increase to the micro-purchase threshold up to $50,000. The recipient or subrecipient may establish a threshold higher than the micro-purchase threshold identified in the FAR in accordance with the requirements of this section. The recipient or subrecipient may
2 CFR 200.320 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods. 2 CFR 200.320 (Jan. 13, 2025)
2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) (enhanced display) page 1 of 4 https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/31/503 https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/31/6101 https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/31/6307 https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/31/7501 https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/89-FR-30136 https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2025-01-13/title-2/section-200.317/ https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2025-01-13/title-2/section-200.318/ https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2025-01-13/title-2/section-200.319/ https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2025-01-13/title-2/section-200.1/ https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2025-01-13/title-2/section-200.1/ self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the Federal agency or pass-through entity and auditors in accordance with § 200.334. The self-certification must include a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation of any of the following:
(A) A qualification as a low-risk auditee, in accordance with the criteria in § 200.520 for the most recent audit;
(B) An annual internal institutional risk assessment to identify, mitigate, and manage financial risks; or,
(C) For public institutions, a higher threshold is consistent with State law.
(v) Recipient or subrecipient increase to the micro-purchase threshold over $50,000. Micro-purchase thresholds higher than $50,000 must be approved by the cognizant agency for indirect costs.
The recipient or subrecipient must submit a request that includes the requirements in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this section. The increased threshold is valid until any factor that was relied on in the establishment and rationale of the threshold changes.
(2) Simplified acquisitions —
(i) Simplified acquisition procedures. The aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Unless specified by the Federal agency, the recipient or subrecipient may exercise judgment in determining what number is adequate.
(ii) Simplified acquisition thresholds. The recipient or subrecipient is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk, and its documented procurement procedures, which may be lower than, but must not exceed, the threshold established in the FAR.
(b) Formal procurement methods. Formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a Federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement transactions above the simplified acquisition threshold determined by the recipient or subrecipient in accordance with paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section:
(1) Sealed bids. This is a procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price.
The sealed bids procurement method is preferred for procuring construction services.
(i) For sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present:
(A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available;
(B) Two or more responsible bidders have been identified as willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and
(C) The procurement lends itself to a firm-fixed-price contract, and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally based on price.
2 CFR 200.320 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods. 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv)(A)
2 CFR 200.320(b)(1)(i)(C) (enhanced display) page 2 of 4 https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2025-01-13/title-2/section-200.334/ https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2025-01-13/title-2/section-200.520/
(ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply:
(A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them with sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids. Unless specified by the Federal agency, the recipient or subrecipient may exercise judgment in determining what number is adequate. For local governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised.
(B) The invitation for bids must define the items or services with specific information, including any required specifications, for the bidder to properly respond;
(C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids. For local governments, the bids must be opened publicly.
(D) A firm-fixed-price contract is awarded in writing to the lowest responsive bid and responsible bidder. When specified in the invitation for bids, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life-cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is the lowest. Payment discounts must only be used to determine the low bid when the recipient or subrecipient determines they are a valid factor based on prior experience.
(E) The recipient or subrecipient must document and provide a justification for all bids it rejects.
(2) Proposals. This is a procurement method used when conditions are not appropriate for using sealed bids. This procurement method may result in either a fixed-price or cost-reimbursement contract.
They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements:
(i) Requests for proposals require public notice, and all evaluation factors and their relative importance must be identified. Proposals must be solicited from multiple qualified entities. To the maximum extent practicable, any proposals submitted in response to the public notice must be considered.
(ii) The recipient or subrecipient must have written procedures for conducting technical evaluations and making selections.
(iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the recipient or subrecipient considering price and other factors; and
(iv) The recipient or subrecipient may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby the offeror's qualifications are evaluated, and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where the price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used to procure architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services. The method may not be used to purchase other services provided by A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort.
(c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which the recipient or subrecipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method. The noncompetitive procurement method may only be used if one of the following circumstances applies:
(1) The aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section);
(2) The procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source;
2 CFR 200.320 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods. 2 CFR 200.320(b)(1)(ii)
2 CFR 200.320(c)(2) (enhanced display) page 3 of 4
(3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation;
(4) The recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or
(5) After soliciting several sources, competition is determined inadequate.
2 CFR 200.320 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods. 2 CFR 200.320(c)(3)
2 CFR 200.320(c)(5) (enhanced display) page 4 of 4
Title 23 —Highways Chapter I —Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation Subchapter B —Payment Procedures Part 172 —Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related
Services Authority: 23 U.S.C. 106, 112, 114(a), 302, 315, and 402; 40 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.; 48 CFR part 31; 49 CFR 1.48(b); and 2 CFR part
200.
Source: 80 FR 29927, May 22, 2015, unless otherwise noted.
§ 172.7 Procurement methods and procedures.
This content is from the eCFR and is authoritative but unofficial.
(a) Procurement methods. The procurement of engineering and design related services funded by FAHP funds and related to a highway construction project subject to the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 112(a) shall be conducted in accordance with one of three methods: Competitive negotiation (qualifications-based selection) procurement, small purchases procurement for small dollar value contracts, and noncompetitive procurement where specific conditions exist allowing solicitation and negotiation to take place with a single consultant.
(1) Competitive negotiation (qualifications-based selection). Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2) and
(3) of this section, contracting agencies shall use the competitive negotiation method for the procurement of engineering and design related services when FAHP funds are involved in the contract, as specified in 23 U.S.C. 112(b)(2)(A). The solicitation, evaluation, ranking, selection, and negotiation shall comply with the qualifications-based selection procurement procedures for architectural and engineering services codified under 40 U.S.C. 1101-1104, commonly referred to as the Brooks Act. In accordance with the requirements of the Brooks Act, the following procedures shall apply to the competitive negotiation procurement method:
(i) Solicitation. The solicitation process shall be by public announcement, public advertisement, or any other public forum or method that assures qualified in-State and out-of-State consultants are given a fair opportunity to be considered for award of the contract. Procurement procedures may involve a single step process with issuance of a request for proposal (RFP) to all interested consultants or a multiphase process with issuance of a request for statements or letters of interest or qualifications (RFQ) whereby responding consultants are ranked based on qualifications and a RFP is then provided to three or more of the most highly qualified consultants. Minimum qualifications of consultants to perform services under general work categories or areas of expertise may also be assessed through a prequalification process whereby annual statements of qualifications and performance data are encouraged.
Regardless of any process utilized for prequalification of consultants or for an initial assessment of a consultant's qualifications under a RFQ, a RFP specific to the project, task, or service is required for evaluation of a consultant's specific technical approach and qualifications.
(ii) Request for proposal (RFP). The RFP shall provide all information and requirements necessary for interested consultants to provide a response to the RFP and compete for the solicited services. The RFP shall:
23 CFR 172.7 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods and procedures. 23 CFR 172.7 (Jan. 13, 2025)
23 CFR 172.7(a)(1)(ii) (enhanced display) page 1 of 7
(A) Provide a clear, accurate, and detailed description of the scope of work, technical requirements, and qualifications of consultants necessary for the services to be rendered.
To the extent practicable, the scope of work should detail the purpose and description of the project, services to be performed, deliverables to be provided, estimated schedule for performance of the work, and applicable standards, specifications, and policies;
(B) Identify the requirements for any discussions that may be conducted with three or more of the most highly qualified consultants following submission and evaluation of proposals;
(C) Identify evaluation factors including their relative weight of importance in accordance with paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section;
(D) Specify the contract type and method(s) of payment anticipated to contract for the solicited services in accordance with § 172.9;
(E) Identify any special provisions or contract requirements associated with the solicited services;
(F) Require that submission of any requested cost proposals or elements of cost be in a concealed format and separate from technical/qualifications proposals, since these shall not be considered in the evaluation, ranking, and selection phase; and
(G) Provide an estimated schedule for the procurement process and establish a submittal deadline for responses to the RFP that provides sufficient time for interested consultants to receive notice, prepare, and submit a proposal, which except in unusual circumstances shall be not less than 14 calendar days from the date of issuance of the RFP.
(iii) Evaluation factors.
(A) Criteria used for evaluation, ranking, and selection of consultants to perform engineering and design related services must assess the demonstrated competence and qualifications for the type of professional services solicited. These qualifications-based factors may include, but are not limited to, technical approach (e.g., project understanding, innovative concepts or alternatives, quality control procedures), work experience, specialized expertise, professional licensure, staff capabilities, workload capacity, and past performance.
(B) Price shall not be used as a factor in the evaluation, ranking, and selection phase. All price or cost related items which include, but are not limited to, cost proposals, direct salaries/ wage rates, indirect cost rates, and other direct costs are prohibited from being used as evaluation criteria.
(C) In-State or local preference shall not be used as a factor in the evaluation, ranking, and selection phase. State licensing laws are not preempted by this provision and professional licensure within a jurisdiction may be established as a requirement for the minimum qualifications and competence of a consultant to perform the solicited services.
(D) The following nonqualifications-based evaluation criteria are permitted under the specified conditions and provided the combined total of these criteria do not exceed a nominal value of 10 percent of the total evaluation criteria to maintain the integrity of a qualifications-based selection:
23 CFR 172.7 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods and procedures. 23 CFR 172.7(a)(1)(ii)(A)
23 CFR 172.7(a)(1)(iii)(D) (enhanced display) page 2 of 7
(1) A local presence may be used as a nominal evaluation factor where appropriate. This criteria shall not be based on political or jurisdictional boundaries and may be applied on a project-by-project basis for contracts where a need has been established for a consultant to provide a local presence, a local presence will add value to the quality and efficiency of the project, and application of this criteria leaves an appropriate number of qualified consultants, given the nature and size of the project. If a consultant from outside of the locality area indicates as part of a proposal that it will satisfy the criteria in some manner, such as establishing a local project office, that commitment shall be considered to have satisfied the local presence criteria.
(2) The participation of qualified and certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) subconsultants may be used as a nominal evaluation criterion where appropriate in accordance with 49 CFR part 26 and a contracting agency's FHWA-approved DBE program.
(iv) Evaluation, ranking, and selection.
(A) The contracting agency shall evaluate consultant proposals based on the criteria established and published within the public solicitation.
(B) Although the contract will be with the consultant, proposal evaluations shall consider the qualifications of the consultant and any subconsultants identified within the proposal with respect to the scope of work and established criteria.
(C) The contracting agency shall specify in the RFP discussion requirements that shall follow submission and evaluation of proposals and based on the size and complexity of the project or as defined in contracting agency written policies and procedures, as specified in § 172.5(c). Discussions, as required by the RFP, may be written, by telephone, video conference, or by oral presentation/interview and shall be with at least three of the most highly qualified consultants to clarify the technical approach, qualifications, and capabilities provided in response to the RFP.
(D) From the proposal evaluation and any subsequent discussions which may have been conducted, the contracting agency shall rank, in order of preference, at least three consultants determined most highly qualified to perform the solicited services based on the established and published criteria. In instances where only two qualified consultants respond to the solicitation, the contracting agency may proceed with evaluation and selection if it is determined that the solicitation did not contain conditions or requirements that arbitrarily limited competition. Alternatively, a contracting agency may pursue procurement following the noncompetitive method when competition is determined to be inadequate and it is determined to not be feasible or practical to re-compete under a new solicitation as specified in paragraph (a)(3)(iii)(C) of this section.
(E) Notification must be provided to responding consultants of the final ranking of the three most highly qualified consultants.
(F) The contracting agency shall retain supporting documentation of the solicitation, proposal, evaluation, and selection of the consultant in accordance with this section and the provisions of 2 CFR 200.333.
(v) Negotiation.
23 CFR 172.7 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods and procedures. 23 CFR 172.7(a)(1)(iii)(D)(1)
23 CFR 172.7(a)(1)(v) (enhanced display) page 3 of 7
(A) The process for negotiation of the contract shall comply with the requirements codified in 40 U.S.C. 1104(b) for the order of negotiation.
(B) Independent estimate. Prior to receipt or review of the most highly qualified consultant's cost proposal, the contracting agency shall prepare a detailed independent estimate with an appropriate breakdown of the work or labor hours, types or classifications of labor required, other direct costs, and consultant's fixed fee for the defined scope of work. The independent estimate shall serve as the basis for negotiation.
(C) The contracting agency shall establish elements of contract costs (e.g., indirect cost rates, direct salary or wage rates, fixed fee, and other direct costs) separately in accordance with § 172.11. The use of the independent estimate and determination of cost allowance in accordance with § 172.11 shall ensure contracts for the consultant services are obtained at a fair and reasonable cost, as specified in 40 U.S.C. 1104(a).
(D) If concealed cost proposals were submitted in conjunction with technical/qualifications proposals, the contracting agency may consider only the cost proposal of the consultant with which negotiations are initiated. Due to the confidential nature of this data, as specified in 23 U.S.C. 112(b)(2)(E), concealed cost proposals of unsuccessful consultants may be disposed of in accordance with written policies and procedures established under § 172.5(c).
(E) The contracting agency shall retain documentation of negotiation activities and resources used in the analysis of costs to establish elements of the contract in accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR 200.333. This documentation shall include the consultant cost certification and documentation supporting the acceptance of the indirect cost rate to be applied to the contract, as specified in § 172.11(c).
(2) Small purchases. The contracting agency may use the State's small purchase procedures that reflect applicable State laws and regulations for the procurement of engineering and design related services provided the total contract costs do not exceed the Federal simplified acquisition threshold (as defined in 48 CFR 2.101). When a lower threshold for use of small purchase procedures is established in State law, regulation, or policy, the lower threshold shall apply to the use of FAHP funds. The following additional requirements shall apply to the small purchase procurement method:
(i) The scope of work, project phases, and contract requirements shall not be broken down into smaller components merely to permit the use of small purchase procedures.
(ii) A minimum of three consultants are required to satisfy the adequate number of qualified sources reviewed. In instances where only two qualified consultants respond to the solicitation, the contracting agency may proceed with evaluation and selection if it is determined that the solicitation did not contain conditions or requirements which arbitrarily limited competition.
Alternatively, a contracting agency may pursue procurement following the noncompetitive method when competition is determined to be inadequate and it is determined to not be feasible or practical to re compete under a new solicitation as specified in § 172.7(a)(3)(iii)(C).
(iii) Contract costs may be negotiated in accordance with State small purchase procedures;
however, the allowability of costs shall be determined in accordance with the Federal cost principles.
23 CFR 172.7 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods and procedures. 23 CFR 172.7(a)(1)(v)(A)
23 CFR 172.7(a)(2)(iii) (enhanced display) page 4 of 7
(iv) The full amount of any contract modification or amendment that would cause the total contract amount to exceed the established simplified acquisition threshold is ineligible for Federal-aid funding. The FHWA may withdraw all Federal-aid from a contract if it is modified or amended above the applicable established simplified acquisition threshold.
(3) Noncompetitive. The following requirements shall apply to the noncompetitive procurement method:
(i) A contracting agency may use its own noncompetitive procedures that reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations and conform to applicable Federal requirements.
(ii) A contracting agency shall establish a process to determine when noncompetitive procedures will be used and shall submit justification to, and receive approval from FHWA before using this form of contracting.
(iii) A contracting agency may award a contract by noncompetitive procedures under the following limited circumstances:
(A) The service is available only from a single source;
(B) There is an emergency which will not permit the time necessary to conduct competitive negotiations; or
(C) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined to be inadequate.
(iv) Contract costs may be negotiated in accordance with contracting agency noncompetitive procedures; however, the allowability of costs shall be determined in accordance with the Federal cost principles.
(b) Additional procurement requirements —
(1) Uniform administrative requirements, cost principles and audit requirements for Federal awards.
(i) STAs or other recipients and their subrecipients shall comply with procurement requirements established in State and local laws, regulations, policies, and procedures that are not addressed by or are not in conflict with applicable Federal laws and regulations, as specified in 2 CFR part 1201.
(ii) When State and local procurement laws, regulations, policies, or procedures are in conflict with applicable Federal laws and regulations, a contracting agency shall comply with Federal requirements to be eligible for Federal-aid reimbursement of the associated costs of the services incurred following FHWA authorization, as specified in 2 CFR 200.102(c).
(2) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program.
(i) A contracting agency shall give consideration to DBE consultants in the procurement of engineering and design related service contracts subject to 23 U.S.C. 112(b)(2) in accordance with 49 CFR part 26. When DBE program participation goals cannot be met through race-neutral measures, additional DBE participation on engineering and design related services contracts may be achieved in accordance with a contracting agency's FHWA approved DBE program through either:
(A) Use of an evaluation criterion in the qualifications-based selection of consultants, as specified in § 172.7(a)(1)(iii)(D); or
(B) Establishment of a contract participation goal.
23 CFR 172.7 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods and procedures. 23 CFR 172.7(a)(2)(iv)
23 CFR 172.7(b)(2)(i)(B) (enhanced display) page 5 of 7
(ii) The use of quotas or exclusive set-asides for DBE consultants is prohibited, as specified in 49
CFR 26.43.
(3) Suspension and debarment. A contracting agency shall verify suspension and debarment actions and eligibility status of consultants and subconsultants prior to entering into an agreement or contract in accordance with 2 CFR part 1200 and 2 CFR part 180.
(4) Conflicts of interest.
(i) A contracting agency shall maintain a written code of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in the award and administration of engineering and design related services contracts under this part and governing the conduct and roles of consultants in the performance of services under such contracts to prevent, identify, and mitigate conflicts of interest in accordance with 2 CFR 200.112, 23 CFR 1.33 and the provisions of this paragraph (b)(4).
(ii) No employee, officer, or agent of the contracting agency shall participate in selection, or in the award or administration of a contract supported by Federal-aid funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. Such a conflict arises when there is a financial or other interest in the consultant selected for award by:
(A) The employee, officer, or agent;
(B) Any member of his or her immediate family;
(C) His or her partner; or
(D) An organization that employs or is about to employ any of the above.
(iii) The contracting agency's officers, employees, or agents shall neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from consultants, potential consultants, or parties to subagreements. A contracting agency may establish dollar thresholds where the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value.
(iv) A contracting agency may provide additional prohibitions relative to real, apparent, or potential conflicts of interest.
(v) To the extent permitted by State or local law or regulations, the standards of conduct required by this paragraph shall provide for penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions for violations of such standards by the contracting agency's officers, employees, or agents, or by consultants or their agents.
(vi) A contracting agency shall promptly disclose in writing any potential conflict of interest to
FHWA.
(5) Consultant services in management support roles.
(i) When FAHP funds participate in a consultant services contract, the contracting agency shall receive approval from FHWA, or the recipient as appropriate, before utilizing a consultant to act in a management support role for the contracting agency; unless an alternate approval procedure has been approved. Use of consultants in management support roles does not relieve the contracting agency of responsibilities associated with the use of FAHP funds, as
23 CFR 172.7 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods and procedures. 23 CFR 172.7(b)(2)(ii)
23 CFR 172.7(b)(5)(i) (enhanced display) page 6 of 7 specified in 23 U.S.C. 302(a) and 23 U.S.C. 106(g)(4) and should be limited to large projects or circumstances where unusual cost or time constraints exist, unique technical or managerial expertise is required, and/or an increase in contracting agency staff is not a viable option.
(ii) Management support roles may include, but are not limited to, providing oversight of an element of a highway program, function, or service on behalf of the contracting agency or may involve managing or providing oversight of a project, series of projects, or the work of other consultants and contractors on behalf of the contracting agency. Contracting agency written policies and procedures as specified in § 172.5(c) may further define allowable management roles and services a consultant may provide, specific approval responsibilities, and associated controls necessary to ensure compliance with Federal requirements.
(iii) Use of consultants or subconsultants in management support roles requires appropriate conflicts of interest standards as specified in paragraph (b)(4) of this section and adequate contracting agency staffing to administer and monitor the management consultant contract, as specified in § 172.9(d). A consultant serving in a management support role may be precluded from providing additional services on projects, activities, or contracts under its oversight due to potential conflicts of interest.
(iv) FAHP funds shall not participate in the costs of a consultant serving in a management support role where the consultant was not procured in accordance with Federal and State requirements, as specified in 23 CFR 1.9(a).
(v) Where benefiting more than a single Federal-aid project, allocability of consultant contract costs for services related to a management support role shall be distributed consistent with the cost principles applicable to the contracting agency, as specified in 2 CFR part 200, subpart E—Cost Principles.
23 CFR 172.7 (up to date as of 1/13/2025) Procurement methods and procedures. 23 CFR 172.7(b)(5)(ii)
23 CFR 172.7(b)(5)(v) (enhanced display) page 7 of 7
IFB 25/26-10 Monroe Hall Renovations INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDER
00200-2 of solicitation documents and to enable notification of required addenda.
Reproduction of these documents without the express permission of the City is prohibited.
1.02 Bidder Questions
Any Bidder who is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of the Bidding Documents, or finds a discrepancy or omission therein, is hereby directed to contact the Owner, in writing, at least ten (10) days prior to the bid opening date, for an interpretation or correction. Written questions shall be submitted on VendorLink www.myvendorlink.com.
(under City of Sanford, and the IFB No. indicated in the Bid Advertisement / Invitation for Bids). The person submitting the request shall be responsible for its delivery as indicated above. Only interpretation, instructions or correction(s) provided, in writing by the City Purchasing Manager will be binding. It is noted that interpretation, instructions or corrections will be provided only by Addendum.
1.03 Addenda
A. Addenda will be made available for download from the City of Sanford’s hosted solution at VendorLink (myvendorlink.com) to Registered Users of VendorLink.
All Addenda issued during the time of bidding shall form a part of the Contract Documents, shall be covered in the Bid, and shall become a part of the Contract.
Receipt of each Addendum shall be acknowledged on the Bid Form; failure to do so may subject the Bidder to disqualification.
B. It shall be the Bidder's responsibility to ensure that it has downloaded all
Addenda prior to bid. The City shall not be responsible for non-receipt of Addenda due to failure on the part of the Bidder to verify it has received all addenda or the Bidder’s inability to download Addenda.
C. Any prospective bidder who obtains the bid documents from any other source other than via registration and downloading from VendorLink will not automatically receive notifications regarding addenda. An omission involving addenda will be resolved against said bidder. Addenda will not otherwise be provided by email or fax.
1.04 Examination of Documents and Inspection of Site
A. Before submitting a Bid, Bidders must thoroughly examine the Specifications and Contract Documents which include the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Bid Form, Construction Agreement Form, Form(s) of Bond(s), General Condi-tions, Supplementary Conditions, Specifications, drawings, any addenda, and fully inform themselves of all existing conditions and limitations, and include in the Proposal a sum to cover the cost of all items included in the Contract Documents. Bidders are required to inform themselves fully of the conditions relating to construction and labor under which the work will be or is now being performed, and the Contractor must employ, so far as possible, such methods and means in carrying out his work as will not cause any interruption or interference with any other construction the Owner has underway.
http://www.myvendorlink.com/
00200-3
B. Each bidder shall visit the site of the proposed work and fully acquaint themselves with conditions relating to construction and labor so that he may fully understand facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending the execution of work under the Contract. The failure or omission of any bidder to receive or examine any form, instrument, addendum or other documents, or to visit the site and acquaint himself with conditions there existing shall in no way relieve any bidder from any obligation with respect to his bid or to the Contract. The submission of a bid shall be taken as prima facie evidence of compliance with this section.
C. In submitting a Bid, the Bidder represents that the Bidder does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the determination of this bid for the performance of the Work at the price(s) bid and within the times and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Bidding Documents.
1.05 Laws and Regulations
A. Each Contractor and Subcontractor shall comply fully with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning labor, work hours and labor conditions.
B. The bidder's attention is directed to the fact that all applicable state laws, municipal ordinances and the rules and regulations of all authorities having jurisdiction over construction of the project shall apply to the contract throughout, and they will be deemed to be included in the contract the same as though herein written out in full.
1.06 Bidder's Interest in More Than One Bid
No person, firm, or corporation shall be allowed to make, file, or have an interest in more than one Bid for the same work, unless Alternates are called for. A person, firm, or corporation who has submitted a sub-bid to a Bidder or who has quoted prices on materials to a Bidder is not hereby disqualified from submitting a sub-bid or quoting prices to other Bidders.
1.07 Certificates and Licenses
Bidders must be properly licensed to perform the Contract Work. Proper licensing shall be as defined by Florida Statutes and the license shall be issued by the Florida Dept. of Business and Professional Regulation Construction Industry Licensing Board.
1.08 Public Entity Crimes - Denial or Revocation of Right to Transact Business With a
Public Entity
Per Florida Statutes (FS) 287.133(2)(a), a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public
00200-4 work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in FS 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO ($35,000) for a period of 36 months from the date of being place6 on the convicted vendor list.
1.09 Florida Trench Safety Act
Bidders must comply with the Florida Trench Safety Act (FS 553.60-553.64), by completing and submitting with the sealed bid the Trench Safety Form, a copy of which is included as part of these Contract Documents.
1.10 Discrimination
An entity or affiliate who has been placed on the discriminatory vendor list may not submit a bid on a contract to provide goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not award or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under contract with any public entity, and may no transact business with any public entity.
1.11 Debarred or Suspended Bidders
The Bidder certifies, by submission of its Proposal (Bid), that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in contracting with any federal department or agency. The City reserves the right to reject any bid from a debarred or suspended Bidder or from a Bidder whose principals are debarred or suspended.
1.12 Rejection of Bidders Under Litigation
The Owner reserves the right to reject the Bid of any Bidder who is behind, as determined by the Owner or Engineer, on the completion schedule for any existing contracts; who has failed to properly progress work on any construction contract with any governmental agency within the past five (5) years; who is currently under litigation with the Owner; who is in litigation with any governmental agency within the past five (5) years; who is involved in any dispute resolution procedure with any governmental agency within the past five (5) years; who has previously defaulted on a contract with any governmental agency within the past five (5) years; or who has previously failed to satisfy all requirements related to life safety including, but not limited to, the maintenance of traffic provisions on existing or previous agreements with any governmental agency within the past five (5) years.
1.13 Form of Bid
A. All bids must be submitted on the Bid Form provided in the City’s bid documents (in the Project Manual). In cases where the City provides an excel version of the Bid Schedule, it is permissible for the Bidder to fill in and then print the Bid Schedule for submittal as part of the overall Bid. Bids on Bidder’s quotation
00200-5 forms shall not be accepted. The Bid Form also lists all required forms and information that are required to be submitted with the Bid.
B. The Bidder is not permitted to make changes in the Bid Form provided. The Bidder shall fill in spaces on the Bid Form by typewriter, computer, or manually in ink. When a Bidder submits a Bid and fills in information, which is then changed, each change must be initialed by the person signing the Bid.
C. The Bidder must fill in all unit prices, total prices and total amounts. Each Unit Price will be deemed to include an amount considered by the Contractor to be adequate to cover all costs, including manpower, labor, equipment materials, supplemental and administrative costs, and profit.
D. Where so indicated by the makeup of the Bid Form, amounts shall be expressed in both words and figures, and in case of discrepancy between the two, the amount in words shall govern.
E. The Bid Form shall be completely filled out including the Bidder information;
acknowledgement of receipt of all Addenda; the Bid Amount including Unit Prices and Total Prices for all Items including all alternate items; the completed Bidder Submittal checklist; and the bid properly signed and dated by the person or persons legally authorized to bind the Bidder to a Contract. A Bid by a corporation shall further give the State of incorporation and have the corporate seal affixed.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .